SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.6% → 98.3%

Time: 13.3s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{+214}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\_m \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 7.2e+214)
   (+ x (* y_m (- (* z (tanh (/ t y_m))) (* z (tanh (/ x y_m))))))
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 7.2e+214) {
		tmp = x + (y_m * ((z * tanh((t / y_m))) - (z * tanh((x / y_m)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 7.2d+214) then
        tmp = x + (y_m * ((z * tanh((t / y_m))) - (z * tanh((x / y_m)))))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 7.2e+214) {
		tmp = x + (y_m * ((z * Math.tanh((t / y_m))) - (z * Math.tanh((x / y_m)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 7.2e+214:
		tmp = x + (y_m * ((z * math.tanh((t / y_m))) - (z * math.tanh((x / y_m)))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 7.2e+214)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y_m * Float64(Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y_m))) - Float64(z * tanh(Float64(x / y_m))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 7.2e+214)
		tmp = x + (y_m * ((z * tanh((t / y_m))) - (z * tanh((x / y_m)))));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 7.2e+214], N[(x + N[(y$95$m * N[(N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 7.2000000000000002e214

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)}, x\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 56.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)} \cdot z, x\right) \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)}} \cdot z, x\right) \]

      3. sqr-neg 89.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \sqrt{\color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}} \cdot z, x\right) \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 42.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)} \cdot z, x\right) \]

      5. add-sqr-sqrt 83.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot z, x\right) \]

      6. cancel-sign-sub 83.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 83.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)}, x\right) \]

      8. add-sqr-sqrt 47.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)}, x\right) \]

      9. sqrt-unprod 87.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)}}, x\right) \]

      10. sqr-neg 87.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}}, x\right) \]

      11. sqrt-unprod 48.1%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right)}, x\right) \]

      12. add-sqr-sqrt 97.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)}, x\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 14.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(\frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/l* 14.4%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} - \frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right) \]

       2. rec-exp 14.4%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right) \]

       3. rec-exp 14.4%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right) \]

       4. tanh-def-a 44.5%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} - \frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right) \]

   11. Simplified 97.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 7.2000000000000002e214 < y

   1. Initial program 76.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y\_m \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(t\_1 - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y_m))))
   (if (<= y_m 8.2e+167)
     (+ x (* (* y_m z) (- t_1 (tanh (/ x y_m)))))
     (+ x (* z (- (* y_m t_1) x))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 8.2e+167) {
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - tanh((x / y_m))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y_m))
    if (y_m <= 8.2d+167) then
        tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - tanh((x / y_m))))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 8.2e+167) {
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - Math.tanh((x / y_m))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y_m))
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 8.2e+167:
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - math.tanh((x / y_m))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y_m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 8.2e+167)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y_m * z) * Float64(t_1 - tanh(Float64(x / y_m)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y_m * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 8.2e+167)
		tmp = x + ((y_m * z) * (t_1 - tanh((x / y_m))));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 8.2e+167], N[(x + N[(N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t$95$1 - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y$95$m * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 8.2e167

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 8.2e167 < y

   1. Initial program 75.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 59.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 59.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 87.9% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t\_1 \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y_m))))
   (if (<= y_m 4.7e+33)
     (+ x (* t_1 (* y_m z)))
     (+ x (* z (- (* y_m t_1) x))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.7e+33) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y_m))
    if (y_m <= 4.7d+33) then
        tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.7e+33) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y_m))
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 4.7e+33:
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y_m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 4.7e+33)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_1 * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y_m * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 4.7e+33)
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 4.7e+33], N[(x + N[(t$95$1 * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y$95$m * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.6999999999999998e33

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 27.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 27.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 27.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 27.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 27.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 4.6999999999999998e33 < y

   1. Initial program 83.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 54.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 54.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+169}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1.6e+169)
   (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y_m)) (* y_m z)))
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.6e+169) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 1.6d+169) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.6e+169) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1.6e+169:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.6e+169)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1.6e+169)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.6e+169], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.5999999999999999e169

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 86.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 86.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 1.5999999999999999e169 < y

   1. Initial program 75.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+169}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 66.3% accurate, 10.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y\_m \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+194} \lor \neg \left(y\_m \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+226}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1.2e+54)
   x
   (if (or (<= y_m 3e+194) (not (<= y_m 5.5e+226))) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* z t))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.2e+54) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y_m <= 3e+194) || !(y_m <= 5.5e+226)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 1.2d+54) then
        tmp = x
    else if ((y_m <= 3d+194) .or. (.not. (y_m <= 5.5d+226))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.2e+54) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y_m <= 3e+194) || !(y_m <= 5.5e+226)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1.2e+54:
		tmp = x
	elif (y_m <= 3e+194) or not (y_m <= 5.5e+226):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.2e+54)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y_m <= 3e+194) || !(y_m <= 5.5e+226))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1.2e+54)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y_m <= 3e+194) || ~((y_m <= 5.5e+226)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.2e+54], x, If[Or[LessEqual[y$95$m, 3e+194], N[Not[LessEqual[y$95$m, 5.5e+226]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 1.19999999999999999e54

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.19999999999999999e54 < y < 3.0000000000000003e194 or 5.5000000000000005e226 < y

   1. Initial program 81.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 65.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 61.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 61.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 61.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if 3.0000000000000003e194 < y < 5.5000000000000005e226

   1. Initial program 99.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   6. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{+54}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+194} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+226}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 71.0% accurate, 14.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y\_m \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 9e+55) x (if (<= y_m 6.4e+91) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (+ x (* z t)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 9e+55) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 6.4e+91) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 9d+55) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y_m <= 6.4d+91) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 9e+55) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 6.4e+91) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 9e+55:
		tmp = x
	elif y_m <= 6.4e+91:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 9e+55)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 6.4e+91)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 9e+55)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 6.4e+91)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 9e+55], x, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 6.4e+91], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 8.99999999999999996e55

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 8.99999999999999996e55 < y < 6.39999999999999979e91

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if 6.39999999999999979e91 < y

   1. Initial program 80.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 67.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 69.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

   6. Simplified 69.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+91}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 60.3% accurate, 16.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y\_m \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+253}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 7e+181) x (if (<= y_m 6.8e+253) (* z t) x)))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 7e+181) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 6.8e+253) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 7d+181) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y_m <= 6.8d+253) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 7e+181) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 6.8e+253) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 7e+181:
		tmp = x
	elif y_m <= 6.8e+253:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 7e+181)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 6.8e+253)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 7e+181)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 6.8e+253)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 7e+181], x, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 6.8e+253], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 7.00000000000000016e181 or 6.80000000000000035e253 < y

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 63.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 7.00000000000000016e181 < y < 6.80000000000000035e253

   1. Initial program 80.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 92.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 44.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   6. Simplified 44.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 78.6% accurate, 17.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 4.8e+15) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.8e+15) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 4.8d+15) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.8e+15) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 4.8e+15:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 4.8e+15)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 4.8e+15)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 4.8e+15], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.8e15

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 4.8e15 < y

   1. Initial program 85.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 60.5% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	return x

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.7%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-define 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 60.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024103 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))