System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 9.2s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)) (* x 0.5)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, ((1.0 - z) + log(z)), (x * 0.5));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z)), Float64(x * 0.5))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

   2. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 74.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-236}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{-213}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, -z, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 3.4e-236)
   (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))
   (if (<= z 3.8e-213) (* y (+ 1.0 (log z))) (fma y (- z) (* x 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3.4e-236) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else if (z <= 3.8e-213) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, -z, (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 3.4e-236)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	elseif (z <= 3.8e-213)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z)));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(-z), Float64(x * 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 3.4e-236], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 3.8e-213], N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * (-z) + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < 3.3999999999999998e-236

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 59.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 59.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Simplified 59.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-neg-out 59.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 59.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   if 3.3999999999999998e-236 < z < 3.8e-213

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]

   if 3.8e-213 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. fma-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   7. Simplified 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-236} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-214}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z 4.4e-236) (not (<= z 4.5e-214)))
   (- (* x 0.5) (* y z))
   (* y (+ 1.0 (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 4.4e-236) || !(z <= 4.5e-214)) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= 4.4d-236) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.5d-214))) then
        tmp = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 + log(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= 4.4e-236) || !(z <= 4.5e-214)) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 + Math.log(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= 4.4e-236) or not (z <= 4.5e-214):
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 + math.log(z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= 4.4e-236) || !(z <= 4.5e-214))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= 4.4e-236) || ~((z <= 4.5e-214)))
		tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 + log(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, 4.4e-236], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.5e-214]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < 4.39999999999999985e-236

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 59.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 59.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 59.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Simplified 59.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-neg-out 59.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 59.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 59.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

   if 4.39999999999999985e-236 < z < 4.5000000000000001e-214

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]

   if 4.5000000000000001e-214 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Simplified 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-236} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-214}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.3:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, -z, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 2.3) (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ 1.0 (log z)))) (fma y (- z) (* x 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.3) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * (1.0 + log(z)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, -z, (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 2.3)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(1.0 + log(z))));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(-z), Float64(x * 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 2.3], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(1.0 + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * (-z) + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 2.2999999999999998

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]

   if 2.2999999999999998 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 60.5% accurate, 12.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 4.4e+23) (* x 0.5) (* y (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 4.4e+23) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 4.4d+23) then
        tmp = x * 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = y * -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 4.4e+23) {
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = y * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 4.4e+23:
		tmp = x * 0.5
	else:
		tmp = y * -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 4.4e+23)
		tmp = Float64(x * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 4.4e+23)
		tmp = x * 0.5;
	else
		tmp = y * -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 4.4e+23], N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 4.40000000000000017e23

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 56.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

   if 4.40000000000000017e23 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + 0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 89.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 89.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \frac{x}{y} - z\right)} \]

      4. associate-*r/ 89.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot x}{y}} - z\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 89.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5}}{y} - z\right) \]

      6. associate-/l* 89.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{0.5}{y}} - z\right) \]

   8. Simplified 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x \cdot \frac{0.5}{y} - z\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. neg-mul-1 74.5%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 74.5%

       \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 74.4% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x 0.5) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 75.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

   2. mul-1-neg 75.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

5. Simplified 75.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-neg-out 75.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. unsub-neg 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 39.7% accurate, 37.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 43.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

4. Final simplification 43.3%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + 0.5 \cdot x\right) - y \cdot \left(z - \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (y + (0.5d0 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * x)) - Float64(y * Float64(z - log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y + N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z - N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024103 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z))))

  (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))