Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A

Percentage Accurate: 90.0% → 98.4%

Time: 13.2s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 1.0×

• 22.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -1.9999999999999999e-154
  2. k = 0.0
  3. m = -2.00000000000000007e154

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.4% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{t\_0}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)} \leq 10^{+245}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\frac{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))))
   (if (<= (/ t_0 (+ (* k k) (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0)))) 1e+245)
     (/ (/ a (hypot 1.0 k)) (/ (hypot 1.0 k) (pow k m)))
     t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245) {
		tmp = (a / hypot(1.0, k)) / (hypot(1.0, k) / pow(k, m));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245) {
		tmp = (a / Math.hypot(1.0, k)) / (Math.hypot(1.0, k) / Math.pow(k, m));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245:
		tmp = (a / math.hypot(1.0, k)) / (math.hypot(1.0, k) / math.pow(k, m))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(k * k) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a / hypot(1.0, k)) / Float64(hypot(1.0, k) / (k ^ m)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245)
		tmp = (a / hypot(1.0, k)) / (hypot(1.0, k) / (k ^ m));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+245], N[(N[(a / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < 1.00000000000000004e245

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

      2. add-sqr-sqrt 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k} \cdot \sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      3. times-frac 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \cdot \frac{a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      4. hypot-1-def 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \cdot \frac{a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \]

      5. hypot-1-def 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

      2. clear-num 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

      3. un-div-inv 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\frac{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\frac{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

   if 1.00000000000000004e245 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)} \leq 10^{+245}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}}{\frac{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.4% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{t\_0}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)} \leq 10^{+245}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))))
   (if (<= (/ t_0 (+ (* k k) (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0)))) 1e+245)
     (* (/ a (hypot 1.0 k)) (/ (pow k m) (hypot 1.0 k)))
     t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245) {
		tmp = (a / hypot(1.0, k)) * (pow(k, m) / hypot(1.0, k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245) {
		tmp = (a / Math.hypot(1.0, k)) * (Math.pow(k, m) / Math.hypot(1.0, k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245:
		tmp = (a / math.hypot(1.0, k)) * (math.pow(k, m) / math.hypot(1.0, k))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(k * k) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a / hypot(1.0, k)) * Float64((k ^ m) / hypot(1.0, k)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))) <= 1e+245)
		tmp = (a / hypot(1.0, k)) * ((k ^ m) / hypot(1.0, k));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+245], N[(N[(a / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < 1.00000000000000004e245

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

      2. add-sqr-sqrt 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k} \cdot \sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      3. times-frac 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \cdot \frac{a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      4. hypot-1-def 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \cdot \frac{a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \]

      5. hypot-1-def 98.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   if 1.00000000000000004e245 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)} \leq 10^{+245}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ t_1 := \frac{t\_0}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+245}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))) (t_1 (/ t_0 (+ (* k k) (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))))))
   (if (<= t_1 1e+245) t_1 t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double t_1 = t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+245) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    t_1 = t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0)))
    if (t_1 <= 1d+245) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double t_1 = t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+245) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	t_1 = t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 1e+245:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	t_1 = Float64(t_0 / Float64(Float64(k * k) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 1e+245)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	t_1 = t_0 / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+245)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(t$95$0 / N[(N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+245], t$95$1, t$95$0]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k))) < 1.00000000000000004e245

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.00000000000000004e245 < (/.f64 (*.f64 a (pow.f64 k m)) (+.f64 (+.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) (*.f64 #s(literal 10 binary64) k)) (*.f64 k k)))

   1. Initial program 53.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 53.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 53.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)} \leq 10^{+245}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 5.6:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m))))
   (if (<= m 5.6) (/ t_0 (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))) t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 5.6) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    if (m <= 5.6d0) then
        tmp = t_0 / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 5.6) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 5.6:
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 5.6)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 5.6)
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, 5.6], N[(t$95$0 / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 5.5999999999999996

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 5.5999999999999996 < m

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 5.6:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 3.6) (* a (/ (pow k m) (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))) (* a (pow k m))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.6) {
		tmp = a * (pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = a * pow(k, m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.6d0) then
        tmp = a * ((k ** m) / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0))))
    else
        tmp = a * (k ** m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.6) {
		tmp = a * (Math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	} else {
		tmp = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.6:
		tmp = a * (math.pow(k, m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))))
	else:
		tmp = a * math.pow(k, m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.6)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64((k ^ m) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * (k ^ m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.6)
		tmp = a * ((k ^ m) / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = a * (k ^ m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.6], N[(a * N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.60000000000000009

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.60000000000000009 < m

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.6:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.4:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{t\_0}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* a (pow k m)))) (if (<= m 3.4) (/ t_0 (+ 1.0 (* k k))) t_0)))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.4) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = a * (k ** m)
    if (m <= 3.4d0) then
        tmp = t_0 / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double t_0 = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.4) {
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	t_0 = a * math.pow(k, m)
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.4:
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = Float64(a * (k ^ m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.4)
		tmp = Float64(t_0 / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	t_0 = a * (k ^ m);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.4)
		tmp = t_0 / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[m, 3.4], N[(t$95$0 / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.39999999999999991

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]

   if 3.39999999999999991 < m

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.4:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 97.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -6400 \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m -6400.0) (not (<= m 1.7e-9)))
   (* a (pow k m))
   (/ a (+ (* k k) (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -6400.0) || !(m <= 1.7e-9)) {
		tmp = a * pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= (-6400.0d0)) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.7d-9))) then
        tmp = a * (k ** m)
    else
        tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -6400.0) || !(m <= 1.7e-9)) {
		tmp = a * Math.pow(k, m);
	} else {
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= -6400.0) or not (m <= 1.7e-9):
		tmp = a * math.pow(k, m)
	else:
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= -6400.0) || !(m <= 1.7e-9))
		tmp = Float64(a * (k ^ m));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(Float64(k * k) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= -6400.0) || ~((m <= 1.7e-9)))
		tmp = a * (k ^ m);
	else
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, -6400.0], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.7e-9]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / N[(N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -6400 or 1.6999999999999999e-9 < m

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 85.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 85.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 85.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 85.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 85.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 85.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 85.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 85.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 85.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   if -6400 < m < 1.6999999999999999e-9

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -6400 \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot {k}^{m}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 54.5% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 4.5e-22)
   (/ a (+ (* k k) (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))))
   (* a (+ 1.0 (* k (- (* k 99.0) 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.5e-22) {
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 4.5d-22) then
        tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a * (1.0d0 + (k * ((k * 99.0d0) - 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.5e-22) {
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 4.5e-22:
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 4.5e-22)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(Float64(k * k) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 99.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 4.5e-22)
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 4.5e-22], N[(a / N[(N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 4.49999999999999987e-22

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   if 4.49999999999999987e-22 < m

   1. Initial program 73.5%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 38.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 54.6% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 4.5e-22)
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))
   (* a (+ 1.0 (* k (- (* k 99.0) 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.5e-22) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 4.5d-22) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a * (1.0d0 + (k * ((k * 99.0d0) - 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 4.5e-22) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 4.5e-22:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 4.5e-22)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 99.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 4.5e-22)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a * (1.0 + (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 4.5e-22], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 4.49999999999999987e-22

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 4.49999999999999987e-22 < m

   1. Initial program 73.5%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.9%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 38.1%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-22}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(1 + k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 53.3% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.76:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.76) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))) (+ a (* k (* a (* k 99.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.76) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.76d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.76) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.76:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.76)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(k * Float64(a * Float64(k * 99.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.76)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.76], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(k * N[(a * N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.76000000000000001

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 1.76000000000000001 < m

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 35.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)} + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 35.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-100 + 1\right)} \cdot a\right)\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

      2. distribute-lft1-in 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-100 \cdot a + a\right)}\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 21.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 \cdot a\right) \cdot k + a \cdot k\right)}\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 21.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot -100\right)} \cdot k + a \cdot k\right)\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 21.2%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot -100\right) \cdot k + a \cdot k\right)}\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in k around inf 35.2%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)} \]

       2. distribute-rgt1-in 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(-k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

       3. metadata-eval 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(-k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right)\right) \]

       4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot \left(--99 \cdot a\right)\right)} \]

       5. distribute-lft-neg-in 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(--99\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

       6. metadata-eval 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{99} \cdot a\right)\right) \]

       7. associate-*l* 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(k \cdot 99\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

       8. metadata-eval 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + 100\right)}\right) \cdot a\right) \]

       9. distribute-rgt-out 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot k + 100 \cdot k\right)} \cdot a\right) \]

       10. *-commutative 35.2%

           \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(-1 \cdot k + 100 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

       11. distribute-rgt-out 35.2%

           \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot \left(-1 + 100\right)\right)}\right) \]

       12. metadata-eval 35.2%

           \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{99}\right)\right) \]

   13. Simplified 35.2%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.76:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 52.4% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.0) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k k))) (+ a (* k (* a (* k 99.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.0) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.0d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.0) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.0:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.0)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(k * Float64(a * Float64(k * 99.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.0)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = a + (k * (a * (k * 99.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.0], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(k * N[(a * N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

   if 2 < m

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 35.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)} + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt1-in 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 35.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right)\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-100 + 1\right)} \cdot a\right)\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

      2. distribute-lft1-in 35.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-100 \cdot a + a\right)}\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 21.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 \cdot a\right) \cdot k + a \cdot k\right)}\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 21.2%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot -100\right)} \cdot k + a \cdot k\right)\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 21.2%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot -100\right) \cdot k + a \cdot k\right)}\right) + a \cdot -10\right) \]

   11. Taylor expanded in k around inf 35.2%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right)} \]

       2. distribute-rgt1-in 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(-k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

       3. metadata-eval 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(-k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right)\right) \]

       4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot \left(--99 \cdot a\right)\right)} \]

       5. distribute-lft-neg-in 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(--99\right) \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

       6. metadata-eval 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{99} \cdot a\right)\right) \]

       7. associate-*l* 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(k \cdot 99\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

       8. metadata-eval 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + 100\right)}\right) \cdot a\right) \]

       9. distribute-rgt-out 35.2%

          \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot k + 100 \cdot k\right)} \cdot a\right) \]

       10. *-commutative 35.2%

           \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(-1 \cdot k + 100 \cdot k\right)\right)} \]

       11. distribute-rgt-out 35.2%

           \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k \cdot \left(-1 + 100\right)\right)}\right) \]

       12. metadata-eval 35.2%

           \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot \color{blue}{99}\right)\right) \]

   13. Simplified 35.2%

       \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(k \cdot 99\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 49.9% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.5) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k k))) (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.5) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.5d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.5) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.5:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k))
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.5)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.5)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.5], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.5

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

   if 1.5 < m

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 10.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 18.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 34.4% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.3) (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))) (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.3) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.3d0) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.3) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.3:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0))
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.3)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.3)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.3], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.30000000000000004

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 46.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 46.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   8. Simplified 46.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

   if 1.30000000000000004 < m

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 10.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 18.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 26.1% accurate, 11.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 0.17:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 0.17) a (* -10.0 (* a k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.17) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 0.17d0) then
        tmp = a
    else
        tmp = (-10.0d0) * (a * k)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 0.17) {
		tmp = a;
	} else {
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 0.17:
		tmp = a
	else:
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 0.17)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-10.0 * Float64(a * k));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 0.17)
		tmp = a;
	else
		tmp = -10.0 * (a * k);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 0.17], a, N[(-10.0 * N[(a * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 0.170000000000000012

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 97.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 29.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

   if 0.170000000000000012 < m

   1. Initial program 73.3%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 73.3%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 2.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 10.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + -10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around inf 18.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-10 \cdot \left(a \cdot k\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 20.5% accurate, 114.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 a)

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return a
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.5%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 89.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 89.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 89.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 89.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 89.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 89.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 89.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 89.5%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 89.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 48.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 21.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024102 
(FPCore (a k m)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))