Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 6.8s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z (fma x -3.0 (* y -2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z - fma(x, -3.0, (y * -2.0));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z - fma(x, -3.0, Float64(y * -2.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z - N[(x * -3.0 + N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

   3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. unsub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   8. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   9. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   10. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   11. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   12. neg-mul-1 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   13. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   14. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   15. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   16. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   17. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   18. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   19. fma-define 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 53.1% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.1 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-37}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-303}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-189}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-169}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-81}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.1e+66)
   z
   (if (<= z -5e-37)
     (* y 2.0)
     (if (<= z 1.6e-303)
       (* x 3.0)
       (if (<= z 1.45e-189)
         (* y 2.0)
         (if (<= z 4.6e-169)
           (* x 3.0)
           (if (<= z 8.2e-81) (* y 2.0) (if (<= z 9.5e+52) (* x 3.0) z))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.1e+66) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= -5e-37) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 1.6e-303) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (z <= 1.45e-189) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 4.6e-169) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (z <= 8.2e-81) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 9.5e+52) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.1d+66)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (z <= (-5d-37)) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (z <= 1.6d-303) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (z <= 1.45d-189) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (z <= 4.6d-169) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (z <= 8.2d-81) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else if (z <= 9.5d+52) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.1e+66) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (z <= -5e-37) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 1.6e-303) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (z <= 1.45e-189) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 4.6e-169) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (z <= 8.2e-81) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else if (z <= 9.5e+52) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.1e+66:
		tmp = z
	elif z <= -5e-37:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif z <= 1.6e-303:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif z <= 1.45e-189:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif z <= 4.6e-169:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif z <= 8.2e-81:
		tmp = y * 2.0
	elif z <= 9.5e+52:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.1e+66)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= -5e-37)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 1.6e-303)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (z <= 1.45e-189)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 4.6e-169)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (z <= 8.2e-81)
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	elseif (z <= 9.5e+52)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.1e+66)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (z <= -5e-37)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (z <= 1.6e-303)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (z <= 1.45e-189)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (z <= 4.6e-169)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (z <= 8.2e-81)
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	elseif (z <= 9.5e+52)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.1e+66], z, If[LessEqual[z, -5e-37], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.6e-303], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.45e-189], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 4.6e-169], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 8.2e-81], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 9.5e+52], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], z]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.10000000000000008e66 or 9.49999999999999994e52 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 65.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -5.10000000000000008e66 < z < -4.9999999999999997e-37 or 1.59999999999999995e-303 < z < 1.45e-189 or 4.6000000000000002e-169 < z < 8.19999999999999968e-81

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -4.9999999999999997e-37 < z < 1.59999999999999995e-303 or 1.45e-189 < z < 4.6000000000000002e-169 or 8.19999999999999968e-81 < z < 9.49999999999999994e52

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.1 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-37}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-303}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-189}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-169}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{-81}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+66} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.95e+66) (not (<= z 2.2e+45)))
   (- z (* y -2.0))
   (+ x (* 2.0 (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.95e+66) || !(z <= 2.2e+45)) {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.95d+66)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.2d+45))) then
        tmp = z - (y * (-2.0d0))
    else
        tmp = x + (2.0d0 * (x + y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.95e+66) || !(z <= 2.2e+45)) {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.95e+66) or not (z <= 2.2e+45):
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0)
	else:
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.95e+66) || !(z <= 2.2e+45))
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(y * -2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.95e+66) || ~((z <= 2.2e+45)))
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	else
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.95e+66], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.2e+45]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z - N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.9500000000000002e66 or 2.2e45 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 2 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 84.1%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(--2\right)} \cdot y \]

      2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -2 \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 84.1%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{y \cdot -2} \]

   7. Simplified 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - y \cdot -2} \]

   if -1.9500000000000002e66 < z < 2.2e45

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+66} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 85.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.32 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+82}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.32e-24) (not (<= x 4.4e+82)))
   (- z (* x -3.0))
   (- z (* y -2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.32e-24) || !(x <= 4.4e+82)) {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.32d-24)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4.4d+82))) then
        tmp = z - (x * (-3.0d0))
    else
        tmp = z - (y * (-2.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.32e-24) || !(x <= 4.4e+82)) {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.32e-24) or not (x <= 4.4e+82):
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0)
	else:
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.32e-24) || !(x <= 4.4e+82))
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(y * -2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.32e-24) || ~((x <= 4.4e+82)))
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	else
		tmp = z - (y * -2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.32e-24], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 4.4e+82]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z - N[(x * -3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.3199999999999999e-24 or 4.4000000000000002e82 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. unsub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      9. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. distribute-neg-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

      11. distribute-neg-out 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      12. neg-mul-1 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      13. count-2 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      16. metadata-eval 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. distribute-rgt-out 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. distribute-neg-out 99.8%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      19. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -3 \cdot x} \]

   if -1.3199999999999999e-24 < x < 4.4000000000000002e82

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + 2 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 90.2%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(--2\right)} \cdot y \]

      2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -2 \cdot y} \]

      3. *-commutative 90.2%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{y \cdot -2} \]

   7. Simplified 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - y \cdot -2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.32 \cdot 10^{-24} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+82}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - y \cdot -2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 79.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+99}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4.2e+104) (not (<= y 7e+99))) (* y 2.0) (- z (* x -3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.2e+104) || !(y <= 7e+99)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-4.2d+104)) .or. (.not. (y <= 7d+99))) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = z - (x * (-3.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.2e+104) || !(y <= 7e+99)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -4.2e+104) or not (y <= 7e+99):
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4.2e+104) || !(y <= 7e+99))
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z - Float64(x * -3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -4.2e+104) || ~((y <= 7e+99)))
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = z - (x * -3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.2e+104], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 7e+99]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(z - N[(x * -3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.1999999999999997e104 or 6.9999999999999995e99 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -4.1999999999999997e104 < y < 6.9999999999999995e99

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

      8. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      9. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      10. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

      11. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      12. neg-mul-1 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      13. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      16. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

      18. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z - \left(x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

      19. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - -3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.2 \cdot 10^{+104} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+99}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z - x \cdot -3\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 53.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{+56} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4.1e+56) (not (<= y 2.9e-22))) (* y 2.0) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.1e+56) || !(y <= 2.9e-22)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-4.1d+56)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.9d-22))) then
        tmp = y * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.1e+56) || !(y <= 2.9e-22)) {
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -4.1e+56) or not (y <= 2.9e-22):
		tmp = y * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4.1e+56) || !(y <= 2.9e-22))
		tmp = Float64(y * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -4.1e+56) || ~((y <= 2.9e-22)))
		tmp = y * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.1e+56], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.9e-22]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.1000000000000004e56 or 2.9000000000000002e-22 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -4.1000000000000004e56 < y < 2.9000000000000002e-22

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{+56} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(z + x \cdot 3\right) - y \cdot -2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ z (* x 3.0)) (* y -2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z + (x * 3.0)) - (y * -2.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (z + (x * 3.0d0)) - (y * (-2.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (z + (x * 3.0)) - (y * -2.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (z + (x * 3.0)) - (y * -2.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0)) - Float64(y * -2.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (z + (x * 3.0)) - (y * -2.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * -2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

   3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. unsub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   8. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\left(x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + x\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

   9. associate-+r+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z - \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right) + \left(y + y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   10. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(x + \left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right)} \]

   11. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   12. neg-mul-1 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot x} + \left(-\left(x + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   13. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \left(-\color{blue}{2 \cdot x}\right)\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   14. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-2\right) \cdot x}\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   15. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{-2} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   16. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\left(-1 \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + -1\right)} \cdot x\right) + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   17. distribute-rgt-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right)} + \left(-\left(y + y\right)\right)\right) \]

   18. distribute-neg-out 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z - \left(x \cdot \left(-1 + \left(-1 + -1\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)}\right) \]

   19. fma-define 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, -1 + \left(-1 + -1\right), \left(-y\right) + \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \mathsf{fma}\left(x, -3, y \cdot -2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + 3 \cdot x\right) - -2 \cdot y} \]

6. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(z + x \cdot 3\right) - y \cdot -2 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* 2.0 (+ x y)) (+ z x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (2.0d0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)) + Float64(z + x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (2.0 * (x + y)) + (z + x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 34.0% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + \left(z + x\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} + \left(y + x\right)\right) + \left(z + x\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(z + x\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + \left(x + z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 32.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024101 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))