Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 95.3% → 98.8%

Time: 12.5s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 0.8×

• 27.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* (* y 9.0) z) 2e+219)
   (fma a (* 27.0 b) (fma x 2.0 (* t (* y (* z -9.0)))))
   (* z (+ (fma 2.0 (/ x z) (* 27.0 (* a (/ b z)))) (* -9.0 (* y t))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * 9.0) * z) <= 2e+219) {
		tmp = fma(a, (27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, (t * (y * (z * -9.0)))));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (fma(2.0, (x / z), (27.0 * (a * (b / z)))) + (-9.0 * (y * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) <= 2e+219)
		tmp = fma(a, Float64(27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, Float64(t * Float64(y * Float64(z * -9.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(fma(2.0, Float64(x / z), Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * Float64(b / z)))) + Float64(-9.0 * Float64(y * t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision], 2e+219], N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0 + N[(t * N[(y * N[(z * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * N[(b / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-9.0 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) < 1.99999999999999993e219

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

      3. *-commutative 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. cancel-sign-sub-inv 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. associate-*r* 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right) \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      7. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t}\right) \cdot z \]

      8. cancel-sign-sub-inv 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      9. associate-+r- 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      10. associate-*l* 96.1%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right) \]

      11. fma-define 96.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      12. cancel-sign-sub-inv 96.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \color{blue}{x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z}\right) \]

      13. fma-define 96.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \left(-\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      14. distribute-lft-neg-in 96.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z}\right)\right) \]

      15. distribute-rgt-neg-in 96.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right)\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 96.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\right) \]

      17. associate-*r* 95.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      18. associate-*l* 95.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      19. neg-mul-1 95.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right)}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      20. associate-*r* 95.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot -1\right) \cdot z\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-9 \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.99999999999999993e219 < (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z)

   1. Initial program 69.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right)} \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      6. associate-*l* 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{z} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 95.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{z} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right)} + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   9. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, t \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - t\_1 \cdot t\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* y 9.0) z)))
   (if (<= t_1 2e+219)
     (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* t_1 t)) (* b (* a 27.0)))
     (* z (+ (fma 2.0 (/ x z) (* 27.0 (* a (/ b z)))) (* -9.0 (* y t)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (y * 9.0) * z;
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 2e+219) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t_1 * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	} else {
		tmp = z * (fma(2.0, (x / z), (27.0 * (a * (b / z)))) + (-9.0 * (y * t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 2e+219)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(t_1 * t)) + Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(fma(2.0, Float64(x / z), Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * Float64(b / z)))) + Float64(-9.0 * Float64(y * t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+219], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * N[(b / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-9.0 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z) < 1.99999999999999993e219

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.99999999999999993e219 < (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) z)

   1. Initial program 69.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 69.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right)} \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      6. associate-*l* 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{z} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 95.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{z} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 95.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{z}\right)} + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \]

   9. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+219}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{z}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{z}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.5e-45)
   (* y (+ (fma 2.0 (/ x y) (* 27.0 (* a (/ b y)))) (* -9.0 (* z t))))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* b (* a 27.0)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.5e-45) {
		tmp = y * (fma(2.0, (x / y), (27.0 * (a * (b / y)))) + (-9.0 * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.5e-45)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(fma(2.0, Float64(x / y), Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * Float64(b / y)))) + Float64(-9.0 * Float64(z * t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.5e-45], N[(y * N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * N[(b / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-9.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.5e-45

   1. Initial program 88.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right)} \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      6. associate-*l* 92.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 78.4%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 78.4%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right)} + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 73.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 73.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   9. Simplified 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -3.5e-45 < z

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-45}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 49.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.7 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-186}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-203}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-82}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -7.7e+93)
   (* a (* 27.0 b))
   (if (<= a -5.4e-186)
     (* t (* z (* y -9.0)))
     (if (<= a 1.85e-203)
       (* x 2.0)
       (if (<= a 2.25e-181)
         (* -9.0 (* t (* y z)))
         (if (<= a 2.5e-82) (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -7.7e+93) {
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b);
	} else if (a <= -5.4e-186) {
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	} else if (a <= 1.85e-203) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (a <= 2.25e-181) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	} else if (a <= 2.5e-82) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-7.7d+93)) then
        tmp = a * (27.0d0 * b)
    else if (a <= (-5.4d-186)) then
        tmp = t * (z * (y * (-9.0d0)))
    else if (a <= 1.85d-203) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else if (a <= 2.25d-181) then
        tmp = (-9.0d0) * (t * (y * z))
    else if (a <= 2.5d-82) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -7.7e+93) {
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b);
	} else if (a <= -5.4e-186) {
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	} else if (a <= 1.85e-203) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (a <= 2.25e-181) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	} else if (a <= 2.5e-82) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -7.7e+93:
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b)
	elif a <= -5.4e-186:
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0))
	elif a <= 1.85e-203:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	elif a <= 2.25e-181:
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z))
	elif a <= 2.5e-82:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -7.7e+93)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b));
	elseif (a <= -5.4e-186)
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z * Float64(y * -9.0)));
	elseif (a <= 1.85e-203)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	elseif (a <= 2.25e-181)
		tmp = Float64(-9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z)));
	elseif (a <= 2.5e-82)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -7.7e+93)
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b);
	elseif (a <= -5.4e-186)
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	elseif (a <= 1.85e-203)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	elseif (a <= 2.25e-181)
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	elseif (a <= 2.5e-82)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -7.7e+93], N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, -5.4e-186], N[(t * N[(z * N[(y * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 1.85e-203], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 2.25e-181], N[(-9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 2.5e-82], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 5 regimes

2. if a < -7.70000000000000004e93

   1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right)} \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*r* 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -7.70000000000000004e93 < a < -5.3999999999999998e-186

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right)} \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      6. associate-*l* 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]

      2. associate-*l* 45.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 45.9%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot -9\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 45.9%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 45.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)} \]

   if -5.3999999999999998e-186 < a < 1.85000000000000001e-203 or 2.2499999999999999e-181 < a < 2.4999999999999999e-82

   1. Initial program 89.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 89.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if 1.85000000000000001e-203 < a < 2.2499999999999999e-181

   1. Initial program 68.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 68.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 68.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 35.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.4999999999999999e-82 < a

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 5 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.7 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{-186}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-203}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-82}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 49.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -2.75 \cdot 10^{-188}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-202}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-78}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* -9.0 (* t (* y z)))))
   (if (<= a -7.5e+93)
     (* a (* 27.0 b))
     (if (<= a -2.75e-188)
       t_1
       (if (<= a 2.6e-202)
         (* x 2.0)
         (if (<= a 1.95e-181)
           t_1
           (if (<= a 5.8e-78) (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b)))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -7.5e+93) {
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b);
	} else if (a <= -2.75e-188) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 2.6e-202) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (a <= 1.95e-181) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 5.8e-78) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (-9.0d0) * (t * (y * z))
    if (a <= (-7.5d+93)) then
        tmp = a * (27.0d0 * b)
    else if (a <= (-2.75d-188)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (a <= 2.6d-202) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else if (a <= 1.95d-181) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (a <= 5.8d-78) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -7.5e+93) {
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b);
	} else if (a <= -2.75e-188) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 2.6e-202) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else if (a <= 1.95e-181) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 5.8e-78) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = -9.0 * (t * (y * z))
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -7.5e+93:
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b)
	elif a <= -2.75e-188:
		tmp = t_1
	elif a <= 2.6e-202:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	elif a <= 1.95e-181:
		tmp = t_1
	elif a <= 5.8e-78:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(-9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -7.5e+93)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b));
	elseif (a <= -2.75e-188)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 2.6e-202)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	elseif (a <= 1.95e-181)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 5.8e-78)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -7.5e+93)
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b);
	elseif (a <= -2.75e-188)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 2.6e-202)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	elseif (a <= 1.95e-181)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 5.8e-78)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(-9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -7.5e+93], N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, -2.75e-188], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 2.6e-202], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 1.95e-181], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 5.8e-78], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if a < -7.5000000000000002e93

   1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right)} \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*r* 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -7.5000000000000002e93 < a < -2.7500000000000001e-188 or 2.60000000000000009e-202 < a < 1.95e-181

   1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.7500000000000001e-188 < a < 2.60000000000000009e-202 or 1.95e-181 < a < 5.8000000000000001e-78

   1. Initial program 90.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if 5.8000000000000001e-78 < a

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 58.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+93}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -2.75 \cdot 10^{-188}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-202}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{-181}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-78}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 97.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.8e+79)
   (* y (+ (* -9.0 (* z t)) (+ (* 2.0 (/ x y)) (* (* a 27.0) (/ b y)))))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* b (* a 27.0)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.8e+79) {
		tmp = y * ((-9.0 * (z * t)) + ((2.0 * (x / y)) + ((a * 27.0) * (b / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.8d+79)) then
        tmp = y * (((-9.0d0) * (z * t)) + ((2.0d0 * (x / y)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * (b / y))))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.8e+79) {
		tmp = y * ((-9.0 * (z * t)) + ((2.0 * (x / y)) + ((a * 27.0) * (b / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.8e+79:
		tmp = y * ((-9.0 * (z * t)) + ((2.0 * (x / y)) + ((a * 27.0) * (b / y))))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.8e+79)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(-9.0 * Float64(z * t)) + Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(x / y)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * Float64(b / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.8e+79)
		tmp = y * ((-9.0 * (z * t)) + ((2.0 * (x / y)) + ((a * 27.0) * (b / y))));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.8e+79], N[(y * N[(N[(-9.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 * N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(b / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.79999999999999984e79

   1. Initial program 85.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right)} \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      6. associate-*l* 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 81.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 81.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right)} + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 76.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 76.7%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   9. Simplified 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. fma-undefine 76.7%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right)} + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

       2. associate-*r* 76.7%

          \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot \frac{b}{y}}\right) + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 76.7%

       \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + \left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)} + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   if -5.79999999999999984e79 < z

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) + \left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 67.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b)))))
   (if (<= t 4e+64)
     t_1
     (if (<= t 4.5e+107)
       (* -9.0 (* y (* z t)))
       (if (<= t 1.85e+161) t_1 (* -9.0 (* t (* y z))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 4e+64) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 4.5e+107) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t));
	} else if (t <= 1.85e+161) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (x * 2.0d0) + (27.0d0 * (a * b))
    if (t <= 4d+64) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= 4.5d+107) then
        tmp = (-9.0d0) * (y * (z * t))
    else if (t <= 1.85d+161) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = (-9.0d0) * (t * (y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 4e+64) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 4.5e+107) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t));
	} else if (t <= 1.85e+161) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b))
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 4e+64:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= 4.5e+107:
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t))
	elif t <= 1.85e+161:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 4e+64)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 4.5e+107)
		tmp = Float64(-9.0 * Float64(y * Float64(z * t)));
	elseif (t <= 1.85e+161)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(-9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 4e+64)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 4.5e+107)
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t));
	elseif (t <= 1.85e+161)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, 4e+64], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 4.5e+107], N[(-9.0 * N[(y * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.85e+161], t$95$1, N[(-9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < 4.00000000000000009e64 or 4.5e107 < t < 1.8499999999999999e161

   1. Initial program 92.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if 4.00000000000000009e64 < t < 4.5e107

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r* 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right)} \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]

      6. associate-*l* 83.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 84.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\right) - y \cdot \left(\left(9 \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 83.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

      2. fma-define 83.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right)} + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 83.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)}\right) + \left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 83.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right) + \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   9. Simplified 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{x}{y}, 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot \frac{b}{y}\right)\right) + -9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around inf 83.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 83.4%

          \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

       2. associate-*l* 67.5%

          \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

       3. *-commutative 67.5%

          \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   12. Simplified 67.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.8499999999999999e161 < t

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 84.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 98.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.12e+32)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* y 9.0) (* z t))) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* b (* a 27.0)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.12e+32) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.12d+32)) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - ((y * 9.0d0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.12e+32) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.12e+32:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.12e+32)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * Float64(z * t))) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.12e+32)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.12e+32], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.12000000000000007e32

   1. Initial program 85.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if -1.12000000000000007e32 < z

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 96.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 1.12e+110)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* y 9.0) (* z t))) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* t (* y z))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.12e+110) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 1.12d+110) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - ((y * 9.0d0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (t * (y * z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.12e+110) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 1.12e+110:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.12e+110)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * Float64(z * t))) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 1.12e+110)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.12e+110], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.1200000000000001e110

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.1200000000000001e110 < z

   1. Initial program 81.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 84.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 84.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 72.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 77.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-117}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -7.5e+93) (not (<= a 6.5e-117)))
   (+ (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b)))
   (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* t (* y z))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -7.5e+93) || !(a <= 6.5e-117)) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-7.5d+93)) .or. (.not. (a <= 6.5d-117))) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) + (27.0d0 * (a * b))
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (t * (y * z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -7.5e+93) || !(a <= 6.5e-117)) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -7.5e+93) or not (a <= 6.5e-117):
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -7.5e+93) || !(a <= 6.5e-117))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -7.5e+93) || ~((a <= 6.5e-117)))
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + (27.0 * (a * b));
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -7.5e+93], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 6.5e-117]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -7.5000000000000002e93 or 6.5000000000000001e-117 < a

   1. Initial program 94.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -7.5000000000000002e93 < a < 6.5000000000000001e-117

   1. Initial program 91.4%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-117}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 77.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 27.0 (* a b))))
   (if (<= t 1.7e+46) (+ (* x 2.0) t_1) (- t_1 (* 9.0 (* t (* y z)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 1.7e+46) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    if (t <= 1.7d+46) then
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) + t_1
    else
        tmp = t_1 - (9.0d0 * (t * (y * z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 1.7e+46) {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1 - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b)
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 1.7e+46:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_1 - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 1.7e+46)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) + t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t_1 - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 1.7e+46)
		tmp = (x * 2.0) + t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_1 - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, 1.7e+46], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(t$95$1 - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 1.6999999999999999e46

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if 1.6999999999999999e46 < t

   1. Initial program 93.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 85.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 85.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 48.1% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+72} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -3.5e+72) (not (<= a 4e-85))) (* 27.0 (* a b)) (* x 2.0)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.5e+72) || !(a <= 4e-85)) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-3.5d+72)) .or. (.not. (a <= 4d-85))) then
        tmp = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    else
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.5e+72) || !(a <= 4e-85)) {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	} else {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -3.5e+72) or not (a <= 4e-85):
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	else:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -3.5e+72) || !(a <= 4e-85))
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -3.5e+72) || ~((a <= 4e-85)))
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	else
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -3.5e+72], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 4e-85]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -3.5000000000000001e72 or 3.9999999999999999e-85 < a

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 63.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -3.5000000000000001e72 < a < 3.9999999999999999e-85

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 46.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+72} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-85}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 48.1% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-80}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -2.4e+72)
   (* a (* 27.0 b))
   (if (<= a 2.8e-80) (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.4e+72) {
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b);
	} else if (a <= 2.8e-80) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-2.4d+72)) then
        tmp = a * (27.0d0 * b)
    else if (a <= 2.8d-80) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.4e+72) {
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b);
	} else if (a <= 2.8e-80) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -2.4e+72:
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b)
	elif a <= 2.8e-80:
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -2.4e+72)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b));
	elseif (a <= 2.8e-80)
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -2.4e+72)
		tmp = a * (27.0 * b);
	elseif (a <= 2.8e-80)
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -2.4e+72], N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 2.8e-80], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -2.4000000000000001e72

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 71.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 71.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right)} \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*r* 71.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 71.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -2.4000000000000001e72 < a < 2.79999999999999989e-80

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 45.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if 2.79999999999999989e-80 < a

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 55.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-80}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 30.5% accurate, 5.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\\\ [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ x \cdot 2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* x 2.0))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x * 2.0d0
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x * 2.0

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x * 2.0)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x * 2.0;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.1%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   3. associate-*l* 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   4. associate-*l* 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

3. Simplified 95.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 29.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 29.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 2 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 94.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y < 7.590524218811189 \cdot 10^{-161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< y 7.590524218811189e-161)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27.0) b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y < 7.590524218811189d-161) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y < 7.590524218811189e-161:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(y * Float64(t * z)))) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Less[y, 7.590524218811189e-161], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(y * N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024101 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< y 7.590524218811189e-161) (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* a (* 27.0 b))) (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

  (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))