Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.5% → 99.9%

Time: 20.3s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 2.7×

• 31.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (fma
     (cos (* phi2 0.5))
     (cos (* 0.5 phi1))
     (* (sin (* phi2 0.5)) (- (sin (* 0.5 phi1))))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos((phi2 * 0.5)), cos((0.5 * phi1)), (sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * -sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)), cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)), Float64(sin(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * Float64(-sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Sin[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-cbrt-cube 97.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. pow3 97.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. div-inv 97.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 97.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 97.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}^{3}}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 97.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 97.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 97.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \phi_1}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}^{3}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. rem-cbrt-cube 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) + \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} + \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

11. Final simplification 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 81.7% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-144}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 1.5e-144)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* phi2 0.5))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 1.5e-144) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 1.5e-144) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 1.5e-144:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 1.5e-144)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 1.5e-144)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 1.5e-144], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 1.4999999999999999e-144

   1. Initial program 61.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 86.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 54.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 54.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 54.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. *-commutative 54.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + {\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 54.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      5. unpow2 54.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. swap-sqr 54.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      7. hypot-define 79.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 79.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.4999999999999999e-144 < phi2

   1. Initial program 60.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 94.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-144}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 73.5% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-61}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -7.5e-61)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))))
   (* R (hypot phi2 (- lambda1 lambda2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -7.5e-61) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -7.5e-61) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -7.5e-61:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -7.5e-61)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -7.5e-61)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -7.5e-61], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -7.50000000000000047e-61

   1. Initial program 64.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 83.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 57.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 57.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 57.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. *-commutative 57.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + {\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 57.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      5. unpow2 57.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. swap-sqr 57.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      7. hypot-define 83.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \]

   8. Simplified 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   if -7.50000000000000047e-61 < phi1

   1. Initial program 59.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 81.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 50.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 50.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 72.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -7.5 \cdot 10^{-61}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 95.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 90.6% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 90.2%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Final simplification 90.2%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 70.8% accurate, 2.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{+184}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -5.6e+184)
   (* phi1 (- (* R (/ phi2 phi1)) R))
   (if (<= phi1 -6.2e+44)
     (* phi2 (- R (/ (* R phi1) phi2)))
     (if (<= phi1 -8e+20)
       (* R (* phi2 (- 1.0 (/ phi1 phi2))))
       (* R (hypot phi2 (- lambda1 lambda2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -5.6e+184) {
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	} else if (phi1 <= -6.2e+44) {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - ((R * phi1) / phi2));
	} else if (phi1 <= -8e+20) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -5.6e+184) {
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	} else if (phi1 <= -6.2e+44) {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - ((R * phi1) / phi2));
	} else if (phi1 <= -8e+20) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -5.6e+184:
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R)
	elif phi1 <= -6.2e+44:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - ((R * phi1) / phi2))
	elif phi1 <= -8e+20:
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -5.6e+184)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(R * Float64(phi2 / phi1)) - R));
	elseif (phi1 <= -6.2e+44)
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(Float64(R * phi1) / phi2)));
	elseif (phi1 <= -8e+20)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 * Float64(1.0 - Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -5.6e+184)
		tmp = phi1 * ((R * (phi2 / phi1)) - R);
	elseif (phi1 <= -6.2e+44)
		tmp = phi2 * (R - ((R * phi1) / phi2));
	elseif (phi1 <= -8e+20)
		tmp = R * (phi2 * (1.0 - (phi1 / phi2)));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -5.6e+184], N[(phi1 * N[(N[(R * N[(phi2 / phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - R), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi1, -6.2e+44], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(N[(R * phi1), $MachinePrecision] / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi1, -8e+20], N[(R * N[(phi2 * N[(1.0 - N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if phi1 < -5.5999999999999998e184

   1. Initial program 52.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 80.3%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 80.3%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 80.3%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot R + \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-R\right)} + \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} + \left(-R\right)\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 83.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 86.0%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1}} - R\right) \]

   10. Simplified 86.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)} \]

   if -5.5999999999999998e184 < phi1 < -6.19999999999999991e44

   1. Initial program 66.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 91.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 70.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 70.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 70.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   if -6.19999999999999991e44 < phi1 < -8e20

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 68.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 68.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 68.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 68.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   if -8e20 < phi1

   1. Initial program 60.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 51.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 51.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 51.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 73.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -5.6 \cdot 10^{+184}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \frac{\phi_2}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{+44}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -8 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 31.9% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_2 \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 -2.65e-17)
   (* R (- lambda1))
   (if (<= lambda2 2.05e+161) (* R (- phi2 phi1)) (* R (hypot phi2 lambda2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda2 <= 2.05e+161) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, lambda2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda2 <= 2.05e+161) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, lambda2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= -2.65e-17:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	elif lambda2 <= 2.05e+161:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, lambda2)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	elseif (lambda2 <= 2.05e+161)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, lambda2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	elseif (lambda2 <= 2.05e+161)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, lambda2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, -2.65e-17], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[lambda2, 2.05e+161], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + lambda2 ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if lambda2 < -2.6499999999999999e-17

   1. Initial program 52.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 46.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 46.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 70.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 15.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 15.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_1} \]

       2. mul-1-neg 15.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R\right)} \cdot \lambda_1 \]

   11. Simplified 15.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R\right) \cdot \lambda_1} \]

   if -2.6499999999999999e-17 < lambda2 < 2.0500000000000001e161

   1. Initial program 66.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 40.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 40.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 40.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 40.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 40.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf 37.6%

      \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-R}{\phi_2}} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} + \frac{-R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      5. unsub-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 37.6%

       \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 42.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 42.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

       2. mul-1-neg 42.6%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

       3. sub-neg 42.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

       4. distribute-lft-out-- 43.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   13. Simplified 43.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 2.0500000000000001e161 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 50.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 50.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 50.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 73.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\lambda_2}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 50.7%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\lambda_2}^{2}}} \]

       2. unpow2 50.7%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\lambda_2}^{2}} \]

       3. unpow2 50.7%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \lambda_2}} \]

       4. hypot-define 70.8%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_2\right)} \]

   11. Simplified 70.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 39.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_2 \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+161}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 27.9% accurate, 13.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-168}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-287} \lor \neg \left(\phi_1 \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-246}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -1.35e-15)
   (* R (- phi1))
   (if (<= phi1 -2.4e-168)
     (* R lambda2)
     (if (or (<= phi1 1.55e-287) (not (<= phi1 3.2e-246)))
       (* R phi2)
       (* R (- lambda1))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.35e-15) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi1 <= -2.4e-168) {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	} else if ((phi1 <= 1.55e-287) || !(phi1 <= 3.2e-246)) {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-1.35d-15)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else if (phi1 <= (-2.4d-168)) then
        tmp = r * lambda2
    else if ((phi1 <= 1.55d-287) .or. (.not. (phi1 <= 3.2d-246))) then
        tmp = r * phi2
    else
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.35e-15) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi1 <= -2.4e-168) {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	} else if ((phi1 <= 1.55e-287) || !(phi1 <= 3.2e-246)) {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1.35e-15:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	elif phi1 <= -2.4e-168:
		tmp = R * lambda2
	elif (phi1 <= 1.55e-287) or not (phi1 <= 3.2e-246):
		tmp = R * phi2
	else:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1.35e-15)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	elseif (phi1 <= -2.4e-168)
		tmp = Float64(R * lambda2);
	elseif ((phi1 <= 1.55e-287) || !(phi1 <= 3.2e-246))
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1.35e-15)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	elseif (phi1 <= -2.4e-168)
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	elseif ((phi1 <= 1.55e-287) || ~((phi1 <= 3.2e-246)))
		tmp = R * phi2;
	else
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -1.35e-15], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi1, -2.4e-168], N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[phi1, 1.55e-287], N[Not[LessEqual[phi1, 3.2e-246]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if phi1 < -1.35000000000000005e-15

   1. Initial program 64.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 68.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -1.35000000000000005e-15 < phi1 < -2.3999999999999999e-168

   1. Initial program 60.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 82.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 55.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 55.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 55.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 81.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 81.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 29.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 29.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   11. Simplified 29.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   if -2.3999999999999999e-168 < phi1 < 1.55e-287 or 3.2000000000000001e-246 < phi1

   1. Initial program 58.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 26.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 26.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   7. Simplified 26.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   if 1.55e-287 < phi1 < 3.2000000000000001e-246

   1. Initial program 71.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 83.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 63.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 63.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 83.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 31.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 31.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_1} \]

       2. mul-1-neg 31.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R\right)} \cdot \lambda_1 \]

   11. Simplified 31.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R\right) \cdot \lambda_1} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 39.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-15}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{-168}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq 1.55 \cdot 10^{-287} \lor \neg \left(\phi_1 \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-246}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 30.9% accurate, 17.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_2 \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R - \lambda_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\lambda_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 -2.65e-17)
   (* R (- lambda1))
   (if (<= lambda2 1.65e+160)
     (* R (- phi2 phi1))
     (* lambda2 (- R (* lambda1 (/ R lambda2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda2 <= 1.65e+160) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = lambda2 * (R - (lambda1 * (R / lambda2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= (-2.65d-17)) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else if (lambda2 <= 1.65d+160) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = lambda2 * (r - (lambda1 * (r / lambda2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda2 <= 1.65e+160) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = lambda2 * (R - (lambda1 * (R / lambda2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= -2.65e-17:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	elif lambda2 <= 1.65e+160:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = lambda2 * (R - (lambda1 * (R / lambda2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	elseif (lambda2 <= 1.65e+160)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(lambda2 * Float64(R - Float64(lambda1 * Float64(R / lambda2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	elseif (lambda2 <= 1.65e+160)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = lambda2 * (R - (lambda1 * (R / lambda2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, -2.65e-17], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[lambda2, 1.65e+160], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(lambda2 * N[(R - N[(lambda1 * N[(R / lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if lambda2 < -2.6499999999999999e-17

   1. Initial program 52.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 46.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 46.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 70.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 15.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 15.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_1} \]

       2. mul-1-neg 15.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R\right)} \cdot \lambda_1 \]

   11. Simplified 15.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R\right) \cdot \lambda_1} \]

   if -2.6499999999999999e-17 < lambda2 < 1.6499999999999999e160

   1. Initial program 66.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 40.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 40.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 40.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 40.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 40.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf 37.6%

      \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-R}{\phi_2}} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} + \frac{-R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      5. unsub-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 37.6%

       \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 42.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 42.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

       2. mul-1-neg 42.6%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

       3. sub-neg 42.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

       4. distribute-lft-out-- 43.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   13. Simplified 43.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 1.6499999999999999e160 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 50.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 50.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 50.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 73.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \lambda_1}{\lambda_2}\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 64.1%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \lambda_1}{\lambda_2}\right)}\right) \]

       2. unsub-neg 64.1%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \lambda_1}{\lambda_2}\right)} \]

       3. *-commutative 64.1%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_2 \cdot \left(R - \frac{\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R}}{\lambda_2}\right) \]

       4. associate-/l* 64.1%

          \[\leadsto \lambda_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\lambda_2}}\right) \]

   11. Simplified 64.1%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R - \lambda_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\lambda_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_2 \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R - \lambda_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\lambda_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 31.2% accurate, 21.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_2 \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 -2.65e-17)
   (* R (- lambda1))
   (if (<= lambda2 3.8e+160) (* R (- phi2 phi1)) (* R lambda2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda2 <= 3.8e+160) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= (-2.65d-17)) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else if (lambda2 <= 3.8d+160) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = r * lambda2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda2 <= 3.8e+160) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= -2.65e-17:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	elif lambda2 <= 3.8e+160:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * lambda2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	elseif (lambda2 <= 3.8e+160)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * lambda2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= -2.65e-17)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	elseif (lambda2 <= 3.8e+160)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, -2.65e-17], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[lambda2, 3.8e+160], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if lambda2 < -2.6499999999999999e-17

   1. Initial program 52.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 71.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 46.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 46.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 46.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 70.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 15.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 15.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_1} \]

       2. mul-1-neg 15.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R\right)} \cdot \lambda_1 \]

   11. Simplified 15.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R\right) \cdot \lambda_1} \]

   if -2.6499999999999999e-17 < lambda2 < 3.80000000000000012e160

   1. Initial program 66.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 99.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 40.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 40.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 40.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{\color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 40.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 40.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \frac{-\phi_1 \cdot R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi1 around inf 37.6%

      \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-R}{\phi_2}} + \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} + \frac{-R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-frac-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      5. unsub-neg 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   10. Simplified 37.6%

       \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(\frac{R}{\phi_1} - \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 42.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. +-commutative 42.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

       2. mul-1-neg 42.6%

          \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

       3. sub-neg 42.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

       4. distribute-lft-out-- 43.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   13. Simplified 43.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 3.80000000000000012e160 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 50.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 50.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 50.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 73.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 70.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 70.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   11. Simplified 70.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 39.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq -2.65 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_2 \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+160}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 27.9% accurate, 25.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-168}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -9e-16)
   (* R (- phi1))
   (if (<= phi1 -9e-168) (* R lambda2) (* R phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -9e-16) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi1 <= -9e-168) {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-9d-16)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else if (phi1 <= (-9d-168)) then
        tmp = r * lambda2
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -9e-16) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi1 <= -9e-168) {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -9e-16:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	elif phi1 <= -9e-168:
		tmp = R * lambda2
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -9e-16)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	elseif (phi1 <= -9e-168)
		tmp = Float64(R * lambda2);
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -9e-16)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	elseif (phi1 <= -9e-168)
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -9e-16], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi1, -9e-168], N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if phi1 < -9.0000000000000003e-16

   1. Initial program 64.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 68.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 68.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -9.0000000000000003e-16 < phi1 < -9.0000000000000002e-168

   1. Initial program 59.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 82.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 53.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 53.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 53.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 80.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 30.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 30.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   11. Simplified 30.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   if -9.0000000000000002e-168 < phi1

   1. Initial program 59.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 24.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 24.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   7. Simplified 24.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_1 \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-168}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 26.1% accurate, 41.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 5.2e-24) (* R lambda2) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.2e-24) {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 5.2d-24) then
        tmp = r * lambda2
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.2e-24) {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 5.2e-24:
		tmp = R * lambda2
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 5.2e-24)
		tmp = Float64(R * lambda2);
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 5.2e-24)
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 5.2e-24], N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 5.2e-24

   1. Initial program 62.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 98.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 88.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 46.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 46.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      2. unpow2 46.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      3. hypot-define 64.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 18.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_2} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 18.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   11. Simplified 18.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   if 5.2e-24 < phi2

   1. Initial program 57.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 95.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 56.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 56.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   7. Simplified 56.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 30.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 14.1% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \lambda_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R lambda2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * lambda2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * lambda2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * lambda2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * lambda2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 82.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 47.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow2 47.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

   2. unpow2 47.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

   3. hypot-define 64.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

8. Simplified 64.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

9. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 15.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_2} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. *-commutative 15.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

11. Simplified 15.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

12. Final simplification 15.7%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \lambda_2 \]
13. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024100 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))