Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 12.7s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (pow E (/ PI s))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + powf(((float) M_E), (((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + (Float32(exp(1)) ^ Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(2.71828182845904523536) ^ (single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. exp-prod98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + (1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(1.0) + (single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 83.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative83.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified83.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Final simplification83.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 11.7% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + {\left(\sqrt[3]{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)}^{3}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (+ (* PI (+ (* u -0.25) 0.25)) (pow (cbrt (* u (* PI -0.25))) 3.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * ((u * -0.25f) + 0.25f)) + powf(cbrtf((u * (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f))), 3.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(0.25))) + (cbrt(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))) ^ Float32(3.0))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + {\left(\sqrt[3]{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)}^{3}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} + 0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    2. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}\right) \]
    3. add-cube-cbrt12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}}\right) \]
    4. pow312.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}\right)}^{3}}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}}\right)}^{3}\right) \]
    6. associate-*r*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}}\right)}^{3}\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr12.9%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)}^{3}}\right) \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 11.7% accurate, 2.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot -0.25, u, \pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (fma (* PI -0.25) u (* PI (fma u -0.25 0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * fmaf((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f), u, (((float) M_PI) * fmaf(u, -0.25f, 0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * fma(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)), u, Float32(Float32(pi) * fma(u, Float32(-0.25), Float32(0.25)))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot -0.25, u, \pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} + 0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot u} + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)\right) \]
    3. distribute-rgt-in12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(\left(u \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot u + \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right)} \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot u + \left(\color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. fma-define12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot -0.25, u, -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    7. associate-*r*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot -0.25, u, \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    8. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot -0.25, u, \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot -0.25\right)} \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    9. distribute-rgt-in12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot -0.25, u, \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)}\right) \]
    10. fma-define12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot -0.25, u, \pi \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)}\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr12.9%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot -0.25, u, \pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)} \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 11.7% accurate, 28.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (+ (* PI (+ (* u -0.25) 0.25)) (* u (* PI -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * ((u * -0.25f) + 0.25f)) + (u * (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(0.25))) + Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * ((single(pi) * ((u * single(-0.25)) + single(0.25))) + (u * (single(pi) * single(-0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} + 0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*12.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 11.7% accurate, 39.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (+ (* PI -0.25) (* (* u PI) 0.5))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f) + ((u * ((float) M_PI)) * 0.5f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(u * Float32(pi)) * Float32(0.5))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * ((single(pi) * single(-0.25)) + ((u * single(pi)) * single(0.5)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification12.9%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + \left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 11.7% accurate, 48.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* PI (+ -0.25 (* u 0.5)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * (-0.25f + (u * 0.5f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(0.5)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * (single(-0.25) + (u * single(0.5))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. exp-prod98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. +-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    8. associate-*r*12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    9. *-commutative12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    10. distribute-rgt-out12.9%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \]
  8. Simplified12.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 11.5% accurate, 216.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-112.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified12.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024100 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))