VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)

Percentage Accurate: 76.3% → 99.3%

Time: 24.1s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 8.1×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. F = -8.220230983839455e-255
  2. l = 3149702261924923.5

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 2e+15)
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) F) F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 2e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / F) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / F) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((tan((pi * l_m)) / F) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 2e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 2e15

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

      3. associate-/r* 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   if 2e15 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 63.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 63.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 63.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 63.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 63.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.5% accurate, 3.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 10000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{l\_m \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{F} + \left(l\_m \cdot l\_m\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}\right) \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 10000000000000.0)
    (-
     (* PI l_m)
     (/
      (*
       l_m
       (+
        (/ PI F)
        (* (* l_m l_m) (* (* (* PI PI) (/ PI F)) 0.3333333333333333))))
      F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((l_m * ((((double) M_PI) / F) + ((l_m * l_m) * (((((double) M_PI) * ((double) M_PI)) * (((double) M_PI) / F)) * 0.3333333333333333)))) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((l_m * ((Math.PI / F) + ((l_m * l_m) * (((Math.PI * Math.PI) * (Math.PI / F)) * 0.3333333333333333)))) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((l_m * ((math.pi / F) + ((l_m * l_m) * (((math.pi * math.pi) * (math.pi / F)) * 0.3333333333333333)))) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(l_m * Float64(Float64(pi / F) + Float64(Float64(l_m * l_m) * Float64(Float64(Float64(pi * pi) * Float64(pi / F)) * 0.3333333333333333)))) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((l_m * ((pi / F) + ((l_m * l_m) * (((pi * pi) * (pi / F)) * 0.3333333333333333)))) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 10000000000000.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(l$95$m * N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(l$95$m * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(Pi * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 1e13

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

      3. associate-/r* 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 70.8%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left({\ell}^{2} \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot \frac{{\pi}^{3}}{F} - -0.5 \cdot \frac{{\pi}^{3}}{F}\right) + \frac{\pi}{F}\right)}}{F} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \ell\right)} \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot \frac{{\pi}^{3}}{F} - -0.5 \cdot \frac{{\pi}^{3}}{F}\right) + \frac{\pi}{F}\right)}{F} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out-- 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell \cdot \left(\left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{{\pi}^{3}}{F} \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 - -0.5\right)\right)} + \frac{\pi}{F}\right)}{F} \]

      3. unpow3 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell \cdot \left(\left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \pi}}{F} \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 - -0.5\right)\right) + \frac{\pi}{F}\right)}{F} \]

      4. associate-/l* 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell \cdot \left(\left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}\right)} \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 - -0.5\right)\right) + \frac{\pi}{F}\right)}{F} \]

      5. metadata-eval 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell \cdot \left(\left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.3333333333333333}\right) + \frac{\pi}{F}\right)}{F} \]

   7. Simplified 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}\right) \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right) + \frac{\pi}{F}\right)}}{F} \]

   if 1e13 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 63.5%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 10000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\ell \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{F} + \left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}\right) \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.5% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 10000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{l\_m \cdot \left(\pi + \left(l\_m \cdot l\_m\right) \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 10000000000000.0)
    (-
     (* PI l_m)
     (/
      (/
       (* l_m (+ PI (* (* l_m l_m) (* PI (* (* PI PI) 0.3333333333333333)))))
       F)
      F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - (((l_m * (((double) M_PI) + ((l_m * l_m) * (((double) M_PI) * ((((double) M_PI) * ((double) M_PI)) * 0.3333333333333333))))) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - (((l_m * (Math.PI + ((l_m * l_m) * (Math.PI * ((Math.PI * Math.PI) * 0.3333333333333333))))) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - (((l_m * (math.pi + ((l_m * l_m) * (math.pi * ((math.pi * math.pi) * 0.3333333333333333))))) / F) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(Float64(l_m * Float64(pi + Float64(Float64(l_m * l_m) * Float64(pi * Float64(Float64(pi * pi) * 0.3333333333333333))))) / F) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - (((l_m * (pi + ((l_m * l_m) * (pi * ((pi * pi) * 0.3333333333333333))))) / F) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 10000000000000.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(l$95$m * N[(Pi + N[(N[(l$95$m * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(Pi * N[(N[(Pi * Pi), $MachinePrecision] * 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 1e13

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

      3. associate-/r* 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + {\ell}^{2} \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.5 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}}{F}}{F} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + \color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \ell\right)} \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.5 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right)\right)}{F}}{F} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out-- 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + \left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left({\pi}^{3} \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 - -0.5\right)\right)}\right)}{F}}{F} \]

      3. cube-unmult 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + \left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 - -0.5\right)\right)\right)}{F}}{F} \]

      4. unpow2 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + \left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{{\pi}^{2}}\right) \cdot \left(-0.16666666666666666 - -0.5\right)\right)\right)}{F}}{F} \]

      5. metadata-eval 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + \left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot {\pi}^{2}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.3333333333333333}\right)\right)}{F}}{F} \]

      6. associate-*l* 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + \left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left({\pi}^{2} \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)}\right)}{F}}{F} \]

      7. unpow2 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + \left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right)} \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\right)}{F}}{F} \]

   7. Simplified 69.7%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + \left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\right)}}{F}}{F} \]

   if 1e13 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 63.5%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 10000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\ell \cdot \left(\pi + \left(\ell \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.5% accurate, 6.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 10000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{l\_m}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 10000000000000.0)
    (- (* PI l_m) (* (/ PI F) (/ l_m F)))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((((double) M_PI) / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.PI / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.pi / F) * (l_m / F))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(pi / F) * Float64(l_m / F)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 10000000000000.0)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((pi / F) * (l_m / F));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 10000000000000.0], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[(l$95$m / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 1e13

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in l around 0 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\ell \cdot \pi\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \left(\ell \cdot \pi\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

      3. *-commutative 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell}}{F \cdot F} \]

      4. times-frac 83.3%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   if 1e13 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 63.5%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 10000000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 92.8% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 1.86 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\frac{\pi}{F}}{F}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (if (<= l_m 1.86e+14) (* l_m (- PI (/ (/ PI F) F))) (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.86e+14) {
		tmp = l_m * (((double) M_PI) - ((((double) M_PI) / F) / F));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.86e+14) {
		tmp = l_m * (Math.PI - ((Math.PI / F) / F));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 1.86e+14:
		tmp = l_m * (math.pi - ((math.pi / F) / F))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 1.86e+14)
		tmp = Float64(l_m * Float64(pi - Float64(Float64(pi / F) / F)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 1.86e+14)
		tmp = l_m * (pi - ((pi / F) / F));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 1.86e+14], N[(l$95$m * N[(Pi - N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 1.86e14

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 81.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 81.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 81.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\pi}{{F}^{2}}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 74.1%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\pi}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\pi}{F \cdot F}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 74.1%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\pi}{F}}{F}}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\pi}{F}}{F}}\right) \]

   if 1.86e14 < l

   1. Initial program 63.5%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 1.86 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\frac{\pi}{F}}{F}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 92.8% accurate, 8.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;l\_m \leq 1.86 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\pi}{F \cdot F}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (* l_s (if (<= l_m 1.86e+14) (* l_m (- PI (/ PI (* F F)))) (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.86e+14) {
		tmp = l_m * (((double) M_PI) - (((double) M_PI) / (F * F)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if (l_m <= 1.86e+14) {
		tmp = l_m * (Math.PI - (Math.PI / (F * F)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if l_m <= 1.86e+14:
		tmp = l_m * (math.pi - (math.pi / (F * F)))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (l_m <= 1.86e+14)
		tmp = Float64(l_m * Float64(pi - Float64(pi / Float64(F * F))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (l_m <= 1.86e+14)
		tmp = l_m * (pi - (pi / (F * F)));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[l$95$m, 1.86e+14], N[(l$95$m * N[(Pi - N[(Pi / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if l < 1.86e14

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 81.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 81.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 81.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\pi}{{F}^{2}}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 74.1%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\pi}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\pi}{F \cdot F}\right)} \]

   if 1.86e14 < l

   1. Initial program 63.5%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 63.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 63.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 81.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\ell \leq 1.86 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \left(\pi - \frac{\pi}{F \cdot F}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 73.5% accurate, 37.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m) :precision binary64 (* l_s (* PI l_m)))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (((double) M_PI) * l_m);
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (Math.PI * l_m);
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * (math.pi * l_m)

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(pi * l_m))
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * (pi * l_m);
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 75.9%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

   2. sqr-neg 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

   3. associate-*r/ 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

   4. sqr-neg 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

   5. *-rgt-identity 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

3. Simplified 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in l around inf 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]

6. Final simplification 74.2%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024098 
(FPCore (F l)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))