Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 70.7% → 83.5%

Time: 14.0s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 70.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 83.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 5.5e-275)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma z y (* x (+ y z)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt y) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.5e-275) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(z, y, (x * (y + z))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5.5e-275)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(z, y, Float64(x * Float64(y + z)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(y) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5.5e-275], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * y + N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.49999999999999988e-275

   1. Initial program 65.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y} + \left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. fma-define 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 65.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, y, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)}} \]

   if 5.49999999999999988e-275 < y

   1. Initial program 72.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 31.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 31.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot z\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. unpow-prod-down 40.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{0.5} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right)} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 40.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{0.5} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow1/2 40.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{y}} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right) \]

      2. unpow1/2 40.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 40.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 83.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 5.5e-275)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (fma x z (* y (+ z x)))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt y) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.5e-275) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, (y * (z + x))));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5.5e-275)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(fma(x, z, Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(y) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5.5e-275], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * z + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.49999999999999988e-275

   1. Initial program 65.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x} + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot x} + y \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot x + \color{blue}{z \cdot y}\right)} \]

      5. +-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      6. +-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot x}} \]

      7. +-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x + \left(z \cdot y + z \cdot x\right)}} \]

      8. *-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z} + z \cdot x\right)} \]

      9. *-commutative 65.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{x \cdot z}\right)} \]

      10. associate-+l+ 65.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right) + x \cdot z}} \]

      11. +-commutative 65.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot z + \left(y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      12. fma-define 65.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot x + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      13. distribute-lft-out 65.4%

          \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)}\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 65.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 5.49999999999999988e-275 < y

   1. Initial program 72.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 31.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 31.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot z\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. unpow-prod-down 40.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{0.5} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right)} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 40.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{0.5} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow1/2 40.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{y}} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right) \]

      2. unpow1/2 40.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 40.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, z, y \cdot \left(z + x\right)\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 83.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(y \cdot x + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 5.5e-275)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* y x) (* z x)) (* y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt y) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.5e-275) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 5.5d-275) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.5e-275) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(y) * Math.sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 5.5e-275:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(y) * math.sqrt(z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5.5e-275)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * x)) + Float64(y * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(y) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 5.5e-275)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(y) * sqrt(z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5.5e-275], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.49999999999999988e-275

   1. Initial program 65.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 5.49999999999999988e-275 < y

   1. Initial program 72.0%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 31.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. pow1/2 31.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(y \cdot z\right)}^{0.5}} \]

      2. unpow-prod-down 40.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{0.5} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right)} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 40.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{0.5} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow1/2 40.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{y}} \cdot {z}^{0.5}\right) \]

      2. unpow1/2 40.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 40.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-275}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(y \cdot x + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 70.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(y \cdot x + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* y x) (* z x)) (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * x)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((y * x) + (z * x)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 68.5%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 68.5%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(y \cdot x + z \cdot x\right) + y \cdot z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 70.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-270}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6.8e-270)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e-270) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-6.8d-270)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e-270) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -6.8e-270:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6.8e-270)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -6.8e-270)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6.8e-270], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.8000000000000001e-270

   1. Initial program 64.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 47.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if -6.8000000000000001e-270 < y

   1. Initial program 71.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 54.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 54.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   5. Simplified 54.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 69.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-270}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -6.8e-270) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e-270) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-6.8d-270)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -6.8e-270) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -6.8e-270:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -6.8e-270)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -6.8e-270)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -6.8e-270], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -6.8000000000000001e-270

   1. Initial program 64.6%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 47.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if -6.8000000000000001e-270 < y

   1. Initial program 71.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 68.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-305}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2.5e-305) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.5e-305) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-2.5d-305)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.5e-305) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2.5e-305:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.5e-305)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2.5e-305)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2.5e-305], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.49999999999999993e-305

   1. Initial program 64.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 27.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 27.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

   5. Simplified 27.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

   if -2.49999999999999993e-305 < y

   1. Initial program 71.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 35.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 68.5%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 23.2%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 23.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

5. Simplified 23.2%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 82.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z)))
          (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))))
   (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y))))
     (* (* t_0 t_0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((pow(y, -0.75) * (pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (pow(z, 0.25) * pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (0.25d0 * (((y ** (-0.75d0)) * ((z ** (-0.75d0)) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ** 0.25d0) * (y ** 0.25d0))
    if (z < 7.636950090573675d+176) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((Math.pow(y, -0.75) * (Math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (Math.pow(z, 0.25) * Math.pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (0.25 * ((math.pow(y, -0.75) * (math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (math.pow(z, 0.25) * math.pow(y, 0.25))
	tmp = 0
	if z < 7.636950090573675e+176:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(0.25 * Float64(Float64((y ^ -0.75) * Float64((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * Float64(y + z))) + Float64((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (0.25 * (((y ^ -0.75) * ((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[y, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[z, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[z, 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 7.636950090573675e+176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024097 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176) (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y)))) (* (* (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25))) (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))) 2.0))

  (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))