Data.HashTable.ST.Basic:computeOverhead from hashtables-1.2.0.2

Percentage Accurate: 86.0% → 99.0%

Time: 9.1s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.3×

• 22.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (* z 2.0) (- 1.0 t))) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 + ((z * 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 - t))) / (t * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * Float64(1.0 - t))) / Float64(t * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 86.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (* z 2.0) (- 1.0 t))) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 + ((z * 2.0d0) * (1.0d0 - t))) / (t * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * Float64(1.0 - t))) / Float64(t * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 + ((z * 2.0) * (1.0 - t))) / (t * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ -2.0 (/ x y)) (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (-2.0 + (x / y)) + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((-2.0d0) + (x / y)) + ((2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (-2.0 + (x / y)) + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (-2.0 + (x / y)) + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(-2.0 + Float64(x / y)) + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (-2.0 + (x / y)) + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(-2.0 + N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.1%

   \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{y}}\right) \]

   4. unsub-neg 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y}} \]

   5. *-commutative 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

   6. associate-*r* 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

   7. distribute-rgt1-in 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

   8. associate-/l* 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot \frac{2}{t \cdot z}} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

   9. fma-neg 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right)} \]

   10. *-commutative 88.4%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - t\right)} + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

   11. fma-define 88.4%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right)}, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

   12. *-commutative 88.4%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot t}}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

   13. distribute-frac-neg 88.4%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, -\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   14. remove-double-neg 88.4%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \]

3. Simplified 88.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate--l+ 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]

   3. sub-neg 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

   5. +-commutative 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

   6. associate-*r/ 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{z}\right)}{t}} \]

   7. distribute-lft-in 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}}{t} \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

   9. associate-*r/ 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

   10. metadata-eval 99.5%

       \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

7. Simplified 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 49.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-153}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-60}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 1.9:\\ \;\;\;\;-2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ x y) -2.4e+38)
   (/ x y)
   (if (<= (/ x y) -7e-7)
     (/ 2.0 t)
     (if (<= (/ x y) 6.8e-153)
       -2.0
       (if (<= (/ x y) 6.8e-60)
         (/ 2.0 t)
         (if (<= (/ x y) 1.9)
           -2.0
           (if (<= (/ x y) 1.1e+99) (/ 2.0 t) (/ x y))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -2.4e+38) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= -7e-7) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 6.8e-153) {
		tmp = -2.0;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 6.8e-60) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1.9) {
		tmp = -2.0;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1.1e+99) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else {
		tmp = x / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x / y) <= (-2.4d+38)) then
        tmp = x / y
    else if ((x / y) <= (-7d-7)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / t
    else if ((x / y) <= 6.8d-153) then
        tmp = -2.0d0
    else if ((x / y) <= 6.8d-60) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / t
    else if ((x / y) <= 1.9d0) then
        tmp = -2.0d0
    else if ((x / y) <= 1.1d+99) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / t
    else
        tmp = x / y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -2.4e+38) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= -7e-7) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 6.8e-153) {
		tmp = -2.0;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 6.8e-60) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1.9) {
		tmp = -2.0;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1.1e+99) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else {
		tmp = x / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x / y) <= -2.4e+38:
		tmp = x / y
	elif (x / y) <= -7e-7:
		tmp = 2.0 / t
	elif (x / y) <= 6.8e-153:
		tmp = -2.0
	elif (x / y) <= 6.8e-60:
		tmp = 2.0 / t
	elif (x / y) <= 1.9:
		tmp = -2.0
	elif (x / y) <= 1.1e+99:
		tmp = 2.0 / t
	else:
		tmp = x / y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x / y) <= -2.4e+38)
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= -7e-7)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / t);
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 6.8e-153)
		tmp = -2.0;
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 6.8e-60)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / t);
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 1.9)
		tmp = -2.0;
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 1.1e+99)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x / y) <= -2.4e+38)
		tmp = x / y;
	elseif ((x / y) <= -7e-7)
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	elseif ((x / y) <= 6.8e-153)
		tmp = -2.0;
	elseif ((x / y) <= 6.8e-60)
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	elseif ((x / y) <= 1.9)
		tmp = -2.0;
	elseif ((x / y) <= 1.1e+99)
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	else
		tmp = x / y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -2.4e+38], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -7e-7], N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 6.8e-153], -2.0, If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 6.8e-60], N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 1.9], -2.0, If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 1.1e+99], N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -2.40000000000000017e38 or 1.09999999999999989e99 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -2.40000000000000017e38 < (/.f64 x y) < -6.99999999999999968e-7 or 6.7999999999999997e-153 < (/.f64 x y) < 6.80000000000000013e-60 or 1.8999999999999999 < (/.f64 x y) < 1.09999999999999989e99

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      2. metadata-eval 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 87.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 63.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}} \]

   if -6.99999999999999968e-7 < (/.f64 x y) < 6.7999999999999997e-153 or 6.80000000000000013e-60 < (/.f64 x y) < 1.8999999999999999

   1. Initial program 89.1%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 48.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 47.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 65.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := -2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -2.85 \cdot 10^{-257}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-157}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 t))))
   (if (<= (/ x y) -3.3e+38)
     (/ x y)
     (if (<= (/ x y) -2.85e-257)
       t_1
       (if (<= (/ x y) 1.25e-157)
         (+ -2.0 (/ (/ 2.0 z) t))
         (if (<= (/ x y) 1.1e+99) t_1 (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -3.3e+38) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= -2.85e-257) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1.25e-157) {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1.1e+99) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (-2.0d0) + (2.0d0 / t)
    if ((x / y) <= (-3.3d+38)) then
        tmp = x / y
    else if ((x / y) <= (-2.85d-257)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if ((x / y) <= 1.25d-157) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + ((2.0d0 / z) / t)
    else if ((x / y) <= 1.1d+99) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x / y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -3.3e+38) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if ((x / y) <= -2.85e-257) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1.25e-157) {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	} else if ((x / y) <= 1.1e+99) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x / y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = -2.0 + (2.0 / t)
	tmp = 0
	if (x / y) <= -3.3e+38:
		tmp = x / y
	elif (x / y) <= -2.85e-257:
		tmp = t_1
	elif (x / y) <= 1.25e-157:
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t)
	elif (x / y) <= 1.1e+99:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x / y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x / y) <= -3.3e+38)
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= -2.85e-257)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 1.25e-157)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / t));
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 1.1e+99)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x / y) <= -3.3e+38)
		tmp = x / y;
	elseif ((x / y) <= -2.85e-257)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif ((x / y) <= 1.25e-157)
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 / z) / t);
	elseif ((x / y) <= 1.1e+99)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x / y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -3.3e+38], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -2.85e-257], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 1.25e-157], N[(-2.0 + N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 1.1e+99], t$95$1, N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -3.2999999999999999e38 or 1.09999999999999989e99 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -3.2999999999999999e38 < (/.f64 x y) < -2.8499999999999999e-257 or 1.25000000000000005e-157 < (/.f64 x y) < 1.09999999999999989e99

   1. Initial program 91.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-in 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + 2 \cdot -1\right)} \]

      6. associate-*r/ 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} + 2 \cdot -1\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} + 2 \cdot -1\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 76.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2}{t} + -2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 71.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + \left(-2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 71.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} + \left(-2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 71.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} + \left(-2\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 71.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{t} + \color{blue}{-2} \]

   8. Simplified 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t} + -2} \]

   if -2.8499999999999999e-257 < (/.f64 x y) < 1.25000000000000005e-157

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{y}}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y}} \]

      5. *-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      6. associate-*r* 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      7. distribute-rgt1-in 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      8. associate-/l* 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot \frac{2}{t \cdot z}} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      9. fma-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right)} \]

      10. *-commutative 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - t\right)} + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      11. fma-define 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right)}, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot t}}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      13. distribute-frac-neg 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, -\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      14. remove-double-neg 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]

      3. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      6. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{z}\right)}{t}} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}}{t} \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      9. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.7%

      \[\leadsto -2 + \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{z}}}{t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -3.3 \cdot 10^{+38}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -2.85 \cdot 10^{-257}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-157}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 79.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.22:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x + -2 \cdot y}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-70}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 70000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t)))
   (if (<= t -0.22)
     (/ (+ x (* -2.0 y)) y)
     (if (<= t 1.1e-90)
       t_1
       (if (<= t 2.8e-70)
         (/ x y)
         (if (<= t 70000000000.0) t_1 (- (/ x y) 2.0)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -0.22) {
		tmp = (x + (-2.0 * y)) / y;
	} else if (t <= 1.1e-90) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 2.8e-70) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if (t <= 70000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t
    if (t <= (-0.22d0)) then
        tmp = (x + ((-2.0d0) * y)) / y
    else if (t <= 1.1d-90) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= 2.8d-70) then
        tmp = x / y
    else if (t <= 70000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -0.22) {
		tmp = (x + (-2.0 * y)) / y;
	} else if (t <= 1.1e-90) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 2.8e-70) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if (t <= 70000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -0.22:
		tmp = (x + (-2.0 * y)) / y
	elif t <= 1.1e-90:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= 2.8e-70:
		tmp = x / y
	elif t <= 70000000000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -0.22)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(-2.0 * y)) / y);
	elseif (t <= 1.1e-90)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 2.8e-70)
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	elseif (t <= 70000000000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -0.22)
		tmp = (x + (-2.0 * y)) / y;
	elseif (t <= 1.1e-90)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 2.8e-70)
		tmp = x / y;
	elseif (t <= 70000000000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = (x / y) - 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -0.22], N[(N[(x + N[(-2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.1e-90], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 2.8e-70], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 70000000000.0], t$95$1, N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if t < -0.220000000000000001

   1. Initial program 74.2%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x + -2 \cdot y}{y}} \]

   if -0.220000000000000001 < t < 1.09999999999999993e-90 or 2.7999999999999999e-70 < t < 7e10

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 82.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      2. metadata-eval 82.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

   if 1.09999999999999993e-90 < t < 2.7999999999999999e-70

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if 7e10 < t

   1. Initial program 83.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 79.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ t_2 := \frac{x}{y} - 2\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -0.013:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-90}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-70}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 20000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t)) (t_2 (- (/ x y) 2.0)))
   (if (<= t -0.013)
     t_2
     (if (<= t 1.1e-90)
       t_1
       (if (<= t 2.8e-70) (/ x y) (if (<= t 20000000000.0) t_1 t_2))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	double t_2 = (x / y) - 2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -0.013) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t <= 1.1e-90) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 2.8e-70) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if (t <= 20000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t
    t_2 = (x / y) - 2.0d0
    if (t <= (-0.013d0)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (t <= 1.1d-90) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= 2.8d-70) then
        tmp = x / y
    else if (t <= 20000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	double t_2 = (x / y) - 2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -0.013) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (t <= 1.1e-90) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 2.8e-70) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else if (t <= 20000000000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t
	t_2 = (x / y) - 2.0
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -0.013:
		tmp = t_2
	elif t <= 1.1e-90:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= 2.8e-70:
		tmp = x / y
	elif t <= 20000000000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t)
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x / y) - 2.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -0.013)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t <= 1.1e-90)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 2.8e-70)
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	elseif (t <= 20000000000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t;
	t_2 = (x / y) - 2.0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -0.013)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (t <= 1.1e-90)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 2.8e-70)
		tmp = x / y;
	elseif (t <= 20000000000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -0.013], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[t, 1.1e-90], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 2.8e-70], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 20000000000.0], t$95$1, t$95$2]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -0.0129999999999999994 or 2e10 < t

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   if -0.0129999999999999994 < t < 1.09999999999999993e-90 or 2.7999999999999999e-70 < t < 2e10

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 82.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      2. metadata-eval 82.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

   if 1.09999999999999993e-90 < t < 2.7999999999999999e-70

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 88.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+52} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+113}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (/ x y) -1e+52) (not (<= (/ x y) 4e+113)))
   (+ (/ x y) (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 t)))
   (+ -2.0 (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -1e+52) || !((x / y) <= 4e+113)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / t));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x / y) <= (-1d+52)) .or. (.not. ((x / y) <= 4d+113))) then
        tmp = (x / y) + ((-2.0d0) + (2.0d0 / t))
    else
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + ((2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -1e+52) || !((x / y) <= 4e+113)) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / t));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x / y) <= -1e+52) or not ((x / y) <= 4e+113):
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / t))
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x / y) <= -1e+52) || !(Float64(x / y) <= 4e+113))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x / y) <= -1e+52) || ~(((x / y) <= 4e+113)))
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / t));
	else
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+52], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 4e+113]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -9.9999999999999999e51 or 4e113 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 85.5%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-in 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + 2 \cdot -1\right)} \]

      6. associate-*r/ 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} + 2 \cdot -1\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} + 2 \cdot -1\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2}{t} + -2\right)} \]

   if -9.9999999999999999e51 < (/.f64 x y) < 4e113

   1. Initial program 89.7%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{y}}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y}} \]

      5. *-commutative 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      6. associate-*r* 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      7. distribute-rgt1-in 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      8. associate-/l* 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot \frac{2}{t \cdot z}} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      9. fma-neg 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right)} \]

      10. *-commutative 89.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - t\right)} + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      11. fma-define 89.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right)}, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 89.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot t}}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      13. distribute-frac-neg 89.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, -\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      14. remove-double-neg 89.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]

      3. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      6. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{z}\right)}{t}} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}}{t} \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      9. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+52} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+113}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 85.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+92} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+113}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (/ x y) -2e+92) (not (<= (/ x y) 4e+113)))
   (/ x y)
   (+ -2.0 (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -2e+92) || !((x / y) <= 4e+113)) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x / y) <= (-2d+92)) .or. (.not. ((x / y) <= 4d+113))) then
        tmp = x / y
    else
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + ((2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -2e+92) || !((x / y) <= 4e+113)) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x / y) <= -2e+92) or not ((x / y) <= 4e+113):
		tmp = x / y
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x / y) <= -2e+92) || !(Float64(x / y) <= 4e+113))
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x / y) <= -2e+92) || ~(((x / y) <= 4e+113)))
		tmp = x / y;
	else
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+92], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 4e+113]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -2.0000000000000001e92 or 4e113 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 85.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -2.0000000000000001e92 < (/.f64 x y) < 4e113

   1. Initial program 89.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{y}}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y}} \]

      5. *-commutative 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      6. associate-*r* 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      7. distribute-rgt1-in 89.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      8. associate-/l* 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot \frac{2}{t \cdot z}} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      9. fma-neg 89.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right)} \]

      10. *-commutative 89.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - t\right)} + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      11. fma-define 89.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right)}, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 89.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot t}}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      13. distribute-frac-neg 89.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, -\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      14. remove-double-neg 89.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]

      3. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      6. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{z}\right)}{t}} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}}{t} \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      9. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+92} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+113}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 89.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (/ x y) -1e+52)
   (+ (/ x y) (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 t)))
   (if (<= (/ x y) 2e+99)
     (+ -2.0 (/ (+ 2.0 (/ 2.0 z)) t))
     (+ (/ x y) (/ (/ 2.0 t) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -1e+52) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / t));
	} else if ((x / y) <= 2e+99) {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x / y) <= (-1d+52)) then
        tmp = (x / y) + ((-2.0d0) + (2.0d0 / t))
    else if ((x / y) <= 2d+99) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + ((2.0d0 + (2.0d0 / z)) / t)
    else
        tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0d0 / t) / z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x / y) <= -1e+52) {
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / t));
	} else if ((x / y) <= 2e+99) {
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x / y) <= -1e+52:
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / t))
	elif (x / y) <= 2e+99:
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) / z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x / y) <= -1e+52)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / t)));
	elseif (Float64(x / y) <= 2e+99)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 / z)) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(Float64(2.0 / t) / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x / y) <= -1e+52)
		tmp = (x / y) + (-2.0 + (2.0 / t));
	elseif ((x / y) <= 2e+99)
		tmp = -2.0 + ((2.0 + (2.0 / z)) / t);
	else
		tmp = (x / y) + ((2.0 / t) / z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -1e+52], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 2e+99], N[(-2.0 + N[(N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -9.9999999999999999e51

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-in 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + 2 \cdot -1\right)} \]

      6. associate-*r/ 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} + 2 \cdot -1\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} + 2 \cdot -1\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2}{t} + -2\right)} \]

   if -9.9999999999999999e51 < (/.f64 x y) < 1.9999999999999999e99

   1. Initial program 90.1%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \frac{x}{y}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{-x}{y}}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y}} \]

      5. *-commutative 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - t\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot 2\right)}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      6. associate-*r* 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      7. distribute-rgt1-in 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot 2}}{t \cdot z} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      8. associate-/l* 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot \frac{2}{t \cdot z}} - \frac{-x}{y} \]

      9. fma-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(1 - t\right) \cdot z + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right)} \]

      10. *-commutative 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - t\right)} + 1, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      11. fma-define 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right)}, \frac{2}{t \cdot z}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      12. *-commutative 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot t}}, -\frac{-x}{y}\right) \]

      13. distribute-frac-neg 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, -\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{y}\right)}\right) \]

      14. remove-double-neg 90.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 1 - t, 1\right), \frac{2}{z \cdot t}, \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \frac{x}{y}\right) - 2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} + \left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} - 2\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]

      3. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2\right)\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} + 2 \cdot \frac{1 + \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      6. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{z}\right)}{t}} \]

      7. distribute-lft-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}}{t} \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t} \]

      9. associate-*r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      10. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 + \frac{x}{y}\right) + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t} \]

   if 1.9999999999999999e99 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 81.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t \cdot z}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+52}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \left(-2 + \frac{2}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y} + \frac{\frac{2}{t}}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 63.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+39} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+99}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (/ x y) -3.8e+39) (not (<= (/ x y) 1.1e+99)))
   (/ x y)
   (+ -2.0 (/ 2.0 t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -3.8e+39) || !((x / y) <= 1.1e+99)) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x / y) <= (-3.8d+39)) .or. (.not. ((x / y) <= 1.1d+99))) then
        tmp = x / y
    else
        tmp = (-2.0d0) + (2.0d0 / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x / y) <= -3.8e+39) || !((x / y) <= 1.1e+99)) {
		tmp = x / y;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x / y) <= -3.8e+39) or not ((x / y) <= 1.1e+99):
		tmp = x / y
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x / y) <= -3.8e+39) || !(Float64(x / y) <= 1.1e+99))
		tmp = Float64(x / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 + Float64(2.0 / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x / y) <= -3.8e+39) || ~(((x / y) <= 1.1e+99)))
		tmp = x / y;
	else
		tmp = -2.0 + (2.0 / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], -3.8e+39], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], 1.1e+99]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 + N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 x y) < -3.7999999999999998e39 or 1.09999999999999989e99 < (/.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]

   if -3.7999999999999998e39 < (/.f64 x y) < 1.09999999999999989e99

   1. Initial program 90.6%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 68.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1 - t}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-sub 68.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} - \frac{t}{t}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 68.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\frac{t}{t}\right)\right)} \]

      3. *-inverses 68.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \left(-\color{blue}{1}\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 68.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{t} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-in 68.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + 2 \cdot -1\right)} \]

      6. associate-*r/ 68.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} + 2 \cdot -1\right) \]

      7. metadata-eval 68.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} + 2 \cdot -1\right) \]

      8. metadata-eval 68.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \left(\frac{2}{t} + \color{blue}{-2}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 68.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x}{y} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{2}{t} + -2\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} - 2} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{t} + \left(-2\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{t}} + \left(-2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} + \left(-2\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 66.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2}{t} + \color{blue}{-2} \]

   8. Simplified 66.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t} + -2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{x}{y} \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+39} \lor \neg \left(\frac{x}{y} \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+99}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 + \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 37.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -300:\\ \;\;\;\;-2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 19000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -300.0) -2.0 (if (<= t 19000000000.0) (/ 2.0 t) -2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -300.0) {
		tmp = -2.0;
	} else if (t <= 19000000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-300.0d0)) then
        tmp = -2.0d0
    else if (t <= 19000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 / t
    else
        tmp = -2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -300.0) {
		tmp = -2.0;
	} else if (t <= 19000000000.0) {
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -300.0:
		tmp = -2.0
	elif t <= 19000000000.0:
		tmp = 2.0 / t
	else:
		tmp = -2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -300.0)
		tmp = -2.0;
	elseif (t <= 19000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 / t);
	else
		tmp = -2.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -300.0)
		tmp = -2.0;
	elseif (t <= 19000000000.0)
		tmp = 2.0 / t;
	else
		tmp = -2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -300.0], -2.0, If[LessEqual[t, 19000000000.0], N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision], -2.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -300 or 1.9e10 < t

   1. Initial program 78.8%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 86.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 40.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} \]

   if -300 < t < 1.9e10

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{z}}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 78.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{z}}}{t} \]

      2. metadata-eval 78.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{2 + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{z}}{t} \]

   5. Simplified 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 + \frac{2}{z}}{t}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 43.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 19.8% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 -2.0)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -2.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -2.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return -2.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := -2.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.1%

   \[\frac{x}{y} + \frac{2 + \left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(1 - t\right)}{t \cdot z} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 57.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y} - 2} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{2}{z} + 2}{t} - \left(2 - \frac{x}{y}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (/ (+ (/ 2.0 z) 2.0) t) (- 2.0 (/ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((2.0d0 / z) + 2.0d0) / t) - (2.0d0 - (x / y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - Float64(2.0 - Float64(x / y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((2.0 / z) + 2.0) / t) - (2.0 - (x / y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(2.0 - N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024097 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Data.HashTable.ST.Basic:computeOverhead from hashtables-1.2.0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- (/ (+ (/ 2.0 z) 2.0) t) (- 2.0 (/ x y)))

  (+ (/ x y) (/ (+ 2.0 (* (* z 2.0) (- 1.0 t))) (* t z))))