Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.7% → 99.9%

Time: 35.2s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.6×

• 30.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t\_0 \cdot t\_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (fma
     (cos (* phi2 0.5))
     (cos (* 0.5 phi1))
     (* (sin (* phi2 0.5)) (- (sin (* 0.5 phi1))))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos((phi2 * 0.5)), cos((0.5 * phi1)), (sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * -sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)), cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)), Float64(sin(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * Float64(-sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Sin[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 57.0%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-expm1-u 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 96.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 96.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-sum 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

8. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-expm1-u 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) + \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

11. Final simplification 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 93.3% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -0.032:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -0.032)
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* phi2 0.5))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -0.032) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -0.032) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -0.032:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -0.032)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -0.032)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -0.032], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -0.032000000000000001

   1. Initial program 46.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 91.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 91.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -0.032000000000000001 < phi1

   1. Initial program 60.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 98.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 95.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -0.032:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.0% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 57.0%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 96.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 90.4% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 57.0%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 90.2%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Final simplification 90.2%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 35.1% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 1.06e+144)
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))
   (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (* R lambda2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 1.06e+144) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = cos((0.5 * phi1)) * (R * lambda2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= 1.06d+144) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = cos((0.5d0 * phi1)) * (r * lambda2)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 1.06e+144) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * (R * lambda2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 1.06e+144:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * (R * lambda2)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 1.06e+144)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * Float64(R * lambda2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 1.06e+144)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = cos((0.5 * phi1)) * (R * lambda2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 1.06e+144], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 1.06e144

   1. Initial program 58.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 28.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 28.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 28.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 28.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 31.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 31.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 31.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 31.5%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 1.06e144 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 46.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 99.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 57.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot R} \]

      2. *-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \cdot R \]

      3. *-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R \]

      4. *-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R \]

      5. +-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R \]

   7. Simplified 57.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot R} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\right)} \cdot R \]

      2. +-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}\right)\right) \cdot R \]

      3. pow1 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot R\right)}^{1}} \]

      4. associate-*l* 57.2%

         \[\leadsto {\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot R\right)\right)}}^{1} \]

      5. *-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}\right)}^{1} \]

      6. *-commutative 57.2%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right)}^{1} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 57.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}^{1}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. unpow1 57.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \]

       2. associate-*r* 57.2%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

       3. +-commutative 57.2%

          \[\leadsto \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(\color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)} \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   11. Simplified 57.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   12. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 54.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 54.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

       2. *-commutative 54.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \]

   14. Simplified 54.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 34.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 1.06 \cdot 10^{+144}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 31.2% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.18 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -1.18e+39)
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))
   (* phi2 (- R (* R (/ phi1 phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.18e+39) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-1.18d+39)) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = phi2 * (r - (r * (phi1 / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.18e+39) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1.18e+39:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1.18e+39)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(R * Float64(phi1 / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1.18e+39)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (R * (phi1 / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -1.18e+39], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(R * N[(phi1 / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -1.17999999999999996e39

   1. Initial program 47.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 56.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 56.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 56.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 56.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 70.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 70.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 70.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 70.1%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if -1.17999999999999996e39 < phi1

   1. Initial program 59.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cbrt-cube 60.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(\left(R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot \left(R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)}} \]

      2. pow3 60.2%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{{\left(R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)}^{3}}} \]

      3. *-commutative 60.2%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{\left(R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)}^{3}} \]

      4. div-inv 60.2%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{\left(R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)} \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)}^{3}} \]

      5. metadata-eval 60.2%

         \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{{\left(R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)}^{3}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{{\left(R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\right)}^{3}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 19.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 19.7%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 19.7%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 20.1%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 20.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 29.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.18 \cdot 10^{+39}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - R \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 32.0% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \phi_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -1.2e+62)
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))
   (* phi2 (- R (* phi1 (/ R phi2))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.2e+62) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (phi1 * (R / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-1.2d+62)) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = phi2 * (r - (phi1 * (r / phi2)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -1.2e+62) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (phi1 * (R / phi2)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -1.2e+62:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (phi1 * (R / phi2)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -1.2e+62)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(phi2 * Float64(R - Float64(phi1 * Float64(R / phi2))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -1.2e+62)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = phi2 * (R - (phi1 * (R / phi2)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -1.2e+62], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(phi2 * N[(R - N[(phi1 * N[(R / phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -1.2e62

   1. Initial program 42.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 92.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 58.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 58.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 58.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 58.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 72.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 72.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 72.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 72.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if -1.2e62 < phi1

   1. Initial program 60.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 97.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 20.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 20.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \frac{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R}}{\phi_2}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 21.2%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 21.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \phi_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 30.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_2 \cdot \left(R - \phi_1 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_2}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 32.0% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 8e-35) (* phi1 (- (* phi2 (/ R phi1)) R)) (* R (- phi2 phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 8e-35) {
		tmp = phi1 * ((phi2 * (R / phi1)) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 8d-35) then
        tmp = phi1 * ((phi2 * (r / phi1)) - r)
    else
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 8e-35) {
		tmp = phi1 * ((phi2 * (R / phi1)) - R);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 8e-35:
		tmp = phi1 * ((phi2 * (R / phi1)) - R)
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 8e-35)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(Float64(phi2 * Float64(R / phi1)) - R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 8e-35)
		tmp = phi1 * ((phi2 * (R / phi1)) - R);
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 8e-35], N[(phi1 * N[(N[(phi2 * N[(R / phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - R), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 8.00000000000000006e-35

   1. Initial program 56.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 15.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 15.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\phi_1 \cdot \left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 15.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(R + -1 \cdot \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 15.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(R + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 15.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(R - \frac{R \cdot \phi_2}{\phi_1}\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 15.8%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(R - \frac{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R}}{\phi_1}\right)\right) \]

      6. associate-/l* 19.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(R - \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_1}}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 19.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-\left(R - \phi_2 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_1}\right)\right)} \]

   if 8.00000000000000006e-35 < phi2

   1. Initial program 58.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 95.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 64.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 64.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 64.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 64.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 64.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 64.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 64.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 64.5%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 31.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 8 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \frac{R}{\phi_1} - R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 29.3% accurate, 36.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 1.7e-48) (* phi1 (- R)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 1.7e-48) {
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 1.7d-48) then
        tmp = phi1 * -r
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 1.7e-48) {
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 1.7e-48:
		tmp = phi1 * -R
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 1.7e-48)
		tmp = Float64(phi1 * Float64(-R));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 1.7e-48)
		tmp = phi1 * -R;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 1.7e-48], N[(phi1 * (-R)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 1.70000000000000014e-48

   1. Initial program 55.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 96.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 17.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 17.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 17.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 17.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 17.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if 1.70000000000000014e-48 < phi2

   1. Initial program 60.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-define 95.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 59.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   7. Simplified 59.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 28.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-48}:\\ \;\;\;\;\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 30.7% accurate, 65.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R (- phi2 phi1)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * (phi2 - phi1)
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * (phi2 - phi1)

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 57.0%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 26.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 26.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 26.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)}\right) \]

7. Simplified 26.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\phi_1}{\phi_2}\right)\right)} \]

8. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 29.2%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 29.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 29.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

10. Simplified 29.2%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

11. Final simplification 29.2%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right) \]
12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 18.2% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 57.0%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-define 96.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 18.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 18.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

7. Simplified 18.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

8. Final simplification 18.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024096 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))