SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.4% → 97.3%

Time: 10.3s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 3.5e+153)
   (fma y_m (* z (- (tanh (/ t y_m)) (tanh (/ x y_m)))) x)
   (fma z (- t x) x)))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.5e+153) {
		tmp = fma(y_m, (z * (tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m)))), x);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, (t - x), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 3.5e+153)
		tmp = fma(y_m, Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) - tanh(Float64(x / y_m)))), x);
	else
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(t - x), x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 3.5e+153], N[(y$95$m * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.4999999999999999e153

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.4999999999999999e153 < y

   1. Initial program 62.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+152}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 8.2e+152)
   (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y_m)) (tanh (/ x y_m))) (* y_m z)))
   (fma z (- t x) x)))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 8.2e+152) {
		tmp = x + ((tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, (t - x), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 8.2e+152)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) - tanh(Float64(x / y_m))) * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(t - x), x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 8.2e+152], N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 8.1999999999999996e152

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 8.1999999999999996e152 < y

   1. Initial program 62.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+152}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 10^{+128}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\_m \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1e+128) (+ x (* y_m (* z (tanh (/ t y_m))))) (fma z (- t x) x)))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1e+128) {
		tmp = x + (y_m * (z * tanh((t / y_m))));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, (t - x), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1e+128)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y_m * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y_m)))));
	else
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(t - x), x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1e+128], N[(x + N[(y$95$m * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.0000000000000001e128

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 27.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right)\right) \]

      3. div-sub 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.0000000000000001e128 < y

   1. Initial program 63.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 5.2e+15) x (fma z (- t x) x)))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 5.2e+15) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, (t - x), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 5.2e+15)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(t - x), x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 5.2e+15], x, N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.2e15

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 5.2e15 < y

   1. Initial program 74.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 89.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 63.2% accurate, 10.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+29} \lor \neg \left(y\_m \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{+69}\right) \land y\_m \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+116}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y_m 3.2e+29) (and (not (<= y_m 2.25e+69)) (<= y_m 2.5e+116)))
   x
   (* z (- t x))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y_m <= 3.2e+29) || (!(y_m <= 2.25e+69) && (y_m <= 2.5e+116))) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y_m <= 3.2d+29) .or. (.not. (y_m <= 2.25d+69)) .and. (y_m <= 2.5d+116)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = z * (t - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y_m <= 3.2e+29) || (!(y_m <= 2.25e+69) && (y_m <= 2.5e+116))) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (y_m <= 3.2e+29) or (not (y_m <= 2.25e+69) and (y_m <= 2.5e+116)):
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = z * (t - x)
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y_m <= 3.2e+29) || (!(y_m <= 2.25e+69) && (y_m <= 2.5e+116)))
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y_m <= 3.2e+29) || (~((y_m <= 2.25e+69)) && (y_m <= 2.5e+116)))
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y$95$m, 3.2e+29], And[N[Not[LessEqual[y$95$m, 2.25e+69]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[y$95$m, 2.5e+116]]], x, N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.19999999999999987e29 or 2.25e69 < y < 2.50000000000000013e116

   1. Initial program 97.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 3.19999999999999987e29 < y < 2.25e69 or 2.50000000000000013e116 < y

   1. Initial program 73.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(t + \frac{x}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+29} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{+69}\right) \land y \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+116}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 70.2% accurate, 10.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.52 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y\_m \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+263}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y\_m \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+281}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1.52e+16)
   x
   (if (<= y_m 1.7e+263)
     (+ x (* z t))
     (if (<= y_m 8.2e+281) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* z (- t x))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.52e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 1.7e+263) {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	} else if (y_m <= 8.2e+281) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 1.52d+16) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y_m <= 1.7d+263) then
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    else if (y_m <= 8.2d+281) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = z * (t - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.52e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 1.7e+263) {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	} else if (y_m <= 8.2e+281) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1.52e+16:
		tmp = x
	elif y_m <= 1.7e+263:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	elif y_m <= 8.2e+281:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * (t - x)
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.52e+16)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 1.7e+263)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (y_m <= 8.2e+281)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1.52e+16)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 1.7e+263)
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	elseif (y_m <= 8.2e+281)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.52e+16], x, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.7e+263], N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 8.2e+281], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if y < 1.52e16

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.52e16 < y < 1.7000000000000001e263

   1. Initial program 76.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 31.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 31.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 31.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right)\right) \]

      3. div-sub 31.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 31.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 67.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 67.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 72.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \]

   8. Simplified 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x} \]

   if 1.7000000000000001e263 < y < 8.19999999999999962e281

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if 8.19999999999999962e281 < y

   1. Initial program 51.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(t + \frac{x}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.52 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+263}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 8.2 \cdot 10^{+281}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 66.2% accurate, 14.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 2100000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y\_m \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+282}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 2100000000.0) x (if (<= y_m 1.05e+282) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* z t))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2100000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 1.05e+282) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 2100000000.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y_m <= 1.05d+282) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 2100000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y_m <= 1.05e+282) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 2100000000.0:
		tmp = x
	elif y_m <= 1.05e+282:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 2100000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 1.05e+282)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 2100000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y_m <= 1.05e+282)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 2100000000.0], x, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.05e+282], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 2.1e9

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.1e9 < y < 1.04999999999999994e282

   1. Initial program 77.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 88.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if 1.04999999999999994e282 < y

   1. Initial program 51.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(t + \frac{x}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 67.0%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 60.7% accurate, 16.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{-209}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.68 \cdot 10^{-190}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -8.4e-209) x (if (<= x 1.68e-190) (* z t) x)))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.4e-209) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.68e-190) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-8.4d-209)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.68d-190) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.4e-209) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.68e-190) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -8.4e-209:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.68e-190:
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -8.4e-209)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.68e-190)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -8.4e-209)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.68e-190)
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -8.4e-209], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.68e-190], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -8.39999999999999983e-209 or 1.67999999999999988e-190 < x

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -8.39999999999999983e-209 < x < 1.67999999999999988e-190

   1. Initial program 82.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 67.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(t + \frac{x}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 52.0%

      \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 78.1% accurate, 17.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+17}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 4.4e+17) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.4e+17) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 4.4d+17) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 4.4e+17) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 4.4e+17:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 4.4e+17)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 4.4e+17)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 4.4e+17], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.4e17

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 4.4e17 < y

   1. Initial program 74.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 60.7% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	return x

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.0%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 59.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024096 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))