System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 61.0% → 98.5%

Time: 20.4s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 211.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = -5.554609798535233e-182
  2. y = 6.453366344358226e+232
  3. z = 1.8294800714365586e+132
  4. t = -3.3567248190181402e-167

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 61.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (log1p (* y (expm1 z))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log1p((y * expm1(z))) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log1p((y * Math.expm1(z))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log1p((y * math.expm1(z))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * expm1(z))) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 64.9%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 80.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 80.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 84.8%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 99.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 92.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{t \cdot \frac{\frac{x}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)}{y}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(y \cdot 0.5 + z \cdot \left(0.041666666666666664 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (* x (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 (* t (/ (- (/ x (- 1.0 (exp z))) (* 0.5 (* x y))) y)))))
   (-
    x
    (/
     (log1p
      (*
       z
       (+
        y
        (*
         z
         (+
          (* y 0.5)
          (*
           z
           (+ (* 0.041666666666666664 (* y z)) (* y 0.16666666666666666))))))))
     t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (1.0 / (t * (((x / (1.0 - exp(z))) - (0.5 * (x * y))) / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((z * (y + (z * ((y * 0.5) + (z * ((0.041666666666666664 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.16666666666666666)))))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (1.0 / (t * (((x / (1.0 - Math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (x * y))) / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((z * (y + (z * ((y * 0.5) + (z * ((0.041666666666666664 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.16666666666666666)))))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.0:
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (1.0 / (t * (((x / (1.0 - math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (x * y))) / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((z * (y + (z * ((y * 0.5) + (z * ((0.041666666666666664 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.16666666666666666)))))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / Float64(t * Float64(Float64(Float64(x / Float64(1.0 - exp(z))) - Float64(0.5 * Float64(x * y))) / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * 0.5) + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(0.041666666666666664 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.16666666666666666)))))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / N[(t * N[(N[(N[(x / N[(1.0 - N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.5 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(z * N[(y + N[(z * N[(N[(y * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(N[(0.041666666666666664 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 84.8%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)} \]

      3. log1p-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}}{t \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. expm1-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 92.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t \cdot x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}}\right) \]

      2. inv-pow 92.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t \cdot x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}}\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - {\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \frac{x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}}^{-1}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 96.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{{\left(t \cdot \frac{x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}}\right) \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. unpow-1 96.3%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t \cdot \frac{x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}}\right) \]

   11. Simplified 96.3%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t \cdot \frac{x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}}\right) \]

   12. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.0%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{t \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right) + \frac{x}{e^{z} - 1}}{y}}}\right) \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 55.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 77.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.041666666666666664 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot y\right)\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{t \cdot \frac{\frac{x}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)}{y}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(y \cdot 0.5 + z \cdot \left(0.041666666666666664 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 92.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{t \cdot \frac{\frac{x}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)}{y}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(y \cdot 0.5 + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (* x (+ 1.0 (/ 1.0 (* t (/ (- (/ x (- 1.0 (exp z))) (* 0.5 (* x y))) y)))))
   (-
    x
    (/
     (log1p (* z (+ y (* z (+ (* y 0.5) (* (* y z) 0.16666666666666666))))))
     t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (1.0 / (t * (((x / (1.0 - exp(z))) - (0.5 * (x * y))) / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((z * (y + (z * ((y * 0.5) + ((y * z) * 0.16666666666666666)))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (1.0 / (t * (((x / (1.0 - Math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (x * y))) / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((z * (y + (z * ((y * 0.5) + ((y * z) * 0.16666666666666666)))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.0:
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (1.0 / (t * (((x / (1.0 - math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (x * y))) / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((z * (y + (z * ((y * 0.5) + ((y * z) * 0.16666666666666666)))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64(1.0 / Float64(t * Float64(Float64(Float64(x / Float64(1.0 - exp(z))) - Float64(0.5 * Float64(x * y))) / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * 0.5) + Float64(Float64(y * z) * 0.16666666666666666)))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(1.0 / N[(t * N[(N[(N[(x / N[(1.0 - N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.5 * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(z * N[(y + N[(z * N[(N[(y * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 84.8%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 82.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\log \left(1 + y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)} \]

      3. log1p-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)\right)}}{t \cdot x}\right) \]

      4. expm1-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t \cdot x}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t \cdot x}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 92.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t \cdot x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}}\right) \]

      2. inv-pow 92.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t \cdot x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}}\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - {\color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \frac{x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}}^{-1}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 96.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{{\left(t \cdot \frac{x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}}\right) \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. unpow-1 96.3%

          \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t \cdot \frac{x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}}\right) \]

   11. Simplified 96.3%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{t \cdot \frac{x}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}}\right) \]

   12. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.0%

       \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - \frac{1}{t \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right) + \frac{x}{e^{z} - 1}}{y}}}\right) \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 55.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 77.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{t \cdot \frac{\frac{x}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)}{y}}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(y \cdot 0.5 + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 91.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(y \cdot 0.5 + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (- x (/ (* y (expm1 z)) t))
   (-
    x
    (/
     (log1p (* z (+ y (* z (+ (* y 0.5) (* (* y z) 0.16666666666666666))))))
     t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((z * (y + (z * ((y * 0.5) + ((y * z) * 0.16666666666666666)))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * Math.expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((z * (y + (z * ((y * 0.5) + ((y * z) * 0.16666666666666666)))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.0:
		tmp = x - ((y * math.expm1(z)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((z * (y + (z * ((y * 0.5) + ((y * z) * 0.16666666666666666)))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * expm1(z)) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * 0.5) + Float64(Float64(y * z) * 0.16666666666666666)))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(z * N[(y + N[(z * N[(N[(y * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.16666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 84.8%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

      2. expm1-define 79.9%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 79.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 80.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 80.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 55.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 77.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(y \cdot 0.5 + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.16666666666666666\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 91.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0)
   (- x (/ (* y (expm1 z)) t))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* z (+ y (* 0.5 (* y z))))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * Math.expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.0:
		tmp = x - ((y * math.expm1(z)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * expm1(z)) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * z))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(z * N[(y + N[(0.5 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 84.8%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

      2. expm1-define 79.9%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 79.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 80.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 80.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 55.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 77.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 90.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp z) 0.0) (- x (/ (* y (expm1 z)) t)) (- x (/ (log1p (* y z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(z) <= 0.0) {
		tmp = x - ((y * Math.expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(z) <= 0.0:
		tmp = x - ((y * math.expm1(z)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((y * z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(z) <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * expm1(z)) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision], 0.0], N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 z) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 84.8%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 84.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

      2. expm1-define 79.9%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 79.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 80.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 80.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   if 0.0 < (exp.f64 z)

   1. Initial program 55.7%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 77.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 77.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{z} \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 90.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7200000.0)
   (- x (* y (/ (expm1 z) t)))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* y z)) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7200000.0) {
		tmp = x - (y * (expm1(z) / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7200000.0) {
		tmp = x - (y * (Math.expm1(z) / t));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((y * z)) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7200000.0:
		tmp = x - (y * (math.expm1(z) / t))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((y * z)) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7200000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(expm1(z) / t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * z)) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7200000.0], N[(x - N[(y * N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.2e6

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 84.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 84.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 79.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

      2. expm1-define 79.4%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

   if -7.2e6 < z

   1. Initial program 56.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 78.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 85.0% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (* y (/ (expm1 z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (expm1(z) / t));
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (Math.expm1(z) / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (y * (math.expm1(z) / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(expm1(z) / t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(y * N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 64.9%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 80.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 80.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 84.8%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 99.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 77.6%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 77.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

   2. expm1-define 87.6%

      \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

7. Simplified 87.6%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

8. Final simplification 87.6%

   \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 81.0% accurate, 17.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -11200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -11200000.0) x (- x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -11200000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-11200000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -11200000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -11200000.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -11200000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -11200000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -11200000.0], x, N[(x - N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.12e7

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 84.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 84.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.12e7 < z

   1. Initial program 56.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 78.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 78.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 91.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -11200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 70.4% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 64.9%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 80.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 80.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 84.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 84.8%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 99.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 73.7%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 74.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{-0.5}{y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -2.8874623088207947 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \frac{t\_1}{z \cdot z}\right) - t\_1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{z \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(1 + z \cdot y\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (- 0.5) (* y t))))
   (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119)
     (- (- x (/ t_1 (* z z))) (* t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z))))
     (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = -0.5d0 / (y * t)
    if (z < (-2.8874623088207947d+119)) then
        tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0d0 / z) / (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x - (log((1.0d0 + (z * y))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -2.8874623088207947e+119:
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-0.5) / Float64(y * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(t_1 / Float64(z * z))) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * y))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[((-0.5) / N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -2.8874623088207947e+119], N[(N[(x - N[(t$95$1 / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024096 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119) (- (- x (/ (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (* z z))) (* (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z)))) (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))

  (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))