Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 5.9s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (y + z)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma z 5.0 (* x (+ z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(z, 5.0, (x * (z + y)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(z, 5.0, Float64(x * Float64(z + y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * 5.0 + N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot 5 + x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 5, x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + y, z \cdot 5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x (+ z y) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, (z + y), (z * 5.0));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, Float64(z + y), Float64(z * 5.0))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + z, z \cdot 5\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y + z, z \cdot 5\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, z + y, z \cdot 5\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 61.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+96}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+97}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -6e+96)
   (* z x)
   (if (<= x -2e-8)
     (* x y)
     (if (<= x 9.5e-16) (* z 5.0) (if (<= x 4.4e+97) (* x y) (* z x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -6e+96) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -2e-8) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 9.5e-16) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else if (x <= 4.4e+97) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-6d+96)) then
        tmp = z * x
    else if (x <= (-2d-8)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= 9.5d-16) then
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    else if (x <= 4.4d+97) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -6e+96) {
		tmp = z * x;
	} else if (x <= -2e-8) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= 9.5e-16) {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	} else if (x <= 4.4e+97) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -6e+96:
		tmp = z * x
	elif x <= -2e-8:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= 9.5e-16:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	elif x <= 4.4e+97:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -6e+96)
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	elseif (x <= -2e-8)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= 9.5e-16)
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	elseif (x <= 4.4e+97)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -6e+96)
		tmp = z * x;
	elseif (x <= -2e-8)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= 9.5e-16)
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	elseif (x <= 4.4e+97)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -6e+96], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -2e-8], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 9.5e-16], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 4.4e+97], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -6.0000000000000001e96 or 4.4000000000000002e97 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]

   if -6.0000000000000001e96 < x < -2e-8 or 9.5000000000000005e-16 < x < 4.4000000000000002e97

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -2e-8 < x < 9.5000000000000005e-16

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+96}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+97}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+153} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7800000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5e+153) (not (<= x 7800000.0)))
   (* x (+ z y))
   (+ (* x y) (* z (+ 5.0 x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5e+153) || !(x <= 7800000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * (5.0 + x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5d+153)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7800000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * (5.0d0 + x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5e+153) || !(x <= 7800000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * (5.0 + x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5e+153) or not (x <= 7800000.0):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * (5.0 + x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5e+153) || !(x <= 7800000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * Float64(5.0 + x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5e+153) || ~((x <= 7800000.0)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * (5.0 + x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5e+153], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7800000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(5.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.00000000000000018e153 or 7.8e6 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -5.00000000000000018e153 < x < 7.8e6

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+153} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7800000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.0) (not (<= x 5.0))) (* x (+ z y)) (+ (* x y) (* z 5.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.0) || !(x <= 5.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (z * 5.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.0) || !(x <= 5.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.0) or not (x <= 5.0):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * 5.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.0) || !(x <= 5.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * 5.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.0) || ~((x <= 5.0)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (z * 5.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5 or 5 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -5 < x < 5

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 78.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \left(5 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 78.4%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \left(5 \cdot \frac{z}{y} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{z}{y}}\right)\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-out 79.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{y} \cdot \left(5 + x\right)}\right) \]

      3. associate-*l/ 79.4%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)}{y}}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 79.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{5 + x}{y}}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z \cdot \frac{5 + x}{y}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{5 \cdot \frac{z}{y}}\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 78.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{5 \cdot z}{y}}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 78.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot 5}}{y}\right) \]

      3. associate-*r/ 78.4%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{5}{y}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 78.4%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{5}{y}}\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 84.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 340000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.4e-5) (not (<= x 340000.0))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z (+ 5.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.4e-5) || !(x <= 340000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.4d-5)) .or. (.not. (x <= 340000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * (5.0d0 + x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.4e-5) || !(x <= 340000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.4e-5) or not (x <= 340000.0):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.4e-5) || !(x <= 340000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(5.0 + x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.4e-5) || ~((x <= 340000.0)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * (5.0 + x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.4e-5], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 340000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(5.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.3999999999999999e-5 or 3.4e5 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -4.3999999999999999e-5 < x < 3.4e5

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z + x \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt-in 70.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 340000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(5 + x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 84.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.5e-8) (not (<= x 3.2e-16))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-8) || !(x <= 3.2e-16)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.5d-8)) .or. (.not. (x <= 3.2d-16))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-8) || !(x <= 3.2e-16)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.5e-8) or not (x <= 3.2e-16):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.5e-8) || !(x <= 3.2e-16))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.5e-8) || ~((x <= 3.2e-16)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.5e-8], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3.2e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.50000000000000024e-8 or 3.20000000000000023e-16 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -3.50000000000000024e-8 < x < 3.20000000000000023e-16

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-8} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 56.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.35e+23) (not (<= y 2.3e+30))) (* x y) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.35e+23) || !(y <= 2.3e+30)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.35d+23)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.3d+30))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z * 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.35e+23) || !(y <= 2.3e+30)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.35e+23) or not (y <= 2.3e+30):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z * 5.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.35e+23) || !(y <= 2.3e+30))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * 5.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.35e+23) || ~((y <= 2.3e+30)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z * 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.35e+23], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.3e+30]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.3499999999999999e23 or 2.3e30 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -1.3499999999999999e23 < y < 2.3e30

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 51.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 59.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{+23} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{+30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot 5\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (+ z y)) (* z 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(z + y)) + Float64(z * 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (z + y)) + (z * 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(z + y\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 36.5% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \cdot 5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* z 5.0))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * 5.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z * 5.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z * 5.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z * 5.0

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z * 5.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z * 5.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + z \cdot 5 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 35.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot z} \]

4. Final simplification 35.7%

   \[\leadsto z \cdot 5 \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + 5\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ x 5.0) z) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x + 5.0d0) * z) + (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 5.0) * z) + Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x + 5.0) * z) + (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x + 5.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024096 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendOutside from plot-0.2.3.4, C"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (+ (* (+ x 5.0) z) (* x y))

  (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* z 5.0)))