Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 67.9% → 99.4%
Time: 9.9s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 67.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+298}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      2e+298)
   (fma
    y
    (/
     (fma z (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) 0.279195317918525)
     (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304))
    x)
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+298) {
		tmp = fma(y, (fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+298)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+298], N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+298}:\\
\;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 1.9999999999999999e298

    1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative96.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]
      2. associate-/l*99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]
      3. fma-define99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]
      4. remove-double-neg99.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]
      5. remove-double-neg99.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]
      6. *-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      7. fma-define99.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      8. fma-define99.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      9. *-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      10. fma-define99.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    if 1.9999999999999999e298 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

    1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
    5. Simplified99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+298}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+298}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      2e+298)
   (+
    x
    (/
     y
     (/
      (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304)
      (fma
       z
       (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968)
       0.279195317918525))))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+298) {
		tmp = x + (y / (fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304) / fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+298)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304) / fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+298], N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+298}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 1.9999999999999999e298

    1. Initial program 96.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-/l*99.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]
      2. *-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
      3. fma-undefine99.8%

        \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
      4. fma-define99.8%

        \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
      5. *-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304} \]
      6. fma-undefine99.8%

        \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
      7. clear-num99.4%

        \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]
      8. un-div-inv99.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]
    4. Applied egg-rr99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

    if 1.9999999999999999e298 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

    1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
    5. Simplified99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+298}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.4% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304\\ t_1 := \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+298}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)}{t\_0}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
        (t_1
         (/
          (*
           y
           (+
            (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
            0.279195317918525))
          t_0)))
   (if (or (<= t_1 (- INFINITY)) (not (<= t_1 2e+298)))
     (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
     (+
      x
      (/
       (+
        (* y 0.279195317918525)
        (* z (+ (* 0.0692910599291889 (* y z)) (* y 0.4917317610505968))))
       t_0)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) || !(t_1 <= 2e+298)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) || !(t_1 <= 2e+298)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304
	t_1 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -math.inf) or not (t_1 <= 2e+298):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= Float64(-Inf)) || !(t_1 <= 2e+298))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 0.279195317918525) + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(0.0692910599291889 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	t_1 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -Inf) || ~((t_1 <= 2e+298)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 2e+298]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y * 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(N[(0.0692910599291889 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304\\
t_1 := \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{t\_0}\\
\mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(t\_1 \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+298}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)}{t\_0}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < -inf.0 or 1.9999999999999999e298 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

    1. Initial program 1.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
    5. Simplified99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

    if -inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 1.9999999999999999e298

    1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{0.279195317918525 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq -\infty \lor \neg \left(\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+298}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -27500000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 650000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -27500000.0)
   (+ x (- (* y 0.0692910599291889) (/ (* y -0.07512208616047561) z)))
   (if (<= z 650000000000.0)
     (+
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      x)
     (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -27500000.0) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else if (z <= 650000000000.0) {
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-27500000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889d0) - ((y * (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z))
    else if (z <= 650000000000.0d0) then
        tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0)) + x
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -27500000.0) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else if (z <= 650000000000.0) {
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -27500000.0:
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z))
	elif z <= 650000000000.0:
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -27500000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889) - Float64(Float64(y * -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	elseif (z <= 650000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -27500000.0)
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	elseif (z <= 650000000000.0)
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -27500000.0], N[(x + N[(N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 650000000000.0], N[(N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -27500000:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 650000000000:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -2.75e7

    1. Initial program 37.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 44.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{0.279195317918525 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right) \]
      3. mul-1-neg99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)}\right) \]
      4. unsub-neg99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]
      5. *-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right) \]
      6. distribute-rgt-out--99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 - -0.4166096748901212\right)}}{z}\right) \]
      7. metadata-eval99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]
    6. Simplified99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

    if -2.75e7 < z < 6.5e11

    1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing

    if 6.5e11 < z

    1. Initial program 35.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
    5. Simplified99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -27500000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 650000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right) - \frac{y}{z} \cdot 0.4166096748901212\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.5)
   (+ x (- (* y 0.0692910599291889) (/ (* y -0.07512208616047561) z)))
   (if (<= z 1.85e-7)
     (+ x (+ (* z (* y -0.00277777777751721)) (* y 0.08333333333333323)))
     (-
      (+ x (+ (* y 0.0692910599291889) (* 0.4917317610505968 (/ y z))))
      (* (/ y z) 0.4166096748901212)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.5) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else if (z <= 1.85e-7) {
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) + (0.4917317610505968 * (y / z)))) - ((y / z) * 0.4166096748901212);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.5d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889d0) - ((y * (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z))
    else if (z <= 1.85d-7) then
        tmp = x + ((z * (y * (-0.00277777777751721d0))) + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0))
    else
        tmp = (x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889d0) + (0.4917317610505968d0 * (y / z)))) - ((y / z) * 0.4166096748901212d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.5) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else if (z <= 1.85e-7) {
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) + (0.4917317610505968 * (y / z)))) - ((y / z) * 0.4166096748901212);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.5:
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z))
	elif z <= 1.85e-7:
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323))
	else:
		tmp = (x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) + (0.4917317610505968 * (y / z)))) - ((y / z) * 0.4166096748901212)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.5)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889) - Float64(Float64(y * -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	elseif (z <= 1.85e-7)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y * -0.00277777777751721)) + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889) + Float64(0.4917317610505968 * Float64(y / z)))) - Float64(Float64(y / z) * 0.4166096748901212));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.5)
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	elseif (z <= 1.85e-7)
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	else
		tmp = (x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) + (0.4917317610505968 * (y / z)))) - ((y / z) * 0.4166096748901212);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.5], N[(x + N[(N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.85e-7], N[(x + N[(N[(z * N[(y * -0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + N[(N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.4917317610505968 * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.4166096748901212), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\left(x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right) - \frac{y}{z} \cdot 0.4166096748901212\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if z < -5.5

    1. Initial program 38.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 45.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{0.279195317918525 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right) \]
      3. mul-1-neg99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)}\right) \]
      4. unsub-neg99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]
      5. *-commutative99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right) \]
      6. distribute-rgt-out--99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 - -0.4166096748901212\right)}}{z}\right) \]
      7. metadata-eval99.5%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]
    6. Simplified99.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

    if -5.5 < z < 1.85000000000000002e-7

    1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.14677053705526136 \cdot y - 0.14954831483277858 \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)}\right) \]
    6. Simplified99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)}\right) \]

    if 1.85000000000000002e-7 < z

    1. Initial program 42.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative42.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]
      2. associate-/l*55.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]
      3. fma-define55.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]
      4. remove-double-neg55.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]
      5. remove-double-neg55.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]
      6. *-commutative55.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      7. fma-define55.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      8. fma-define55.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      9. *-commutative55.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      10. fma-define55.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]
    3. Simplified55.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right) - 0.4166096748901212 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right) - \frac{y}{z} \cdot 0.4166096748901212\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.5) (not (<= z 1.85e-7)))
   (+ x (- (* y 0.0692910599291889) (/ (* y -0.07512208616047561) z)))
   (+ x (+ (* z (* y -0.00277777777751721)) (* y 0.08333333333333323)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5) || !(z <= 1.85e-7)) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.5d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.85d-7))) then
        tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889d0) - ((y * (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z))
    else
        tmp = x + ((z * (y * (-0.00277777777751721d0))) + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5) || !(z <= 1.85e-7)) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.5) or not (z <= 1.85e-7):
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.5) || !(z <= 1.85e-7))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889) - Float64(Float64(y * -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y * -0.00277777777751721)) + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.5) || ~((z <= 1.85e-7)))
		tmp = x + ((y * 0.0692910599291889) - ((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z));
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.5], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.85e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(z * N[(y * -0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -5.5 or 1.85000000000000002e-7 < z

    1. Initial program 40.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 49.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{0.279195317918525 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]
      2. *-commutative99.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right) \]
      3. mul-1-neg99.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)}\right) \]
      4. unsub-neg99.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]
      5. *-commutative99.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right) \]
      6. distribute-rgt-out--99.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 - -0.4166096748901212\right)}}{z}\right) \]
      7. metadata-eval99.4%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]
    6. Simplified99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

    if -5.5 < z < 1.85000000000000002e-7

    1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.14677053705526136 \cdot y - 0.14954831483277858 \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)}\right) \]
    6. Simplified99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)}\right) \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.5) (not (<= z 1.85e-7)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (+ (* z (* y -0.00277777777751721)) (* y 0.08333333333333323)))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5) || !(z <= 1.85e-7)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.5d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.85d-7))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + ((z * (y * (-0.00277777777751721d0))) + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.5) || !(z <= 1.85e-7)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.5) or not (z <= 1.85e-7):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323))
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.5) || !(z <= 1.85e-7))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * Float64(y * -0.00277777777751721)) + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.5) || ~((z <= 1.85e-7)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * (y * -0.00277777777751721)) + (y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.5], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.85e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(z * N[(y * -0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -5.5 or 1.85000000000000002e-7 < z

    1. Initial program 40.2%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative98.8%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
    5. Simplified98.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

    if -5.5 < z < 1.85000000000000002e-7

    1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.14677053705526136 \cdot y - 0.14954831483277858 \cdot y\right)\right)} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.00277777777751721 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)}\right) \]
    6. Simplified99.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)}\right) \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.5 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right) + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\right)\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 98.8% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5000.0) (not (<= z 1.85e-7)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5000.0) || !(z <= 1.85e-7)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.85d-7))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5000.0) || !(z <= 1.85e-7)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5000.0) or not (z <= 1.85e-7):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5000.0) || !(z <= 1.85e-7))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5000.0) || ~((z <= 1.85e-7)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.85e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if z < -5e3 or 1.85000000000000002e-7 < z

    1. Initial program 39.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative98.7%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
    5. Simplified98.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

    if -5e3 < z < 1.85000000000000002e-7

    1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative99.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]
    5. Simplified99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 61.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+73} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+79}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.1e+73) (not (<= y 6.5e+79))) (* y 0.08333333333333323) x))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.1e+73) || !(y <= 6.5e+79)) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.1d+73)) .or. (.not. (y <= 6.5d+79))) then
        tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.1e+73) || !(y <= 6.5e+79)) {
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.1e+73) or not (y <= 6.5e+79):
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.1e+73) || !(y <= 6.5e+79))
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.1e+73) || ~((y <= 6.5e+79)))
		tmp = y * 0.08333333333333323;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.1e+73], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 6.5e+79]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision], x]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+73} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+79}\right):\\
\;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;x\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if y < -1.1e73 or 6.49999999999999954e79 < y

    1. Initial program 52.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Add Preprocessing
    3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 60.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative60.2%

        \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]
    5. Simplified60.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative60.2%

        \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} + 0.08333333333333323\right)} \]
    8. Simplified60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + 0.08333333333333323\right)} \]
    9. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
    10. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative45.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]
    11. Simplified45.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]

    if -1.1e73 < y < 6.49999999999999954e79

    1. Initial program 74.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative74.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]
      2. associate-/l*76.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]
      3. fma-define76.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]
      4. remove-double-neg76.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]
      5. remove-double-neg76.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]
      6. *-commutative76.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      7. fma-define76.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      8. fma-define76.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      9. *-commutative76.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
      10. fma-define76.4%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]
    3. Simplified76.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification66.5%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{+73} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+79}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 80.1% accurate, 4.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889))
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 68.1%

    \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
  2. Add Preprocessing
  3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 84.8%

    \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative84.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
  5. Simplified84.8%

    \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 51.4% accurate, 21.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	return x
function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := x
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 68.1%

    \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]
    2. associate-/l*73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]
    3. fma-define73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]
    4. remove-double-neg73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)}, x\right) \]
    5. remove-double-neg73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}, x\right) \]
    6. *-commutative73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
    7. fma-define73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
    8. fma-define73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
    9. *-commutative73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]
    10. fma-define73.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]
  3. Simplified73.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 58.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp
function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\
\mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\
\;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t\_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024096 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z -8120153.652456675) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304)))) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))