Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 98.9%
Time: 16.7s
Alternatives: 10
Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 10 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (exp (log (/ PI s))))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf(expf(logf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(exp(log(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp(exp(log((single(pi) / s)))))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-exp-log99.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 + \left(\frac{1}{u} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{\pi}{-s} - \log u\right)\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log1p (+ -1.0 (+ (/ 1.0 u) (expm1 (- (/ PI (- s)) (log u)))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -log1pf((-1.0f + ((1.0f / u) + expm1f(((((float) M_PI) / -s) - logf(u))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log1p(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / u) + expm1(Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s)) - log(u))))))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 + \left(\frac{1}{u} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{\pi}{-s} - \log u\right)\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 87.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative87.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified87.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-197.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right) \]
    3. associate--l+97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    4. mul-1-neg97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{u} - 1\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-frac-neg297.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}}{u} - 1\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log1p-expm1-u97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-undefine97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} - 1}\right) \]
    3. add-exp-log97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} - 1\right) \]
    4. add-exp-log97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u}\right)}} - 1\right)\right) - 1\right) \]
    5. expm1-define97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u}\right)\right)}\right) - 1\right) \]
    6. log-div97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}\right) - \log u}\right)\right) - 1\right) \]
    7. add-log-exp97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{-s}} - \log u\right)\right) - 1\right) \]
    8. distribute-frac-neg297.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} - \log u\right)\right) - 1\right) \]
  11. Applied egg-rr97.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right) - \log u\right)\right) - 1\right)} \]
  12. Final simplification97.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 + \left(\frac{1}{u} + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{\pi}{-s} - \log u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
  13. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.7% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- s) (log (+ (/ 1.0 u) (+ -1.0 (/ (exp (/ PI (- s))) u))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / u) + (-1.0f + (expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)) / u))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / u) + Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))) / u)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / u) + (single(-1.0) + (exp((single(pi) / -s)) / u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 87.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative87.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified87.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-197.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right) \]
    3. associate--l+97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    4. mul-1-neg97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{u} - 1\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-frac-neg297.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}}{u} - 1\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification97.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u}\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 37.1% accurate, 4.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (log (+ -1.0 (/ 2.0 u)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (2.0f / u)));
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = -s * log(((-1.0e0) + (2.0e0 / u)))
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(2.0) / u))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(2.0) / u)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{u}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 87.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative87.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified87.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-197.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right) \]
    3. associate--l+97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
    4. mul-1-neg97.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{-\frac{\pi}{s}}}}{u} - 1\right)\right) \]
    5. distribute-frac-neg297.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}}{u} - 1\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  10. Taylor expanded in s around inf 36.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  11. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*36.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-136.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg36.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/36.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{u}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval36.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval36.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]
  12. Simplified36.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{u} + -1\right)} \]
  13. Final simplification36.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{u}\right) \]
  14. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 25.1% accurate, 4.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log1p (/ PI s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 87.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative87.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified87.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*25.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-125.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    3. log1p-define25.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 16.2% accurate, 28.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{s} - 2} - -0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (* (* u -4.0) (- (/ 1.0 (- (/ PI s) 2.0)) -0.5))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * ((u * -4.0f) * ((1.0f / ((((float) M_PI) / s) - 2.0f)) - -0.5f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-4.0)) * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) / s) - Float32(2.0))) - Float32(-0.5))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * ((u * single(-4.0)) * ((single(1.0) / ((single(pi) / s) - single(2.0))) - single(-0.5)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{s} - 2} - -0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 9.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around inf 15.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-115.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right)} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg15.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Simplified15.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  8. Taylor expanded in u around 0 16.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} - 0.5\right)\right)\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*16.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} - 0.5\right)\right)} \]
    2. sub-neg16.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval16.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)\right) \]
  10. Simplified16.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} + -0.5\right)\right)} \]
  11. Final simplification16.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{s} - 2} - -0.5\right)\right) \]
  12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 16.2% accurate, 86.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* -2.0 (* s u)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -2.0f * (s * u);
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = (-2.0e0) * (s * u)
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-2.0) * Float32(s * u))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-2.0) * (s * u);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 9.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around inf 15.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-115.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right)} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg15.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Simplified15.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around 0 15.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{1 - u} - 1\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg15.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{1 - u} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r/15.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{1 - u}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval15.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{1 - u} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval15.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{1 - u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]
  10. Simplified15.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{2}{1 - u} + -1\right)} \]
  11. Taylor expanded in u around 0 16.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  12. Final simplification16.4%

    \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) \]
  13. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 16.2% accurate, 86.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ u \cdot \left(s \cdot -2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* u (* s -2.0)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return u * (s * -2.0f);
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = u * (s * (-2.0e0))
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(u * Float32(s * Float32(-2.0)))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = u * (s * single(-2.0));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
u \cdot \left(s \cdot -2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 9.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around inf 15.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-115.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right)} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg15.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Simplified15.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around 0 15.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{1 - u} - 1\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg15.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{1 - u} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r/15.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{1 - u}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval15.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{1 - u} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval15.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{1 - u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]
  10. Simplified15.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{2}{1 - u} + -1\right)} \]
  11. Taylor expanded in u around 0 16.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  12. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*16.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot s\right) \cdot u} \]
    2. *-commutative16.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot -2\right)} \cdot u \]
  13. Simplified16.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot -2\right) \cdot u} \]
  14. Final simplification16.4%

    \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(s \cdot -2\right) \]
  15. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 11.2% accurate, 216.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.1%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-110.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified10.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Final simplification10.9%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024095 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))