Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 16.3s

Alternatives: 19

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5d0) * log(c))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * Math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * Math.log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((((x * math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * math.log(c))) + (y * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + Float64(Float64(b - 0.5) * log(c))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5d0) * log(c))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((((x * Math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * Math.log(c))) + (y * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((((x * math.log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * math.log(c))) + (y * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + Float64(Float64(b - 0.5) * log(c))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((((x * log(y)) + z) + t) + a) + ((b - 0.5) * log(c))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] + a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y i (fma (+ b -0.5) (log c) (+ z (fma x (log y) (+ t a))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(y, i, fma((b + -0.5), log(c), (z + fma(x, log(y), (t + a)))));
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(y, i, fma(Float64(b + -0.5), log(c), Float64(z + fma(x, log(y), Float64(t + a)))))
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(y * i + N[(N[(b + -0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(t + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   4. associate-+r+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   5. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   6. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   7. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

   8. associate-+l+ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

   9. +-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

   10. fma-define 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

   11. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   12. fma-define 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

   13. sub-neg 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

   14. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

   15. +-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 90.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + t\_1\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a + \left(t + \left(z + t\_1\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))
   (if (<= y 6e-26)
     (+ a (+ t (+ z (+ (* x (log y)) t_1))))
     (fma y i (+ a (+ t (+ z t_1)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6e-26) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + ((x * log(y)) + t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, i, (a + (t + (z + t_1))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 6e-26)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + t_1))));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, i, Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + t_1))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 6e-26], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * i + N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 6.00000000000000023e-26

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if 6.00000000000000023e-26 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)\right) + y \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (* (log c) (- b 0.5)) (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y)))))) (* y i)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * log(y)))))) + (y * i);
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = ((log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * log(y)))))) + (y * i)
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return ((Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y)))))) + (y * i);
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return ((math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y)))))) + (y * i)

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)) + Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))))) + Float64(y * i))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (t + (z + (x * log(y)))))) + (y * i);
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right)\right) + y \cdot i \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 90.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-24}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + t\_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a + \left(t + \left(z + t\_1\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))
   (if (<= y 2.6e-24)
     (+ a (+ z (+ (* x (log y)) t_1)))
     (fma y i (+ a (+ t (+ z t_1)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.6e-24) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((x * log(y)) + t_1));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, i, (a + (t + (z + t_1))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.6e-24)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + t_1)));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, i, Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + t_1))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 2.6e-24], N[(a + N[(z + N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * i + N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.6e-24

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.6e-24 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 90.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + t\_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(t\_1 + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))
   (if (<= y 2.9e-25)
     (+ a (+ z (+ (* x (log y)) t_1)))
     (+ (* y i) (+ t_1 (+ a (+ z t)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.9e-25) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((x * log(y)) + t_1));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t_1 + (a + (z + t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)
    if (y <= 2.9d-25) then
        tmp = a + (z + ((x * log(y)) + t_1))
    else
        tmp = (y * i) + (t_1 + (a + (z + t)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.9e-25) {
		tmp = a + (z + ((x * Math.log(y)) + t_1));
	} else {
		tmp = (y * i) + (t_1 + (a + (z + t)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.9e-25:
		tmp = a + (z + ((x * math.log(y)) + t_1))
	else:
		tmp = (y * i) + (t_1 + (a + (z + t)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.9e-25)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) + t_1)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(t_1 + Float64(a + Float64(z + t))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = log(c) * (b - 0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.9e-25)
		tmp = a + (z + ((x * log(y)) + t_1));
	else
		tmp = (y * i) + (t_1 + (a + (z + t)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 2.9e-25], N[(a + N[(z + N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t$95$1 + N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.9000000000000001e-25

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 83.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if 2.9000000000000001e-25 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 98.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right) + b \cdot \log c\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (* y i) (+ (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y))))) (* b (log c)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (b * log(c)));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (b * log(c)))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))))) + (b * Math.log(c)));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))) + (b * math.log(c)))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y))))) + Float64(b * log(c))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (y * i) + ((a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))) + (b * log(c)));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in b around inf 97.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c}\right) + y \cdot i \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

5. Simplified 97.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot b}\right) + y \cdot i \]

6. Final simplification 97.4%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot i + \left(\left(a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\right) + b \cdot \log c\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 56.5% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := y \cdot i + b \cdot \log c\\ t_2 := z + x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-224}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-159}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-81}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 0.08:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* y i) (* b (log c)))) (t_2 (+ z (* x (log y)))))
   (if (<= a 2e-224)
     t_2
     (if (<= a 2.5e-159)
       t_1
       (if (<= a 3.4e-81)
         t_2
         (if (<= a 5.1e-26)
           t_1
           (if (<= a 0.08)
             (* x (+ (log y) (/ z x)))
             (if (<= a 1.7e+37)
               t_1
               (if (<= a 4.4e+64)
                 t_2
                 (if (<= a 7e+120) (fma y i z) (fma y i a)))))))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (y * i) + (b * log(c));
	double t_2 = z + (x * log(y));
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 2e-224) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (a <= 2.5e-159) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 3.4e-81) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (a <= 5.1e-26) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 0.08) {
		tmp = x * (log(y) + (z / x));
	} else if (a <= 1.7e+37) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= 4.4e+64) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (a <= 7e+120) {
		tmp = fma(y, i, z);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(b * log(c)))
	t_2 = Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 2e-224)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (a <= 2.5e-159)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 3.4e-81)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (a <= 5.1e-26)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 0.08)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(log(y) + Float64(z / x)));
	elseif (a <= 1.7e+37)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= 4.4e+64)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (a <= 7e+120)
		tmp = fma(y, i, z);
	else
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, 2e-224], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[a, 2.5e-159], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 3.4e-81], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[a, 5.1e-26], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 0.08], N[(x * N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(z / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 1.7e+37], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, 4.4e+64], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[a, 7e+120], N[(y * i + z), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * i + a), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 5 regimes

2. if a < 2e-224 or 2.50000000000000016e-159 < a < 3.3999999999999999e-81 or 1.70000000000000003e37 < a < 4.40000000000000004e64

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\log y + \left(\frac{a}{x} + \left(\frac{t}{x} + \left(\frac{z}{x} + \left(\frac{i \cdot y}{x} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{x}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 27.7%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log y + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{x}}\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 32.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x \cdot \log y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 32.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y + z} \]

   7. Simplified 32.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y + z} \]

   if 2e-224 < a < 2.50000000000000016e-159 or 3.3999999999999999e-81 < a < 5.09999999999999991e-26 or 0.0800000000000000017 < a < 1.70000000000000003e37

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\frac{x \cdot \log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 75.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i}} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 75.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 75.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 75.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \frac{b + -0.5}{i}}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 75.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.5 + b}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 42.6%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\frac{b \cdot \log c}{i}}\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 42.5%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{b \cdot \frac{\log c}{i}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 42.5%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{b \cdot \frac{\log c}{i}}\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in i around 0 45.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c + i \cdot y} \]

   if 5.09999999999999991e-26 < a < 0.0800000000000000017

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\log y + \left(\frac{a}{x} + \left(\frac{t}{x} + \left(\frac{z}{x} + \left(\frac{i \cdot y}{x} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{x}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 67.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log y + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{x}}\right) \]

   if 4.40000000000000004e64 < a < 7.00000000000000015e120

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   if 7.00000000000000015e120 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a}\right) \]
3. Recombined 5 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-224}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-159}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + b \cdot \log c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-81}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-26}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + b \cdot \log c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 0.08:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+37}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + b \cdot \log c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 69.1% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ t_2 := y \cdot i + b \cdot \log c\\ \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+147}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-208}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-246}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y)))))) (t_2 (+ (* y i) (* b (log c)))))
   (if (<= b -4e+147)
     t_2
     (if (<= b -6.8e-208)
       t_1
       (if (<= b -1.9e-246) (fma y i a) (if (<= b 4.9e+158) t_1 t_2))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	double t_2 = (y * i) + (b * log(c));
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -4e+147) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (b <= -6.8e-208) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (b <= -1.9e-246) {
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	} else if (b <= 4.9e+158) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(b * log(c)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -4e+147)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (b <= -6.8e-208)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (b <= -1.9e-246)
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	elseif (b <= 4.9e+158)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[b, -4e+147], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[b, -6.8e-208], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[b, -1.9e-246], N[(y * i + a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[b, 4.9e+158], t$95$1, t$95$2]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < -3.9999999999999999e147 or 4.9000000000000004e158 < b

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\frac{x \cdot \log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 74.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i}} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 74.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 74.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 74.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \frac{b + -0.5}{i}}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 74.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.5 + b}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 60.2%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\frac{b \cdot \log c}{i}}\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 60.1%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{b \cdot \frac{\log c}{i}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 60.1%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{b \cdot \frac{\log c}{i}}\right) \]

   9. Taylor expanded in i around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \log c + i \cdot y} \]

   if -3.9999999999999999e147 < b < -6.8e-208 or -1.89999999999999988e-246 < b < 4.9000000000000004e158

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 78.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.8%

      \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y}\right)\right) \]

   if -6.8e-208 < b < -1.89999999999999988e-246

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 62.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+147}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + b \cdot \log c\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-208}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{-246}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq 4.9 \cdot 10^{+158}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + b \cdot \log c\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 90.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+175}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+188}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log y + \frac{y \cdot i}{x}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.3e+175)
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y)))))
   (if (<= x 6.8e+188)
     (+ (* y i) (+ (* (log c) (- b 0.5)) (+ a (+ z t))))
     (* x (+ (log y) (/ (* y i) x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.3e+175) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	} else if (x <= 6.8e+188) {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (log(y) + ((y * i) / x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.3d+175)) then
        tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))
    else if (x <= 6.8d+188) then
        tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)) + (a + (z + t)))
    else
        tmp = x * (log(y) + ((y * i) / x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.3e+175) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else if (x <= 6.8e+188) {
		tmp = (y * i) + ((Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (Math.log(y) + ((y * i) / x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.3e+175:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))
	elif x <= 6.8e+188:
		tmp = (y * i) + ((math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)))
	else:
		tmp = x * (math.log(y) + ((y * i) / x))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.3e+175)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	elseif (x <= 6.8e+188)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * i) + Float64(Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)) + Float64(a + Float64(z + t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(log(y) + Float64(Float64(y * i) / x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.3e+175)
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	elseif (x <= 6.8e+188)
		tmp = (y * i) + ((log(c) * (b - 0.5)) + (a + (z + t)));
	else
		tmp = x * (log(y) + ((y * i) / x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.3e+175], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 6.8e+188], N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a + N[(z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -2.3e175

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.1%

      \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y}\right)\right) \]

   if -2.3e175 < x < 6.79999999999999991e188

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 95.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(\left(\color{blue}{z} + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]

   if 6.79999999999999991e188 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\log y + \left(\frac{a}{x} + \left(\frac{t}{x} + \left(\frac{z}{x} + \left(\frac{i \cdot y}{x} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{x}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log y + \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot y}{x}}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{+175}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+188}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i + \left(\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right) + \left(a + \left(z + t\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log y + \frac{y \cdot i}{x}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 71.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log y + \frac{y \cdot i}{x}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.15e+170)
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y)))))
   (if (<= x 2.4e+186)
     (+ a (+ t (+ z (* (log c) (- b 0.5)))))
     (* x (+ (log y) (/ (* y i) x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.15e+170) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	} else if (x <= 2.4e+186) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (log(c) * (b - 0.5))));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (log(y) + ((y * i) / x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.15d+170)) then
        tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))
    else if (x <= 2.4d+186) then
        tmp = a + (t + (z + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0))))
    else
        tmp = x * (log(y) + ((y * i) / x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.15e+170) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else if (x <= 2.4e+186) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (Math.log(y) + ((y * i) / x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.15e+170:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))
	elif x <= 2.4e+186:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5))))
	else:
		tmp = x * (math.log(y) + ((y * i) / x))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.15e+170)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	elseif (x <= 2.4e+186)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(log(y) + Float64(Float64(y * i) / x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.15e+170)
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	elseif (x <= 2.4e+186)
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (log(c) * (b - 0.5))));
	else
		tmp = x * (log(y) + ((y * i) / x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.15e+170], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 2.4e+186], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.15e170

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.1%

      \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y}\right)\right) \]

   if -1.15e170 < x < 2.39999999999999995e186

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}\right)\right) \]

   if 2.39999999999999995e186 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\log y + \left(\frac{a}{x} + \left(\frac{t}{x} + \left(\frac{z}{x} + \left(\frac{i \cdot y}{x} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{x}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log y + \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot y}{x}}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+170}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log y + \frac{y \cdot i}{x}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 71.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log y + \frac{y \cdot i}{x}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -8.5e+168)
   (+ a (+ t (+ z (* x (log y)))))
   (if (<= x 3.9e+186)
     (+ a (+ z (* (log c) (- b 0.5))))
     (* x (+ (log y) (/ (* y i) x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.5e+168) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	} else if (x <= 3.9e+186) {
		tmp = a + (z + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (log(y) + ((y * i) / x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-8.5d+168)) then
        tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))))
    else if (x <= 3.9d+186) then
        tmp = a + (z + (log(c) * (b - 0.5d0)))
    else
        tmp = x * (log(y) + ((y * i) / x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.5e+168) {
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * Math.log(y))));
	} else if (x <= 3.9e+186) {
		tmp = a + (z + (Math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
	} else {
		tmp = x * (Math.log(y) + ((y * i) / x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -8.5e+168:
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * math.log(y))))
	elif x <= 3.9e+186:
		tmp = a + (z + (math.log(c) * (b - 0.5)))
	else:
		tmp = x * (math.log(y) + ((y * i) / x))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -8.5e+168)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(t + Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)))));
	elseif (x <= 3.9e+186)
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(z + Float64(log(c) * Float64(b - 0.5))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(log(y) + Float64(Float64(y * i) / x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -8.5e+168)
		tmp = a + (t + (z + (x * log(y))));
	elseif (x <= 3.9e+186)
		tmp = a + (z + (log(c) * (b - 0.5)));
	else
		tmp = x * (log(y) + ((y * i) / x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[x, -8.5e+168], N[(a + N[(t + N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 3.9e+186], N[(a + N[(z + N[(N[Log[c], $MachinePrecision] * N[(b - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -8.50000000000000069e168

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 84.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.1%

      \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y}\right)\right) \]

   if -8.50000000000000069e168 < x < 3.9000000000000001e186

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto a + \left(t + \left(z + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}\right)\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 58.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.9000000000000001e186 < x

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\log y + \left(\frac{a}{x} + \left(\frac{t}{x} + \left(\frac{z}{x} + \left(\frac{i \cdot y}{x} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{x}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log y + \color{blue}{\frac{i \cdot y}{x}}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(t + \left(z + x \cdot \log y\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.9 \cdot 10^{+186}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(\log y + \frac{y \cdot i}{x}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 59.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{-203}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 9.6e-203)
   (+ z (* x (log y)))
   (if (<= a 6.4e+120) (fma y i z) (fma y i a))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 9.6e-203) {
		tmp = z + (x * log(y));
	} else if (a <= 6.4e+120) {
		tmp = fma(y, i, z);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 9.6e-203)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * log(y)));
	elseif (a <= 6.4e+120)
		tmp = fma(y, i, z);
	else
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 9.6e-203], N[(z + N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 6.4e+120], N[(y * i + z), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * i + a), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < 9.5999999999999994e-203

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\log y + \left(\frac{a}{x} + \left(\frac{t}{x} + \left(\frac{z}{x} + \left(\frac{i \cdot y}{x} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{x}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 28.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\log y + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{x}}\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 32.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x \cdot \log y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 32.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y + z} \]

   7. Simplified 32.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y + z} \]

   if 9.5999999999999994e-203 < a < 6.39999999999999964e120

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   if 6.39999999999999964e120 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{-203}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 50.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{i}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 3.1e-104) z (if (<= a 6.4e+120) (* i (+ y (/ z i))) (fma y i a))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 3.1e-104) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 6.4e+120) {
		tmp = i * (y + (z / i));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 3.1e-104)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 6.4e+120)
		tmp = Float64(i * Float64(y + Float64(z / i)));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 3.1e-104], z, If[LessEqual[a, 6.4e+120], N[(i * N[(y + N[(z / i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * i + a), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < 3.09999999999999976e-104

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 15.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 3.09999999999999976e-104 < a < 6.39999999999999964e120

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\frac{x \cdot \log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 71.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i}} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 71.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 71.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 71.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \frac{b + -0.5}{i}}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 71.4%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.5 + b}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 40.3%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{i}}\right) \]

   if 6.39999999999999964e120 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a}\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 59.8% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, a\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 8e+120) (fma y i z) (fma y i a)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 8e+120) {
		tmp = fma(y, i, z);
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 8e+120)
		tmp = fma(y, i, z);
	else
		tmp = fma(y, i, a);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 8e+120], N[(y * i + z), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * i + a), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 7.9999999999999998e120

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 37.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{z}\right) \]

   if 7.9999999999999998e120 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      3. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(a + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(z + t\right)\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      4. associate-+r+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \left(z + t\right)\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a + x \cdot \log y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(t + z\right)}\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right)} + \left(t + z\right)\right) + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      7. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)} + \left(\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + y \cdot i\right) \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i} \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i + \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      10. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right)} \]

      11. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c + \left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      12. fma-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b - 0.5, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)}\right) \]

      13. sub-neg 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{b + \left(-0.5\right)}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      14. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}, \log c, \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right) + z\right)\right) \]

      15. +-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y + a\right) + t\right)}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(b + -0.5, \log c, z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, t + a\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, i, \color{blue}{a}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 43.5% accurate, 12.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 2.66 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{i}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 3.2e-104) z (if (<= a 2.66e+126) (* i (+ y (/ z i))) a)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 3.2e-104) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 2.66e+126) {
		tmp = i * (y + (z / i));
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= 3.2d-104) then
        tmp = z
    else if (a <= 2.66d+126) then
        tmp = i * (y + (z / i))
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 3.2e-104) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 2.66e+126) {
		tmp = i * (y + (z / i));
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 3.2e-104:
		tmp = z
	elif a <= 2.66e+126:
		tmp = i * (y + (z / i))
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 3.2e-104)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 2.66e+126)
		tmp = Float64(i * Float64(y + Float64(z / i)));
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= 3.2e-104)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 2.66e+126)
		tmp = i * (y + (z / i));
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 3.2e-104], z, If[LessEqual[a, 2.66e+126], N[(i * N[(y + N[(z / i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], a]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < 3.19999999999999989e-104

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 15.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 3.19999999999999989e-104 < a < 2.6599999999999999e126

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\frac{x \cdot \log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.9%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i}} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 72.9%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 72.9%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 72.9%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \frac{b + -0.5}{i}}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 72.9%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.5 + b}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 41.9%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\frac{z}{i}}\right) \]

   if 2.6599999999999999e126 < a

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 42.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 42.6% accurate, 12.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-79}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{+248}:\\ \;\;\;\;i \cdot \left(y + \frac{a}{i}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 1.15e-79) z (if (<= a 1.1e+248) (* i (+ y (/ a i))) a)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 1.15e-79) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 1.1e+248) {
		tmp = i * (y + (a / i));
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= 1.15d-79) then
        tmp = z
    else if (a <= 1.1d+248) then
        tmp = i * (y + (a / i))
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 1.15e-79) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 1.1e+248) {
		tmp = i * (y + (a / i));
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 1.15e-79:
		tmp = z
	elif a <= 1.1e+248:
		tmp = i * (y + (a / i))
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 1.15e-79)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 1.1e+248)
		tmp = Float64(i * Float64(y + Float64(a / i)));
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= 1.15e-79)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 1.1e+248)
		tmp = i * (y + (a / i));
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 1.15e-79], z, If[LessEqual[a, 1.1e+248], N[(i * N[(y + N[(a / i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], a]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < 1.15000000000000006e-79

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 15.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 1.15000000000000006e-79 < a < 1.1e248

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\frac{x \cdot \log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.0%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i}} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 73.0%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 73.0%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \frac{\log c \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 73.0%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \color{blue}{\log c \cdot \frac{b + -0.5}{i}}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 73.0%

         \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.5 + b}}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{a}{i} + \left(\frac{t}{i} + \left(\frac{z}{i} + \left(x \cdot \frac{\log y}{i} + \log c \cdot \frac{-0.5 + b}{i}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 37.7%

      \[\leadsto i \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\frac{a}{i}}\right) \]

   if 1.1e248 < a

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 17: 39.6% accurate, 16.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-80}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a 4.2e-80) z (if (<= a 6e+120) (* y i) a)))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 4.2e-80) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 6e+120) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= 4.2d-80) then
        tmp = z
    else if (a <= 6d+120) then
        tmp = y * i
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 4.2e-80) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (a <= 6e+120) {
		tmp = y * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 4.2e-80:
		tmp = z
	elif a <= 6e+120:
		tmp = y * i
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 4.2e-80)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 6e+120)
		tmp = Float64(y * i);
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= 4.2e-80)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (a <= 6e+120)
		tmp = y * i;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 4.2e-80], z, If[LessEqual[a, 6e+120], N[(y * i), $MachinePrecision], a]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < 4.20000000000000003e-80

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 15.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 4.20000000000000003e-80 < a < 6e120

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 35.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{i \cdot y} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 35.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   5. Simplified 35.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot i} \]

   if 6e120 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 42.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 18: 38.3% accurate, 36.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+120}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (if (<= a 7.5e+120) z a))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 7.5e+120) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= 7.5d+120) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= 7.5e+120) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = a;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= 7.5e+120:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = a
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= 7.5e+120)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= 7.5e+120)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[a, 7.5e+120], z, a]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < 7.5000000000000006e120

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + \left(t + \left(z + \left(x \cdot \log y + \log c \cdot \left(b - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 16.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if 7.5000000000000006e120 < a

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 42.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 19: 23.0% accurate, 219.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])\\ \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 a)

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b && b < c && c < i;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return a
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, b, c, and i should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot \log y + z\right) + t\right) + a\right) + \left(b - 0.5\right) \cdot \log c\right) + y \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 17.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024091 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logBeta from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ (* x (log y)) z) t) a) (* (- b 0.5) (log c))) (* y i)))