Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 69.8% → 99.6%

Time: 12.4s

Alternatives: 15

Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 69.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304\\ t_1 := z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\\ t_2 := \frac{y \cdot t\_1}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \frac{t\_1}{t\_0}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_2 \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
        (t_1
         (+
          (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
          0.279195317918525))
        (t_2 (/ (* y t_1) t_0)))
   (if (<= t_2 -2e+70)
     (* y (+ (/ x y) (/ t_1 t_0)))
     (if (<= t_2 1e+307)
       (+
        x
        (/
         (+
          (* y 0.279195317918525)
          (* z (+ (* 0.0692910599291889 (* y z)) (* y 0.4917317610505968))))
         t_0))
       (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = (z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525;
	double t_2 = (y * t_1) / t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -2e+70) {
		tmp = y * ((x / y) + (t_1 / t_0));
	} else if (t_2 <= 1e+307) {
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0
    t_1 = (z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0
    t_2 = (y * t_1) / t_0
    if (t_2 <= (-2d+70)) then
        tmp = y * ((x / y) + (t_1 / t_0))
    else if (t_2 <= 1d+307) then
        tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525d0) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889d0 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968d0)))) / t_0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = (z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525;
	double t_2 = (y * t_1) / t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (t_2 <= -2e+70) {
		tmp = y * ((x / y) + (t_1 / t_0));
	} else if (t_2 <= 1e+307) {
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304
	t_1 = (z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525
	t_2 = (y * t_1) / t_0
	tmp = 0
	if t_2 <= -2e+70:
		tmp = y * ((x / y) + (t_1 / t_0))
	elif t_2 <= 1e+307:
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(y * t_1) / t_0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_2 <= -2e+70)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(x / y) + Float64(t_1 / t_0)));
	elseif (t_2 <= 1e+307)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 0.279195317918525) + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(0.0692910599291889 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	t_1 = (z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525;
	t_2 = (y * t_1) / t_0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_2 <= -2e+70)
		tmp = y * ((x / y) + (t_1 / t_0));
	elseif (t_2 <= 1e+307)
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$2, -2e+70], N[(y * N[(N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t$95$1 / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$2, 1e+307], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y * 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(N[(0.0692910599291889 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < -2.00000000000000015e70

   1. Initial program 86.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 86.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + -1 \cdot \frac{0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)}{3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)}\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.00000000000000015e70 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 9.99999999999999986e306

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{0.279195317918525 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   if 9.99999999999999986e306 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 9.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+70}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(\frac{x}{y} + \frac{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.7% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      1e+307)
   (fma
    y
    (/
     (fma z (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) 0.279195317918525)
     (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304))
    x)
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+307) {
		tmp = fma(y, (fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+307)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525) / fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+307], N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 9.99999999999999986e306

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 9.99999999999999986e306 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 9.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.7% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      1e+307)
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (/
      (fma (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) z 0.279195317918525)
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304))))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+307) {
		tmp = x + (y * (fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 1e+307)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525) / fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1e+307], N[(x + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 9.99999999999999986e306

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 9.99999999999999986e306 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 9.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304\\ t_1 := \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)}{t\_0}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
        (t_1
         (/
          (*
           y
           (+
            (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
            0.279195317918525))
          t_0)))
   (if (<= t_1 (- INFINITY))
     (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ x y)))
     (if (<= t_1 1e+307)
       (+
        x
        (/
         (+
          (* y 0.279195317918525)
          (* z (+ (* 0.0692910599291889 (* y z)) (* y 0.4917317610505968))))
         t_0))
       (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = y * (0.0692910599291889 + (x / y));
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+307) {
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	double t_1 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = y * (0.0692910599291889 + (x / y));
	} else if (t_1 <= 1e+307) {
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304
	t_1 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = y * (0.0692910599291889 + (x / y))
	elif t_1 <= 1e+307:
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(x / y)));
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+307)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 0.279195317918525) + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(0.0692910599291889 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304;
	t_1 = (y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / t_0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -Inf)
		tmp = y * (0.0692910599291889 + (x / y));
	elseif (t_1 <= 1e+307)
		tmp = x + (((y * 0.279195317918525) + (z * ((0.0692910599291889 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.4917317610505968)))) / t_0);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+307], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y * 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(N[(0.0692910599291889 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 6.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 3.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)\right)}{x \cdot \left(3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)\right)}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 86.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot \frac{y}{x}}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64))) < 9.99999999999999986e306

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{0.279195317918525 \cdot y + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.4917317610505968 \cdot y\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

   if 9.99999999999999986e306 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 692910599291889/10000000000000000 binary64)) #s(literal 307332350656623/625000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 11167812716741/40000000000000 binary64))) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z #s(literal 6012459259764103/1000000000000000 binary64)) z) #s(literal 104698244219447/31250000000000 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 0.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 9.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 9.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{x}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 10^{+307}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y \cdot 0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.4917317610505968\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5500000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1000000000.0) (not (<= z 5500000.0)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+
    (/
     (*
      y
      (+
       (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
       0.279195317918525))
     (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
    x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1000000000.0) || !(z <= 5500000.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5500000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0)) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103d0)) + 3.350343815022304d0)) + x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1000000000.0) || !(z <= 5500000.0)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1000000000.0) or not (z <= 5500000.0):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1000000000.0) || !(z <= 5500000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1000000000.0) || ~((z <= 5500000.0)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = ((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) + x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5500000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1e9 or 5.5e6 < z

   1. Initial program 42.0%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 42.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 42.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 42.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 52.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 52.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -1e9 < z < 5.5e6

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1000000000 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5500000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} + x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.3) (not (<= z 1.45e-6)))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (-
      0.0692910599291889
      (/ (+ (/ 0.4046220386999212 z) -0.07512208616047561) z))))
   (+
    x
    (*
     y
     (+
      0.08333333333333323
      (* z (- (* z 0.0007936505811533442) 0.00277777777751721)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.45e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.3d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.45d-6))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 - (((0.4046220386999212d0 / z) + (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442d0) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.45e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.3) or not (z <= 1.45e-6):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.45e-6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || ~((z <= 1.45e-6)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 - (((0.4046220386999212 / z) + -0.07512208616047561) / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.3], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.45e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 - N[(N[(N[(0.4046220386999212 / z), $MachinePrecision] + -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.29999999999999982 or 1.4500000000000001e-6 < z

   1. Initial program 43.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 43.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 43.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 43.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 53.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 53.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 53.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 53.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 53.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + -1 \cdot \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} - 0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

      3. sub-neg 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212 \cdot \frac{1}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{0.4046220386999212 \cdot 1}{z}} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{0.4046220386999212}}{z} + \left(-0.07512208616047561\right)}{z}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.29999999999999982 < z < 1.4500000000000001e-6

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 - \frac{\frac{0.4046220386999212}{z} + -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 98.8% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(\frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z} - y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.3)
   (- x (- (/ (* y -0.07512208616047561) z) (* y 0.0692910599291889)))
   (if (<= z 1.25e-16)
     (+
      x
      (*
       y
       (+
        0.08333333333333323
        (* z (- (* z 0.0007936505811533442) 0.00277777777751721)))))
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.3) {
		tmp = x - (((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889));
	} else if (z <= 1.25e-16) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.3d0)) then
        tmp = x - (((y * (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889d0))
    else if (z <= 1.25d-16) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442d0) - 0.00277777777751721d0))))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.3) {
		tmp = x - (((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889));
	} else if (z <= 1.25e-16) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.3:
		tmp = x - (((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889))
	elif z <= 1.25e-16:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.3)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889)));
	elseif (z <= 1.25e-16)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.3)
		tmp = x - (((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889));
	elseif (z <= 1.25e-16)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * ((z * 0.0007936505811533442) - 0.00277777777751721))));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.3], N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.25e-16], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision] - 0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.29999999999999982

   1. Initial program 41.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 41.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 41.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 41.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 46.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-out-- 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 - -0.4166096748901212\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.29999999999999982 < z < 1.2500000000000001e-16

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.2500000000000001e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 48.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 63.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(\frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z} - y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442 - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 98.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.3) (not (<= z 1.25e-16)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.08333333333333323 (* z (* z 0.0007936505811533442)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.3d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.25d-16))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.3) or not (z <= 1.25e-16):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || ~((z <= 1.25e-16)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.3], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.25e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.29999999999999982 or 1.2500000000000001e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 44.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 44.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 44.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 44.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.29999999999999982 < z < 1.2500000000000001e-16

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z\right)}\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442\right)}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442\right)}\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 98.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(\frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z} - y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.3)
   (- x (- (/ (* y -0.07512208616047561) z) (* y 0.0692910599291889)))
   (if (<= z 1.25e-16)
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.08333333333333323 (* z (* z 0.0007936505811533442)))))
     (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.3) {
		tmp = x - (((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889));
	} else if (z <= 1.25e-16) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-5.3d0)) then
        tmp = x - (((y * (-0.07512208616047561d0)) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889d0))
    else if (z <= 1.25d-16) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442d0))))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.3) {
		tmp = x - (((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889));
	} else if (z <= 1.25e-16) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.3:
		tmp = x - (((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889))
	elif z <= 1.25e-16:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.3)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889)));
	elseif (z <= 1.25e-16)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * Float64(z * 0.0007936505811533442)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.3)
		tmp = x - (((y * -0.07512208616047561) / z) - (y * 0.0692910599291889));
	elseif (z <= 1.25e-16)
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * (z * 0.0007936505811533442))));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.3], N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * -0.07512208616047561), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.25e-16], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * N[(z * 0.0007936505811533442), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.29999999999999982

   1. Initial program 41.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 41.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 41.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 41.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 46.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 46.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around -inf 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z} + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + -1 \cdot \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)}\right) \]

      3. unsub-neg 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{-0.4917317610505968 \cdot y - -0.4166096748901212 \cdot y}{z}\right)} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-out-- 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-0.4917317610505968 - -0.4166096748901212\right)}}{z}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 97.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 \cdot y - \frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.29999999999999982 < z < 1.2500000000000001e-16

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z - 0.00277777777751721\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0007936505811533442 \cdot z\right)}\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442\right)}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442\right)}\right) \]

   if 1.2500000000000001e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 48.9%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 48.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 63.4%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 63.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.7%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(\frac{y \cdot -0.07512208616047561}{z} - y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0007936505811533442\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 98.8% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.3) (not (<= z 1.25e-16)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.08333333333333323 (* z -0.00277777777751721))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.3d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.25d-16))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323d0 + (z * (-0.00277777777751721d0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.3) or not (z <= 1.25e-16):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.08333333333333323 + Float64(z * -0.00277777777751721))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || ~((z <= 1.25e-16)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (0.08333333333333323 + (z * -0.00277777777751721)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.3], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.25e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.08333333333333323 + N[(z * -0.00277777777751721), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.29999999999999982 or 1.2500000000000001e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 44.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 44.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 44.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 44.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.29999999999999982 < z < 1.2500000000000001e-16

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.08333333333333323 + -0.00277777777751721 \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.08333333333333323 + z \cdot -0.00277777777751721\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 98.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.3) (not (<= z 1.25e-16)))
   (+ x (* y (+ 0.0692910599291889 (/ 0.07512208616047561 z))))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.3d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.25d-16))) then
        tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889d0 + (0.07512208616047561d0 / z)))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16)) {
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.3) or not (z <= 1.25e-16):
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(0.0692910599291889 + Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || ~((z <= 1.25e-16)))
		tmp = x + (y * (0.0692910599291889 + (0.07512208616047561 / z)));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.3], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.25e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * N[(0.0692910599291889 + N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.29999999999999982 or 1.2500000000000001e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 44.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. remove-double-neg 44.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-\left(-y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-out 44.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 44.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      4. associate-/l* 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\right)\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} \]

   3. Simplified 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + 0.07512208616047561 \cdot \frac{1}{z}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.07512208616047561 \cdot 1}{z}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{\color{blue}{0.07512208616047561}}{z}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)} \]

   if -5.29999999999999982 < z < 1.2500000000000001e-16

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(0.0692910599291889 + \frac{0.07512208616047561}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 98.5% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.3) (not (<= z 1.25e-16)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.3d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.25d-16))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.3) or not (z <= 1.25e-16):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.3) || !(z <= 1.25e-16))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.3) || ~((z <= 1.25e-16)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.3], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.25e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.29999999999999982 or 1.2500000000000001e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 44.8%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 44.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 54.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

   if -5.29999999999999982 < z < 1.2500000000000001e-16

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]

   7. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.3 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 61.2% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-100}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.7 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.02e-100) x (if (<= x 3.7e-41) (* y 0.0692910599291889) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.02e-100) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 3.7e-41) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.02d-100)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 3.7d-41) then
        tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.02e-100) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 3.7e-41) {
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.02e-100:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 3.7e-41:
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.02e-100)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 3.7e-41)
		tmp = Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.02e-100)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 3.7e-41)
		tmp = y * 0.0692910599291889;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.02e-100], x, If[LessEqual[x, 3.7e-41], N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.02e-100 or 3.7000000000000002e-41 < x

   1. Initial program 74.4%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 74.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 70.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.02e-100 < x < 3.7000000000000002e-41

   1. Initial program 71.1%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

      2. associate-/l* 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

      3. fma-define 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      5. fma-define 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      6. fma-define 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

      8. fma-define 75.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + \frac{y \cdot \left(0.279195317918525 + z \cdot \left(0.4917317610505968 + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot z\right)\right)}{x \cdot \left(3.350343815022304 + z \cdot \left(6.012459259764103 + z\right)\right)}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 53.6%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot \frac{y}{x}}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 50.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

   9. Simplified 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 79.0% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 73.1%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. associate-/l* 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   3. fma-define 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   5. fma-define 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-define 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. fma-define 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 77.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

7. Simplified 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y + x} \]

8. Final simplification 78.1%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 51.3% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 73.1%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} + x} \]

   2. associate-/l* 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}} + x \]

   3. fma-define 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   5. fma-define 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)}}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   6. fma-define 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304}, x\right) \]

   8. fma-define 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 77.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 49.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024089 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z -8120153.652456675) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304)))) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))