Logistic function from Lakshay Garg

Percentage Accurate: 53.8% → 99.0%

Time: 8.4s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 18.1×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 53.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -20000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot \left(0.13333333333333333 + {x}^{2} \cdot -0.05396825396825397\right) - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -20000.0)
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 1e-7)
     (*
      x
      (+
       1.0
       (*
        (pow x 2.0)
        (-
         (*
          (pow x 2.0)
          (+ 0.13333333333333333 (* (pow x 2.0) -0.05396825396825397)))
         0.3333333333333333))))
     -1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -20000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (pow(x, 2.0) * ((pow(x, 2.0) * (0.13333333333333333 + (pow(x, 2.0) * -0.05396825396825397))) - 0.3333333333333333)));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-20000.0d0)) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 1d-7) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 + ((x ** 2.0d0) * (((x ** 2.0d0) * (0.13333333333333333d0 + ((x ** 2.0d0) * (-0.05396825396825397d0)))) - 0.3333333333333333d0)))
    else
        tmp = -1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -20000.0) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (Math.pow(x, 2.0) * ((Math.pow(x, 2.0) * (0.13333333333333333 + (Math.pow(x, 2.0) * -0.05396825396825397))) - 0.3333333333333333)));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (-2.0 * x) <= -20000.0:
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	elif (-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7:
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (math.pow(x, 2.0) * ((math.pow(x, 2.0) * (0.13333333333333333 + (math.pow(x, 2.0) * -0.05396825396825397))) - 0.3333333333333333)))
	else:
		tmp = -1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -20000.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64((x ^ 2.0) * Float64(Float64((x ^ 2.0) * Float64(0.13333333333333333 + Float64((x ^ 2.0) * -0.05396825396825397))) - 0.3333333333333333))));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -20000.0)
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	elseif ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = x * (1.0 + ((x ^ 2.0) * (((x ^ 2.0) * (0.13333333333333333 + ((x ^ 2.0) * -0.05396825396825397))) - 0.3333333333333333)));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -20000.0], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 1e-7], N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(N[Power[x, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Power[x, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(0.13333333333333333 + N[(N[Power[x, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * -0.05396825396825397), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -1.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -2e4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -2e4 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 9.9999999999999995e-8

   1. Initial program 8.2%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot \left(0.13333333333333333 + -0.05396825396825397 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)} \]

   if 9.9999999999999995e-8 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot x - 2\right)}} - 1 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -20000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot \left(0.13333333333333333 + {x}^{2} \cdot -0.05396825396825397\right) - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot 0.13333333333333333 - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -0.01)
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 1e-7)
     (*
      x
      (+
       1.0
       (*
        (pow x 2.0)
        (- (* (pow x 2.0) 0.13333333333333333) 0.3333333333333333))))
     -1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.01) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (pow(x, 2.0) * ((pow(x, 2.0) * 0.13333333333333333) - 0.3333333333333333)));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-0.01d0)) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 1d-7) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 + ((x ** 2.0d0) * (((x ** 2.0d0) * 0.13333333333333333d0) - 0.3333333333333333d0)))
    else
        tmp = -1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.01) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (Math.pow(x, 2.0) * ((Math.pow(x, 2.0) * 0.13333333333333333) - 0.3333333333333333)));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (-2.0 * x) <= -0.01:
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	elif (-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7:
		tmp = x * (1.0 + (math.pow(x, 2.0) * ((math.pow(x, 2.0) * 0.13333333333333333) - 0.3333333333333333)))
	else:
		tmp = -1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -0.01)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 + Float64((x ^ 2.0) * Float64(Float64((x ^ 2.0) * 0.13333333333333333) - 0.3333333333333333))));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.01)
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	elseif ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = x * (1.0 + ((x ^ 2.0) * (((x ^ 2.0) * 0.13333333333333333) - 0.3333333333333333)));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -0.01], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 1e-7], N[(x * N[(1.0 + N[(N[Power[x, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[Power[x, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * 0.13333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -1.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -0.0100000000000000002

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -0.0100000000000000002 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 9.9999999999999995e-8

   1. Initial program 7.5%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left(0.13333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2} - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)} \]

   if 9.9999999999999995e-8 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot x - 2\right)}} - 1 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 + {x}^{2} \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot 0.13333333333333333 - 0.3333333333333333\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.004:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* -2.0 x) -0.004)
   (+ (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) -1.0)
   (if (<= (* -2.0 x) 1e-7) (+ x (* -0.3333333333333333 (pow x 3.0))) -1.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.004) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= (-0.004d0)) then
        tmp = (2.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(((-2.0d0) * x)))) + (-1.0d0)
    else if (((-2.0d0) * x) <= 1d-7) then
        tmp = x + ((-0.3333333333333333d0) * (x ** 3.0d0))
    else
        tmp = -1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.004) {
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	} else if ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7) {
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * Math.pow(x, 3.0));
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (-2.0 * x) <= -0.004:
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0
	elif (-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7:
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * math.pow(x, 3.0))
	else:
		tmp = -1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= -0.004)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0);
	elseif (Float64(-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0)));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((-2.0 * x) <= -0.004)
		tmp = (2.0 / (1.0 + exp((-2.0 * x)))) + -1.0;
	elseif ((-2.0 * x) <= 1e-7)
		tmp = x + (-0.3333333333333333 * (x ^ 3.0));
	else
		tmp = -1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], -0.004], N[(N[(2.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(-2.0 * x), $MachinePrecision], 1e-7], N[(x + N[(-0.3333333333333333 * N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -1.0]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < -0.0040000000000000001

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -0.0040000000000000001 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x) < 9.9999999999999995e-8

   1. Initial program 6.8%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2} + 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{2}\right) \cdot x + 1 \cdot x} \]

      3. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left({x}^{2} \cdot x\right)} + 1 \cdot x \]

      4. unpow2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot x\right) + 1 \cdot x \]

      5. pow3 100.0%

         \[\leadsto -0.3333333333333333 \cdot \color{blue}{{x}^{3}} + 1 \cdot x \]

      6. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + \color{blue}{x} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3} + x} \]

   if 9.9999999999999995e-8 < (*.f64 #s(literal -2 binary64) x)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot x - 2\right)}} - 1 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-2 \cdot x \leq -0.004:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} + -1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;-2 \cdot x \leq 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -0.3333333333333333 \cdot {x}^{3}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 78.5% accurate, 7.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{-0.5}{x} \cdot \left(-2 - x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -0.66) -1.0 (/ 1.0 (* (/ -0.5 x) (- -2.0 x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((-0.5 / x) * (-2.0 - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-0.66d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / (((-0.5d0) / x) * ((-2.0d0) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((-0.5 / x) * (-2.0 - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -0.66:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / ((-0.5 / x) * (-2.0 - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(-0.5 / x) * Float64(-2.0 - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / ((-0.5 / x) * (-2.0 - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -0.66], -1.0, N[(1.0 / N[(N[(-0.5 / x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-2.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.660000000000000031

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot x - 2\right)}} - 1 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -0.660000000000000031 < x

   1. Initial program 42.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 6.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 6.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      2. clear-num 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}}} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{\color{blue}{x + \left(1 + 1\right)}}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}} \]

      4. metadata-eval 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{x + \color{blue}{2}}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}} \]

      5. metadata-eval 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - \color{blue}{1}}} \]

      6. difference-of-sqr-1 6.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) + 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 6.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 + 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}} \]

      8. metadata-eval 6.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\left(x + \color{blue}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)}} \]

      9. associate--l+ 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 - 1\right)\right)}}} \]

      10. metadata-eval 64.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{0}\right)}} \]

      11. +-rgt-identity 64.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + 2}}}} \]

      2. frac-2neg 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{-\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{-\left(x + 2\right)}}}} \]

      3. associate-/r/ 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{-\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x} \cdot \left(-\left(x + 2\right)\right)}} \]

      4. *-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{-\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)}} \cdot \left(-\left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-\left(x + 2\right)\right)}} \cdot \left(-\left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

      6. +-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{x \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(2 + x\right)}\right)} \cdot \left(-\left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

      7. distribute-neg-in 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-2\right) + \left(-x\right)\right)}} \cdot \left(-\left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

      8. metadata-eval 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-\left(x + 2\right)\right)} \]

      9. +-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{x \cdot \left(-2 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(2 + x\right)}\right)} \]

      10. distribute-neg-in 64.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{x \cdot \left(-2 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-2\right) + \left(-x\right)\right)}} \]

      11. metadata-eval 64.1%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{1}{x \cdot \left(-2 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-2} + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{x \cdot \left(-2 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-2 + \left(-x\right)\right)}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{-0.5}{x}} \cdot \left(-2 + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{-0.5}{x} \cdot \left(-2 - x\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 78.5% accurate, 7.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.66:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{0.5}{x}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -0.66) -1.0 (/ (/ 1.0 (+ x 2.0)) (/ 0.5 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-0.66d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 / (x + 2.0d0)) / (0.5d0 / x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -0.66) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -0.66:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(x + 2.0)) / Float64(0.5 / x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -0.66)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 / (x + 2.0)) / (0.5 / x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -0.66], -1.0, N[(N[(1.0 / N[(x + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(0.5 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.660000000000000031

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot x - 2\right)}} - 1 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -0.660000000000000031 < x

   1. Initial program 42.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 6.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)} - 1 \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 6.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   5. Simplified 6.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)} - 1 \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. flip-- 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      2. div-inv 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - 1 \cdot 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1}} \]

      3. metadata-eval 6.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \left(x + 1\right) - \color{blue}{1}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      4. difference-of-sqr-1 6.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + 1\right) + 1\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      5. associate-+l+ 6.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 + 1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      6. metadata-eval 6.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + \color{blue}{2}\right) \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) - 1\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      7. associate--l+ 64.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(1 - 1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      8. metadata-eval 64.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{0}\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      9. +-rgt-identity 64.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 1\right) + 1} \]

      10. associate-+l+ 64.3%

          \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{x + \left(1 + 1\right)}} \]

      11. metadata-eval 64.3%

          \[\leadsto \left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + \color{blue}{2}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x\right) \cdot \frac{1}{x + 2}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 64.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}{x + 2}} \]

      2. clear-num 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{x + 2}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]

      3. div-inv 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]

      4. associate-/r* 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{1}{\left(x + 2\right) \cdot x}}} \]

      5. *-commutative 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x + 2\right)}}} \]

      6. associate-/r* 64.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{x}}{x + 2}}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 64.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\frac{\frac{1}{x}}{x + 2}}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in x around 0 68.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2}}{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{x}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 75.9% accurate, 18.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (if (<= x -1.0) -1.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.0:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], -1.0, x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot x - 2\right)}} - 1 \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if -1 < x

   1. Initial program 42.1%

      \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 26.9% accurate, 109.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.6%

   \[\frac{2}{1 + e^{-2 \cdot x}} - 1 \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{2}{\color{blue}{2 + x \cdot \left(2 \cdot x - 2\right)}} - 1 \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 27.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024089 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic function from Lakshay Garg"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 2.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (* -2.0 x)))) 1.0))