Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 14.4s
Alternatives: 11
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 11 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t\_0\right) + t\_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (* PI (/ 1.0 s)))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) * (1.0f / s))))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / s))))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) * (single(1.0) / s))))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]
  5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 37.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/ 1.0 (+ (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (* PI (/ 1.0 s))))) (/ u 2.0))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / (((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) * (1.0f / s))))) + (u / 2.0f)))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / s))))) + Float32(u / Float32(2.0))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) * (single(1.0) / s))))) + (u / single(2.0))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 38.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Final simplification38.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 37.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))) (/ u 2.0))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / (((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))) + (u / 2.0f)))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) + Float32(u / Float32(2.0))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))) + (u / single(2.0))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 38.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Final simplification38.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right) \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 11.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{e^{\log \left(\frac{u}{\pi}\right)}} + \pi \cdot 0.25\right) - \pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  4.0
  (*
   u
   (- (+ (* -0.25 (/ 1.0 (exp (log (/ u PI))))) (* PI 0.25)) (* PI -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (u * (((-0.25f * (1.0f / expf(logf((u / ((float) M_PI)))))) + (((float) M_PI) * 0.25f)) - (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / exp(log(Float32(u / Float32(pi)))))) + Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.25))) - Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (u * (((single(-0.25) * (single(1.0) / exp(log((u / single(pi)))))) + (single(pi) * single(0.25))) - (single(pi) * single(-0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{e^{\log \left(\frac{u}{\pi}\right)}} + \pi \cdot 0.25\right) - \pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{\pi}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    2. inv-pow11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{u}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{u}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow-111.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{\pi}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{\pi}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-exp-log11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{u}{\pi}\right)}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  11. Applied egg-rr11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{u}{\pi}\right)}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  12. Final simplification11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{e^{\log \left(\frac{u}{\pi}\right)}} + \pi \cdot 0.25\right) - \pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \]
  13. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 11.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + -0.25 \cdot e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}\right) - \pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* 4.0 (* u (- (+ (* PI 0.25) (* -0.25 (exp (log (/ PI u))))) (* PI -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (u * (((((float) M_PI) * 0.25f) + (-0.25f * expf(logf((((float) M_PI) / u))))) - (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.25)) + Float32(Float32(-0.25) * exp(log(Float32(Float32(pi) / u))))) - Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (u * (((single(pi) * single(0.25)) + (single(-0.25) * exp(log((single(pi) / u))))) - (single(pi) * single(-0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + -0.25 \cdot e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}\right) - \pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-exp-log11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  8. Final simplification11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + -0.25 \cdot e^{\log \left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}\right) - \pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \]
  9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 11.6% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + -0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{{\left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}^{-1}}\right) - \pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  4.0
  (*
   u
   (- (+ (* PI 0.25) (* -0.25 (/ 1.0 (pow (/ PI u) -1.0)))) (* PI -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (u * (((((float) M_PI) * 0.25f) + (-0.25f * (1.0f / powf((((float) M_PI) / u), -1.0f)))) - (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(0.25)) + Float32(Float32(-0.25) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / (Float32(Float32(pi) / u) ^ Float32(-1.0))))) - Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (u * (((single(pi) * single(0.25)) + (single(-0.25) * (single(1.0) / ((single(pi) / u) ^ single(-1.0))))) - (single(pi) * single(-0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + -0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{{\left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}^{-1}}\right) - \pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{\pi}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    2. inv-pow11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{u}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{u}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow-111.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{\pi}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{u}{\pi}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{u}}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    2. inv-pow11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}^{-1}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  11. Applied egg-rr11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}^{-1}}} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
  12. Final simplification11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + -0.25 \cdot \frac{1}{{\left(\frac{\pi}{u}\right)}^{-1}}\right) - \pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \]
  13. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 11.6% accurate, 28.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (+ (* PI (+ 0.25 (* u -0.25))) (* u (* PI -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * (0.25f + (u * -0.25f))) + (u * (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)))) + Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * ((single(pi) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.25)))) + (u * (single(pi) * single(-0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} + 0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*11.6%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification11.6%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 11.6% accurate, 39.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.5 + \frac{-0.25}{u}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* u (* PI (+ 0.5 (/ -0.25 u))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (u * (((float) M_PI) * (0.5f + (-0.25f / u))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.5) + Float32(Float32(-0.25) / u)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (u * (single(pi) * (single(0.5) + (single(-0.25) / u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.5 + \frac{-0.25}{u}\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  6. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    2. expm1-log1p-u11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    3. expm1-undefine11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \pi\right)} - 1\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot u}\right)} - 1\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} - 1\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-define11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  10. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\pi \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
  11. Taylor expanded in u around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u} + 0.5 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  12. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right)}\right) \]
    2. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot 0.5} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{\pi}{u}\right)\right) \]
    3. associate-*r/11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\frac{-0.25 \cdot \pi}{u}}\right)\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot 0.5 + \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}}{u}\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-/l*11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \frac{-0.25}{u}}\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-lft-out11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.5 + \frac{-0.25}{u}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  13. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.5 + \frac{-0.25}{u}\right)\right)\right)} \]
  14. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 11.6% accurate, 48.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* PI (+ -0.25 (* u 0.5)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * (-0.25f + (u * 0.5f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(0.5)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * (single(-0.25) + (u * single(0.5))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right) - -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. associate-*r*11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    9. *-commutative11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    10. distribute-lft-out11.6%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  8. Simplified11.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification11.6%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 11.4% accurate, 216.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Add Preprocessing
  4. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Simplified11.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024089 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))