SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.4% → 97.0%

Time: 14.9s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 3.05 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t\_1 - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y_m))))
   (if (<= y_m 3.05e+119)
     (+ x (* (- t_1 (tanh (/ x y_m))) (* y_m z)))
     (+ x (* z (- (* y_m t_1) x))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.05e+119) {
		tmp = x + ((t_1 - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y_m))
    if (y_m <= 3.05d+119) then
        tmp = x + ((t_1 - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.05e+119) {
		tmp = x + ((t_1 - Math.tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y_m))
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 3.05e+119:
		tmp = x + ((t_1 - math.tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y_m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 3.05e+119)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(t_1 - tanh(Float64(x / y_m))) * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y_m * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 3.05e+119)
		tmp = x + ((t_1 - tanh((x / y_m))) * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 3.05e+119], N[(x + N[(N[(t$95$1 - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y$95$m * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.05e119

   1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.05e119 < y

   1. Initial program 86.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 67.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 67.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - x\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 67.0%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} - x\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 67.0%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 67.0%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} - x\right) \]

      4. tanh-def-a 95.7%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} - x\right) \]

   8. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.05 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y_m (- (* (tanh (/ t y_m)) z) (* z (tanh (/ x y_m)))) x))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y_m, ((tanh((t / y_m)) * z) - (z * tanh((x / y_m)))), x);
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	return fma(y_m, Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) * z) - Float64(z * tanh(Float64(x / y_m)))), x)
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := N[(y$95$m * N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-define 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)}, x\right) \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

7. Final simplification 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), x\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y\_m, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y\_m}\right)\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y_m (* z (- (tanh (/ t y_m)) (tanh (/ x y_m)))) x))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y_m, (z * (tanh((t / y_m)) - tanh((x / y_m)))), x);
}

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	return fma(y_m, Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) - tanh(Float64(x / y_m)))), x)
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := N[(y$95$m * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-define 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.0% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\_m \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot t\_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y_m))))
   (if (<= y_m 1.7e+101)
     (+ x (* y_m (* t_1 z)))
     (+ x (* z (- (* y_m t_1) x))))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.7e+101) {
		tmp = x + (y_m * (t_1 * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y_m))
    if (y_m <= 1.7d+101) then
        tmp = x + (y_m * (t_1 * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y_m));
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.7e+101) {
		tmp = x + (y_m * (t_1 * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y_m))
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1.7e+101:
		tmp = x + (y_m * (t_1 * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y_m))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.7e+101)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y_m * Float64(t_1 * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y_m * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y_m));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1.7e+101)
		tmp = x + (y_m * (t_1 * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y_m * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.7e+101], N[(x + N[(y$95$m * N[(t$95$1 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y$95$m * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.70000000000000009e101

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 24.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. div-sub 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 84.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 84.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.70000000000000009e101 < y

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 64.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 94.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - x\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 64.0%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} - x\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 64.0%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 64.0%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} - x\right) \]

      4. tanh-def-a 94.5%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} - x\right) \]

   8. Simplified 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.9% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot \left(y\_m \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 1.25e+130)
   (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y_m)) (* y_m z)))
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.25e+130) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 1.25d+130) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 1.25e+130) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 1.25e+130:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 1.25e+130)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) * Float64(y_m * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 1.25e+130)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y_m)) * (y_m * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 1.25e+130], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y$95$m * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.2499999999999999e130

   1. Initial program 94.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 24.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 24.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 24.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 24.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 24.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 83.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 1.2499999999999999e130 < y

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+130}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 86.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\_m \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y\_m}\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 3.8e+129)
   (+ x (* y_m (* (tanh (/ t y_m)) z)))
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.8e+129) {
		tmp = x + (y_m * (tanh((t / y_m)) * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 3.8d+129) then
        tmp = x + (y_m * (tanh((t / y_m)) * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.8e+129) {
		tmp = x + (y_m * (Math.tanh((t / y_m)) * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 3.8e+129:
		tmp = x + (y_m * (math.tanh((t / y_m)) * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 3.8e+129)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y_m * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y_m)) * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 3.8e+129)
		tmp = x + (y_m * (tanh((t / y_m)) * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 3.8e+129], N[(x + N[(y$95$m * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.80000000000000005e129

   1. Initial program 94.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 25.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 25.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. div-sub 25.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 25.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 25.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 84.3%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 84.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.80000000000000005e129 < y

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 77.1% accurate, 17.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 6.5e+101) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 6.5e+101) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 6.5d+101) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 6.5e+101) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 6.5e+101:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 6.5e+101)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 6.5e+101)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 6.5e+101], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 6.50000000000000016e101

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 6.50000000000000016e101 < y

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 71.1% accurate, 21.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y_m 5.2e+81) x (+ x (* t z))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 5.2e+81) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 5.2d+81) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (t * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 5.2e+81) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 5.2e+81:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (t * z)
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 5.2e+81)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 5.2e+81)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 5.2e+81], x, N[(x + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.19999999999999984e81

   1. Initial program 94.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 5.19999999999999984e81 < y

   1. Initial program 88.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 40.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 40.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 40.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 40.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 40.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 40.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 76.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 76.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 67.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

   8. Simplified 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.2 \cdot 10^{+81}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 67.4% accurate, 21.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y\_m \leq 3.3 \cdot 10^{+103}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y_m 3.3e+103) x (* x (- 1.0 z))))

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.3e+103) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y_m <= 3.3d+103) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y_m <= 3.3e+103) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y_m <= 3.3e+103:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y_m <= 3.3e+103)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp_2 = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y_m <= 3.3e+103)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y$95$m, 3.3e+103], x, N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.30000000000000009e103

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 3.30000000000000009e103 < y

   1. Initial program 88.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 77.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 70.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 70.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 70.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 60.8% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} y_m = \left|y\right| \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

y_m = (fabs.f64 y)
(FPCore (x y_m z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

y_m = fabs(y);
double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

y_m = abs(y)
real(8) function code(x, y_m, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

y_m = Math.abs(y);
public static double code(double x, double y_m, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

y_m = math.fabs(y)
def code(x, y_m, z, t):
	return x

Julia

y_m = abs(y)
function code(x, y_m, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

y_m = abs(y);
function tmp = code(x, y_m, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

y_m = N[Abs[y], $MachinePrecision]
code[x_, y$95$m_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-define 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 65.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024088 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))