Graphics.Rendering.Chart.Drawing:drawTextsR from Chart-1.5.3

Percentage Accurate: 98.1% → 100.0%

Time: 5.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.3×

• 21.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- x 1.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((x - 1.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- x 1.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((x - 1.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((x - 1.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(z + y\right) - z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x (+ z y)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) - z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * (z + y)) - z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * (z + y)) - z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * (z + y)) - z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * Float64(z + y)) - z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * (z + y)) - z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + \left(-1\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{-1} \cdot z\right) \]

   5. neg-mul-1 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

   6. associate-+r+ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + \left(-z\right)} \]

   7. unsub-neg 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) - z} \]

   8. +-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} - z \]

   9. distribute-lft-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} - z \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right) - z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 61.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 0.00065:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+235}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.0)
   (* x z)
   (if (<= x 0.00065) (- z) (if (<= x 1.9e+235) (* x y) (* x z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (x <= 0.00065) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (x <= 1.9e+235) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * z
    else if (x <= 0.00065d0) then
        tmp = -z
    else if (x <= 1.9d+235) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = x * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x * z;
	} else if (x <= 0.00065) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else if (x <= 1.9e+235) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = x * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.0:
		tmp = x * z
	elif x <= 0.00065:
		tmp = -z
	elif x <= 1.9e+235:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = x * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	elseif (x <= 0.00065)
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	elseif (x <= 1.9e+235)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = x * z;
	elseif (x <= 0.00065)
		tmp = -z;
	elseif (x <= 1.9e+235)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = x * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 0.00065], (-z), If[LessEqual[x, 1.9e+235], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1.89999999999999988e235 < x

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 60.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot z} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 58.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   6. Simplified 58.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < x < 6.4999999999999997e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 74.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   5. Simplified 74.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if 6.4999999999999997e-4 < x < 1.89999999999999988e235

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 61.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 0.00065:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{+235}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.0024\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 0.0024))) (* x (+ z y)) (- (* x y) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.0024)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 0.0024d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.0024)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 0.0024):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.0024))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 0.0024)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 0.0024]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 0.00239999999999999979 < x

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -1 < x < 0.00239999999999999979

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 82.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + \frac{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 81.6%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{z}{y}}\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 81.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot z}{y}}\right) \]

      2. neg-mul-1 81.6%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \frac{\color{blue}{-z}}{y}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 81.6%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{y}}\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + -1 \cdot z} \]

      2. fma-define 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, -1 \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{-z}\right) \]

      4. fma-neg 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - z} \]

   9. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.0024\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y - z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -32000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.0022\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + -1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -32000.0) (not (<= x 0.0022))) (* x (+ z y)) (* z (+ x -1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -32000.0) || !(x <= 0.0022)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (x + -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-32000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 0.0022d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = z * (x + (-1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -32000.0) || !(x <= 0.0022)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (x + -1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -32000.0) or not (x <= 0.0022):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = z * (x + -1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -32000.0) || !(x <= 0.0022))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(x + -1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -32000.0) || ~((x <= 0.0022)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = z * (x + -1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -32000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 0.0022]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(x + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -32000 or 0.00220000000000000013 < x

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -32000 < x < 0.00220000000000000013

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x - 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -32000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.0022\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(x + -1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-35} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.00065\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -3.6e-35) (not (<= x 0.00065))) (* x (+ z y)) (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.6e-35) || !(x <= 0.00065)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-3.6d-35)) .or. (.not. (x <= 0.00065d0))) then
        tmp = x * (z + y)
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -3.6e-35) || !(x <= 0.00065)) {
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -3.6e-35) or not (x <= 0.00065):
		tmp = x * (z + y)
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -3.6e-35) || !(x <= 0.00065))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(z + y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -3.6e-35) || ~((x <= 0.00065)))
		tmp = x * (z + y);
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -3.6e-35], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 0.00065]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.60000000000000019e-35 or 6.4999999999999997e-4 < x

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z + y\right)} \]

   if -3.60000000000000019e-35 < x < 6.4999999999999997e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 76.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   5. Simplified 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{-35} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.00065\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(z + y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 62.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.00065\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.8e-36) (not (<= x 0.00065))) (* x y) (- z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.8e-36) || !(x <= 0.00065)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.8d-36)) .or. (.not. (x <= 0.00065d0))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.8e-36) || !(x <= 0.00065)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.8e-36) or not (x <= 0.00065):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.8e-36) || !(x <= 0.00065))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.8e-36) || ~((x <= 0.00065)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.8e-36], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 0.00065]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], (-z)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.80000000000000026e-36 or 6.4999999999999997e-4 < x

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 54.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -5.80000000000000026e-36 < x < 6.4999999999999997e-4

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 76.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   5. Simplified 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.00065\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 36.3% accurate, 4.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = -z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 38.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 38.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

5. Simplified 38.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024087 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Chart.Drawing:drawTextsR from Chart-1.5.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* (- x 1.0) z)))