Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.5s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 25.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- 1.0 (* x (+ 0.253 (* x 0.12)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * (0.253 + (x * 0.12)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.0d0 - (x * (0.253d0 + (x * 0.12d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * (0.253 + (x * 0.12)));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.0 - (x * (0.253 + (x * 0.12)))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * Float64(0.253 + Float64(x * 0.12))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.0 - (x * (0.253 + (x * 0.12)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(1.0 - N[(x * N[(0.253 + N[(x * 0.12), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- 1.0 (* x (+ 0.253 (* x 0.12)))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * (0.253 + (x * 0.12)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.0d0 - (x * (0.253d0 + (x * 0.12d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * (0.253 + (x * 0.12)));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.0 - (x * (0.253 + (x * 0.12)))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * Float64(0.253 + Float64(x * 0.12))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.0 - (x * (0.253 + (x * 0.12)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(1.0 - N[(x * N[(0.253 + N[(x * 0.12), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot 0.12, x, x \cdot 0.253\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- 1.0 (fma (* x 0.12) x (* x 0.253))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - fma((x * 0.12), x, (x * 0.253));
}

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(1.0 - fma(Float64(x * 0.12), x, Float64(x * 0.253)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(1.0 - N[(N[(x * 0.12), $MachinePrecision] * x + N[(x * 0.253), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.12 + 0.253\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 - \color{blue}{\left(\left(x \cdot 0.12\right) \cdot x + 0.253 \cdot x\right)} \]

   3. fma-define 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot 0.12, x, 0.253 \cdot x\right)} \]

   4. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 - \mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot 0.12, x, \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.253}\right) \]

4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 1 - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot 0.12, x, x \cdot 0.253\right)} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot -0.12\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 - x \cdot 0.253\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.1) (not (<= x 2.0))) (* (* x x) -0.12) (- 1.0 (* x 0.253))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.1) || !(x <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = (x * x) * -0.12;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 - (x * 0.253);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.1d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = (x * x) * (-0.12d0)
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 - (x * 0.253d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.1) || !(x <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = (x * x) * -0.12;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 - (x * 0.253);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.1) or not (x <= 2.0):
		tmp = (x * x) * -0.12
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 - (x * 0.253)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.1) || !(x <= 2.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) * -0.12);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * 0.253));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.1) || ~((x <= 2.0)))
		tmp = (x * x) * -0.12;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 - (x * 0.253);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.1], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] * -0.12), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 - N[(x * 0.253), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.0999999999999996 or 2 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.12 \cdot {x}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot -0.12} \]

   5. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot -0.12} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot -0.12 \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot -0.12 \]

   if -4.0999999999999996 < x < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 - \color{blue}{0.253 \cdot x} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto 1 - \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.253} \]

   5. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 - \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.253} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot -0.12\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 - x \cdot 0.253\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot -0.12\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.1) (not (<= x 2.0))) (* (* x x) -0.12) 1.0))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.1) || !(x <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = (x * x) * -0.12;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.1d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = (x * x) * (-0.12d0)
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.1) || !(x <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = (x * x) * -0.12;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.1) or not (x <= 2.0):
		tmp = (x * x) * -0.12
	else:
		tmp = 1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.1) || !(x <= 2.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * x) * -0.12);
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.1) || ~((x <= 2.0)))
		tmp = (x * x) * -0.12;
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.1], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] * -0.12), $MachinePrecision], 1.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.0999999999999996 or 2 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.12 \cdot {x}^{2}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot -0.12} \]

   5. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot -0.12} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 98.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot -0.12 \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot -0.12 \]

   if -4.0999999999999996 < x < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot x\right) \cdot -0.12\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 - x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(0.12 + \frac{0.253}{x}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- 1.0 (* x (* x (+ 0.12 (/ 0.253 x))))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * (x * (0.12 + (0.253 / x))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.0d0 - (x * (x * (0.12d0 + (0.253d0 / x))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * (x * (0.12 + (0.253 / x))));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.0 - (x * (x * (0.12 + (0.253 / x))))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * Float64(x * Float64(0.12 + Float64(0.253 / x)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.0 - (x * (x * (0.12 + (0.253 / x))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(1.0 - N[(x * N[(x * N[(0.12 + N[(0.253 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(0.12 + 0.253 \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 1 - x \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(0.12 + \color{blue}{\frac{0.253}{x}}\right)\right) \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 - x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.12 + 0.253\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- 1.0 (* x (+ (* x 0.12) 0.253))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * ((x * 0.12) + 0.253));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.0d0 - (x * ((x * 0.12d0) + 0.253d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * ((x * 0.12) + 0.253));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.0 - (x * ((x * 0.12) + 0.253))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * Float64(Float64(x * 0.12) + 0.253)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.0 - (x * ((x * 0.12) + 0.253));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(1.0 - N[(x * N[(N[(x * 0.12), $MachinePrecision] + 0.253), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 1 - x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.12 + 0.253\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 97.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 - x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.12\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- 1.0 (* x (* x 0.12))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * (x * 0.12));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.0d0 - (x * (x * 0.12d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.0 - (x * (x * 0.12));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.0 - (x * (x * 0.12))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(1.0 - Float64(x * Float64(x * 0.12)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.0 - (x * (x * 0.12));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(1.0 - N[(x * N[(x * 0.12), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9%

   \[\leadsto 1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(0.12 + 0.253 \cdot \frac{1}{x}\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.12 \cdot x\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 97.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.12\right)} \]

6. Simplified 97.7%

   \[\leadsto 1 - x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 0.12\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 49.0% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(x)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[1 - x \cdot \left(0.253 + x \cdot 0.12\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 45.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024087 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64
  (- 1.0 (* x (+ 0.253 (* x 0.12)))))