Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, A

Percentage Accurate: 95.5% → 98.9%

Time: 10.1s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 0.8×

• 26.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot 9 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-27}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* y 9.0) -1e-27)
   (fma a (* 27.0 b) (fma x 2.0 (* y (* z (* t -9.0)))))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* z (* (* y 9.0) t))) (* a (* 27.0 b)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y * 9.0) <= -1e-27) {
		tmp = fma(a, (27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, (y * (z * (t * -9.0)))));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (z * ((y * 9.0) * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * 9.0) <= -1e-27)
		tmp = fma(a, Float64(27.0 * b), fma(x, 2.0, Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(t * -9.0)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * t))) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision], -1e-27], N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0 + N[(y * N[(z * N[(t * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64)) < -1e-27

   1. Initial program 93.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

      2. associate-+r- 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t} \]

      3. *-commutative 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. cancel-sign-sub-inv 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-t\right) \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      5. associate-*r* 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right) \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-in 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)} \cdot z \]

      7. *-commutative 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t}\right) \cdot z \]

      8. cancel-sign-sub-inv 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + x \cdot 2\right) - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z} \]

      9. associate-+r- 87.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      10. associate-*l* 87.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right) \]

      11. fma-define 87.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      12. fma-neg 87.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, -\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      13. associate-*l* 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, -\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(-t \cdot z\right)}\right)\right) \]

      15. *-commutative 99.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot t}\right)\right)\right) \]

      16. associate-*l* 99.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(-z \cdot t\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      17. *-commutative 99.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-z \cdot t\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right)\right) \]

      18. distribute-lft-neg-in 99.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(z \cdot t\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right)\right) \]

      19. associate-*r* 99.8%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot 9\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if -1e-27 < (*.f64 y #s(literal 9 binary64))

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Simplified 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(9 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot 9 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-27}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(a, 27 \cdot b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 2, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot -9\right)\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 80.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ t_2 := x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ t_3 := y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot -9\right)\right) + t\_1\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-74}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-87}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{-74}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 27.0 (* a b)))
        (t_2 (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* t (* y z)))))
        (t_3 (+ (* y (* z (* t -9.0))) t_1)))
   (if (<= z -5.2e+45)
     t_3
     (if (<= z -5.5e-74)
       t_2
       (if (<= z -3.8e-87) t_3 (if (<= z 1.22e-74) (+ t_1 (* x 2.0)) t_2))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	double t_3 = (y * (z * (t * -9.0))) + t_1;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.2e+45) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if (z <= -5.5e-74) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (z <= -3.8e-87) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if (z <= 1.22e-74) {
		tmp = t_1 + (x * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: t_3
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    t_2 = (x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (t * (y * z)))
    t_3 = (y * (z * (t * (-9.0d0)))) + t_1
    if (z <= (-5.2d+45)) then
        tmp = t_3
    else if (z <= (-5.5d-74)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (z <= (-3.8d-87)) then
        tmp = t_3
    else if (z <= 1.22d-74) then
        tmp = t_1 + (x * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = t_2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	double t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	double t_3 = (y * (z * (t * -9.0))) + t_1;
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.2e+45) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if (z <= -5.5e-74) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (z <= -3.8e-87) {
		tmp = t_3;
	} else if (z <= 1.22e-74) {
		tmp = t_1 + (x * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t_2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b)
	t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)))
	t_3 = (y * (z * (t * -9.0))) + t_1
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -5.2e+45:
		tmp = t_3
	elif z <= -5.5e-74:
		tmp = t_2
	elif z <= -3.8e-87:
		tmp = t_3
	elif z <= 1.22e-74:
		tmp = t_1 + (x * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = t_2
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z))))
	t_3 = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(t * -9.0))) + t_1)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.2e+45)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif (z <= -5.5e-74)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (z <= -3.8e-87)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif (z <= 1.22e-74)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = 27.0 * (a * b);
	t_2 = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	t_3 = (y * (z * (t * -9.0))) + t_1;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -5.2e+45)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif (z <= -5.5e-74)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (z <= -3.8e-87)
		tmp = t_3;
	elseif (z <= 1.22e-74)
		tmp = t_1 + (x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$3 = N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(t * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -5.2e+45], t$95$3, If[LessEqual[z, -5.5e-74], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[z, -3.8e-87], t$95$3, If[LessEqual[z, 1.22e-74], N[(t$95$1 + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$2]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -5.20000000000000014e45 or -5.5000000000000001e-74 < z < -3.8e-87

   1. Initial program 86.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 86.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 86.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 91.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 96.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(9 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 69.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot 27\right)} \cdot b - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 69.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \]

   10. Simplified 69.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. sub-neg 69.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]

       2. +-commutative 69.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

       3. distribute-lft-neg-in 69.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-9\right) \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

       4. metadata-eval 69.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9} \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

       5. associate-*r* 69.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

       6. *-commutative 69.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot -9\right)} \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

       7. *-commutative 69.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(t \cdot -9\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

       8. associate-*r* 74.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot -9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot y} + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

       9. *-commutative 74.3%

          \[\leadsto \left(\left(t \cdot -9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot b\right) \cdot a} \]

       10. associate-*l* 74.3%

           \[\leadsto \left(\left(t \cdot -9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot y + \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(b \cdot a\right)} \]

       11. *-commutative 74.3%

           \[\leadsto \left(\left(t \cdot -9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot y + 27 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   12. Applied egg-rr 74.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot -9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot y + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -5.20000000000000014e45 < z < -5.5000000000000001e-74 or 1.22000000000000009e-74 < z

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -3.8e-87 < z < 1.22000000000000009e-74

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot -9\right)\right) + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-74}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-87}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(t \cdot -9\right)\right) + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.22 \cdot 10^{-74}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 1.5e-17)
   (+ (* a (* 27.0 b)) (- (* x 2.0) (* (* y 9.0) (* z t))))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* t (* (* y 9.0) z))) (* b (* a 27.0)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.5e-17) {
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z))) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 1.5d-17) then
        tmp = (a * (27.0d0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0d0) - ((y * 9.0d0) * (z * t)))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (t * ((y * 9.0d0) * z))) + (b * (a * 27.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 1.5e-17) {
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z))) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 1.5e-17:
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z))) + (b * (a * 27.0))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 1.5e-17)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)) + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * Float64(z * t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z))) + Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 1.5e-17)
		tmp = (a * (27.0 * b)) + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (t * ((y * 9.0) * z))) + (b * (a * 27.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, 1.5e-17], N[(N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 1.50000000000000003e-17

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 97.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.50000000000000003e-17 < z

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right)\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* a (* 27.0 b))))
   (if (<= z 5e+50)
     (+ t_1 (- (* x 2.0) (* (* y 9.0) (* z t))))
     (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* z (* (* y 9.0) t))) t_1))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (27.0 * b);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 5e+50) {
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (z * ((y * 9.0) * t))) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a * (27.0d0 * b)
    if (z <= 5d+50) then
        tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0d0) - ((y * 9.0d0) * (z * t)))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (z * ((y * 9.0d0) * t))) + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (27.0 * b);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 5e+50) {
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (z * ((y * 9.0) * t))) + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = a * (27.0 * b)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 5e+50:
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (z * ((y * 9.0) * t))) + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 5e+50)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * Float64(z * t))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * t))) + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = a * (27.0 * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 5e+50)
		tmp = t_1 + ((x * 2.0) - ((y * 9.0) * (z * t)));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (z * ((y * 9.0) * t))) + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, 5e+50], N[(t$95$1 + N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 5e50

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 5e50 < z

   1. Initial program 90.6%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 90.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 90.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 91.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 91.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Simplified 95.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(9 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) + \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 78.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.58 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-74}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.58e-13)
   (* z (* t (* y -9.0)))
   (if (<= z 1.9e-74)
     (+ (* 27.0 (* a b)) (* x 2.0))
     (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* t (* y z)))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.58e-13) {
		tmp = z * (t * (y * -9.0));
	} else if (z <= 1.9e-74) {
		tmp = (27.0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.58d-13)) then
        tmp = z * (t * (y * (-9.0d0)))
    else if (z <= 1.9d-74) then
        tmp = (27.0d0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (t * (y * z)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.58e-13) {
		tmp = z * (t * (y * -9.0));
	} else if (z <= 1.9e-74) {
		tmp = (27.0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.58e-13:
		tmp = z * (t * (y * -9.0))
	elif z <= 1.9e-74:
		tmp = (27.0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.58e-13)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t * Float64(y * -9.0)));
	elseif (z <= 1.9e-74)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)) + Float64(x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.58e-13)
		tmp = z * (t * (y * -9.0));
	elseif (z <= 1.9e-74)
		tmp = (27.0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = (x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (t * (y * z)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.58e-13], N[(z * N[(t * N[(y * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.9e-74], N[(N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.58000000000000008e-13

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 70.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 46.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 46.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 46.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(-9 \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 46.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(-9 \cdot t\right) \]

      4. associate-*r* 52.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-9 \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-*l* 52.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot -9\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(-9 \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.58000000000000008e-13 < z < 1.8999999999999998e-74

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if 1.8999999999999998e-74 < z

   1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 66.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.58 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-74}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 76.1% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.6 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7.6e-14)
   (* z (* t (* y -9.0)))
   (if (<= z 0.01) (+ (* 27.0 (* a b)) (* x 2.0)) (* t (* z (* y -9.0))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7.6e-14) {
		tmp = z * (t * (y * -9.0));
	} else if (z <= 0.01) {
		tmp = (27.0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-7.6d-14)) then
        tmp = z * (t * (y * (-9.0d0)))
    else if (z <= 0.01d0) then
        tmp = (27.0d0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = t * (z * (y * (-9.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7.6e-14) {
		tmp = z * (t * (y * -9.0));
	} else if (z <= 0.01) {
		tmp = (27.0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7.6e-14:
		tmp = z * (t * (y * -9.0))
	elif z <= 0.01:
		tmp = (27.0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7.6e-14)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t * Float64(y * -9.0)));
	elseif (z <= 0.01)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b)) + Float64(x * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z * Float64(y * -9.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -7.6e-14)
		tmp = z * (t * (y * -9.0));
	elseif (z <= 0.01)
		tmp = (27.0 * (a * b)) + (x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7.6e-14], N[(z * N[(t * N[(y * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 0.01], N[(N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * N[(z * N[(y * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -7.6000000000000004e-14

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 70.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 46.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 46.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 46.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(-9 \cdot t\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 46.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot \left(-9 \cdot t\right) \]

      4. associate-*r* 52.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-9 \cdot t\right)\right)} \]

      5. associate-*l* 52.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(y \cdot -9\right) \cdot t\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)} \]

      7. *-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-9 \cdot y\right)}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(-9 \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

   if -7.6000000000000004e-14 < z < 0.0100000000000000002

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x + 27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if 0.0100000000000000002 < z

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(9 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]

      2. associate-*l* 45.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 45.8%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot -9\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 45.8%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 45.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.6 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 0.01:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right) + x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 49.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-82} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.3e-82) (not (<= z 2.3e-74)))
   (* -9.0 (* t (* y z)))
   (* b (* a 27.0))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.3e-82) || !(z <= 2.3e-74)) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.3d-82)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.3d-74))) then
        tmp = (-9.0d0) * (t * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = b * (a * 27.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.3e-82) || !(z <= 2.3e-74)) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.3e-82) or not (z <= 2.3e-74):
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.3e-82) || !(z <= 2.3e-74))
		tmp = Float64(-9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.3e-82) || ~((z <= 2.3e-74)))
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.3e-82], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.3e-74]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.29999999999999997e-82 or 2.2999999999999998e-74 < z

   1. Initial program 91.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 42.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.29999999999999997e-82 < z < 2.2999999999999998e-74

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(27 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(27 \cdot a\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-82} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 51.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{-83}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-75}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -2.35e-83)
   (* -9.0 (* y (* z t)))
   (if (<= z 2.55e-75) (* b (* a 27.0)) (* t (* z (* y -9.0))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.35e-83) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t));
	} else if (z <= 2.55e-75) {
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-2.35d-83)) then
        tmp = (-9.0d0) * (y * (z * t))
    else if (z <= 2.55d-75) then
        tmp = b * (a * 27.0d0)
    else
        tmp = t * (z * (y * (-9.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.35e-83) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t));
	} else if (z <= 2.55e-75) {
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	} else {
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.35e-83:
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t))
	elif z <= 2.55e-75:
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0)
	else:
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.35e-83)
		tmp = Float64(-9.0 * Float64(y * Float64(z * t)));
	elseif (z <= 2.55e-75)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * Float64(z * Float64(y * -9.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.35e-83)
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t));
	elseif (z <= 2.55e-75)
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	else
		tmp = t * (z * (y * -9.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -2.35e-83], N[(-9.0 * N[(y * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 2.55e-75], N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * N[(z * N[(y * -9.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.3500000000000002e-83

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 45.8%

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 45.8%

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 44.5%

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 44.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.3500000000000002e-83 < z < 2.5500000000000002e-75

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(27 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(27 \cdot a\right)} \]

   if 2.5500000000000002e-75 < z

   1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      2. associate-*r* 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 95.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      5. associate-*l* 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   7. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(9 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 43.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 43.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right) \cdot -9} \]

      2. associate-*l* 43.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -9\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 43.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot -9\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 43.0%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 43.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{-83}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-75}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot -9\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 51.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-82}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-75}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3e-82)
   (* -9.0 (* y (* z t)))
   (if (<= z 7.2e-75) (* b (* a 27.0)) (* -9.0 (* t (* y z))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3e-82) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t));
	} else if (z <= 7.2e-75) {
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	} else {
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3d-82)) then
        tmp = (-9.0d0) * (y * (z * t))
    else if (z <= 7.2d-75) then
        tmp = b * (a * 27.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (-9.0d0) * (t * (y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3e-82) {
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t));
	} else if (z <= 7.2e-75) {
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	} else {
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3e-82:
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t))
	elif z <= 7.2e-75:
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0)
	else:
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3e-82)
		tmp = Float64(-9.0 * Float64(y * Float64(z * t)));
	elseif (z <= 7.2e-75)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-9.0 * Float64(t * Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3e-82)
		tmp = -9.0 * (y * (z * t));
	elseif (z <= 7.2e-75)
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	else
		tmp = -9.0 * (t * (y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3e-82], N[(-9.0 * N[(y * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 7.2e-75], N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-9.0 * N[(t * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.9999999999999999e-82

   1. Initial program 90.3%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 73.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{x}{y} + 27 \cdot \frac{a \cdot b}{y}\right) - 9 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 42.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 45.8%

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 45.8%

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 44.5%

         \[\leadsto -9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 44.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.9999999999999999e-82 < z < 7.2000000000000001e-75

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 52.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(27 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(27 \cdot a\right)} \]

   if 7.2000000000000001e-75 < z

   1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 93.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 43.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3 \cdot 10^{-82}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-75}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 93.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* z (* (* y 9.0) t))) (* a (* 27.0 b))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (z * ((y * 9.0) * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x * 2.0d0) - (z * ((y * 9.0d0) * t))) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x * 2.0) - (z * ((y * 9.0) * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x * 2.0) - (z * ((y * 9.0) * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b))

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * t))) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (z * ((y * 9.0) * t))) + (a * (27.0 * b));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.3%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   3. associate-*l* 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   4. associate-*l* 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.3%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{9 \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot z\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   2. associate-*r* 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right) \cdot z}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(9 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot 9\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   5. associate-*l* 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(y \cdot 9\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(9 \cdot y\right)}\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

7. Simplified 94.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(9 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]

8. Final simplification 94.1%

   \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - z \cdot \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right) \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 46.8% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+104} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.2e+104) (not (<= x 2.45e+56))) (* x 2.0) (* b (* a 27.0))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.2e+104) || !(x <= 2.45e+56)) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.2d+104)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.45d+56))) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = b * (a * 27.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.2e+104) || !(x <= 2.45e+56)) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.2e+104) or not (x <= 2.45e+56):
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.2e+104) || !(x <= 2.45e+56))
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(a * 27.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.2e+104) || ~((x <= 2.45e+56)))
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = b * (a * 27.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.2e+104], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.45e+56]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(b * N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.20000000000000001e104 or 2.4500000000000001e56 < x

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if -5.20000000000000001e104 < x < 2.4500000000000001e56

   1. Initial program 92.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 50.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(27 \cdot a\right) \cdot b} \]

      2. *-commutative 50.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(27 \cdot a\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(27 \cdot a\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+104} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{+56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(a \cdot 27\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 46.8% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+104} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.1 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.5e+104) (not (<= x 6.1e+55))) (* x 2.0) (* 27.0 (* a b))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.5e+104) || !(x <= 6.1e+55)) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.5d+104)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6.1d+55))) then
        tmp = x * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 27.0d0 * (a * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.5e+104) || !(x <= 6.1e+55)) {
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.5e+104) or not (x <= 6.1e+55):
		tmp = x * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b)
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.5e+104) || !(x <= 6.1e+55))
		tmp = Float64(x * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(27.0 * Float64(a * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.5e+104) || ~((x <= 6.1e+55)))
		tmp = x * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 27.0 * (a * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.5e+104], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6.1e+55]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(27.0 * N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.5000000000000005e104 or 6.1000000000000001e55 < x

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 96.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

   if -6.5000000000000005e104 < x < 6.1000000000000001e55

   1. Initial program 92.8%

      \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      2. sub-neg 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      3. associate-*l* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

      4. associate-*l* 96.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 50.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+104} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.1 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;27 \cdot \left(a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 30.8% accurate, 5.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z, t, a, b] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z, t, a, b])\\ \\ x \cdot 2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 (* x 2.0))

C

assert(x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b);
double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x * 2.0d0
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z && z < t && t < a && a < b;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x * 2.0;
}

Python

[x, y, z, t, a, b] = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x * 2.0

Julia

x, y, z, t, a, b = sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])
function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(x * 2.0)
end

MATLAB

x, y, z, t, a, b = num2cell(sort([x, y, z, t, a, b])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x * 2.0;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, z, t, a, and b should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.3%

   \[\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 + \left(-\left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   2. sub-neg 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right)} + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   3. associate-*l* 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b \]

   4. associate-*l* 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 30.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} \]

6. Final simplification 30.2%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 2 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 95.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y < 7.590524218811189 \cdot 10^{-161}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - \left(\left(y \cdot 9\right) \cdot z\right) \cdot t\right) + a \cdot \left(27 \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot 2 - 9 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)\right)\right) + \left(a \cdot 27\right) \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< y 7.590524218811189e-161)
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* a (* 27.0 b)))
   (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27.0) b))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y < 7.590524218811189d-161) then
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (((y * 9.0d0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0d0 * b))
    else
        tmp = ((x * 2.0d0) - (9.0d0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0d0) * b)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161) {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if y < 7.590524218811189e-161:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + Float64(a * Float64(27.0 * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 2.0) - Float64(9.0 * Float64(y * Float64(t * z)))) + Float64(Float64(a * 27.0) * b));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y < 7.590524218811189e-161)
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (((y * 9.0) * z) * t)) + (a * (27.0 * b));
	else
		tmp = ((x * 2.0) - (9.0 * (y * (t * z)))) + ((a * 27.0) * b);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Less[y, 7.590524218811189e-161], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(y * 9.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(27.0 * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(9.0 * N[(y * N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * 27.0), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024087 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:cubForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< y 7.590524218811189e-161) (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* a (* 27.0 b))) (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* 9.0 (* y (* t z)))) (* (* a 27.0) b)))

  (+ (- (* x 2.0) (* (* (* y 9.0) z) t)) (* (* a 27.0) b)))