System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 61.4% → 98.3%

Time: 22.5s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 211.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = 4.433654731545134e-107
  2. y = 3.558117974606999e+75
  3. z = 9.844570931981268e+23
  4. t = 1.8218332654949117e-118

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 61.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (log1p (* y (expm1 z))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log1p((y * expm1(z))) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log1p((y * Math.expm1(z))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log1p((y * math.expm1(z))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * expm1(z))) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.7%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 77.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 77.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 81.8%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 99.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 93.7% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -6.5e+19)
   (+ x (/ 1.0 (/ (- (/ t (- 1.0 (exp z))) (* 0.5 (* y t))) y)))
   (-
    x
    (/
     (log1p (* z (+ y (* z (+ (* 0.16666666666666666 (* y z)) (* y 0.5))))))
     t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.5e+19) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5)))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -6.5e+19) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - Math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5)))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -6.5e+19:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((z * (y + (z * ((0.16666666666666666 * (y * z)) + (y * 0.5)))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -6.5e+19)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(t / Float64(1.0 - exp(z))) - Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * t))) / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(0.16666666666666666 * Float64(y * z)) + Float64(y * 0.5)))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -6.5e+19], N[(x + N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(t / N[(1.0 - N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.5 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(z * N[(y + N[(z * N[(N[(0.16666666666666666 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.5e19

   1. Initial program 82.9%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 82.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 82.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 83.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + \frac{t}{e^{z} - 1}}{y}}} \]

   if -6.5e19 < z

   1. Initial program 52.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 74.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 74.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 74.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 74.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 74.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 74.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 74.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 74.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot y\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+19}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + z \cdot \left(0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 93.5% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.8e+14)
   (+ x (/ 1.0 (/ (- (/ t (- 1.0 (exp z))) (* 0.5 (* y t))) y)))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* z (+ y (* 0.5 (* y z))))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.8e+14) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.8e+14) {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - Math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.8e+14:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / (((t / (1.0 - math.exp(z))) - (0.5 * (y * t))) / y))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.8e+14)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(t / Float64(1.0 - exp(z))) - Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * t))) / y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * z))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.8e+14], N[(x + N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(t / N[(1.0 - N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.5 * N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(z * N[(y + N[(0.5 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.8e14

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around 0 83.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) + \frac{t}{e^{z} - 1}}{y}}} \]

   if -3.8e14 < z

   1. Initial program 51.4%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 74.4%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{1 - e^{z}} - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)}{y}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 91.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.8e+14)
   (- x (/ (* y (expm1 z)) t))
   (- x (/ (log1p (* z (+ y (* 0.5 (* y z))))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.8e+14) {
		tmp = x - ((y * expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.8e+14) {
		tmp = x - ((y * Math.expm1(z)) / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.8e+14:
		tmp = x - ((y * math.expm1(z)) / t)
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p((z * (y + (0.5 * (y * z))))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.8e+14)
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * expm1(z)) / t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * Float64(y * z))))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.8e+14], N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(z * N[(y + N[(0.5 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.8e14

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 78.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-define 78.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 78.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   if -3.8e14 < z

   1. Initial program 51.4%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 74.4%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 86.2% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (* y (/ (expm1 z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (expm1(z) / t));
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (Math.expm1(z) / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (y * (math.expm1(z) / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(expm1(z) / t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(y * N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.7%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 77.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 77.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 81.8%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 99.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.9%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 74.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

   2. expm1-define 88.2%

      \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

7. Simplified 88.2%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 70.9% accurate, 13.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.55 \cdot 10^{-222}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-226}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{z}{-t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -2.55e-222) x (if (<= t 9.5e-226) (* y (/ z (- t))) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.55e-222) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (t <= 9.5e-226) {
		tmp = y * (z / -t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-2.55d-222)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (t <= 9.5d-226) then
        tmp = y * (z / -t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.55e-222) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (t <= 9.5e-226) {
		tmp = y * (z / -t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -2.55e-222:
		tmp = x
	elif t <= 9.5e-226:
		tmp = y * (z / -t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -2.55e-222)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (t <= 9.5e-226)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z / Float64(-t)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -2.55e-222)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (t <= 9.5e-226)
		tmp = y * (z / -t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -2.55e-222], x, If[LessEqual[t, 9.5e-226], N[(y * N[(z / (-t)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -2.5500000000000001e-222 or 9.5000000000000007e-226 < t

   1. Initial program 66.9%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 85.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 85.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 86.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 86.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 86.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 86.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 86.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 86.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 86.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 86.3%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.3%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2.5500000000000001e-222 < t < 9.5000000000000007e-226

   1. Initial program 21.9%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 27.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 27.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 53.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 97.1%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 54.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 57.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 57.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 41.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 41.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 43.8%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 43.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 43.8%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{-t}} \]

   10. Simplified 43.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{-t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 82.1% accurate, 14.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{t + -0.5 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (/ -1.0 (/ (+ t (* -0.5 (* z t))) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (-1.0 / ((t + (-0.5 * (z * t))) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * ((-1.0d0) / ((t + ((-0.5d0) * (z * t))) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (-1.0 / ((t + (-0.5 * (z * t))) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (-1.0 / ((t + (-0.5 * (z * t))) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(t + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(z * t))) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (-1.0 / ((t + (-0.5 * (z * t))) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(t + N[(-0.5 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.7%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 77.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 77.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 81.8%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 99.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 74.9%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}{t}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 74.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{z} - 1}{t}} \]

   2. expm1-define 88.2%

      \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

7. Simplified 88.2%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 88.2%

      \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}} \]

   2. inv-pow 88.2%

      \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

9. Applied egg-rr 88.2%

   \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
10. Step-by-step derivation

    1. unpow-1 88.2%

       \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}} \]

11. Simplified 88.2%

    \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}} \]

12. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.9%

    \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{t + -0.5 \cdot \left(t \cdot z\right)}{z}}} \]
13. Step-by-step derivation

    1. *-commutative 84.9%

       \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{t + -0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t\right)}}{z}} \]

14. Simplified 84.9%

    \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{t + -0.5 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}{z}}} \]

15. Final simplification 84.9%

    \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{t + -0.5 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)}{z}} \]
16. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 82.5% accurate, 17.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.00295:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -0.00295) x (- x (/ y (/ t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -0.00295) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-0.00295d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y / (t / z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -0.00295) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -0.00295:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -0.00295)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / Float64(t / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -0.00295)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -0.00295], x, N[(x - N[(y / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -0.00294999999999999993

   1. Initial program 84.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 84.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 84.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -0.00294999999999999993 < z

   1. Initial program 50.6%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 74.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 92.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 92.6%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

      2. un-div-inv 92.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 82.5% accurate, 17.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.00295:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -0.00295) x (- x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -0.00295) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-0.00295d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -0.00295) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -0.00295:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -0.00295)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -0.00295)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -0.00295], x, N[(x - N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -0.00294999999999999993

   1. Initial program 84.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 84.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 84.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -0.00294999999999999993 < z

   1. Initial program 50.6%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      2. sub-neg 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. log1p-define 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      4. neg-sub0 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      5. associate-+l- 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. neg-sub0 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      7. +-commutative 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      8. unsub-neg 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      9. *-rgt-identity 74.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      10. distribute-lft-out-- 74.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      11. expm1-define 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 92.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 92.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]

   7. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 71.5% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.7%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 77.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   2. sub-neg 77.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. log1p-define 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-\left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   4. neg-sub0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{0 - \left(y - y \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. associate-+l- 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(0 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. neg-sub0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   7. +-commutative 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   8. unsub-neg 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   9. *-rgt-identity 81.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   10. distribute-lft-out-- 81.8%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   11. expm1-define 99.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 74.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{-0.5}{y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -2.8874623088207947 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \frac{t\_1}{z \cdot z}\right) - t\_1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{z \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(1 + z \cdot y\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (- 0.5) (* y t))))
   (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119)
     (- (- x (/ t_1 (* z z))) (* t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z))))
     (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = -0.5d0 / (y * t)
    if (z < (-2.8874623088207947d+119)) then
        tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0d0 / z) / (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x - (log((1.0d0 + (z * y))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -2.8874623088207947e+119:
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-0.5) / Float64(y * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(t_1 / Float64(z * z))) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * y))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[((-0.5) / N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -2.8874623088207947e+119], N[(N[(x - N[(t$95$1 / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024087 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119) (- (- x (/ (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (* z z))) (* (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z)))) (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))

  (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))