Quadratic roots, medium range

Percentage Accurate: 31.4% → 95.5%
Time: 14.0s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 29.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(\left(1.1102230246251565 \cdot 10^{-16} < a \land a < 9007199254740992\right) \land \left(1.1102230246251565 \cdot 10^{-16} < b \land b < 9007199254740992\right)\right) \land \left(1.1102230246251565 \cdot 10^{-16} < c \land c < 9007199254740992\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (- b) (sqrt (- (* b b) (* (* 4.0 a) c)))) (* 2.0 a)))
double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
}
real(8) function code(a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0d0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0d0 * a)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (-b + Math.sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
}
def code(a, b, c):
	return (-b + math.sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a)
function code(a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-b) + sqrt(Float64(Float64(b * b) - Float64(Float64(4.0 * a) * c)))) / Float64(2.0 * a))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, c)
	tmp = (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
end
code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[((-b) + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(4.0 * a), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 31.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (- b) (sqrt (- (* b b) (* (* 4.0 a) c)))) (* 2.0 a)))
double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
}
real(8) function code(a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0d0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0d0 * a)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (-b + Math.sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
}
def code(a, b, c):
	return (-b + math.sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a)
function code(a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-b) + sqrt(Float64(Float64(b * b) - Float64(Float64(4.0 * a) * c)))) / Float64(2.0 * a))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, c)
	tmp = (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
end
code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[((-b) + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(4.0 * a), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 95.5% accurate, 0.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \frac{20 \cdot {c}^{4}}{{b}^{6}}}{b}\right) - \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (*
   a
   (-
    (*
     a
     (+
      (* -2.0 (/ (pow c 3.0) (pow b 5.0)))
      (* -0.25 (/ (* a (/ (* 20.0 (pow c 4.0)) (pow b 6.0))) b))))
    (/ (pow c 2.0) (pow b 3.0))))
  (/ c b)))
double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (a * ((a * ((-2.0 * (pow(c, 3.0) / pow(b, 5.0))) + (-0.25 * ((a * ((20.0 * pow(c, 4.0)) / pow(b, 6.0))) / b)))) - (pow(c, 2.0) / pow(b, 3.0)))) - (c / b);
}
real(8) function code(a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (a * ((a * (((-2.0d0) * ((c ** 3.0d0) / (b ** 5.0d0))) + ((-0.25d0) * ((a * ((20.0d0 * (c ** 4.0d0)) / (b ** 6.0d0))) / b)))) - ((c ** 2.0d0) / (b ** 3.0d0)))) - (c / b)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (a * ((a * ((-2.0 * (Math.pow(c, 3.0) / Math.pow(b, 5.0))) + (-0.25 * ((a * ((20.0 * Math.pow(c, 4.0)) / Math.pow(b, 6.0))) / b)))) - (Math.pow(c, 2.0) / Math.pow(b, 3.0)))) - (c / b);
}
def code(a, b, c):
	return (a * ((a * ((-2.0 * (math.pow(c, 3.0) / math.pow(b, 5.0))) + (-0.25 * ((a * ((20.0 * math.pow(c, 4.0)) / math.pow(b, 6.0))) / b)))) - (math.pow(c, 2.0) / math.pow(b, 3.0)))) - (c / b)
function code(a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(a * Float64(Float64(a * Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64((c ^ 3.0) / (b ^ 5.0))) + Float64(-0.25 * Float64(Float64(a * Float64(Float64(20.0 * (c ^ 4.0)) / (b ^ 6.0))) / b)))) - Float64((c ^ 2.0) / (b ^ 3.0)))) - Float64(c / b))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, c)
	tmp = (a * ((a * ((-2.0 * ((c ^ 3.0) / (b ^ 5.0))) + (-0.25 * ((a * ((20.0 * (c ^ 4.0)) / (b ^ 6.0))) / b)))) - ((c ^ 2.0) / (b ^ 3.0)))) - (c / b);
end
code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(a * N[(N[(a * N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(N[Power[c, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-0.25 * N[(N[(a * N[(N[(20.0 * N[Power[c, 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 6.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
a \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \frac{20 \cdot {c}^{4}}{{b}^{6}}}{b}\right) - \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 32.3%

    \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative32.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
  3. Simplified32.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 94.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + a \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{{c}^{4}}{{b}^{6}} + 16 \cdot \frac{{c}^{4}}{{b}^{6}}\right)}{b}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 94.2%

    \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + a \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(20 \cdot \frac{{c}^{4}}{{b}^{6}}\right)}}{b}\right)\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/94.2%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + a \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{20 \cdot {c}^{4}}{{b}^{6}}}}{b}\right)\right) \]
  8. Simplified94.2%

    \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + a \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{20 \cdot {c}^{4}}{{b}^{6}}}}{b}\right)\right) \]
  9. Final simplification94.2%

    \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{a \cdot \frac{20 \cdot {c}^{4}}{{b}^{6}}}{b}\right) - \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b} \]
  10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 95.3% accurate, 0.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ c \cdot \left(c \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}, {a}^{3} \cdot \left(-5 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{7}} + -2 \cdot \frac{c}{a \cdot {b}^{5}}\right)\right) + \frac{-1}{b}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  c
  (+
   (*
    c
    (fma
     -1.0
     (/ a (pow b 3.0))
     (*
      (pow a 3.0)
      (+
       (* -5.0 (/ (pow c 2.0) (pow b 7.0)))
       (* -2.0 (/ c (* a (pow b 5.0))))))))
   (/ -1.0 b))))
double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return c * ((c * fma(-1.0, (a / pow(b, 3.0)), (pow(a, 3.0) * ((-5.0 * (pow(c, 2.0) / pow(b, 7.0))) + (-2.0 * (c / (a * pow(b, 5.0)))))))) + (-1.0 / b));
}
function code(a, b, c)
	return Float64(c * Float64(Float64(c * fma(-1.0, Float64(a / (b ^ 3.0)), Float64((a ^ 3.0) * Float64(Float64(-5.0 * Float64((c ^ 2.0) / (b ^ 7.0))) + Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c / Float64(a * (b ^ 5.0)))))))) + Float64(-1.0 / b)))
end
code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(c * N[(N[(c * N[(-1.0 * N[(a / N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[a, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(-5.0 * N[(N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 7.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-2.0 * N[(c / N[(a * N[Power[b, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
c \cdot \left(c \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}, {a}^{3} \cdot \left(-5 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{7}} + -2 \cdot \frac{c}{a \cdot {b}^{5}}\right)\right) + \frac{-1}{b}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 32.3%

    \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative32.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
  3. Simplified32.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 93.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}} + c \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2}}{{b}^{5}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{c \cdot \left(4 \cdot \frac{{a}^{4}}{{b}^{6}} + 16 \cdot \frac{{a}^{4}}{{b}^{6}}\right)}{a \cdot b}\right)\right) - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. Simplified93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(c \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}, c \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-2, \frac{{a}^{2}}{{b}^{5}}, -0.25 \cdot \left(c \cdot \frac{\frac{{a}^{4}}{{b}^{6}} \cdot 20}{a \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    2. Taylor expanded in a around inf 93.8%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}, \color{blue}{{a}^{3} \cdot \left(-5 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{7}} + -2 \cdot \frac{c}{a \cdot {b}^{5}}\right)}\right) - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
    3. Final simplification93.8%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}, {a}^{3} \cdot \left(-5 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{7}} + -2 \cdot \frac{c}{a \cdot {b}^{5}}\right)\right) + \frac{-1}{b}\right) \]
    4. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 3: 94.0% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot \left(\frac{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot {c}^{3}\right)}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (a b c)
     :precision binary64
     (-
      (*
       a
       (- (/ (* -2.0 (* a (pow c 3.0))) (pow b 5.0)) (/ (pow c 2.0) (pow b 3.0))))
      (/ c b)))
    double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return (a * (((-2.0 * (a * pow(c, 3.0))) / pow(b, 5.0)) - (pow(c, 2.0) / pow(b, 3.0)))) - (c / b);
    }
    
    real(8) function code(a, b, c)
        real(8), intent (in) :: a
        real(8), intent (in) :: b
        real(8), intent (in) :: c
        code = (a * ((((-2.0d0) * (a * (c ** 3.0d0))) / (b ** 5.0d0)) - ((c ** 2.0d0) / (b ** 3.0d0)))) - (c / b)
    end function
    
    public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return (a * (((-2.0 * (a * Math.pow(c, 3.0))) / Math.pow(b, 5.0)) - (Math.pow(c, 2.0) / Math.pow(b, 3.0)))) - (c / b);
    }
    
    def code(a, b, c):
    	return (a * (((-2.0 * (a * math.pow(c, 3.0))) / math.pow(b, 5.0)) - (math.pow(c, 2.0) / math.pow(b, 3.0)))) - (c / b)
    
    function code(a, b, c)
    	return Float64(Float64(a * Float64(Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64(a * (c ^ 3.0))) / (b ^ 5.0)) - Float64((c ^ 2.0) / (b ^ 3.0)))) - Float64(c / b))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(a, b, c)
    	tmp = (a * (((-2.0 * (a * (c ^ 3.0))) / (b ^ 5.0)) - ((c ^ 2.0) / (b ^ 3.0)))) - (c / b);
    end
    
    code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(a * N[(N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(a * N[Power[c, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    a \cdot \left(\frac{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot {c}^{3}\right)}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 32.3%

      \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative32.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    3. Simplified32.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot c}{{b}^{5}} + -1 \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -1 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)} \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative92.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -1 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b}} \]
      2. mul-1-neg92.5%

        \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -1 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{c}{b}\right)} \]
      3. unsub-neg92.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -1 \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}} \]
      4. mul-1-neg92.5%

        \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)}\right) - \frac{c}{b} \]
      5. unsub-neg92.5%

        \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)} - \frac{c}{b} \]
      6. associate-*r/92.5%

        \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot {c}^{3}\right)}{{b}^{5}}} - \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b} \]
    8. Simplified92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(\frac{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot {c}^{3}\right)}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}} \]
    9. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 4: 93.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot {a}^{2}}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right) + \frac{-1}{b}\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (a b c)
     :precision binary64
     (*
      c
      (+
       (* c (- (* -2.0 (/ (* c (pow a 2.0)) (pow b 5.0))) (/ a (pow b 3.0))))
       (/ -1.0 b))))
    double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return c * ((c * ((-2.0 * ((c * pow(a, 2.0)) / pow(b, 5.0))) - (a / pow(b, 3.0)))) + (-1.0 / b));
    }
    
    real(8) function code(a, b, c)
        real(8), intent (in) :: a
        real(8), intent (in) :: b
        real(8), intent (in) :: c
        code = c * ((c * (((-2.0d0) * ((c * (a ** 2.0d0)) / (b ** 5.0d0))) - (a / (b ** 3.0d0)))) + ((-1.0d0) / b))
    end function
    
    public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return c * ((c * ((-2.0 * ((c * Math.pow(a, 2.0)) / Math.pow(b, 5.0))) - (a / Math.pow(b, 3.0)))) + (-1.0 / b));
    }
    
    def code(a, b, c):
    	return c * ((c * ((-2.0 * ((c * math.pow(a, 2.0)) / math.pow(b, 5.0))) - (a / math.pow(b, 3.0)))) + (-1.0 / b))
    
    function code(a, b, c)
    	return Float64(c * Float64(Float64(c * Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64(Float64(c * (a ^ 2.0)) / (b ^ 5.0))) - Float64(a / (b ^ 3.0)))) + Float64(-1.0 / b)))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(a, b, c)
    	tmp = c * ((c * ((-2.0 * ((c * (a ^ 2.0)) / (b ^ 5.0))) - (a / (b ^ 3.0)))) + (-1.0 / b));
    end
    
    code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(c * N[(N[(c * N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(N[(c * N[Power[a, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a / N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot {a}^{2}}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right) + \frac{-1}{b}\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 32.3%

      \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative32.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    3. Simplified32.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot c}{{b}^{5}} + -1 \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    6. Final simplification92.1%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-2 \cdot \frac{c \cdot {a}^{2}}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right) + \frac{-1}{b}\right) \]
    7. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 5: 90.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, {\left(\frac{c}{b}\right)}^{2}, c\right)}{-b} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (a b c) :precision binary64 (/ (fma a (pow (/ c b) 2.0) c) (- b)))
    double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return fma(a, pow((c / b), 2.0), c) / -b;
    }
    
    function code(a, b, c)
    	return Float64(fma(a, (Float64(c / b) ^ 2.0), c) / Float64(-b))
    end
    
    code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[N[(c / b), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision] + c), $MachinePrecision] / (-b)), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, {\left(\frac{c}{b}\right)}^{2}, c\right)}{-b}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 32.3%

      \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative32.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    3. Simplified32.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)}{{b}^{3}}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
      2. neg-mul-189.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-a \cdot c}}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(-c\right)}}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
    7. Simplified89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\frac{a \cdot \left(-c\right)}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in c around inf 89.1%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right)\right)} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}} + \left(-\frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right)\right)}\right) \]
      2. +-commutative89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)}\right) \]
      3. mul-1-neg89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(-\frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)}\right)\right) \]
      4. unsub-neg89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right) - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)}\right) \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{b \cdot c}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
      6. metadata-eval89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{b \cdot c} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
      7. *-commutative89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\color{blue}{c \cdot b}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
    10. Simplified89.1%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{c \cdot b} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right)} \]
    11. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-un-lft-identity89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{-1}{c \cdot b}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
      2. associate-/r*89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(1 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-1}{c}}{b}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
    12. Applied egg-rr89.1%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\frac{-1}{c}}{b}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
    13. Taylor expanded in b around inf 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot c + -1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{2}}}{b}} \]
    14. Step-by-step derivation
      1. distribute-lft-out89.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(c + \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{2}}\right)}}{b} \]
      2. associate-*r/89.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c + \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{2}}}{b}} \]
      3. mul-1-neg89.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{c + \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{2}}}{b}} \]
      4. distribute-neg-frac289.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{c + \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{2}}}{-b}} \]
      5. +-commutative89.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{2}} + c}}{-b} \]
      6. associate-/l*89.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{2}}} + c}{-b} \]
      7. fma-define89.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \frac{{c}^{2}}{{b}^{2}}, c\right)}}{-b} \]
      8. unpow289.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \frac{\color{blue}{c \cdot c}}{{b}^{2}}, c\right)}{-b} \]
      9. unpow289.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \frac{c \cdot c}{\color{blue}{b \cdot b}}, c\right)}{-b} \]
      10. times-frac89.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{\frac{c}{b} \cdot \frac{c}{b}}, c\right)}{-b} \]
      11. unpow289.6%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{c}{b}\right)}^{2}}, c\right)}{-b} \]
    15. Simplified89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, {\left(\frac{c}{b}\right)}^{2}, c\right)}{-b}} \]
    16. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 6: 90.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ c \cdot \frac{-1 - \frac{c \cdot a}{{b}^{2}}}{b} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (a b c)
     :precision binary64
     (* c (/ (- -1.0 (/ (* c a) (pow b 2.0))) b)))
    double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return c * ((-1.0 - ((c * a) / pow(b, 2.0))) / b);
    }
    
    real(8) function code(a, b, c)
        real(8), intent (in) :: a
        real(8), intent (in) :: b
        real(8), intent (in) :: c
        code = c * (((-1.0d0) - ((c * a) / (b ** 2.0d0))) / b)
    end function
    
    public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return c * ((-1.0 - ((c * a) / Math.pow(b, 2.0))) / b);
    }
    
    def code(a, b, c):
    	return c * ((-1.0 - ((c * a) / math.pow(b, 2.0))) / b)
    
    function code(a, b, c)
    	return Float64(c * Float64(Float64(-1.0 - Float64(Float64(c * a) / (b ^ 2.0))) / b))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(a, b, c)
    	tmp = c * ((-1.0 - ((c * a) / (b ^ 2.0))) / b);
    end
    
    code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(c * N[(N[(-1.0 - N[(N[(c * a), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    c \cdot \frac{-1 - \frac{c \cdot a}{{b}^{2}}}{b}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 32.3%

      \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative32.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    3. Simplified32.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)}{{b}^{3}}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
      2. neg-mul-189.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-a \cdot c}}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(-c\right)}}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
    7. Simplified89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\frac{a \cdot \left(-c\right)}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 89.3%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{2}} - 1}{b}} \]
    9. Final simplification89.3%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \frac{-1 - \frac{c \cdot a}{{b}^{2}}}{b} \]
    10. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 7: 90.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{b} - a \cdot \frac{c}{{b}^{3}}\right) \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (a b c)
     :precision binary64
     (* c (- (/ -1.0 b) (* a (/ c (pow b 3.0))))))
    double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return c * ((-1.0 / b) - (a * (c / pow(b, 3.0))));
    }
    
    real(8) function code(a, b, c)
        real(8), intent (in) :: a
        real(8), intent (in) :: b
        real(8), intent (in) :: c
        code = c * (((-1.0d0) / b) - (a * (c / (b ** 3.0d0))))
    end function
    
    public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return c * ((-1.0 / b) - (a * (c / Math.pow(b, 3.0))));
    }
    
    def code(a, b, c):
    	return c * ((-1.0 / b) - (a * (c / math.pow(b, 3.0))))
    
    function code(a, b, c)
    	return Float64(c * Float64(Float64(-1.0 / b) - Float64(a * Float64(c / (b ^ 3.0)))))
    end
    
    function tmp = code(a, b, c)
    	tmp = c * ((-1.0 / b) - (a * (c / (b ^ 3.0))));
    end
    
    code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(c * N[(N[(-1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a * N[(c / N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{b} - a \cdot \frac{c}{{b}^{3}}\right)
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 32.3%

      \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative32.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    3. Simplified32.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)}{{b}^{3}}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
      2. neg-mul-189.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-a \cdot c}}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(-c\right)}}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
    7. Simplified89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\frac{a \cdot \left(-c\right)}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in c around inf 89.1%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right)\right)} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}} + \left(-\frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right)\right)}\right) \]
      2. +-commutative89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)}\right) \]
      3. mul-1-neg89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(-\frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)}\right)\right) \]
      4. unsub-neg89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{1}{b \cdot c}\right) - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)}\right) \]
      5. distribute-neg-frac89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1}{b \cdot c}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
      6. metadata-eval89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{b \cdot c} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
      7. *-commutative89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{\color{blue}{c \cdot b}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
    10. Simplified89.1%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{c \cdot b} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right)} \]
    11. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-un-lft-identity89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{-1}{c \cdot b}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
      2. associate-/r*89.1%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(1 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-1}{c}}{b}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
    12. Applied egg-rr89.1%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\frac{-1}{c}}{b}} - \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
    13. Taylor expanded in c around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    14. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}} + \left(-\frac{1}{b}\right)\right)} \]
      2. distribute-neg-frac89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}} + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{b}}\right) \]
      3. metadata-eval89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}} + \frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{b}\right) \]
      4. +-commutative89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{b} + -1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}}\right)} \]
      5. mul-1-neg89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{b} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}}\right)}\right) \]
      6. *-commutative89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{b} + \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{c \cdot a}}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right) \]
      7. associate-*r/89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{b} + \left(-\color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}}\right)\right) \]
      8. unsub-neg89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{b} - c \cdot \frac{a}{{b}^{3}}\right)} \]
      9. associate-*r/89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{b} - \color{blue}{\frac{c \cdot a}{{b}^{3}}}\right) \]
      10. *-commutative89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{b} - \frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot c}}{{b}^{3}}\right) \]
      11. associate-/l*89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{b} - \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{c}{{b}^{3}}}\right) \]
    15. Simplified89.3%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{b} - a \cdot \frac{c}{{b}^{3}}\right)} \]
    16. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 8: 81.3% accurate, 29.0× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-c}{b} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (a b c) :precision binary64 (/ (- c) b))
    double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return -c / b;
    }
    
    real(8) function code(a, b, c)
        real(8), intent (in) :: a
        real(8), intent (in) :: b
        real(8), intent (in) :: c
        code = -c / b
    end function
    
    public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return -c / b;
    }
    
    def code(a, b, c):
    	return -c / b
    
    function code(a, b, c)
    	return Float64(Float64(-c) / b)
    end
    
    function tmp = code(a, b, c)
    	tmp = -c / b;
    end
    
    code[a_, b_, c_] := N[((-c) / b), $MachinePrecision]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \frac{-c}{b}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 32.3%

      \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative32.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    3. Simplified32.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b}} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/80.7%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot c}{b}} \]
      2. mul-1-neg80.7%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-c}}{b} \]
    7. Simplified80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-c}{b}} \]
    8. Add Preprocessing

    Alternative 9: 3.2% accurate, 116.0× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (a b c) :precision binary64 0.0)
    double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return 0.0;
    }
    
    real(8) function code(a, b, c)
        real(8), intent (in) :: a
        real(8), intent (in) :: b
        real(8), intent (in) :: c
        code = 0.0d0
    end function
    
    public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	return 0.0;
    }
    
    def code(a, b, c):
    	return 0.0
    
    function code(a, b, c)
    	return 0.0
    end
    
    function tmp = code(a, b, c)
    	tmp = 0.0;
    end
    
    code[a_, b_, c_] := 0.0
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    0
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Initial program 32.3%

      \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative32.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    3. Simplified32.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
    4. Add Preprocessing
    5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    6. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)}{{b}^{3}}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
      2. neg-mul-189.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-a \cdot c}}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in89.3%

        \[\leadsto c \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{a \cdot \left(-c\right)}}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right) \]
    7. Simplified89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot \left(\frac{a \cdot \left(-c\right)}{{b}^{3}} - \frac{1}{b}\right)} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in a around 0 80.5%

      \[\leadsto c \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{b}} \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. expm1-log1p-u72.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(c \cdot \frac{-1}{b}\right)\right)} \]
      2. expm1-undefine34.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(c \cdot \frac{-1}{b}\right)} - 1} \]
    10. Applied egg-rr34.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(c \cdot \frac{-1}{b}\right)} - 1} \]
    11. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg34.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(c \cdot \frac{-1}{b}\right)} + \left(-1\right)} \]
      2. metadata-eval34.5%

        \[\leadsto e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(c \cdot \frac{-1}{b}\right)} + \color{blue}{-1} \]
      3. +-commutative34.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(c \cdot \frac{-1}{b}\right)}} \]
      4. log1p-undefine34.5%

        \[\leadsto -1 + e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + c \cdot \frac{-1}{b}\right)}} \]
      5. rem-exp-log42.7%

        \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + c \cdot \frac{-1}{b}\right)} \]
      6. associate-*r/42.7%

        \[\leadsto -1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{c \cdot -1}{b}}\right) \]
      7. *-commutative42.7%

        \[\leadsto -1 + \left(1 + \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot c}}{b}\right) \]
      8. associate-*r/42.7%

        \[\leadsto -1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b}}\right) \]
      9. mul-1-neg42.7%

        \[\leadsto -1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{c}{b}\right)}\right) \]
      10. unsub-neg42.7%

        \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{c}{b}\right)} \]
    12. Simplified42.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + \left(1 - \frac{c}{b}\right)} \]
    13. Taylor expanded in c around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto -1 + \color{blue}{1} \]
    14. Final simplification3.2%

      \[\leadsto 0 \]
    15. Add Preprocessing

    Reproduce

    ?
    herbie shell --seed 2024086 
    (FPCore (a b c)
      :name "Quadratic roots, medium range"
      :precision binary64
      :pre (and (and (and (< 1.1102230246251565e-16 a) (< a 9007199254740992.0)) (and (< 1.1102230246251565e-16 b) (< b 9007199254740992.0))) (and (< 1.1102230246251565e-16 c) (< c 9007199254740992.0)))
      (/ (+ (- b) (sqrt (- (* b b) (* (* 4.0 a) c)))) (* 2.0 a)))