_multiplyComplex, real part

Percentage Accurate: 99.3% → 99.3%

Time: 2.7s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 1.0×

• 23.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x.re \cdot y.re - x.im \cdot y.im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* x.re y.re) (* x.im y.im)))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    code = (x_46re * y_46re) - (x_46im * y_46im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im);
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	return (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im)

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return Float64(Float64(x_46_re * y_46_re) - Float64(x_46_im * y_46_im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im);
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(N[(x$46$re * y$46$re), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x$46$im * y$46$im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x.re \cdot y.re - x.im \cdot y.im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* x.re y.re) (* x.im y.im)))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    code = (x_46re * y_46re) - (x_46im * y_46im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im);
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	return (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im)

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return Float64(Float64(x_46_re * y_46_re) - Float64(x_46_im * y_46_im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im);
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(N[(x$46$re * y$46$re), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x$46$im * y$46$im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x.re \cdot y.re - x.im \cdot y.im \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* x.re y.re) (* x.im y.im)))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    code = (x_46re * y_46re) - (x_46im * y_46im)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im);
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	return (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im)

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return Float64(Float64(x_46_re * y_46_re) - Float64(x_46_im * y_46_im))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = (x_46_re * y_46_re) - (x_46_im * y_46_im);
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(N[(x$46$re * y$46$re), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x$46$im * y$46$im), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x.re \cdot y.re - x.im \cdot y.im \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 67.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y.im \leq -8.6 \cdot 10^{-152} \lor \neg \left(y.im \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y.im \cdot \left(-x.im\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x.re \cdot y.re\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y.im -8.6e-152) (not (<= y.im 3.1e-66)))
   (* y.im (- x.im))
   (* x.re y.re)))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y_46_im <= -8.6e-152) || !(y_46_im <= 3.1e-66)) {
		tmp = y_46_im * -x_46_im;
	} else {
		tmp = x_46_re * y_46_re;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y_46im <= (-8.6d-152)) .or. (.not. (y_46im <= 3.1d-66))) then
        tmp = y_46im * -x_46im
    else
        tmp = x_46re * y_46re
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y_46_im <= -8.6e-152) || !(y_46_im <= 3.1e-66)) {
		tmp = y_46_im * -x_46_im;
	} else {
		tmp = x_46_re * y_46_re;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	tmp = 0
	if (y_46_im <= -8.6e-152) or not (y_46_im <= 3.1e-66):
		tmp = y_46_im * -x_46_im
	else:
		tmp = x_46_re * y_46_re
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y_46_im <= -8.6e-152) || !(y_46_im <= 3.1e-66))
		tmp = Float64(y_46_im * Float64(-x_46_im));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x_46_re * y_46_re);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y_46_im <= -8.6e-152) || ~((y_46_im <= 3.1e-66)))
		tmp = y_46_im * -x_46_im;
	else
		tmp = x_46_re * y_46_re;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y$46$im, -8.6e-152], N[Not[LessEqual[y$46$im, 3.1e-66]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y$46$im * (-x$46$im)), $MachinePrecision], N[(x$46$re * y$46$re), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y.im < -8.5999999999999997e-152 or 3.0999999999999997e-66 < y.im

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[x.re \cdot y.re - x.im \cdot y.im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x.re around 0 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x.im \cdot y.im\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 72.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x.im \cdot y.im} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 72.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x.im \cdot \left(-y.im\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x.im \cdot \left(-y.im\right)} \]

   if -8.5999999999999997e-152 < y.im < 3.0999999999999997e-66

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x.re \cdot y.re - x.im \cdot y.im \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x.re around inf 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x.re \cdot y.re} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y.im \leq -8.6 \cdot 10^{-152} \lor \neg \left(y.im \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{-66}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y.im \cdot \left(-x.im\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x.re \cdot y.re\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 51.8% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x.re \cdot y.re \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im) :precision binary64 (* x.re y.re))

C

double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return x_46_re * y_46_re;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x_46re, x_46im, y_46re, y_46im)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_46im
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46re
    real(8), intent (in) :: y_46im
    code = x_46re * y_46re
end function

Java

public static double code(double x_46_re, double x_46_im, double y_46_re, double y_46_im) {
	return x_46_re * y_46_re;
}

Python

def code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im):
	return x_46_re * y_46_re

Julia

function code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	return Float64(x_46_re * y_46_re)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x_46_re, x_46_im, y_46_re, y_46_im)
	tmp = x_46_re * y_46_re;
end

Wolfram

code[x$46$re_, x$46$im_, y$46$re_, y$46$im_] := N[(x$46$re * y$46$re), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.4%

   \[x.re \cdot y.re - x.im \cdot y.im \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x.re around inf 43.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x.re \cdot y.re} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024086 
(FPCore (x.re x.im y.re y.im)
  :name "_multiplyComplex, real part"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* x.re y.re) (* x.im y.im)))