Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C

Percentage Accurate: 95.9% → 98.7%

Time: 12.9s

Alternatives: 16

Speedup: 0.4×

• 41.4% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 95.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) + Float64(a * b)) + Float64(c * i))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) + (a * b)) + (c * i);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.7% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(b + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{a} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{a} + x \cdot \frac{y}{a}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY)
     t_1
     (* a (+ b (+ (* c (/ i a)) (+ (* t (/ z a)) (* x (/ y a)))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = a * (b + ((c * (i / a)) + ((t * (z / a)) + (x * (y / a)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = a * (b + ((c * (i / a)) + ((t * (z / a)) + (x * (y / a)))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = a * (b + ((c * (i / a)) + ((t * (z / a)) + (x * (y / a)))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(Float64(c * Float64(i / a)) + Float64(Float64(t * Float64(z / a)) + Float64(x * Float64(y / a))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = a * (b + ((c * (i / a)) + ((t * (z / a)) + (x * (y / a)))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(a * N[(b + N[(N[(c * N[(i / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t * N[(z / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(y / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \left(\frac{c \cdot i}{a} + \left(\frac{t \cdot z}{a} + \frac{x \cdot y}{a}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 54.5%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(b + \left(\color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{i}{a}} + \left(\frac{t \cdot z}{a} + \frac{x \cdot y}{a}\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 72.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(b + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{a} + \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot \frac{z}{a}} + \frac{x \cdot y}{a}\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-/l* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(b + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{a} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{a} + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{a}}\right)\right)\right) \]

   5. Simplified 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{a} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{a} + x \cdot \frac{y}{a}\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(b + \left(c \cdot \frac{i}{a} + \left(t \cdot \frac{z}{a} + x \cdot \frac{y}{a}\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.0% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma x y (fma z t (* a b)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(x, y, fma(z, t, (a * b))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(x, y, fma(z, t, Float64(a * b))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(x * y + N[(z * t + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. associate-+l+ 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, t, a \cdot b\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.9% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (fma c i (fma a b (fma x y (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, (z * t))));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return fma(c, i, fma(a, b, fma(x, y, Float64(z * t))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(c * i + N[(a * b + N[(x * y + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   4. fma-define 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)}\right) \]

   5. fma-define 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(c, i, \mathsf{fma}\left(a, b, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 98.0% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(b + c \cdot \frac{i}{a}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* a (+ b (* c (/ i a)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = a * (b + (c * (i / a)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = a * (b + (c * (i / a)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = a * (b + (c * (i / a)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(c * Float64(i / a))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = (c * i) + ((a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = a * (b + (c * (i / a)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(a * N[(b + N[(c * N[(i / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 a b)) (*.f64 c i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 27.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{c \cdot i}{a}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 63.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(b + \color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{i}{a}}\right) \]

   7. Simplified 63.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + c \cdot \frac{i}{a}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(b + c \cdot \frac{i}{a}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+100} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 400000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -1e+100) (not (<= (* c i) 400000000.0)))
   (+ (* c i) (* z (+ t (/ (* x y) z))))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -1e+100) || !((c * i) <= 400000000.0)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * (t + ((x * y) / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-1d+100)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 400000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * (t + ((x * y) / z)))
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -1e+100) || !((c * i) <= 400000000.0)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * (t + ((x * y) / z)));
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+100) or not ((c * i) <= 400000000.0):
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * (t + ((x * y) / z)))
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -1e+100) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 400000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * Float64(t + Float64(Float64(x * y) / z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -1e+100) || ~(((c * i) <= 400000000.0)))
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * (t + ((x * y) / z)));
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1e+100], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 400000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(t + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1.00000000000000002e100 or 4e8 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 85.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e100 < (*.f64 c i) < 4e8

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+100} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 400000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 87.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+30} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+78}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -5e+30) (not (<= (* x y) 5e+78)))
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))
   (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+30) || !((x * y) <= 5e+78)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-5d+30)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 5d+78))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+30) || !((x * y) <= 5e+78)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -5e+30) or not ((x * y) <= 5e+78):
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -5e+30) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 5e+78))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -5e+30) || ~(((x * y) <= 5e+78)))
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+30], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+78]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.9999999999999998e30 or 4.99999999999999984e78 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -4.9999999999999998e30 < (*.f64 x y) < 4.99999999999999984e78

   1. Initial program 94.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+30} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+78}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 88.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+30}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* x y) -5e+30)
   (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))
   (if (<= (* x y) 1e+76)
     (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (* z t)))
     (+ (* c i) (+ (* a b) (* x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -5e+30) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+76) {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x * y) <= (-5d+30)) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    else if ((x * y) <= 1d+76) then
        tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x * y) <= -5e+30) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else if ((x * y) <= 1e+76) {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (x * y) <= -5e+30:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	elif (x * y) <= 1e+76:
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(x * y) <= -5e+30)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	elseif (Float64(x * y) <= 1e+76)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x * y) <= -5e+30)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	elseif ((x * y) <= 1e+76)
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (c * i) + ((a * b) + (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -5e+30], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 1e+76], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -4.9999999999999998e30

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -4.9999999999999998e30 < (*.f64 x y) < 1e76

   1. Initial program 93.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + t \cdot z\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   if 1e76 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 96.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+30}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \cdot y \leq 10^{+76}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + \left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 84.6% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -1e+100)
   (+ (* c i) (* z t))
   (if (<= (* c i) 1e+179)
     (+ (* a b) (+ (* x y) (* z t)))
     (+ (* x y) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+100) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1e+179) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-1d+100)) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((c * i) <= 1d+179) then
        tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+100) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 1e+179) {
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -1e+100:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (c * i) <= 1e+179:
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t))
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -1e+100)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 1e+179)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+100)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 1e+179)
		tmp = (a * b) + ((x * y) + (z * t));
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1e+100], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 1e+179], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1.00000000000000002e100

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 81.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e100 < (*.f64 c i) < 9.9999999999999998e178

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + \left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 9.9999999999999998e178 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 10^{+179}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + \left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 38.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-116}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -5.8e+50)
   (* z t)
   (if (<= t 1.12e-116)
     (* a b)
     (if (<= t 3.2e-57) (* x y) (if (<= t 2e+111) (* c i) (* z t))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.8e+50) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if (t <= 1.12e-116) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (t <= 3.2e-57) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (t <= 2e+111) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-5.8d+50)) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if (t <= 1.12d-116) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if (t <= 3.2d-57) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (t <= 2d+111) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.8e+50) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if (t <= 1.12e-116) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (t <= 3.2e-57) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (t <= 2e+111) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -5.8e+50:
		tmp = z * t
	elif t <= 1.12e-116:
		tmp = a * b
	elif t <= 3.2e-57:
		tmp = x * y
	elif t <= 2e+111:
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -5.8e+50)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (t <= 1.12e-116)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (t <= 3.2e-57)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (t <= 2e+111)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -5.8e+50)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif (t <= 1.12e-116)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif (t <= 3.2e-57)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (t <= 2e+111)
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[t, -5.8e+50], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.12e-116], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 3.2e-57], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 2e+111], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if t < -5.8e50 or 1.99999999999999991e111 < t

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 49.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -5.8e50 < t < 1.12e-116

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 35.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if 1.12e-116 < t < 3.2000000000000001e-57

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if 3.2000000000000001e-57 < t < 1.99999999999999991e111

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 37.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{-116}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 65.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+99} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -3.6e+99) (not (<= (* c i) 6.8e-22)))
   (+ (* c i) (* z t))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.6e+99) || !((c * i) <= 6.8e-22)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-3.6d+99)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 6.8d-22))) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.6e+99) || !((c * i) <= 6.8e-22)) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -3.6e+99) or not ((c * i) <= 6.8e-22):
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -3.6e+99) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 6.8e-22))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -3.6e+99) || ~(((c * i) <= 6.8e-22)))
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -3.6e+99], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 6.8e-22]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -3.6000000000000002e99 or 6.7999999999999997e-22 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -3.6000000000000002e99 < (*.f64 c i) < 6.7999999999999997e-22

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -3.6 \cdot 10^{+99} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 64.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (* c i) -1e+100)
   (+ (* c i) (* z t))
   (if (<= (* c i) 2e-39) (+ (* a b) (* z t)) (+ (* x y) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+100) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e-39) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c * i) <= (-1d+100)) then
        tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
    else if ((c * i) <= 2d-39) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+100) {
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	} else if ((c * i) <= 2e-39) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c * i) <= -1e+100:
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t)
	elif (c * i) <= 2e-39:
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(c * i) <= -1e+100)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(c * i) + Float64(z * t));
	elseif (Float64(c * i) <= 2e-39)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c * i) <= -1e+100)
		tmp = (c * i) + (z * t);
	elseif ((c * i) <= 2e-39)
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (x * y) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -1e+100], N[(N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2e-39], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -1.00000000000000002e100

   1. Initial program 85.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 83.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 81.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + t \cdot z} \]

   if -1.00000000000000002e100 < (*.f64 c i) < 1.99999999999999986e-39

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 75.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]

   if 1.99999999999999986e-39 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i + x \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;c \cdot i \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-39}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 38.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.05 \cdot 10^{-65}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.32 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -8.5e+46)
   (* z t)
   (if (<= t 3.05e-65) (* a b) (if (<= t 2.32e+111) (* c i) (* z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -8.5e+46) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if (t <= 3.05e-65) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (t <= 2.32e+111) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-8.5d+46)) then
        tmp = z * t
    else if (t <= 3.05d-65) then
        tmp = a * b
    else if (t <= 2.32d+111) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = z * t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -8.5e+46) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else if (t <= 3.05e-65) {
		tmp = a * b;
	} else if (t <= 2.32e+111) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = z * t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -8.5e+46:
		tmp = z * t
	elif t <= 3.05e-65:
		tmp = a * b
	elif t <= 2.32e+111:
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = z * t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -8.5e+46)
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	elseif (t <= 3.05e-65)
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	elseif (t <= 2.32e+111)
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -8.5e+46)
		tmp = z * t;
	elseif (t <= 3.05e-65)
		tmp = a * b;
	elseif (t <= 2.32e+111)
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = z * t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[LessEqual[t, -8.5e+46], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 3.05e-65], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 2.32e+111], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -8.4999999999999996e46 or 2.32e111 < t

   1. Initial program 92.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -8.4999999999999996e46 < t < 3.05000000000000007e-65

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 34.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]

   if 3.05000000000000007e-65 < t < 2.32e111

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 36.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{+46}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.05 \cdot 10^{-65}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 2.32 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 59.6% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-149} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+111}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -6.2e-149) (not (<= t 2e+111)))
   (+ (* a b) (* z t))
   (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -6.2e-149) || !(t <= 2e+111)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-6.2d-149)) .or. (.not. (t <= 2d+111))) then
        tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -6.2e-149) || !(t <= 2e+111)) {
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -6.2e-149) or not (t <= 2e+111):
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t)
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -6.2e-149) || !(t <= 2e+111))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(z * t));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -6.2e-149) || ~((t <= 2e+111)))
		tmp = (a * b) + (z * t);
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -6.2e-149], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 2e+111]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -6.19999999999999974e-149 or 1.99999999999999991e111 < t

   1. Initial program 93.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{t \cdot z} + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]

   5. Taylor expanded in c around 0 68.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + t \cdot z} \]

   if -6.19999999999999974e-149 < t < 1.99999999999999991e111

   1. Initial program 98.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -6.2 \cdot 10^{-149} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+111}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 53.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+211} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.7e+211) (not (<= z 6.8e-18))) (* z t) (+ (* a b) (* c i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.7e+211) || !(z <= 6.8e-18)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.7d+211)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.8d-18))) then
        tmp = z * t
    else
        tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.7e+211) || !(z <= 6.8e-18)) {
		tmp = z * t;
	} else {
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.7e+211) or not (z <= 6.8e-18):
		tmp = z * t
	else:
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.7e+211) || !(z <= 6.8e-18))
		tmp = Float64(z * t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(a * b) + Float64(c * i));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.7e+211) || ~((z <= 6.8e-18)))
		tmp = z * t;
	else
		tmp = (a * b) + (c * i);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.7e+211], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.8e-18]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.69999999999999995e211 or 6.80000000000000002e-18 < z

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 56.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if -1.69999999999999995e211 < z < 6.80000000000000002e-18

   1. Initial program 97.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + x \cdot y\right)} + c \cdot i \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b + c \cdot i} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+211} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-18}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b + c \cdot i\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 42.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+99} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* c i) -6.4e+99) (not (<= (* c i) 2.4e-22))) (* c i) (* a b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -6.4e+99) || !((c * i) <= 2.4e-22)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((c * i) <= (-6.4d+99)) .or. (.not. ((c * i) <= 2.4d-22))) then
        tmp = c * i
    else
        tmp = a * b
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((c * i) <= -6.4e+99) || !((c * i) <= 2.4e-22)) {
		tmp = c * i;
	} else {
		tmp = a * b;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((c * i) <= -6.4e+99) or not ((c * i) <= 2.4e-22):
		tmp = c * i
	else:
		tmp = a * b
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(c * i) <= -6.4e+99) || !(Float64(c * i) <= 2.4e-22))
		tmp = Float64(c * i);
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * b);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((c * i) <= -6.4e+99) || ~(((c * i) <= 2.4e-22)))
		tmp = c * i;
	else
		tmp = a * b;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], -6.4e+99], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], 2.4e-22]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision], N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 c i) < -6.39999999999999999e99 or 2.40000000000000002e-22 < (*.f64 c i)

   1. Initial program 91.7%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around inf 54.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{c \cdot i} \]

   if -6.39999999999999999e99 < (*.f64 c i) < 2.40000000000000002e-22

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 41.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \cdot i \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+99} \lor \neg \left(c \cdot i \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-22}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;c \cdot i\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot b\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 27.5% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* a b))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = a * b
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return a * b;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return a * b

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(a * b)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = a * b;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.7%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) + a \cdot b\right) + c \cdot i \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 28.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot b} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024086 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Linear.V4:$cdot from linear-1.19.1.3, C"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* a b)) (* c i)))