Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 62.6% → 100.0%

Time: 4.9s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 3.0×

• 20.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (- (* x y) (* y z)) (* y y)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(y * z)) - Float64(y * y)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 62.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (- (* x y) (* y z)) (* y y)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(y * z)) - Float64(y * y)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(x - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y (- x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * (x - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * (x - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * (x - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * (x - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * Float64(x - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * (x - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 61.2%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. +-inverses 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \color{blue}{0} \]

   3. --rgt-identity 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]

   4. *-commutative 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

   5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 76.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-28} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-52}\right) \land \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+60} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+92}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -7e-28)
         (and (not (<= z 1.15e-52)) (or (<= z 1.25e+60) (not (<= z 9.6e+92)))))
   (* z (- y))
   (* y x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7e-28) || (!(z <= 1.15e-52) && ((z <= 1.25e+60) || !(z <= 9.6e+92)))) {
		tmp = z * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-7d-28)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.15d-52)) .and. (z <= 1.25d+60) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.6d+92))) then
        tmp = z * -y
    else
        tmp = y * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7e-28) || (!(z <= 1.15e-52) && ((z <= 1.25e+60) || !(z <= 9.6e+92)))) {
		tmp = z * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -7e-28) or (not (z <= 1.15e-52) and ((z <= 1.25e+60) or not (z <= 9.6e+92))):
		tmp = z * -y
	else:
		tmp = y * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -7e-28) || (!(z <= 1.15e-52) && ((z <= 1.25e+60) || !(z <= 9.6e+92))))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -7e-28) || (~((z <= 1.15e-52)) && ((z <= 1.25e+60) || ~((z <= 9.6e+92)))))
		tmp = z * -y;
	else
		tmp = y * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -7e-28], And[N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.15e-52]], $MachinePrecision], Or[LessEqual[z, 1.25e+60], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9.6e+92]], $MachinePrecision]]]], N[(z * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.9999999999999999e-28 or 1.14999999999999997e-52 < z < 1.24999999999999994e60 or 9.60000000000000018e92 < z

   1. Initial program 70.3%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. +-inverses 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \color{blue}{0} \]

      3. --rgt-identity 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]

      4. *-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

      5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 82.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 82.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. *-commutative 82.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   if -6.9999999999999999e-28 < z < 1.14999999999999997e-52 or 1.24999999999999994e60 < z < 9.60000000000000018e92

   1. Initial program 49.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 72.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. +-inverses 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \color{blue}{0} \]

      3. --rgt-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]

      4. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

      5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   7. Simplified 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-28} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{-52}\right) \land \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+60} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+92}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 55.2% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 61.2%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 75.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. +-inverses 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \color{blue}{0} \]

   3. --rgt-identity 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]

   4. *-commutative 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

   5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 51.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

7. Simplified 51.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x - z\right) \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- x z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x - z) * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x - z) * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x - z) * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x - z) * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024086 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (* (- x z) y)

  (+ (- (- (* x y) (* y z)) (* y y)) (* y y)))