ENA, Section 1.4, Exercise 4b, n=5

Percentage Accurate: 88.1% → 98.9%

Time: 10.5s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.8×

Specification

\[\left(-1000000000 \leq x \land x \leq 1000000000\right) \land \left(-1 \leq \varepsilon \land \varepsilon \leq 1\right)\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps) :precision binary64 (- (pow (+ x eps) 5.0) (pow x 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	return pow((x + eps), 5.0) - pow(x, 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = ((x + eps) ** 5.0d0) - (x ** 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	return Math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - Math.pow(x, 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	return math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - math.pow(x, 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	return Float64((Float64(x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, eps)
	tmp = ((x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := N[(N[Power[N[(x + eps), $MachinePrecision], 5.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 88.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps) :precision binary64 (- (pow (+ x eps) 5.0) (pow x 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	return pow((x + eps), 5.0) - pow(x, 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = ((x + eps) ** 5.0d0) - (x ** 5.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	return Math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - Math.pow(x, 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	return math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - math.pow(x, 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	return Float64((Float64(x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, eps)
	tmp = ((x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := N[(N[Power[N[(x + eps), $MachinePrecision], 5.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := {\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_0 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-296} \lor \neg \left(t\_0 \leq 0\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (- (pow (+ x eps) 5.0) (pow x 5.0))))
   (if (or (<= t_0 -1e-296) (not (<= t_0 0.0)))
     t_0
     (* (pow x 4.0) (* eps 5.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double t_0 = pow((x + eps), 5.0) - pow(x, 5.0);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-296) || !(t_0 <= 0.0)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = ((x + eps) ** 5.0d0) - (x ** 5.0d0)
    if ((t_0 <= (-1d-296)) .or. (.not. (t_0 <= 0.0d0))) then
        tmp = t_0
    else
        tmp = (x ** 4.0d0) * (eps * 5.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double t_0 = Math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - Math.pow(x, 5.0);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-296) || !(t_0 <= 0.0)) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	t_0 = math.pow((x + eps), 5.0) - math.pow(x, 5.0)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_0 <= -1e-296) or not (t_0 <= 0.0):
		tmp = t_0
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * 5.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	t_0 = Float64((Float64(x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0))
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-296) || !(t_0 <= 0.0))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = Float64((x ^ 4.0) * Float64(eps * 5.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	t_0 = ((x + eps) ^ 5.0) - (x ^ 5.0);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_0 <= -1e-296) || ~((t_0 <= 0.0)))
		tmp = t_0;
	else
		tmp = (x ^ 4.0) * (eps * 5.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Power[N[(x + eps), $MachinePrecision], 5.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[Power[x, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$0, -1e-296], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$0, 0.0]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$0, N[(N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(eps * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (pow.f64 (+.f64 x eps) #s(literal 5 binary64)) (pow.f64 x #s(literal 5 binary64))) < -1e-296 or 0.0 < (-.f64 (pow.f64 (+.f64 x eps) #s(literal 5 binary64)) (pow.f64 x #s(literal 5 binary64)))

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if -1e-296 < (-.f64 (pow.f64 (+.f64 x eps) #s(literal 5 binary64)) (pow.f64 x #s(literal 5 binary64))) < 0.0

   1. Initial program 82.2%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(5 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-296} \lor \neg \left({\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \leq 0\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 97.9% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.26 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{3} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(x \cdot 5 + \varepsilon \cdot 10\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + 5 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.26e-50) (not (<= x 7.5e-46)))
   (* (pow x 3.0) (* eps (+ (* x 5.0) (* eps 10.0))))
   (* (pow eps 5.0) (+ 1.0 (* 5.0 (/ x eps))))))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.26e-50) || !(x <= 7.5e-46)) {
		tmp = pow(x, 3.0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0) + (eps * 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(eps, 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.26d-50)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7.5d-46))) then
        tmp = (x ** 3.0d0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0d0) + (eps * 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = (eps ** 5.0d0) * (1.0d0 + (5.0d0 * (x / eps)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.26e-50) || !(x <= 7.5e-46)) {
		tmp = Math.pow(x, 3.0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0) + (eps * 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(eps, 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.26e-50) or not (x <= 7.5e-46):
		tmp = math.pow(x, 3.0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0) + (eps * 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(eps, 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.26e-50) || !(x <= 7.5e-46))
		tmp = Float64((x ^ 3.0) * Float64(eps * Float64(Float64(x * 5.0) + Float64(eps * 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64((eps ^ 5.0) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(5.0 * Float64(x / eps))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.26e-50) || ~((x <= 7.5e-46)))
		tmp = (x ^ 3.0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0) + (eps * 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = (eps ^ 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.26e-50], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7.5e-46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(eps * N[(N[(x * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(eps * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(5.0 * N[(x / eps), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.26e-50 or 7.50000000000000027e-46 < x

   1. Initial program 41.1%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x} + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.6%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \varepsilon + -1 \cdot \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+r+ 90.6%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 90.6%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 90.6%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 90.6%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 90.6%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 90.6%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot 5} - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot 5 - \frac{{\varepsilon}^{2} \cdot -10}{x}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{3} \cdot \left(5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right) + 10 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 90.5%

      \[\leadsto {x}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot x + 10 \cdot \varepsilon\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.26e-50 < x < 7.50000000000000027e-46

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + \left(4 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon} + \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft1-in 99.3%

         \[\leadsto {\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.3%

         \[\leadsto {\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{5} \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + 5 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.26 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{3} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(x \cdot 5 + \varepsilon \cdot 10\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + 5 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 97.9% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{3} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(x \cdot 5 + \varepsilon \cdot 10\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + 5 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 + 10 \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{x}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.05e-50)
   (* (pow x 3.0) (* eps (+ (* x 5.0) (* eps 10.0))))
   (if (<= x 5.1e-46)
     (* (pow eps 5.0) (+ 1.0 (* 5.0 (/ x eps))))
     (* (pow x 4.0) (* eps (+ 5.0 (* 10.0 (/ eps x))))))))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.05e-50) {
		tmp = pow(x, 3.0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0) + (eps * 10.0)));
	} else if (x <= 5.1e-46) {
		tmp = pow(eps, 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * (5.0 + (10.0 * (eps / x))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.05d-50)) then
        tmp = (x ** 3.0d0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0d0) + (eps * 10.0d0)))
    else if (x <= 5.1d-46) then
        tmp = (eps ** 5.0d0) * (1.0d0 + (5.0d0 * (x / eps)))
    else
        tmp = (x ** 4.0d0) * (eps * (5.0d0 + (10.0d0 * (eps / x))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.05e-50) {
		tmp = Math.pow(x, 3.0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0) + (eps * 10.0)));
	} else if (x <= 5.1e-46) {
		tmp = Math.pow(eps, 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * (5.0 + (10.0 * (eps / x))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.05e-50:
		tmp = math.pow(x, 3.0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0) + (eps * 10.0)))
	elif x <= 5.1e-46:
		tmp = math.pow(eps, 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * (5.0 + (10.0 * (eps / x))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.05e-50)
		tmp = Float64((x ^ 3.0) * Float64(eps * Float64(Float64(x * 5.0) + Float64(eps * 10.0))));
	elseif (x <= 5.1e-46)
		tmp = Float64((eps ^ 5.0) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(5.0 * Float64(x / eps))));
	else
		tmp = Float64((x ^ 4.0) * Float64(eps * Float64(5.0 + Float64(10.0 * Float64(eps / x)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.05e-50)
		tmp = (x ^ 3.0) * (eps * ((x * 5.0) + (eps * 10.0)));
	elseif (x <= 5.1e-46)
		tmp = (eps ^ 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)));
	else
		tmp = (x ^ 4.0) * (eps * (5.0 + (10.0 * (eps / x))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.05e-50], N[(N[Power[x, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(eps * N[(N[(x * 5.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(eps * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 5.1e-46], N[(N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(5.0 * N[(x / eps), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(eps * N[(5.0 + N[(10.0 * N[(eps / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -2.04999999999999993e-50

   1. Initial program 36.3%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x} + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.0%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \varepsilon + -1 \cdot \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+r+ 95.0%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 95.0%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 95.0%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 95.0%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 95.0%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 95.0%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot 5} - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot 5 - \frac{{\varepsilon}^{2} \cdot -10}{x}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{3} \cdot \left(5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot x\right) + 10 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 95.0%

      \[\leadsto {x}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot x + 10 \cdot \varepsilon\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.04999999999999993e-50 < x < 5.0999999999999997e-46

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + \left(4 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon} + \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft1-in 99.3%

         \[\leadsto {\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.3%

         \[\leadsto {\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{5} \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + 5 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)} \]

   if 5.0999999999999997e-46 < x

   1. Initial program 46.2%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x} + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 85.9%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \varepsilon + -1 \cdot \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+r+ 85.9%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)} \]

      3. mul-1-neg 85.9%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 85.9%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-rgt1-in 85.9%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 85.9%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 85.9%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot 5} - \frac{-4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + -1 \cdot \left(2 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2} + 4 \cdot {\varepsilon}^{2}\right)}{x}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 85.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot 5 - \frac{{\varepsilon}^{2} \cdot -10}{x}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 85.9%

      \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 + 10 \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{x}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.05 \cdot 10^{-50}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{3} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(x \cdot 5 + \varepsilon \cdot 10\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + 5 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 + 10 \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{x}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 97.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-51}:\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + 5 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -8.2e-51)
   (* eps (* 5.0 (pow x 4.0)))
   (if (<= x 7.8e-44)
     (* (pow eps 5.0) (+ 1.0 (* 5.0 (/ x eps))))
     (* (pow x 4.0) (* eps 5.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.2e-51) {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * pow(x, 4.0));
	} else if (x <= 7.8e-44) {
		tmp = pow(eps, 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-8.2d-51)) then
        tmp = eps * (5.0d0 * (x ** 4.0d0))
    else if (x <= 7.8d-44) then
        tmp = (eps ** 5.0d0) * (1.0d0 + (5.0d0 * (x / eps)))
    else
        tmp = (x ** 4.0d0) * (eps * 5.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.2e-51) {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * Math.pow(x, 4.0));
	} else if (x <= 7.8e-44) {
		tmp = Math.pow(eps, 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -8.2e-51:
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * math.pow(x, 4.0))
	elif x <= 7.8e-44:
		tmp = math.pow(eps, 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * 5.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -8.2e-51)
		tmp = Float64(eps * Float64(5.0 * (x ^ 4.0)));
	elseif (x <= 7.8e-44)
		tmp = Float64((eps ^ 5.0) * Float64(1.0 + Float64(5.0 * Float64(x / eps))));
	else
		tmp = Float64((x ^ 4.0) * Float64(eps * 5.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -8.2e-51)
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * (x ^ 4.0));
	elseif (x <= 7.8e-44)
		tmp = (eps ^ 5.0) * (1.0 + (5.0 * (x / eps)));
	else
		tmp = (x ^ 4.0) * (eps * 5.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[x, -8.2e-51], N[(eps * N[(5.0 * N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 7.8e-44], N[(N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + N[(5.0 * N[(x / eps), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(eps * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -8.19999999999999947e-51

   1. Initial program 36.3%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      3. metadata-eval 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      4. *-commutative 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      5. associate-*r* 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   if -8.19999999999999947e-51 < x < 7.8000000000000004e-44

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in eps around inf 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + \left(4 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon} + \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft1-in 99.3%

         \[\leadsto {\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}}\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 99.3%

         \[\leadsto {\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{5} \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + 5 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)} \]

   if 7.8000000000000004e-44 < x

   1. Initial program 46.2%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 85.3%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 85.3%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \]

   5. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(5 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.2 \cdot 10^{-51}:\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{-44}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5} \cdot \left(1 + 5 \cdot \frac{x}{\varepsilon}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 97.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{-51} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.4e-51) (not (<= x 7.5e-46)))
   (* eps (* 5.0 (pow x 4.0)))
   (pow eps 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.4e-51) || !(x <= 7.5e-46)) {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * pow(x, 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(eps, 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.4d-51)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7.5d-46))) then
        tmp = eps * (5.0d0 * (x ** 4.0d0))
    else
        tmp = eps ** 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.4e-51) || !(x <= 7.5e-46)) {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * Math.pow(x, 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(eps, 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.4e-51) or not (x <= 7.5e-46):
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * math.pow(x, 4.0))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(eps, 5.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.4e-51) || !(x <= 7.5e-46))
		tmp = Float64(eps * Float64(5.0 * (x ^ 4.0)));
	else
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.4e-51) || ~((x <= 7.5e-46)))
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * (x ^ 4.0));
	else
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.4e-51], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7.5e-46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(eps * N[(5.0 * N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.4e-51 or 7.50000000000000027e-46 < x

   1. Initial program 41.1%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      3. metadata-eval 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      4. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      5. associate-*r* 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   if -6.4e-51 < x < 7.50000000000000027e-46

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{-51} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 97.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-51} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.3 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.8e-51) (not (<= x 5.3e-46)))
   (* 5.0 (* eps (pow x 4.0)))
   (pow eps 5.0)))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.8e-51) || !(x <= 5.3e-46)) {
		tmp = 5.0 * (eps * pow(x, 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(eps, 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.8d-51)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.3d-46))) then
        tmp = 5.0d0 * (eps * (x ** 4.0d0))
    else
        tmp = eps ** 5.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.8e-51) || !(x <= 5.3e-46)) {
		tmp = 5.0 * (eps * Math.pow(x, 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(eps, 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.8e-51) or not (x <= 5.3e-46):
		tmp = 5.0 * (eps * math.pow(x, 4.0))
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(eps, 5.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.8e-51) || !(x <= 5.3e-46))
		tmp = Float64(5.0 * Float64(eps * (x ^ 4.0)));
	else
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.8e-51) || ~((x <= 5.3e-46)))
		tmp = 5.0 * (eps * (x ^ 4.0));
	else
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.8e-51], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.3e-46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(5.0 * N[(eps * N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.80000000000000005e-51 or 5.30000000000000018e-46 < x

   1. Initial program 41.1%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-cube-cbrt 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}} \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}}} \]

      2. pow3 40.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}}\right)}^{3}} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 40.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5}}\right)}^{3}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 89.0%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 89.0%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(5 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4}} \]

      4. associate-*r* 88.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   if -6.80000000000000005e-51 < x < 5.30000000000000018e-46

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-51} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.3 \cdot 10^{-46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;5 \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 97.6% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.06e-49)
   (* eps (* 5.0 (pow x 4.0)))
   (if (<= x 5.1e-46) (pow eps 5.0) (* (pow x 4.0) (* eps 5.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.06e-49) {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * pow(x, 4.0));
	} else if (x <= 5.1e-46) {
		tmp = pow(eps, 5.0);
	} else {
		tmp = pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.06d-49)) then
        tmp = eps * (5.0d0 * (x ** 4.0d0))
    else if (x <= 5.1d-46) then
        tmp = eps ** 5.0d0
    else
        tmp = (x ** 4.0d0) * (eps * 5.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.06e-49) {
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * Math.pow(x, 4.0));
	} else if (x <= 5.1e-46) {
		tmp = Math.pow(eps, 5.0);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * 5.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.06e-49:
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * math.pow(x, 4.0))
	elif x <= 5.1e-46:
		tmp = math.pow(eps, 5.0)
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(x, 4.0) * (eps * 5.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.06e-49)
		tmp = Float64(eps * Float64(5.0 * (x ^ 4.0)));
	elseif (x <= 5.1e-46)
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64((x ^ 4.0) * Float64(eps * 5.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.06e-49)
		tmp = eps * (5.0 * (x ^ 4.0));
	elseif (x <= 5.1e-46)
		tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
	else
		tmp = (x ^ 4.0) * (eps * 5.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.06e-49], N[(eps * N[(5.0 * N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 5.1e-46], N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Power[x, 4.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(eps * 5.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.06000000000000002e-49

   1. Initial program 36.3%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4}} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      3. metadata-eval 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      4. *-commutative 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)} \cdot {x}^{4} \]

      5. associate-*r* 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)} \]

   if -1.06000000000000002e-49 < x < 5.0999999999999997e-46

   1. Initial program 99.6%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5}} \]

   if 5.0999999999999997e-46 < x

   1. Initial program 46.2%

      \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon + 4 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 85.3%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(4 + 1\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]

      2. metadata-eval 85.3%

         \[\leadsto {x}^{4} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{5} \cdot \varepsilon\right) \]

   5. Simplified 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{4} \cdot \left(5 \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{-49}:\\ \;\;\;\;\varepsilon \cdot \left(5 \cdot {x}^{4}\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.1 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;{\varepsilon}^{5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{4} \cdot \left(\varepsilon \cdot 5\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 87.0% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\varepsilon}^{5} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x eps) :precision binary64 (pow eps 5.0))

C

double code(double x, double eps) {
	return pow(eps, 5.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = eps ** 5.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double eps) {
	return Math.pow(eps, 5.0);
}

Python

def code(x, eps):
	return math.pow(eps, 5.0)

Julia

function code(x, eps)
	return eps ^ 5.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, eps)
	tmp = eps ^ 5.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, eps_] := N[Power[eps, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 85.4%

   \[{\left(x + \varepsilon\right)}^{5} - {x}^{5} \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\varepsilon}^{5}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024085 
(FPCore (x eps)
  :name "ENA, Section 1.4, Exercise 4b, n=5"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (<= -1000000000.0 x) (<= x 1000000000.0)) (and (<= -1.0 eps) (<= eps 1.0)))
  (- (pow (+ x eps) 5.0) (pow x 5.0)))