Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3

Percentage Accurate: 97.8% → 100.0%

Time: 5.0s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.3×

• 20.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 97.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * y) + ((1.0d0 - x) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(Float64(1.0 - x) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * y) + ((1.0 - x) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z - x \cdot \left(z - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- z (* x (- z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z - (x * (z - y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z - (x * (z - y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z - (x * (z - y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z - (x * (z - y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z - Float64(x * Float64(z - y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z - (x * (z - y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z - N[(x * N[(z - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.3%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

   4. neg-sub0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   5. neg-sub0 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   6. *-commutative 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

   7. distribute-lft-neg-in 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   8. remove-double-neg 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot \left(1 - x\right) + x \cdot y \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out-- 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot z - x \cdot z\right)} + x \cdot y \]

   10. *-lft-identity 97.3%

       \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} - x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y \]

   11. associate-+l- 97.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(x \cdot z - x \cdot y\right)} \]

   12. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

       \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 60.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.9 \cdot 10^{+48}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+264}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* x (- z))))
   (if (<= x -2.9e+48)
     (* x y)
     (if (<= x -1.0)
       t_0
       (if (<= x 1.9e-6) z (if (<= x 6.2e+264) (* x y) t_0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -z;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.9e+48) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 1.9e-6) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 6.2e+264) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = x * -z
    if (x <= (-2.9d+48)) then
        tmp = x * y
    else if (x <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x <= 1.9d-6) then
        tmp = z
    else if (x <= 6.2d+264) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = x * -z;
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.9e+48) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else if (x <= -1.0) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x <= 1.9e-6) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (x <= 6.2e+264) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = x * -z
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.9e+48:
		tmp = x * y
	elif x <= -1.0:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x <= 1.9e-6:
		tmp = z
	elif x <= 6.2e+264:
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(x * Float64(-z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.9e+48)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	elseif (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 1.9e-6)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 6.2e+264)
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = x * -z;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.9e+48)
		tmp = x * y;
	elseif (x <= -1.0)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x <= 1.9e-6)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (x <= 6.2e+264)
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(x * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -2.9e+48], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, -1.0], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[x, 1.9e-6], z, If[LessEqual[x, 6.2e+264], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -2.8999999999999999e48 or 1.9e-6 < x < 6.19999999999999962e264

   1. Initial program 94.4%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -2.8999999999999999e48 < x < -1 or 6.19999999999999962e264 < x

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot z} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   if -1 < x < 1.9e-6

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -510000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -510000.0) (not (<= x 1.0))) (* x (- y z)) (+ z (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -510000.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-510000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -510000.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -510000.0) or not (x <= 1.0):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -510000.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -510000.0) || ~((x <= 1.0)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -510000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.1e5 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   if -5.1e5 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

      4. neg-sub0 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      5. neg-sub0 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(1 - x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      6. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)}\right) + x \cdot y \]

      7. distribute-lft-neg-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-z\right)\right) \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      8. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot \left(1 - x\right) + x \cdot y \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot z - x \cdot z\right)} + x \cdot y \]

      10. *-lft-identity 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{z} - x \cdot z\right) + x \cdot y \]

      11. associate-+l- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - \left(x \cdot z - x \cdot y\right)} \]

      12. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

          \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z - x \cdot \left(z - y\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 99.2%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.2%

         \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto z - \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(-y\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot \left(-y\right)\right) + z} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-out 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot y\right)}\right) + z \]

      4. remove-double-neg 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} + z \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -510000 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1040000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.8e-29) (not (<= x 1040000000.0)))
   (* x (- y z))
   (* z (- 1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.8e-29) || !(x <= 1040000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.8d-29)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1040000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z * (1.0d0 - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.8e-29) || !(x <= 1040000000.0)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.8e-29) or not (x <= 1040000000.0):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.8e-29) || !(x <= 1040000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(1.0 - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.8e-29) || ~((x <= 1040000000.0)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z * (1.0 - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.8e-29], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1040000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * N[(1.0 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.80000000000000048e-29 or 1.04e9 < x

   1. Initial program 94.8%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 97.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 97.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   if -5.80000000000000048e-29 < x < 1.04e9

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 83.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1040000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 84.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -9.8e-29) (not (<= x 2.55e-9))) (* x (- y z)) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9.8e-29) || !(x <= 2.55e-9)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-9.8d-29)) .or. (.not. (x <= 2.55d-9))) then
        tmp = x * (y - z)
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9.8e-29) || !(x <= 2.55e-9)) {
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -9.8e-29) or not (x <= 2.55e-9):
		tmp = x * (y - z)
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -9.8e-29) || !(x <= 2.55e-9))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y - z));
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -9.8e-29) || ~((x <= 2.55e-9)))
		tmp = x * (y - z);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -9.8e-29], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 2.55e-9]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(y - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -9.7999999999999997e-29 or 2.55000000000000009e-9 < x

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. sub-neg 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y - z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y - z\right)} \]

   if -9.7999999999999997e-29 < x < 2.55000000000000009e-9

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{-9}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 61.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -6.8e-29) (not (<= x 1.1e-5))) (* x y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.8e-29) || !(x <= 1.1e-5)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-6.8d-29)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.1d-5))) then
        tmp = x * y
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -6.8e-29) || !(x <= 1.1e-5)) {
		tmp = x * y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -6.8e-29) or not (x <= 1.1e-5):
		tmp = x * y
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -6.8e-29) || !(x <= 1.1e-5))
		tmp = Float64(x * y);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -6.8e-29) || ~((x <= 1.1e-5)))
		tmp = x * y;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -6.8e-29], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.1e-5]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -6.79999999999999945e-29 or 1.1e-5 < x

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]

   if -6.79999999999999945e-29 < x < 1.1e-5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{-29} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-5}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 36.3% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 97.3%

   \[x \cdot y + \left(1 - x\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 40.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024085 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.Backend.Rasterific:$crender from diagrams-rasterific-1.3.1.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x y) (* (- 1.0 x) z)))