Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

Percentage Accurate: 78.2% → 96.6%
Time: 12.1s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 313.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 78.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\ wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0} \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* wj (exp wj)))) (- wj (/ (- t_0 x) (+ (exp wj) t_0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = wj * exp(wj)
    code = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = wj * Math.exp(wj);
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + t_0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = wj * math.exp(wj)
	return wj - ((t_0 - x) / (math.exp(wj) + t_0))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(wj * exp(wj))
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(t_0 - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + t_0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = wj * exp(wj);
	tmp = wj - ((t_0 - x) / (exp(wj) + t_0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(wj - N[(N[(t$95$0 - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := wj \cdot e^{wj}\\
wj - \frac{t\_0 - x}{e^{wj} + t\_0}
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 96.6% accurate, 7.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\\ x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 - wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(x \cdot -3 + \left(-2 \cdot t\_0 + x \cdot 0.6666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right) - t\_0\right) - x \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* x -4.0) (* x 1.5))))
   (+
    x
    (*
     wj
     (-
      (*
       wj
       (-
        (-
         1.0
         (*
          wj
          (+ 1.0 (+ (* x -3.0) (+ (* -2.0 t_0) (* x 0.6666666666666666))))))
        t_0))
      (* x 2.0))))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5);
	return x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 - (wj * (1.0 + ((x * -3.0) + ((-2.0 * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0)));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (x * (-4.0d0)) + (x * 1.5d0)
    code = x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0d0 - (wj * (1.0d0 + ((x * (-3.0d0)) + (((-2.0d0) * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666d0)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0d0)))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5);
	return x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 - (wj * (1.0 + ((x * -3.0) + ((-2.0 * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0)));
}
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5)
	return x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 - (wj * (1.0 + ((x * -3.0) + ((-2.0 * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0)))
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(x * -4.0) + Float64(x * 1.5))
	return Float64(x + Float64(wj * Float64(Float64(wj * Float64(Float64(1.0 - Float64(wj * Float64(1.0 + Float64(Float64(x * -3.0) + Float64(Float64(-2.0 * t_0) + Float64(x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - Float64(x * 2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5);
	tmp = x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 - (wj * (1.0 + ((x * -3.0) + ((-2.0 * t_0) + (x * 0.6666666666666666)))))) - t_0)) - (x * 2.0)));
end
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(x * -4.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 1.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(x + N[(wj * N[(N[(wj * N[(N[(1.0 - N[(wj * N[(1.0 + N[(N[(x * -3.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-2.0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 0.6666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\\
x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 - wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(x \cdot -3 + \left(-2 \cdot t\_0 + x \cdot 0.6666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right) - t\_0\right) - x \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 81.0%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt1-in81.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    2. associate-/l/81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. div-sub81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. associate-/l*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    5. *-inverses81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    6. *-rgt-identity81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
  3. Simplified81.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right) + 0.6666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  6. Final simplification97.9%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 - wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(x \cdot -3 + \left(-2 \cdot \left(x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\right) + x \cdot 0.6666666666666666\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\right)\right) - x \cdot 2\right) \]
  7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.6% accurate, 14.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 - wj\right) - \left(x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\right)\right) - x \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* wj (- (* wj (- (- 1.0 wj) (+ (* x -4.0) (* x 1.5)))) (* x 2.0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 - wj) - ((x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5)))) - (x * 2.0)));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0d0 - wj) - ((x * (-4.0d0)) + (x * 1.5d0)))) - (x * 2.0d0)))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 - wj) - ((x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5)))) - (x * 2.0)));
}
def code(wj, x):
	return x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 - wj) - ((x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5)))) - (x * 2.0)))
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x + Float64(wj * Float64(Float64(wj * Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) - Float64(Float64(x * -4.0) + Float64(x * 1.5)))) - Float64(x * 2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x + (wj * ((wj * ((1.0 - wj) - ((x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5)))) - (x * 2.0)));
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(x + N[(wj * N[(N[(wj * N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(x * -4.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 1.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 - wj\right) - \left(x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\right)\right) - x \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 81.0%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt1-in81.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    2. associate-/l/81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. div-sub81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. associate-/l*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    5. *-inverses81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    6. *-rgt-identity81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
  3. Simplified81.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right) + 0.6666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.7%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \color{blue}{wj}\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  7. Final simplification97.7%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 - wj\right) - \left(x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\right)\right) - x \cdot 2\right) \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.4% accurate, 24.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right) - x \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* wj (- (* wj (- 1.0 wj)) (* x 2.0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0 - wj)) - (x * 2.0)));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0d0 - wj)) - (x * 2.0d0)))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0 - wj)) - (x * 2.0)));
}
def code(wj, x):
	return x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0 - wj)) - (x * 2.0)))
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x + Float64(wj * Float64(Float64(wj * Float64(1.0 - wj)) - Float64(x * 2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x + (wj * ((wj * (1.0 - wj)) - (x * 2.0)));
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(x + N[(wj * N[(N[(wj * N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right) - x \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 81.0%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt1-in81.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    2. associate-/l/81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. div-sub81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. associate-/l*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    5. *-inverses81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    6. *-rgt-identity81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
  3. Simplified81.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right) + 0.6666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.7%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \color{blue}{wj}\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.5%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot wj\right)} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-197.5%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-wj\right)}\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
    2. sub-neg97.5%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  9. Simplified97.5%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  10. Final simplification97.5%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right) - x \cdot 2\right) \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 96.0% accurate, 34.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + wj \cdot \left(wj - x \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ x (* wj (- wj (* x 2.0)))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * (wj - (x * 2.0)));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x + (wj * (wj - (x * 2.0d0)))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (wj * (wj - (x * 2.0)));
}
def code(wj, x):
	return x + (wj * (wj - (x * 2.0)))
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x + Float64(wj * Float64(wj - Float64(x * 2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x + (wj * (wj - (x * 2.0)));
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(x + N[(wj * N[(wj - N[(x * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + wj \cdot \left(wj - x \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 81.0%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt1-in81.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    2. associate-/l/81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. div-sub81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. associate-/l*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    5. *-inverses81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    6. *-rgt-identity81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
  3. Simplified81.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 97.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(-2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right) + 0.6666666666666666 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.7%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot \color{blue}{wj}\right) - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.5%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot wj\right)} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-197.5%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-wj\right)}\right) - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
    2. sub-neg97.5%

      \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  9. Simplified97.5%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(\color{blue}{wj \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  10. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 97.2%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(\color{blue}{wj} - 2 \cdot x\right) \]
  11. Final simplification97.2%

    \[\leadsto x + wj \cdot \left(wj - x \cdot 2\right) \]
  12. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 85.4% accurate, 34.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \frac{x}{wj + 1} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 wj) (/ x (+ wj 1.0))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return (1.0 - wj) * (x / (wj + 1.0));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (1.0d0 - wj) * (x / (wj + 1.0d0))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return (1.0 - wj) * (x / (wj + 1.0));
}
def code(wj, x):
	return (1.0 - wj) * (x / (wj + 1.0))
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - wj) * Float64(x / Float64(wj + 1.0)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = (1.0 - wj) * (x / (wj + 1.0));
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \frac{x}{wj + 1}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 81.0%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt1-in81.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    2. associate-/l/81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. div-sub81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. associate-/l*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    5. *-inverses81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    6. *-rgt-identity81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
  3. Simplified81.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 81.1%

    \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(x + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)}}{wj + 1} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x}\right)}{wj + 1} \]
    2. neg-mul-181.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(-wj\right)} \cdot x\right)}{wj + 1} \]
    3. distribute-rgt1-in81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-wj\right) + 1\right) \cdot x}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. +-commutative81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-wj\right)\right)} \cdot x}{wj + 1} \]
    5. sub-neg81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} \cdot x}{wj + 1} \]
  7. Simplified81.1%

    \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot x}}{wj + 1} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 88.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + wj} - \frac{wj}{1 + wj}\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. div-sub88.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 - wj}{1 + wj}} \]
    2. associate-/l*88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)}{1 + wj}} \]
    3. *-commutative88.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot x}}{1 + wj} \]
    4. +-commutative88.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]
    5. associate-/l*88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \frac{x}{wj + 1}} \]
  10. Simplified88.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \frac{x}{wj + 1}} \]
  11. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 85.3% accurate, 44.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + -2 \cdot \left(x \cdot wj\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (+ x (* -2.0 (* x wj))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (-2.0 * (x * wj));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x + ((-2.0d0) * (x * wj))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x + (-2.0 * (x * wj));
}
def code(wj, x):
	return x + (-2.0 * (x * wj))
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x + Float64(-2.0 * Float64(x * wj)))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x + (-2.0 * (x * wj));
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(x + N[(-2.0 * N[(x * wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x + -2 \cdot \left(x \cdot wj\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 81.0%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt1-in81.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    2. associate-/l/81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. div-sub81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. associate-/l*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    5. *-inverses81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    6. *-rgt-identity81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
  3. Simplified81.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 88.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative88.0%

      \[\leadsto x + -2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot wj\right)} \]
  7. Simplified88.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -2 \cdot \left(x \cdot wj\right)} \]
  8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 84.8% accurate, 62.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - wj\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 wj)))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x * (1.0 - wj);
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x * (1.0d0 - wj)
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x * (1.0 - wj);
}
def code(wj, x):
	return x * (1.0 - wj)
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - wj))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - wj);
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - wj), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 81.0%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt1-in81.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    2. associate-/l/81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. div-sub81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. associate-/l*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    5. *-inverses81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    6. *-rgt-identity81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
  3. Simplified81.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 81.1%

    \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(x + -1 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)}}{wj + 1} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot wj\right) \cdot x}\right)}{wj + 1} \]
    2. neg-mul-181.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \left(x + \color{blue}{\left(-wj\right)} \cdot x\right)}{wj + 1} \]
    3. distribute-rgt1-in81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(\left(-wj\right) + 1\right) \cdot x}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. +-commutative81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-wj\right)\right)} \cdot x}{wj + 1} \]
    5. sub-neg81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right)} \cdot x}{wj + 1} \]
  7. Simplified81.1%

    \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj - \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot x}}{wj + 1} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 88.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + wj} - \frac{wj}{1 + wj}\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. div-sub88.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 - wj}{1 + wj}} \]
    2. associate-/l*88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot \left(1 - wj\right)}{1 + wj}} \]
    3. *-commutative88.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot x}}{1 + wj} \]
    4. +-commutative88.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot x}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]
    5. associate-/l*88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \frac{x}{wj + 1}} \]
  10. Simplified88.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \frac{x}{wj + 1}} \]
  11. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 87.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(1 - wj\right) \cdot \color{blue}{x} \]
  12. Final simplification87.3%

    \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - wj\right) \]
  13. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 84.8% accurate, 313.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 x)
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x;
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = x
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return x;
}
def code(wj, x):
	return x
function code(wj, x)
	return x
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = x;
end
code[wj_, x_] := x
\begin{array}{l}

\\
x
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 81.0%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt1-in81.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    2. associate-/l/81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. div-sub81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. associate-/l*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    5. *-inverses81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    6. *-rgt-identity81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
  3. Simplified81.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 87.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 4.3% accurate, 313.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x) :precision binary64 wj)
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj;
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = wj
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj;
}
def code(wj, x):
	return wj
function code(wj, x)
	return wj
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = wj;
end
code[wj_, x_] := wj
\begin{array}{l}

\\
wj
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 81.0%

    \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt1-in81.0%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]
    2. associate-/l/81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. div-sub81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}}{wj + 1} \]
    4. associate-/l*81.1%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj \cdot \frac{e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    5. *-inverses81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{wj \cdot \color{blue}{1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
    6. *-rgt-identity81.8%

      \[\leadsto wj - \frac{\color{blue}{wj} - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1} \]
  3. Simplified81.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj - \frac{x}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
  4. Add Preprocessing
  5. Taylor expanded in wj around inf 4.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj} \]
  6. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 79.0% accurate, 1.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj)))))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0d0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))))
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj)))));
}
def code(wj, x):
	return wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj)))))
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)) - Float64(x / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj))))))
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = wj - ((wj / (wj + 1.0)) - (x / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj)))));
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2024085 
(FPCore (wj x)
  :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))

  (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))