SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.2% → 96.3%

Time: 13.6s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq 10^{+299}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\left(t + \frac{x}{z}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))) (* y z)))))
   (if (<= t_1 1e+299) t_1 (* z (- (+ t (/ x z)) x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+299) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * ((t + (x / z)) - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z))
    if (t_1 <= 1d+299) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = z * ((t + (x / z)) - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+299) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = z * ((t + (x / z)) - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + ((math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))) * (y * z))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= 1e+299:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = z * ((t + (x / z)) - x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))) * Float64(y * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= 1e+299)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(Float64(t + Float64(x / z)) - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= 1e+299)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = z * ((t + (x / z)) - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 1e+299], t$95$1, N[(z * N[(N[(t + N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 1.0000000000000001e299

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.0000000000000001e299 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 48.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 48.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(t + \frac{x}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \leq 10^{+299}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\left(t + \frac{x}{z}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y (- (* (tanh (/ t y)) z) (* z (tanh (/ x y)))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, ((tanh((t / y)) * z) - (z * tanh((x / y)))), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * z) - Float64(z * tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.0%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)}, x\right) \]

   2. distribute-rgt-in 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

6. Applied egg-rr 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

7. Final simplification 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z - z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right), x\right) \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 96.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.0%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-define 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 86.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 0.17\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -2.5e-104) (not (<= t 0.17)))
   (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y)) (* y z)))
   (fma y (* z (- (/ t y) (tanh (/ x y)))) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -2.5e-104) || !(t <= 0.17)) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, (z * ((t / y) - tanh((x / y)))), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -2.5e-104) || !(t <= 0.17))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(z * Float64(Float64(t / y) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -2.5e-104], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 0.17]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -2.49999999999999989e-104 or 0.170000000000000012 < t

   1. Initial program 96.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 13.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 12.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 12.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 12.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 12.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 12.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 90.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if -2.49999999999999989e-104 < t < 0.170000000000000012

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.5 \cdot 10^{-104} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 0.17\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 86.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -4.8e+21) (not (<= x 1.05e-52)))
   (- x (* (tanh (/ x y)) (* y z)))
   (+ x (* z (- (* y (tanh (/ t y))) x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.8e+21) || !(x <= 1.05e-52)) {
		tmp = x - (tanh((x / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * tanh((t / y))) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-4.8d+21)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.05d-52))) then
        tmp = x - (tanh((x / y)) * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y * tanh((t / y))) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -4.8e+21) || !(x <= 1.05e-52)) {
		tmp = x - (Math.tanh((x / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * Math.tanh((t / y))) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -4.8e+21) or not (x <= 1.05e-52):
		tmp = x - (math.tanh((x / y)) * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * math.tanh((t / y))) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -4.8e+21) || !(x <= 1.05e-52))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(tanh(Float64(x / y)) * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * tanh(Float64(t / y))) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -4.8e+21) || ~((x <= 1.05e-52)))
		tmp = x - (tanh((x / y)) * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * tanh((t / y))) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -4.8e+21], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.05e-52]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -4.8e21 or 1.0499999999999999e-52 < x

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)}, x\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in t around 0 13.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 13.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 13.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}} \]

      3. associate-/l* 13.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}} \]

      4. associate-/l* 13.5%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)} \]

      5. rec-exp 13.5%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right) \]

      6. div-sub 13.5%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   if -4.8e21 < x < 1.0499999999999999e-52

   1. Initial program 92.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 27.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 27.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - x\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 27.8%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} - x\right) \]

      2. rec-exp 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 27.9%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} - x\right) \]

      4. tanh-def-a 89.6%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} - x\right) \]

   8. Simplified 89.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+21} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 83.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-94} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.45 \cdot 10^{-124}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -1.4e-94) (not (<= t 3.45e-124)))
   (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y)) (* y z)))
   (- x (* (tanh (/ x y)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.4e-94) || !(t <= 3.45e-124)) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (tanh((x / y)) * (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-1.4d-94)) .or. (.not. (t <= 3.45d-124))) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x - (tanh((x / y)) * (y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.4e-94) || !(t <= 3.45e-124)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.tanh((x / y)) * (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -1.4e-94) or not (t <= 3.45e-124):
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.tanh((x / y)) * (y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -1.4e-94) || !(t <= 3.45e-124))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(tanh(Float64(x / y)) * Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -1.4e-94) || ~((t <= 3.45e-124)))
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x - (tanh((x / y)) * (y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -1.4e-94], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 3.45e-124]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.3999999999999999e-94 or 3.45e-124 < t

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 19.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 19.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 19.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 19.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 19.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 19.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 89.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 89.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if -1.3999999999999999e-94 < t < 3.45e-124

   1. Initial program 90.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)}, x\right) \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot z + \left(-\tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot z}, x\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in t around 0 18.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 18.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)} \]

      2. unsub-neg 18.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}} \]

      3. associate-/l* 18.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z \cdot \left(e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}\right)}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}} \]

      4. associate-/l* 18.7%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)} \]

      5. rec-exp 18.7%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right) \]

      6. div-sub 18.7%

         \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}} - \frac{e^{-\frac{x}{y}}}{e^{\frac{x}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{x}{y}}}}\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(z \cdot y\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-94} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 3.45 \cdot 10^{-124}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 81.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+203}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 3.2e+203) (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y)) (* y z))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.2e+203) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 3.2d+203) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.2e+203) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3.2e+203:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3.2e+203)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3.2e+203)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 3.2e+203], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.1999999999999997e203

   1. Initial program 95.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 26.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 26.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 26.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 26.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 26.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 26.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 83.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 3.1999999999999997e203 < y

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 95.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+203}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 68.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.05e+80) x (fma z (- t x) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.05e+80) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = fma(z, (t - x), x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.05e+80)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = fma(z, Float64(t - x), x);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.05e+80], x, N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.05000000000000001e80

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.05000000000000001e80 < y

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 86.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, t - x, x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 62.0% accurate, 10.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.72 \cdot 10^{+162}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.3 \cdot 10^{+258} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{+290}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.72e+162)
   x
   (if (or (<= y 6.3e+258) (not (<= y 2.25e+290))) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.72e+162) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 6.3e+258) || !(y <= 2.25e+290)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.72d+162) then
        tmp = x
    else if ((y <= 6.3d+258) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.25d+290))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = t * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.72e+162) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 6.3e+258) || !(y <= 2.25e+290)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = t * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.72e+162:
		tmp = x
	elif (y <= 6.3e+258) or not (y <= 2.25e+290):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = t * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.72e+162)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 6.3e+258) || !(y <= 2.25e+290))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.72e+162)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 6.3e+258) || ~((y <= 2.25e+290)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = t * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.72e+162], x, If[Or[LessEqual[y, 6.3e+258], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.25e+290]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 1.72e162

   1. Initial program 96.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.72e162 < y < 6.30000000000000034e258 or 2.2499999999999998e290 < y

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 80.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 73.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 73.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 73.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if 6.30000000000000034e258 < y < 2.2499999999999998e290

   1. Initial program 75.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 52.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 77.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\left(t + \frac{x}{z}\right) - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.72 \cdot 10^{+162}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.3 \cdot 10^{+258} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{+290}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 68.8% accurate, 17.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.5 \cdot 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 8.5e+79) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.5e+79) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 8.5d+79) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.5e+79) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 8.5e+79:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 8.5e+79)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 8.5e+79)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 8.5e+79], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 8.4999999999999998e79

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 8.4999999999999998e79 < y

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 65.1% accurate, 21.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.85 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 2.85e+82) x (+ x (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.85e+82) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.85d+82) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (t * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.85e+82) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.85e+82:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (t * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.85e+82)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.85e+82)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.85e+82], x, N[(x + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.85000000000000008e82

   1. Initial program 96.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 68.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.85000000000000008e82 < y

   1. Initial program 88.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around inf 74.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{t - x}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 73.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 73.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   6. Simplified 73.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.85 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 60.1% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.0%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024085 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))