VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)

Percentage Accurate: 76.4% → 99.2%

Time: 30.0s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 6.3×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. F = -1.2230963272432014e+190
  2. l = -1249888103157634.5

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (F l)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))

C

double code(double F, double l) {
	return (((double) M_PI) * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l)));
}

Java

public static double code(double F, double l) {
	return (Math.PI * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l)));
}

Python

def code(F, l):
	return (math.pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * math.tan((math.pi * l)))

Julia

function code(F, l)
	return Float64(Float64(pi * l) - Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(F * F)) * tan(Float64(pi * l))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(F, l)
	tmp = (pi * l) - ((1.0 / (F * F)) * tan((pi * l)));
end

Wolfram

code[F_, l_] := N[(N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(1.0 / N[(F * F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\cos \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}{\sin \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 2e+15)
    (-
     (* PI l_m)
     (/ (* (/ 1.0 F) (/ 1.0 (/ (cos (* PI l_m)) (sin (* PI l_m))))) F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - (((1.0 / F) * (1.0 / (cos((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / sin((((double) M_PI) * l_m))))) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - (((1.0 / F) * (1.0 / (Math.cos((Math.PI * l_m)) / Math.sin((Math.PI * l_m))))) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 2e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - (((1.0 / F) * (1.0 / (math.cos((math.pi * l_m)) / math.sin((math.pi * l_m))))) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / F) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(cos(Float64(pi * l_m)) / sin(Float64(pi * l_m))))) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - (((1.0 / F) * (1.0 / (cos((pi * l_m)) / sin((pi * l_m))))) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 2e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(1.0 / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[Cos[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / N[Sin[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 2e15

   1. Initial program 79.9%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{F}}{F}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{1}}}{F}}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      3. add-sqr-sqrt 35.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{F} \cdot \sqrt{F}}}}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      4. sqrt-prod 68.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{F \cdot F}}}}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      5. sqrt-div 68.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\frac{1}{F \cdot F}}}}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      6. associate-*l/ 68.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{\frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}} \]

      7. sqrt-div 68.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\sqrt{F \cdot F}}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \]

      8. metadata-eval 68.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\sqrt{F \cdot F}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \]

      9. sqrt-prod 39.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{F} \cdot \sqrt{F}}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \]

      10. add-sqr-sqrt 86.6%

          \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{F}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. tan-quot 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\sin \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\cos \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}}{F} \]

      2. clear-num 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\cos \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\sin \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}}}{F} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\cos \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\sin \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}}}{F} \]

   if 2e15 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 54.5%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 44.3%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in F around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{\cos \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{\sin \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 2e+15)
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ (* (/ 1.0 F) (tan (* PI l_m))) F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - (((1.0 / F) * tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m))) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - (((1.0 / F) * Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m))) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 2e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - (((1.0 / F) * math.tan((math.pi * l_m))) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / F) * tan(Float64(pi * l_m))) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - (((1.0 / F) * tan((pi * l_m))) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 2e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(1.0 / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 2e15

   1. Initial program 79.9%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{F}}{F}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      2. metadata-eval 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{1}}}{F}}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      3. add-sqr-sqrt 35.7%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{F} \cdot \sqrt{F}}}}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      4. sqrt-prod 68.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{F \cdot F}}}}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      5. sqrt-div 68.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\frac{1}{F \cdot F}}}}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]

      6. associate-*l/ 68.1%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{\frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}} \]

      7. sqrt-div 68.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{1}}{\sqrt{F \cdot F}}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \]

      8. metadata-eval 68.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\sqrt{F \cdot F}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \]

      9. sqrt-prod 39.0%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{F} \cdot \sqrt{F}}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \]

      10. add-sqr-sqrt 86.6%

          \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{F}} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}} \]

   if 2e15 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 54.5%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 44.3%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in F around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{1}{F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 2e+15)
    (- (* PI l_m) (/ (/ (tan (* PI l_m)) F) F))
    (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((tan((((double) M_PI) * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.tan((Math.PI * l_m)) / F) / F);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 2e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.tan((math.pi * l_m)) / F) / F)
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(tan(Float64(pi * l_m)) / F) / F));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((tan((pi * l_m)) / F) / F);
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 2e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[Tan[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision] / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 2e15

   1. Initial program 79.9%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. *-un-lft-identity 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

      3. associate-/r* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}} \]

   if 2e15 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 54.5%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 44.3%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in F around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F}}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 73.3% accurate, 3.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;F \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-273} \lor \neg \left(F \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-246}\right) \land \left(F \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-146} \lor \neg \left(F \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{-135}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;l\_m \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{-1}{F}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (or (<= F 3.4e-273)
          (and (not (<= F 2.9e-246))
               (or (<= F 1.7e-146) (not (<= F 8.6e-135)))))
    (* PI l_m)
    (* l_m (* (/ PI F) (/ -1.0 F))))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((F <= 3.4e-273) || (!(F <= 2.9e-246) && ((F <= 1.7e-146) || !(F <= 8.6e-135)))) {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * ((((double) M_PI) / F) * (-1.0 / F));
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((F <= 3.4e-273) || (!(F <= 2.9e-246) && ((F <= 1.7e-146) || !(F <= 8.6e-135)))) {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	} else {
		tmp = l_m * ((Math.PI / F) * (-1.0 / F));
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (F <= 3.4e-273) or (not (F <= 2.9e-246) and ((F <= 1.7e-146) or not (F <= 8.6e-135))):
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	else:
		tmp = l_m * ((math.pi / F) * (-1.0 / F))
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((F <= 3.4e-273) || (!(F <= 2.9e-246) && ((F <= 1.7e-146) || !(F <= 8.6e-135))))
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(l_m * Float64(Float64(pi / F) * Float64(-1.0 / F)));
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((F <= 3.4e-273) || (~((F <= 2.9e-246)) && ((F <= 1.7e-146) || ~((F <= 8.6e-135)))))
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	else
		tmp = l_m * ((pi / F) * (-1.0 / F));
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[Or[LessEqual[F, 3.4e-273], And[N[Not[LessEqual[F, 2.9e-246]], $MachinePrecision], Or[LessEqual[F, 1.7e-146], N[Not[LessEqual[F, 8.6e-135]], $MachinePrecision]]]], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], N[(l$95$m * N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if F < 3.39999999999999991e-273 or 2.9e-246 < F < 1.7e-146 or 8.59999999999999997e-135 < F

   1. Initial program 73.4%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 73.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 73.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 67.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in F around inf 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]

   if 3.39999999999999991e-273 < F < 2.9e-246 or 1.7e-146 < F < 8.59999999999999997e-135

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in F around 0 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{\ell \cdot \pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

      2. associate-*r/ 86.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \frac{\pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 86.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \left(-\frac{\pi}{{F}^{2}}\right)} \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac 86.5%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-\pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]

   8. Simplified 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \frac{-\pi}{{F}^{2}}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 86.5%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi}}{{F}^{2}} \]

      2. pow2 86.5%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot \pi}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      3. times-frac 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{F} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}\right)} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 86.7%

       \[\leadsto \ell \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1}{F} \cdot \frac{\pi}{F}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;F \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-273} \lor \neg \left(F \leq 2.9 \cdot 10^{-246}\right) \land \left(F \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-146} \lor \neg \left(F \leq 8.6 \cdot 10^{-135}\right)\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\ell \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{-1}{F}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.4% accurate, 6.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot l\_m \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{l\_m}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot l\_m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  l_s
  (if (<= (* PI l_m) 2e+15) (- (* PI l_m) (* (/ PI F) (/ l_m F))) (* PI l_m))))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((((double) M_PI) * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (((double) M_PI) * l_m) - ((((double) M_PI) / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = ((double) M_PI) * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((Math.PI * l_m) <= 2e+15) {
		tmp = (Math.PI * l_m) - ((Math.PI / F) * (l_m / F));
	} else {
		tmp = Math.PI * l_m;
	}
	return l_s * tmp;
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	tmp = 0
	if (math.pi * l_m) <= 2e+15:
		tmp = (math.pi * l_m) - ((math.pi / F) * (l_m / F))
	else:
		tmp = math.pi * l_m
	return l_s * tmp

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(pi * l_m) - Float64(Float64(pi / F) * Float64(l_m / F)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(pi * l_m);
	end
	return Float64(l_s * tmp)
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp_2 = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((pi * l_m) <= 2e+15)
		tmp = (pi * l_m) - ((pi / F) * (l_m / F));
	else
		tmp = pi * l_m;
	end
	tmp_2 = l_s * tmp;
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * If[LessEqual[N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision], 2e+15], N[(N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(Pi / F), $MachinePrecision] * N[(l$95$m / F), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (PI.f64) l) < 2e15

   1. Initial program 79.9%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 79.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell}}{F \cdot F} \]

      2. times-frac 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}} \]

   if 2e15 < (*.f64 (PI.f64) l)

   1. Initial program 54.5%

      \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

      2. sqr-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

      4. sqr-neg 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

      5. *-rgt-identity 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

   3. Simplified 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 44.3%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in F around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\pi \cdot \ell \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\pi}{F} \cdot \frac{\ell}{F}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\pi \cdot \ell\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 73.8% accurate, 37.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} l\_m = \left|\ell\right| \\ l\_s = \mathsf{copysign}\left(1, \ell\right) \\ l\_s \cdot \left(\pi \cdot l\_m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

l\_m = (fabs.f64 l)
l\_s = (copysign.f64 #s(literal 1 binary64) l)
(FPCore (l_s F l_m) :precision binary64 (* l_s (* PI l_m)))

C

l\_m = fabs(l);
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l);
double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (((double) M_PI) * l_m);
}

Java

l\_m = Math.abs(l);
l\_s = Math.copySign(1.0, l);
public static double code(double l_s, double F, double l_m) {
	return l_s * (Math.PI * l_m);
}

Python

l\_m = math.fabs(l)
l\_s = math.copysign(1.0, l)
def code(l_s, F, l_m):
	return l_s * (math.pi * l_m)

Julia

l\_m = abs(l)
l\_s = copysign(1.0, l)
function code(l_s, F, l_m)
	return Float64(l_s * Float64(pi * l_m))
end

MATLAB

l\_m = abs(l);
l\_s = sign(l) * abs(1.0);
function tmp = code(l_s, F, l_m)
	tmp = l_s * (pi * l_m);
end

Wolfram

l\_m = N[Abs[l], $MachinePrecision]
l\_s = N[With[{TMP1 = Abs[1.0], TMP2 = Sign[l]}, TMP1 * If[TMP2 == 0, 1, TMP2]], $MachinePrecision]
code[l$95$s_, F_, l$95$m_] := N[(l$95$s * N[(Pi * l$95$m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 73.9%

   \[\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{1}{F \cdot F} \cdot \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{F \cdot F}} \]

   2. sqr-neg 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

   3. associate-*r/ 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \color{blue}{\frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\left(-F\right) \cdot \left(-F\right)}} \]

   4. sqr-neg 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right) \cdot 1}{\color{blue}{F \cdot F}} \]

   5. *-rgt-identity 74.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}}{F \cdot F} \]

3. Simplified 74.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\tan \left(\pi \cdot \ell\right)}{F \cdot F}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in l around 0 68.0%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell - \frac{\color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi}}{F \cdot F} \]

6. Taylor expanded in F around inf 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\ell \cdot \pi} \]

7. Final simplification 75.9%

   \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \ell \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024082 
(FPCore (F l)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (6)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* PI l) (* (/ 1.0 (* F F)) (tan (* PI l)))))