Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 91.5% → 94.2%

Time: 12.5s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 0.4×

• 49.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 91.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * ((z * z) - t))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * ((z * z) - t));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 94.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x\_m \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x\_m, x\_m, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x\_m}^{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x_m 3e+181) (fma x_m x_m (* (- (* z z) t) (* y -4.0))) (pow x_m 2.0)))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x_m <= 3e+181) {
		tmp = fma(x_m, x_m, (((z * z) - t) * (y * -4.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = pow(x_m, 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x_m <= 3e+181)
		tmp = fma(x_m, x_m, Float64(Float64(Float64(z * z) - t) * Float64(y * -4.0)));
	else
		tmp = x_m ^ 2.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x$95$m, 3e+181], N[(x$95$m * x$95$m + N[(N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[Power[x$95$m, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < 3.00000000000000012e181

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-neg 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(-y \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 92.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 3.00000000000000012e181 < x

   1. Initial program 70.4%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+181}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot -4\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{2}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x\_m \cdot x\_m + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x\_m}^{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x_m x_m) (* (* y 4.0) (- t (* z z))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (pow x_m 2.0))))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = pow(x_m, 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.pow(x_m, 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = math.pow(x_m, 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x_m * x_m) + Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(t - Float64(z * z))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x_m ^ 2.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp_2 = code(x_m, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x_m ^ 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[Power[x$95$m, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (*.f64 x x) (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 4 binary64)) (-.f64 (*.f64 z z) t))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x x) (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 4 binary64)) (-.f64 (*.f64 z z) t)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{x}^{2}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;{x}^{2}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 93.3% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x\_m \cdot x\_m + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\_m \cdot x\_m - y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* x_m x_m) (* (* y 4.0) (- t (* z z))))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (- (* x_m x_m) (* y (* t -4.0))))))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0))
	return tmp

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(x_m * x_m) + Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * Float64(t - Float64(z * z))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x_m * x_m) - Float64(y * Float64(t * -4.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp_2 = code(x_m, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (x_m * x_m) + ((y * 4.0) * (t - (z * z)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(t - N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(t * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (*.f64 x x) (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 4 binary64)) (-.f64 (*.f64 z z) t))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (*.f64 x x) (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 4 binary64)) (-.f64 (*.f64 z z) t)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 60.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 60.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot -4} \]

      2. *-commutative 60.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \cdot -4 \]

      3. associate-*l* 60.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 60.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x + \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(t - z \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot x - y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 66.1% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ x\_m \cdot x\_m - y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x_m x_m) (* y (* t -4.0))))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0));
}

Fortran

x_m = abs(x)
real(8) function code(x_m, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * (-4.0d0)))
end function

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0));
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m, y, z, t):
	return (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0))

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x_m * x_m) - Float64(y * Float64(t * -4.0)))
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp = code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x_m * x_m) - (y * (t * -4.0));
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x$95$m * x$95$m), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(t * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.5%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 70.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 70.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot y\right) \cdot -4} \]

   2. *-commutative 70.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \cdot -4 \]

   3. associate-*l* 70.5%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]

5. Simplified 70.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 70.5%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot x - y \cdot \left(t \cdot -4\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 31.4% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} x_m = \left|x\right| \\ 4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

x_m = (fabs.f64 x)
(FPCore (x_m y z t) :precision binary64 (* 4.0 (* t y)))

C

x_m = fabs(x);
double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 4.0 * (t * y);
}

Fortran

x_m = abs(x)
real(8) function code(x_m, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x_m
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = 4.0d0 * (t * y)
end function

Java

x_m = Math.abs(x);
public static double code(double x_m, double y, double z, double t) {
	return 4.0 * (t * y);
}

Python

x_m = math.fabs(x)
def code(x_m, y, z, t):
	return 4.0 * (t * y)

Julia

x_m = abs(x)
function code(x_m, y, z, t)
	return Float64(4.0 * Float64(t * y))
end

MATLAB

x_m = abs(x);
function tmp = code(x_m, y, z, t)
	tmp = 4.0 * (t * y);
end

Wolfram

x_m = N[Abs[x], $MachinePrecision]
code[x$95$m_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(4.0 * N[(t * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 88.5%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 38.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 38.3%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

5. Simplified 38.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(y \cdot t\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 38.3%

   \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(t \cdot y\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 91.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - 4 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot z - t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* y (- (* z z) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (x * x) - (4.0d0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(4.0 * Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * z) - t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (x * x) - (4.0 * (y * ((z * z) - t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(4.0 * N[(y * N[(N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024082 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.Shading:$sradialGradientWithFocusShader from Rasterific-0.6.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- (* x x) (* 4.0 (* y (- (* z z) t))))

  (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) (- (* z z) t))))