Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 9.3s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 28.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * y) + z) * y) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + z) * y) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * y) + z) * y) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma (fma x y z) y t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(fma(x, y, z), y, t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * y + z), $MachinePrecision] * y + t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot y + z, y, t\right)} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right)}, y, t\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z\right), y, t\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 85.3% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+54} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + x \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2e+54) (not (<= z 8.8e+74)))
   (+ t (* y z))
   (+ t (* x (* y y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2e+54) || !(z <= 8.8e+74)) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (x * (y * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2d+54)) .or. (.not. (z <= 8.8d+74))) then
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = t + (x * (y * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2e+54) || !(z <= 8.8e+74)) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (x * (y * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2e+54) or not (z <= 8.8e+74):
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = t + (x * (y * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2e+54) || !(z <= 8.8e+74))
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(x * Float64(y * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2e+54) || ~((z <= 8.8e+74)))
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = t + (x * (y * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2e+54], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8.8e+74]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(x * N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.0000000000000002e54 or 8.8000000000000005e74 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]

   if -2.0000000000000002e54 < z < 8.8000000000000005e74

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 88.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot z}{x} + {y}^{2}\right)} + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{2} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      2. unpow2 88.7%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot y} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right) + t \]

      3. associate-/l* 89.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right) + t \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 91.9%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   5. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)} + t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{y}\right) + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+54} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+74}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + x \cdot \left(y \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 88.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+54} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+75}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.05e+54) (not (<= z 1.3e+75)))
   (+ t (* y z))
   (+ t (* y (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.05e+54) || !(z <= 1.3e+75)) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.05d+54)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.3d+75))) then
        tmp = t + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = t + (y * (x * y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.05e+54) || !(z <= 1.3e+75)) {
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.05e+54) or not (z <= 1.3e+75):
		tmp = t + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.05e+54) || !(z <= 1.3e+75))
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(x * y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.05e+54) || ~((z <= 1.3e+75)))
		tmp = t + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = t + (y * (x * y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.05e+54], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.3e+75]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(y * N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.04999999999999993e54 or 1.29999999999999992e75 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]

   if -1.04999999999999993e54 < z < 1.29999999999999992e75

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \cdot y + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y + t \]

   5. Simplified 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot y + t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+54} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+75}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + y \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 51.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4500000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.1e+42) (not (<= z 4500000000000.0))) (* y z) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.1e+42) || !(z <= 4500000000000.0)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.1d+42)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4500000000000.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.1e+42) || !(z <= 4500000000000.0)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.1e+42) or not (z <= 4500000000000.0):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.1e+42) || !(z <= 4500000000000.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.1e+42) || ~((z <= 4500000000000.0)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.1e+42], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4500000000000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], t]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.1000000000000002e42 or 4.5e12 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(\frac{y \cdot z}{x} + {y}^{2}\right)} + t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left({y}^{2} + \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot {y}^{2} + x \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      3. unpow2 70.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot y\right)} + x \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-*l* 72.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot y} + x \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{x}\right) + t \]

      5. associate-/l* 58.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot y + x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \frac{z}{x}\right)}\right) + t \]

      6. associate-*r* 64.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right) + t \]

      7. distribute-lft-out 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)} + t \]

      8. *-commutative 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right)} \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right) + t \]

   5. Simplified 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)} + t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in t around inf 65.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{x \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 62.5%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)}{t}}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 62.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \frac{y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)}{t}\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 62.5%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)}}}\right) \]

      2. un-div-inv 62.5%

         \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{x}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)}}}\right) \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 62.5%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{x}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)}}}\right) \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/r/ 61.2%

          \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\frac{x}{t} \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)\right)}\right) \]

       2. associate-*r* 65.5%

          \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{t} \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)}\right) \]

   12. Simplified 65.5%

       \[\leadsto t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{t} \cdot y\right) \cdot \left(y + \frac{z}{x}\right)}\right) \]

   13. Taylor expanded in z around inf 64.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -3.1000000000000002e42 < z < 4.5e12

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 59.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 61.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+42} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4500000000000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (* y (+ z (* x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + (y * (z + (x * y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + (y * (z + (x * y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(x * y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + (y * (z + (x * y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(y * N[(z + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto t + y \cdot \left(z + x \cdot y\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 66.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \cdot y + t \]

4. Final simplification 73.1%

   \[\leadsto t + y \cdot z \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 39.3% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(x \cdot y + z\right) \cdot y + t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 41.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

4. Final simplification 41.7%

   \[\leadsto t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024080 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Language.Haskell.HsColour.ColourHighlight:unbase from hscolour-1.23"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* (+ (* x y) z) y) t))