b parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.5%

Time: 6.3s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 41.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-31}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + m \cdot \left(m - 2\right)\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 5e-31) (+ -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))) (/ (* m (+ 1.0 (* m (- m 2.0)))) v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 5e-31) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (1.0 + (m * (m - 2.0)))) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 5d-31) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (m + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = (m * (1.0d0 + (m * (m - 2.0d0)))) / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 5e-31) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m * (1.0 + (m * (m - 2.0)))) / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 5e-31:
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = (m * (1.0 + (m * (m - 2.0)))) / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 5e-31)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 + Float64(m * Float64(m - 2.0)))) / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 5e-31)
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = (m * (1.0 + (m * (m - 2.0)))) / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 5e-31], N[(-1.0 + N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 + N[(m * N[(m - 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 5e-31

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \left(-2 \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} - 1 \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot 1 + m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} - 1 \]

      2. *-rgt-identity 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{m} + m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1 \]

      3. associate-*r/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(m + \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot 1}{v}}\right) - 1 \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(m + \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v}\right) - 1 \]

   8. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)} - 1 \]

   if 5e-31 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + m \cdot \left(m - 2\right)\right)}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-31}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m \cdot \left(1 + m \cdot \left(m - 2\right)\right)}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 63.0% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-153}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 2.6e-153) -1.0 (/ m v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.6e-153) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.6d-153) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.6e-153) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.6e-153:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.6e-153)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.6e-153)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.6e-153], -1.0, N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.6000000000000001e-153

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 2.6000000000000001e-153 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in v around 0 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot {\left(1 - m\right)}^{2}}{v}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-153}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 75.9% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (-1.0d0) + (m + (m / v))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0 + (m + (m / v))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m + Float64(m / v)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(-1.0 + N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 46.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \left(-2 \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1} \]

6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 75.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} - 1 \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-in 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot 1 + m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} - 1 \]

   2. *-rgt-identity 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{m} + m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1 \]

   3. associate-*r/ 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(m + \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot 1}{v}}\right) - 1 \]

   4. *-rgt-identity 75.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(m + \frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v}\right) - 1 \]

8. Simplified 75.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)} - 1 \]

9. Final simplification 75.2%

   \[\leadsto -1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right) \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 27.1% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ m -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in v around inf 25.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 - m\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 25.6%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 25.6%

      \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(\left(-m\right) + 1\right)} \]

   4. distribute-neg-in 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-m\right)\right) + \left(-1\right)} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} + \left(-1\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 25.6%

      \[\leadsto m + \color{blue}{-1} \]

7. Simplified 25.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m + -1} \]

8. Final simplification 25.6%

   \[\leadsto m + -1 \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 24.7% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 23.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

6. Final simplification 23.0%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024080 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "b parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))