Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5

Percentage Accurate: 70.2% → 97.6%

Time: 15.5s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 70.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(x * z)) + Float64(y * z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x * y) + (x * z)) + (y * z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{\left(x + z\right) \cdot {y}^{3}}}\right)\right) - \sqrt{\frac{x + z}{y}}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-246}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -2.8e+16)
   (*
    2.0
    (*
     y
     (-
      (* 0.5 (* x (* z (sqrt (/ 1.0 (* (+ x z) (pow y 3.0)))))))
      (sqrt (/ (+ x z) y)))))
   (if (<= y -4.8e-246)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
     (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ x (fma x (/ y z) y))) (sqrt z))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.8e+16) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (y * ((0.5 * (x * (z * sqrt((1.0 / ((x + z) * pow(y, 3.0))))))) - sqrt(((x + z) / y))));
	} else if (y <= -4.8e-246) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((x + fma(x, (y / z), y))) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.8e+16)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(y * Float64(Float64(0.5 * Float64(x * Float64(z * sqrt(Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(x + z) * (y ^ 3.0))))))) - sqrt(Float64(Float64(x + z) / y)))));
	elseif (y <= -4.8e-246)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(x + fma(x, Float64(y / z), y))) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -2.8e+16], N[(2.0 * N[(y * N[(N[(0.5 * N[(x * N[(z * N[Sqrt[N[(1.0 / N[(N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -4.8e-246], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(x + N[(x * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -2.8e16

   1. Initial program 56.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 56.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 56.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 56.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 56.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 0.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{x + z}{y}} + 0.5 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \left(x + z\right)}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 0.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{\color{blue}{z + x}}{y}} + 0.5 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot z\right) \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \left(x + z\right)}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 0.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{z + x}{y}} + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \left(x + z\right)}}\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 0.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{z + x}{y}} + 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)}}}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 0.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(\sqrt{\frac{z + x}{y}} + 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \left(z + x\right)}}\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around -inf 0.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{\frac{x + z}{y}} \cdot {\left(\sqrt{-1}\right)}^{2}} + 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \left(z + x\right)}}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{-1}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{x + z}{y}}} + 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \left(z + x\right)}}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      2. unpow2 0.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-1} \cdot \sqrt{-1}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{x + z}{y}} + 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \left(z + x\right)}}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

      3. rem-square-sqrt 81.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-1} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{x + z}{y}} + 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \left(z + x\right)}}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

   10. Simplified 81.9%

       \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{x + z}{y}}} + 0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{{y}^{3} \cdot \left(z + x\right)}}\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

   if -2.8e16 < y < -4.7999999999999996e-246

   1. Initial program 84.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 84.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 84.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 84.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 84.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 60.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if -4.7999999999999996e-246 < y

   1. Initial program 72.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 63.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 61.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{z}}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 61.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 57.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 57.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 57.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \frac{y}{z} + y\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 57.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 57.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(z \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{\left(x + z\right) \cdot {y}^{3}}}\right)\right) - \sqrt{\frac{x + z}{y}}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-246}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 84.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-246}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -4.8e-246)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt (+ x (fma x (/ y z) y))) (sqrt z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4.8e-246) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt((x + fma(x, (y / z), y))) * sqrt(z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4.8e-246)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(Float64(x + fma(x, Float64(y / z), y))) * sqrt(z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -4.8e-246], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[N[(x + N[(x * N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.7999999999999996e-246

   1. Initial program 71.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 71.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 45.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if -4.7999999999999996e-246 < y

   1. Initial program 72.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 63.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + \frac{x \cdot y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 61.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + \color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{y}{z}}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 61.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 57.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 57.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \left(y + x \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 57.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \frac{y}{z} + y\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]

      4. fma-define 57.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 57.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 52.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{-246}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{x + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \frac{y}{z}, y\right)} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 85.0% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-288}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.85e-288)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.85e-288) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt((y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.85d-288) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt((y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.85e-288) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt((y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.85e-288:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt((y + x)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.85e-288)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.85e-288)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt((y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.85e-288], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.85e-288

   1. Initial program 72.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 1.85e-288 < y

   1. Initial program 71.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 71.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 45.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 45.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 45.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}} \]

      2. *-commutative 45.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z}} \]

      3. sqrt-prod 53.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x + y} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 53.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{y + x}} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right) \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 53.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{y + x} \cdot \sqrt{z}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-288}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y + x}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 83.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.9 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 8.9e-41)
   (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* x (+ y z)) (* y z))))
   (* 2.0 (* (sqrt z) (sqrt y)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.9e-41) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 8.9d-41) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.9e-41) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (Math.sqrt(z) * Math.sqrt(y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 8.9e-41:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (math.sqrt(z) * math.sqrt(y))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 8.9e-41)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(x * Float64(y + z)) + Float64(y * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(sqrt(z) * sqrt(y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 8.9e-41)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((x * (y + z)) + (y * z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (sqrt(z) * sqrt(y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 8.9e-41], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[Sqrt[z], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 8.90000000000000006e-41

   1. Initial program 74.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 74.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 74.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 74.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   if 8.90000000000000006e-41 < y

   1. Initial program 65.7%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-out 65.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)} + y \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 65.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 65.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(y + z\right) \cdot x} + y \cdot z} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 28.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}} \]

   7. Simplified 28.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot y}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sqrt-prod 44.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 44.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.9 \cdot 10^{-41}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right) + y \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\sqrt{z} \cdot \sqrt{y}\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 69.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-288}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 5.5e-288) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.5e-288) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 5.5d-288) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 5.5e-288) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 5.5e-288:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 5.5e-288)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 5.5e-288)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 5.5e-288], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.5e-288

   1. Initial program 72.8%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.8%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 5.5e-288 < y

   1. Initial program 71.5%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 71.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 39.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-288}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 70.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 10^{-302}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1e-302) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* x (+ y z)))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1e-302) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1d-302) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1e-302) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1e-302:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((x * (y + z)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((z * (y + x)))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1e-302)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(x * Float64(y + z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(z * Float64(y + x))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1e-302)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((x * (y + z)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((z * (y + x)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1e-302], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(x * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 9.9999999999999996e-303

   1. Initial program 72.1%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.1%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.8%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}} \]

   if 9.9999999999999996e-303 < y

   1. Initial program 72.2%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.2%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(x + y\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 46.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)}} \]

   7. Simplified 46.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 10^{-302}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot \left(y + z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 70.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* y x) (* z (+ y x))))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(y * x) + Float64(z * Float64(y + x)))))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt(((y * x) + (z * (y + x))));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(y + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 72.2%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 72.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. +-commutative 72.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 72.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 72.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 72.2%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 68.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -4e-310) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))) (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y z)))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-4d-310)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -4e-310) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -4e-310:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -4e-310)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -4e-310)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -4e-310], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.999999999999988e-310

   1. Initial program 71.9%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 71.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 71.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 71.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 71.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 25.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 25.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

   7. Simplified 25.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

   if -3.999999999999988e-310 < y

   1. Initial program 72.4%

      \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 72.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

      2. +-commutative 72.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 72.4%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 27.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 26.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-310}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 35.7% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} [x, y, z] = \mathsf{sort}([x, y, z])\\ \\ 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (sqrt (* y x))))

C

assert(x < y && y < z);
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
}

Fortran

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 2.0d0 * sqrt((y * x))
end function

Java

assert x < y && y < z;
public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 2.0 * Math.sqrt((y * x));
}

Python

[x, y, z] = sort([x, y, z])
def code(x, y, z):
	return 2.0 * math.sqrt((y * x))

Julia

x, y, z = sort([x, y, z])
function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(y * x)))
end

MATLAB

x, y, z = num2cell(sort([x, y, z])){:}
function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((y * x));
end

Wolfram

NOTE: x, y, and z should be sorted in increasing order before calling this function.
code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 72.2%

   \[2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x \cdot y + x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 72.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{x \cdot y + \left(x \cdot z + y \cdot z\right)}} \]

   2. +-commutative 72.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x \cdot z\right)}} \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 72.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 72.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \sqrt{x \cdot y + z \cdot \left(y + x\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 26.6%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot y}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 26.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot x}} \]

7. Simplified 26.6%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{y \cdot x}} \]

8. Final simplification 26.6%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \sqrt{y \cdot x} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 82.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 0.25 \cdot \left(\left({y}^{-0.75} \cdot \left({z}^{-0.75} \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot \left(y + z\right)\right) + {z}^{0.25} \cdot {y}^{0.25}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < 7.636950090573675 \cdot 10^{+176}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \sqrt{\left(x + y\right) \cdot z + x \cdot y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t\_0 \cdot t\_0\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (+
          (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z)))
          (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))))
   (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176)
     (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y))))
     (* (* t_0 t_0) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((pow(y, -0.75) * (pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (pow(z, 0.25) * pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (0.25d0 * (((y ** (-0.75d0)) * ((z ** (-0.75d0)) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ** 0.25d0) * (y ** 0.25d0))
    if (z < 7.636950090573675d+176) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
    else
        tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (0.25 * ((Math.pow(y, -0.75) * (Math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (Math.pow(z, 0.25) * Math.pow(y, 0.25));
	double tmp;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176) {
		tmp = 2.0 * Math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	} else {
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (0.25 * ((math.pow(y, -0.75) * (math.pow(z, -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + (math.pow(z, 0.25) * math.pow(y, 0.25))
	tmp = 0
	if z < 7.636950090573675e+176:
		tmp = 2.0 * math.sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)))
	else:
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(0.25 * Float64(Float64((y ^ -0.75) * Float64((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * Float64(y + z))) + Float64((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * sqrt(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) * z) + Float64(x * y))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (0.25 * (((y ^ -0.75) * ((z ^ -0.75) * x)) * (y + z))) + ((z ^ 0.25) * (y ^ 0.25));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < 7.636950090573675e+176)
		tmp = 2.0 * sqrt((((x + y) * z) + (x * y)));
	else
		tmp = (t_0 * t_0) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[y, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[z, -0.75], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Power[z, 0.25], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[y, 0.25], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, 7.636950090573675e+176], N[(2.0 * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024080 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.TwoD.Apollonian:descartes from diagrams-contrib-1.3.0.5"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z 7.636950090573675e+176) (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (* (+ x y) z) (* x y)))) (* (* (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25))) (+ (* 0.25 (* (* (pow y -0.75) (* (pow z -0.75) x)) (+ y z))) (* (pow z 0.25) (pow y 0.25)))) 2.0))

  (* 2.0 (sqrt (+ (+ (* x y) (* x z)) (* y z)))))