Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.5% → 97.2%

Time: 10.2s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 0.6×

• 32.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+141} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{+184}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + z \cdot y\right) + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + a \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4e+141) (not (<= z 9.8e+184)))
   (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z))))))
   (+ (+ x (* z y)) (+ (* a (* z b)) (* a t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4e+141) || !(z <= 9.8e+184)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (z * y)) + ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4d+141)) .or. (.not. (z <= 9.8d+184))) then
        tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
    else
        tmp = (x + (z * y)) + ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4e+141) || !(z <= 9.8e+184)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (z * y)) + ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4e+141) or not (z <= 9.8e+184):
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
	else:
		tmp = (x + (z * y)) + ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4e+141) || !(z <= 9.8e+184))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(z * y)) + Float64(Float64(a * Float64(z * b)) + Float64(a * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4e+141) || ~((z <= 9.8e+184)))
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	else
		tmp = (x + (z * y)) + ((a * (z * b)) + (a * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4e+141], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 9.8e+184]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.00000000000000007e141 or 9.80000000000000059e184 < z

   1. Initial program 79.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 79.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 79.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 93.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 93.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 93.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.00000000000000007e141 < z < 9.80000000000000059e184

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+141} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{+184}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + z \cdot y\right) + \left(a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right) + a \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -5.2e+139)
   (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z))))))
   (+ (fma y z x) (* a (+ t (* z b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -5.2e+139) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, z, x) + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -5.2e+139)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(fma(y, z, x) + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[z, -5.2e+139], N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y * z + x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.20000000000000044e139

   1. Initial program 79.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 79.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 80.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 94.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.8%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -5.20000000000000044e139 < z

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 95.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 97.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 57.0% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + z \cdot y\\ t_2 := b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+172}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -24:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{-44} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3150000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* z y))) (t_2 (* b (* z a))))
   (if (<= a -6.8e+172)
     t_2
     (if (<= a -8.4e+126)
       t_1
       (if (<= a -1.05e+25)
         (* a t)
         (if (<= a -24.0)
           t_1
           (if (<= a -5.2e-13)
             (* a t)
             (if (or (<= a -3.9e-44) (not (<= a 3150000.0))) t_2 t_1))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (z * y);
	double t_2 = b * (z * a);
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -6.8e+172) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (a <= -8.4e+126) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -1.05e+25) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (a <= -24.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -5.2e-13) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if ((a <= -3.9e-44) || !(a <= 3150000.0)) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: t_2
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + (z * y)
    t_2 = b * (z * a)
    if (a <= (-6.8d+172)) then
        tmp = t_2
    else if (a <= (-8.4d+126)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (a <= (-1.05d+25)) then
        tmp = a * t
    else if (a <= (-24.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (a <= (-5.2d-13)) then
        tmp = a * t
    else if ((a <= (-3.9d-44)) .or. (.not. (a <= 3150000.0d0))) then
        tmp = t_2
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (z * y);
	double t_2 = b * (z * a);
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -6.8e+172) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else if (a <= -8.4e+126) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -1.05e+25) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (a <= -24.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -5.2e-13) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if ((a <= -3.9e-44) || !(a <= 3150000.0)) {
		tmp = t_2;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = x + (z * y)
	t_2 = b * (z * a)
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -6.8e+172:
		tmp = t_2
	elif a <= -8.4e+126:
		tmp = t_1
	elif a <= -1.05e+25:
		tmp = a * t
	elif a <= -24.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif a <= -5.2e-13:
		tmp = a * t
	elif (a <= -3.9e-44) or not (a <= 3150000.0):
		tmp = t_2
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(z * y))
	t_2 = Float64(b * Float64(z * a))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -6.8e+172)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (a <= -8.4e+126)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -1.05e+25)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	elseif (a <= -24.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -5.2e-13)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	elseif ((a <= -3.9e-44) || !(a <= 3150000.0))
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = x + (z * y);
	t_2 = b * (z * a);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -6.8e+172)
		tmp = t_2;
	elseif (a <= -8.4e+126)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -1.05e+25)
		tmp = a * t;
	elseif (a <= -24.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -5.2e-13)
		tmp = a * t;
	elseif ((a <= -3.9e-44) || ~((a <= 3150000.0)))
		tmp = t_2;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(b * N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -6.8e+172], t$95$2, If[LessEqual[a, -8.4e+126], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, -1.05e+25], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, -24.0], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, -5.2e-13], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[a, -3.9e-44], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 3150000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$2, t$95$1]]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -6.7999999999999996e172 or -5.2000000000000001e-13 < a < -3.9000000000000002e-44 or 3.15e6 < a

   1. Initial program 86.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 79.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 83.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 85.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in a around inf 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. *-commutative 76.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot z\right)} \cdot a \]

      3. associate-*l* 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 77.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right)} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in b around inf 55.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b} \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right) \]

   if -6.7999999999999996e172 < a < -8.3999999999999997e126 or -1.05e25 < a < -24 or -3.9000000000000002e-44 < a < 3.15e6

   1. Initial program 97.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]

   if -8.3999999999999997e126 < a < -1.05e25 or -24 < a < -5.2000000000000001e-13

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 55.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6.8 \cdot 10^{+172}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -8.4 \cdot 10^{+126}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+25}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -24:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{-44} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3150000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 84.1% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot y + a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1 + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+77} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot \left(z + \frac{t}{b}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z y) (* a t))))
   (if (<= b -6.4e+153)
     (+ t_1 (* b (* z a)))
     (if (or (<= b -3e+77) (not (<= b 1.7e-37)))
       (+ x (* (* a b) (+ z (/ t b))))
       (+ x t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * y) + (a * t);
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -6.4e+153) {
		tmp = t_1 + (b * (z * a));
	} else if ((b <= -3e+77) || !(b <= 1.7e-37)) {
		tmp = x + ((a * b) * (z + (t / b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * y) + (a * t)
    if (b <= (-6.4d+153)) then
        tmp = t_1 + (b * (z * a))
    else if ((b <= (-3d+77)) .or. (.not. (b <= 1.7d-37))) then
        tmp = x + ((a * b) * (z + (t / b)))
    else
        tmp = x + t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * y) + (a * t);
	double tmp;
	if (b <= -6.4e+153) {
		tmp = t_1 + (b * (z * a));
	} else if ((b <= -3e+77) || !(b <= 1.7e-37)) {
		tmp = x + ((a * b) * (z + (t / b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * y) + (a * t)
	tmp = 0
	if b <= -6.4e+153:
		tmp = t_1 + (b * (z * a))
	elif (b <= -3e+77) or not (b <= 1.7e-37):
		tmp = x + ((a * b) * (z + (t / b)))
	else:
		tmp = x + t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * y) + Float64(a * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= -6.4e+153)
		tmp = Float64(t_1 + Float64(b * Float64(z * a)));
	elseif ((b <= -3e+77) || !(b <= 1.7e-37))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(a * b) * Float64(z + Float64(t / b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * y) + (a * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= -6.4e+153)
		tmp = t_1 + (b * (z * a));
	elseif ((b <= -3e+77) || ~((b <= 1.7e-37)))
		tmp = x + ((a * b) * (z + (t / b)));
	else
		tmp = x + t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[b, -6.4e+153], N[(t$95$1 + N[(b * N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[b, -3e+77], N[Not[LessEqual[b, 1.7e-37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z + N[(t / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if b < -6.4000000000000003e153

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]

   if -6.4000000000000003e153 < b < -2.9999999999999998e77 or 1.70000000000000009e-37 < b

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in b around inf 89.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(a \cdot z + \frac{a \cdot t}{b}\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-lft-in 89.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right) + b \cdot \frac{a \cdot t}{b}\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot z} + b \cdot \frac{a \cdot t}{b}\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \cdot z + b \cdot \frac{a \cdot t}{b}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z + b \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \frac{t}{b}\right)}\right) \]

      5. associate-*r* 81.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot a\right) \cdot \frac{t}{b}}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 81.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right)} \cdot \frac{t}{b}\right) \]

      7. distribute-lft-out 89.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot \left(z + \frac{t}{b}\right)} \]

   8. Simplified 89.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot \left(z + \frac{t}{b}\right)} \]

   if -2.9999999999999998e77 < b < 1.70000000000000009e-37

   1. Initial program 90.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq -6.4 \cdot 10^{+153}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(z \cdot y + a \cdot t\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;b \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+77} \lor \neg \left(b \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{-37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot \left(z + \frac{t}{b}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot y + a \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 39.2% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+175}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-47} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2750\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (* z a))))
   (if (<= a -5.8e+175)
     t_1
     (if (<= a -3.8e-13)
       (* a t)
       (if (or (<= a -9e-47) (not (<= a 2750.0))) t_1 x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (z * a);
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -5.8e+175) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -3.8e-13) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if ((a <= -9e-47) || !(a <= 2750.0)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (z * a)
    if (a <= (-5.8d+175)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (a <= (-3.8d-13)) then
        tmp = a * t
    else if ((a <= (-9d-47)) .or. (.not. (a <= 2750.0d0))) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (z * a);
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -5.8e+175) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -3.8e-13) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if ((a <= -9e-47) || !(a <= 2750.0)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (z * a)
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -5.8e+175:
		tmp = t_1
	elif a <= -3.8e-13:
		tmp = a * t
	elif (a <= -9e-47) or not (a <= 2750.0):
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(z * a))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -5.8e+175)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -3.8e-13)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	elseif ((a <= -9e-47) || !(a <= 2750.0))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (z * a);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -5.8e+175)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -3.8e-13)
		tmp = a * t;
	elseif ((a <= -9e-47) || ~((a <= 2750.0)))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -5.8e+175], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, -3.8e-13], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[a, -9e-47], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 2750.0]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$1, x]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -5.8e175 or -3.8e-13 < a < -9e-47 or 2750 < a

   1. Initial program 86.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 79.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 79.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 79.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 83.1%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 85.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in a around inf 76.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. *-commutative 76.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot z\right)} \cdot a \]

      3. associate-*l* 77.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 77.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 77.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right)} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in b around inf 55.2%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b} \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right) \]

   if -5.8e175 < a < -3.8e-13

   1. Initial program 90.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 90.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 46.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -9e-47 < a < 2750

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -5.8 \cdot 10^{+175}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-47} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2750\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 93.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{-112} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4.7e-112) (not (<= z 2.8e-16)))
   (* z (+ y (+ (/ x z) (* a (+ b (/ t z))))))
   (+ x (* a (+ t (* z b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.7e-112) || !(z <= 2.8e-16)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4.7d-112)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.8d-16))) then
        tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
    else
        tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.7e-112) || !(z <= 2.8e-16)) {
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4.7e-112) or not (z <= 2.8e-16):
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4.7e-112) || !(z <= 2.8e-16))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(Float64(x / z) + Float64(a * Float64(b + Float64(t / z))))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4.7e-112) || ~((z <= 2.8e-16)))
		tmp = z * (y + ((x / z) + (a * (b + (t / z)))));
	else
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4.7e-112], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.8e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y + N[(N[(x / z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(b + N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.7000000000000004e-112 or 2.8000000000000001e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 89.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 89.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 91.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 97.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.2%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.7000000000000004e-112 < z < 2.8000000000000001e-16

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.7 \cdot 10^{-112} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 38.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+175}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 440000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* a (* z b))))
   (if (<= a -6e+175)
     t_1
     (if (<= a -7.2e-40) (* a t) (if (<= a 440000.0) x t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (z * b);
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -6e+175) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -7.2e-40) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (a <= 440000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a * (z * b)
    if (a <= (-6d+175)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (a <= (-7.2d-40)) then
        tmp = a * t
    else if (a <= 440000.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (z * b);
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -6e+175) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (a <= -7.2e-40) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else if (a <= 440000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = a * (z * b)
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -6e+175:
		tmp = t_1
	elif a <= -7.2e-40:
		tmp = a * t
	elif a <= 440000.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(a * Float64(z * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -6e+175)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -7.2e-40)
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	elseif (a <= 440000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = a * (z * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -6e+175)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (a <= -7.2e-40)
		tmp = a * t;
	elseif (a <= 440000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[a, -6e+175], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[a, -7.2e-40], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[a, 440000.0], x, t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if a < -6.0000000000000003e175 or 4.4e5 < a

   1. Initial program 86.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.1%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 78.1%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 78.1%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 82.4%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 84.6%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 49.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 49.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot b\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 49.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -6.0000000000000003e175 < a < -7.2e-40

   1. Initial program 91.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 44.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -7.2e-40 < a < 4.4e5

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 47.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 47.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -6 \cdot 10^{+175}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-40}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;a \leq 440000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 62.1% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+247}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* z y))))
   (if (<= z -1.05e+247)
     t_1
     (if (<= z -1.3e+111)
       (* b (* z a))
       (if (<= z 9.6e+72) (+ x (* a t)) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (z * y);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e+247) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= -1.3e+111) {
		tmp = b * (z * a);
	} else if (z <= 9.6e+72) {
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + (z * y)
    if (z <= (-1.05d+247)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= (-1.3d+111)) then
        tmp = b * (z * a)
    else if (z <= 9.6d+72) then
        tmp = x + (a * t)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (z * y);
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.05e+247) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= -1.3e+111) {
		tmp = b * (z * a);
	} else if (z <= 9.6e+72) {
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = x + (z * y)
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.05e+247:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= -1.3e+111:
		tmp = b * (z * a)
	elif z <= 9.6e+72:
		tmp = x + (a * t)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(z * y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.05e+247)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= -1.3e+111)
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(z * a));
	elseif (z <= 9.6e+72)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * t));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = x + (z * y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.05e+247)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= -1.3e+111)
		tmp = b * (z * a);
	elseif (z <= 9.6e+72)
		tmp = x + (a * t);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -1.05e+247], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, -1.3e+111], N[(b * N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 9.6e+72], N[(x + N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -1.05e247 or 9.6000000000000004e72 < z

   1. Initial program 85.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 85.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.05e247 < z < -1.2999999999999999e111

   1. Initial program 77.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 77.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 78.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 78.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 95.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(a \cdot b + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\frac{x}{z} + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right) + a \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      2. associate-+l+ 95.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(\frac{a \cdot t}{z} + a \cdot b\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b + \frac{a \cdot t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \left(a \cdot b + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)\right)\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-out 99.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + \left(\frac{x}{z} + a \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in a around inf 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 58.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right)\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. *-commutative 58.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot z\right)} \cdot a \]

      3. associate-*l* 60.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 60.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot z\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 60.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b + \frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right)} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in b around inf 63.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b} \cdot \left(a \cdot z\right) \]

   if -1.2999999999999999e111 < z < 9.6000000000000004e72

   1. Initial program 98.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 98.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 69.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

   7. Simplified 69.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 67.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.05 \cdot 10^{+247}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.3 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 80.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+58} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+216}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.7e+58) (not (<= z 2.5e+216)))
   (* z (+ y (* a b)))
   (+ x (* a (+ t (* z b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.7e+58) || !(z <= 2.5e+216)) {
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.7d+58)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.5d+216))) then
        tmp = z * (y + (a * b))
    else
        tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.7e+58) || !(z <= 2.5e+216)) {
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.7e+58) or not (z <= 2.5e+216):
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b))
	else:
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.7e+58) || !(z <= 2.5e+216))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.7e+58) || ~((z <= 2.5e+216)))
		tmp = z * (y + (a * b));
	else
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.7e+58], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.5e+216]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.7000000000000002e58 or 2.4999999999999999e216 < z

   1. Initial program 81.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 81.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 81.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 85.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} \]

   if -3.7000000000000002e58 < z < 2.4999999999999999e216

   1. Initial program 97.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 97.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.7 \cdot 10^{+58} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+216}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 87.1% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot y + a \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -1.35e-41) (not (<= a 2.4e-59)))
   (+ x (* a (+ t (* z b))))
   (+ x (+ (* z y) (* a t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.35e-41) || !(a <= 2.4e-59)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * y) + (a * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-1.35d-41)) .or. (.not. (a <= 2.4d-59))) then
        tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
    else
        tmp = x + ((z * y) + (a * t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.35e-41) || !(a <= 2.4e-59)) {
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * y) + (a * t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -1.35e-41) or not (a <= 2.4e-59):
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * y) + (a * t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -1.35e-41) || !(a <= 2.4e-59))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * y) + Float64(a * t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -1.35e-41) || ~((a <= 2.4e-59)))
		tmp = x + (a * (t + (z * b)));
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * y) + (a * t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -1.35e-41], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 2.4e-59]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.35e-41 or 2.40000000000000015e-59 < a

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 89.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. *-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -1.35e-41 < a < 2.40000000000000015e-59

   1. Initial program 99.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.35 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot y + a \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 74.2% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -1.1e-41) (not (<= a 4.6e-25)))
   (* a (+ t (* z b)))
   (+ x (* z y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.1e-41) || !(a <= 4.6e-25)) {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-1.1d-41)) .or. (.not. (a <= 4.6d-25))) then
        tmp = a * (t + (z * b))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.1e-41) || !(a <= 4.6e-25)) {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -1.1e-41) or not (a <= 4.6e-25):
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -1.1e-41) || !(a <= 4.6e-25))
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -1.1e-41) || ~((a <= 4.6e-25)))
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -1.1e-41], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 4.6e-25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.1e-41 or 4.5999999999999998e-25 < a

   1. Initial program 88.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 76.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -1.1e-41 < a < 4.5999999999999998e-25

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.1 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{-25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 39.2% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-40} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -9.5e-40) (not (<= a 3.5e-25))) (* a t) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -9.5e-40) || !(a <= 3.5e-25)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-9.5d-40)) .or. (.not. (a <= 3.5d-25))) then
        tmp = a * t
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -9.5e-40) || !(a <= 3.5e-25)) {
		tmp = a * t;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -9.5e-40) or not (a <= 3.5e-25):
		tmp = a * t
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -9.5e-40) || !(a <= 3.5e-25))
		tmp = Float64(a * t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -9.5e-40) || ~((a <= 3.5e-25)))
		tmp = a * t;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -9.5e-40], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 3.5e-25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * t), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -9.5000000000000006e-40 or 3.5000000000000002e-25 < a

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 39.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -9.5000000000000006e-40 < a < 3.5000000000000002e-25

   1. Initial program 99.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 95.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-40} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 26.5% accurate, 15.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 93.0%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. associate-*l* 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 94.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 27.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 27.5%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024080 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))