Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A

Percentage Accurate: 89.6% → 96.9%

Time: 17.2s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 0.5×

• 47.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 89.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * c) * i)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (((a + (b * c)) * c) * i));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)}{x}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* 2.0 (* (- x) (fma -1.0 y (* c (/ (* i (fma b c a)) x))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (-x * fma(-1.0, y, (c * ((i * fma(b, c, a)) / x))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(-x) * fma(-1.0, y, Float64(c * Float64(Float64(i * fma(b, c, a)) / x)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[((-x) * N[(-1.0 * y + N[(c * N[(N[(i * N[(b * c + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 95.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 56.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 73.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(-1 \cdot y + \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(-1 \cdot y + \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(-1 \cdot y + \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{x}\right)\right) \]

      3. fma-define 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{x}\right)}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, \color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)}{x}}\right)\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)}}{x}\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-undefine 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)}}{x}\right)\right) \]

   6. Simplified 73.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)}{x}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 96.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{\left(b \cdot c\right) \cdot i}{x}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* (* x (fma -1.0 y (* c (/ (* (* b c) i) x)))) (- 2.0)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x * fma(-1.0, y, (c * (((b * c) * i) / x)))) * -2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * fma(-1.0, y, Float64(c * Float64(Float64(Float64(b * c) * i) / x)))) * Float64(-2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x * N[(-1.0 * y + N[(c * N[(N[(N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * (-2.0)), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 95.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 56.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around -inf 73.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot \left(-1 \cdot y + \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{x}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot \left(-1 \cdot y + \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \left(-1 \cdot y + \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{x}\right)\right) \]

      3. fma-define 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, \frac{c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)}{x}\right)}\right) \]

      4. associate-/l* 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, \color{blue}{c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)}{x}}\right)\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c + a\right)}}{x}\right)\right) \]

      6. fma-undefine 73.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)}}{x}\right)\right) \]

   6. Simplified 73.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(b, c, a\right)}{x}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in b around inf 69.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{b \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}}{x}\right)\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 69.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot b}}{x}\right)\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 69.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(i \cdot c\right)} \cdot b}{x}\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 65.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{i \cdot \left(c \cdot b\right)}}{x}\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 65.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{i \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot c\right)}}{x}\right)\right) \]

   9. Simplified 65.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{i \cdot \left(b \cdot c\right)}}{x}\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(-1, y, c \cdot \frac{\left(b \cdot c\right) \cdot i}{x}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-2\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 94.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\\ t_3 := \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_3 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot t\_2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t\_3 \leq 10^{+303}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - t\_3\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - t\_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (* c (* t_1 i))) (t_3 (* (* c t_1) i)))
   (if (<= t_3 (- INFINITY))
     (* -2.0 t_2)
     (if (<= t_3 1e+303)
       (* (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) t_3) 2.0)
       (* 2.0 (- (* x y) t_2))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = c * (t_1 * i);
	double t_3 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if (t_3 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * t_2;
	} else if (t_3 <= 1e+303) {
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_3) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = c * (t_1 * i);
	double t_3 = (c * t_1) * i;
	double tmp;
	if (t_3 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = -2.0 * t_2;
	} else if (t_3 <= 1e+303) {
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_3) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = c * (t_1 * i)
	t_3 = (c * t_1) * i
	tmp = 0
	if t_3 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = -2.0 * t_2
	elif t_3 <= 1e+303:
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_3) * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i))
	t_3 = Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_3 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * t_2);
	elseif (t_3 <= 1e+303)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - t_3) * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - t_2));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = c * (t_1 * i);
	t_3 = (c * t_1) * i;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_3 <= -Inf)
		tmp = -2.0 * t_2;
	elseif (t_3 <= 1e+303)
		tmp = (((x * y) + (z * t)) - t_3) * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - t_2);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$3 = N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$3, (-Infinity)], N[(-2.0 * t$95$2), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$3, 1e+303], N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$3), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 61.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 90.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around 0 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i) < 1e303

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if 1e303 < (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)

   1. Initial program 68.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 88.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq 10^{+303}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 96.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a + b \cdot c\\ t_2 := x \cdot y + z \cdot t\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_2 - \left(c \cdot t\_1\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(t\_2 - t\_1 \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(t\_1 \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ a (* b c))) (t_2 (+ (* x y) (* z t))))
   (if (<= (- t_2 (* (* c t_1) i)) INFINITY)
     (* 2.0 (- t_2 (* t_1 (* c i))))
     (* -2.0 (* c (* t_1 i))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = a + (b * c);
	double t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = a + (b * c)
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if (t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= math.inf:
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)))
	else:
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(a + Float64(b * c))
	t_2 = Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(t_2 - Float64(Float64(c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(t_2 - Float64(t_1 * Float64(c * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(t_1 * i)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = a + (b * c);
	t_2 = (x * y) + (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_2 - ((c * t_1) * i)) <= Inf)
		tmp = 2.0 * (t_2 - (t_1 * (c * i)));
	else
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * (t_1 * i));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$2 = N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(t$95$2 - N[(N[(c * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(2.0 * N[(t$95$2 - N[(t$95$1 * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(t$95$1 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 95.0%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right)} - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]

      2. associate-*l* 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, y, z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-define 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 98.7%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 98.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t + x \cdot y\right)} - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \]

   if +inf.0 < (-.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 x y) (*.f64 z t)) (*.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 a (*.f64 b c)) c) i))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 61.0%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around 0 61.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(c \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right) \cdot i \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 80.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-111} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -1.7e-111) (not (<= c 1.8e-55)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.7e-111) || !(c <= 1.8e-55)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-1.7d-111)) .or. (.not. (c <= 1.8d-55))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.7e-111) || !(c <= 1.8e-55)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -1.7e-111) or not (c <= 1.8e-55):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -1.7e-111) || !(c <= 1.8e-55))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -1.7e-111) || ~((c <= 1.8e-55)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -1.7e-111], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 1.8e-55]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -1.69999999999999998e-111 or 1.8e-55 < c

   1. Initial program 79.1%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.69999999999999998e-111 < c < 1.8e-55

   1. Initial program 98.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 84.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{-111} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 87.0% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-49} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 48\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -2.7e-49) (not (<= c 48.0)))
   (* 2.0 (- (* x y) (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i))))
   (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* i (* a c))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.7e-49) || !(c <= 48.0)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-2.7d-49)) .or. (.not. (c <= 48.0d0))) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -2.7e-49) || !(c <= 48.0)) {
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -2.7e-49) or not (c <= 48.0):
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)))
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -2.7e-49) || !(c <= 48.0))
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(i * Float64(a * c))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -2.7e-49) || ~((c <= 48.0)))
		tmp = 2.0 * ((x * y) - (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - (i * (a * c)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -2.7e-49], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 48.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(i * N[(a * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -2.7e-49 or 48 < c

   1. Initial program 75.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 83.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -2.7e-49 < c < 48

   1. Initial program 98.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 94.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.3%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]

   5. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot a\right)} \cdot i\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-49} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 48\right):\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(x \cdot y - c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - i \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 39.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-64}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.55 \cdot 10^{-96}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* 2.0 (* z t))))
   (if (<= t -7e-64)
     t_1
     (if (<= t 3.55e-96)
       (* (* x y) 2.0)
       (if (<= t 1.4e+82) (* -2.0 (* a (* c i))) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -7e-64) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 3.55e-96) {
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0;
	} else if (t <= 1.4e+82) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
    if (t <= (-7d-64)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (t <= 3.55d-96) then
        tmp = (x * y) * 2.0d0
    else if (t <= 1.4d+82) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (a * (c * i))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double t_1 = 2.0 * (z * t);
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -7e-64) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (t <= 3.55e-96) {
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0;
	} else if (t <= 1.4e+82) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	t_1 = 2.0 * (z * t)
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -7e-64:
		tmp = t_1
	elif t <= 3.55e-96:
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0
	elif t <= 1.4e+82:
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -7e-64)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 3.55e-96)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) * 2.0);
	elseif (t <= 1.4e+82)
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(a * Float64(c * i)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	t_1 = 2.0 * (z * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -7e-64)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (t <= 3.55e-96)
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0;
	elseif (t <= 1.4e+82)
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -7e-64], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[t, 3.55e-96], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 1.4e+82], N[(-2.0 * N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -7.0000000000000006e-64 or 1.4e82 < t

   1. Initial program 81.7%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 44.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -7.0000000000000006e-64 < t < 3.55000000000000019e-96

   1. Initial program 93.9%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 39.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if 3.55000000000000019e-96 < t < 1.4e82

   1. Initial program 89.0%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 41.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 41.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 41.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 33.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{c \cdot \left(i \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 33.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 33.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(-a \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 33.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{i \cdot a}\right)\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 33.6%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot \left(-a\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 33.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(-a\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 41.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -7 \cdot 10^{-64}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.55 \cdot 10^{-96}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+82}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 74.4% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-43} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= c -1.4e-43) (not (<= c 7.8e+25)))
   (* -2.0 (* c (* (+ a (* b c)) i)))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.4e-43) || !(c <= 7.8e+25)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((c <= (-1.4d-43)) .or. (.not. (c <= 7.8d+25))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((c <= -1.4e-43) || !(c <= 7.8e+25)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (c <= -1.4e-43) or not (c <= 7.8e+25):
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((c <= -1.4e-43) || !(c <= 7.8e+25))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(c * Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((c <= -1.4e-43) || ~((c <= 7.8e+25)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (c * ((a + (b * c)) * i));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[c, -1.4e-43], N[Not[LessEqual[c, 7.8e+25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(c * N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if c < -1.3999999999999999e-43 or 7.8000000000000004e25 < c

   1. Initial program 73.8%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in i around inf 76.6%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around 0 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(a + b \cdot c\right)\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.3999999999999999e-43 < c < 7.8000000000000004e25

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;c \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{-43} \lor \neg \left(c \leq 7.8 \cdot 10^{+25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 44.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+187} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* x y) -2e+187) (not (<= (* x y) 5e+40)))
   (* (* x y) 2.0)
   (* 2.0 (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+187) || !((x * y) <= 5e+40)) {
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((x * y) <= (-2d+187)) .or. (.not. ((x * y) <= 5d+40))) then
        tmp = (x * y) * 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+187) || !((x * y) <= 5e+40)) {
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if ((x * y) <= -2e+187) or not ((x * y) <= 5e+40):
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(x * y) <= -2e+187) || !(Float64(x * y) <= 5e+40))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * y) * 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((x * y) <= -2e+187) || ~(((x * y) <= 5e+40)))
		tmp = (x * y) * 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], -2e+187], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision], 5e+40]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 x y) < -1.99999999999999981e187 or 5.00000000000000003e40 < (*.f64 x y)

   1. Initial program 82.3%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 52.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -1.99999999999999981e187 < (*.f64 x y) < 5.00000000000000003e40

   1. Initial program 89.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 39.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 44.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \cdot y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+187} \lor \neg \left(x \cdot y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y\right) \cdot 2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 56.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+101} \lor \neg \left(i \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+195}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= i -4.6e+101) (not (<= i 8.8e+195)))
   (* -2.0 (* a (* c i)))
   (* (+ (* x y) (* z t)) 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((i <= -4.6e+101) || !(i <= 8.8e+195)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((i <= (-4.6d+101)) .or. (.not. (i <= 8.8d+195))) then
        tmp = (-2.0d0) * (a * (c * i))
    else
        tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if ((i <= -4.6e+101) || !(i <= 8.8e+195)) {
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	} else {
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	tmp = 0
	if (i <= -4.6e+101) or not (i <= 8.8e+195):
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i))
	else:
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((i <= -4.6e+101) || !(i <= 8.8e+195))
		tmp = Float64(-2.0 * Float64(a * Float64(c * i)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) * 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((i <= -4.6e+101) || ~((i <= 8.8e+195)))
		tmp = -2.0 * (a * (c * i));
	else
		tmp = ((x * y) + (z * t)) * 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := If[Or[LessEqual[i, -4.6e+101], N[Not[LessEqual[i, 8.8e+195]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-2.0 * N[(a * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if i < -4.6000000000000003e101 or 8.7999999999999999e195 < i

   1. Initial program 84.4%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in a around inf 50.9%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 50.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 50.9%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(c \cdot i\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{c \cdot \left(i \cdot a\right)}\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(-c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot i\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(-a \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

      6. *-commutative 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{i \cdot a}\right)\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 36.5%

         \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(c \cdot \color{blue}{\left(i \cdot \left(-a\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. Simplified 36.5%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(c \cdot \left(i \cdot \left(-a\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in c around 0 50.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)} \]

   if -4.6000000000000003e101 < i < 8.7999999999999999e195

   1. Initial program 87.2%

      \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in c around 0 63.1%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + x \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \leq -4.6 \cdot 10^{+101} \lor \neg \left(i \leq 8.8 \cdot 10^{+195}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 28.7% accurate, 3.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i) :precision binary64 (* 2.0 (* z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (z * t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (z * t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (z * t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (z * t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(z * t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (z * t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 86.5%

   \[2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(\left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot c\right) \cdot i\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 30.3%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 30.3%

   \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(z \cdot t\right) \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 94.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(\left(x \cdot y + z \cdot t\right) - \left(a + b \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(c \cdot i\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
 :precision binary64
 (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 2.0d0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b, double c, double i) {
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i):
	return 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	return Float64(2.0 * Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) + Float64(z * t)) - Float64(Float64(a + Float64(b * c)) * Float64(c * i))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b, c, i)
	tmp = 2.0 * (((x * y) + (z * t)) - ((a + (b * c)) * (c * i)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_, c_, i_] := N[(2.0 * N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a + N[(b * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(c * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024079 
(FPCore (x y z t a b c i)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Shapes:frustum from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3, A"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (+ a (* b c)) (* c i))))

  (* 2.0 (- (+ (* x y) (* z t)) (* (* (+ a (* b c)) c) i))))