Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 9.0s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * Math.cos(y)) + (z * Math.sin(y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * math.cos(y)) + (z * math.sin(y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * cos(y)) + Float64(z * sin(y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * cos(y)) + (z * sin(y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 86.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-89} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.2e-89) (not (<= z 1.8e-25)))
   (+ x (* z (sin y)))
   (* x (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.2e-89) || !(z <= 1.8e-25)) {
		tmp = x + (z * sin(y));
	} else {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.2d-89)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.8d-25))) then
        tmp = x + (z * sin(y))
    else
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.2e-89) || !(z <= 1.8e-25)) {
		tmp = x + (z * Math.sin(y));
	} else {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.2e-89) or not (z <= 1.8e-25):
		tmp = x + (z * math.sin(y))
	else:
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.2e-89) || !(z <= 1.8e-25))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * sin(y)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.2e-89) || ~((z <= 1.8e-25)))
		tmp = x + (z * sin(y));
	else
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.2e-89], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.8e-25]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.1999999999999997e-89 or 1.8e-25 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} + z \cdot \sin y \]

   if -5.1999999999999997e-89 < z < 1.8e-25

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-89} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-25}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 74.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -980000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.222\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z + y \cdot \left(x \cdot -0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -980000.0) (not (<= y 0.222)))
   (* x (cos y))
   (+ x (* y (+ z (* y (+ (* x -0.5) (* -0.16666666666666666 (* y z)))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -980000.0) || !(y <= 0.222)) {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * -0.5) + (-0.16666666666666666 * (y * z))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-980000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 0.222d0))) then
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * (-0.5d0)) + ((-0.16666666666666666d0) * (y * z))))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -980000.0) || !(y <= 0.222)) {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * -0.5) + (-0.16666666666666666 * (y * z))))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -980000.0) or not (y <= 0.222):
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * -0.5) + (-0.16666666666666666 * (y * z))))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -980000.0) || !(y <= 0.222))
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(x * -0.5) + Float64(-0.16666666666666666 * Float64(y * z)))))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -980000.0) || ~((y <= 0.222)))
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (z + (y * ((x * -0.5) + (-0.16666666666666666 * (y * z))))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -980000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 0.222]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + N[(y * N[(N[(x * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-0.16666666666666666 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -9.8e5 or 0.222000000000000003 < y

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]

   if -9.8e5 < y < 0.222000000000000003

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot x + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -980000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 0.222\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z + y \cdot \left(x \cdot -0.5 + -0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 73.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.4e+32) (not (<= z 1.75e-16))) (* z (sin y)) (* x (cos y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.4e+32) || !(z <= 1.75e-16)) {
		tmp = z * sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.4d+32)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.75d-16))) then
        tmp = z * sin(y)
    else
        tmp = x * cos(y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.4e+32) || !(z <= 1.75e-16)) {
		tmp = z * Math.sin(y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * Math.cos(y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.4e+32) or not (z <= 1.75e-16):
		tmp = z * math.sin(y)
	else:
		tmp = x * math.cos(y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.4e+32) || !(z <= 1.75e-16))
		tmp = Float64(z * sin(y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * cos(y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.4e+32) || ~((z <= 1.75e-16)))
		tmp = z * sin(y);
	else
		tmp = x * cos(y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.4e+32], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.75e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[Sin[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[Cos[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.4e32 or 1.75000000000000009e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \sin y} \]

   if -1.4e32 < z < 1.75000000000000009e-16

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \cos y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.4 \cdot 10^{+32} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \sin y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \cos y\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 32.7% accurate, 13.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+70} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+194}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{x}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.65e+70) (not (<= z 8e+194))) (* y z) (* y (/ x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.65e+70) || !(z <= 8e+194)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (x / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.65d+70)) .or. (.not. (z <= 8d+194))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = y * (x / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.65e+70) || !(z <= 8e+194)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * (x / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.65e+70) or not (z <= 8e+194):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = y * (x / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.65e+70) || !(z <= 8e+194))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.65e+70) || ~((z <= 8e+194)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = y * (x / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.65e+70], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 8e+194]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.65000000000000008e70 or 7.99999999999999956e194 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 54.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 54.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 54.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 36.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.65000000000000008e70 < z < 7.99999999999999956e194

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 46.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 46.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   5. Simplified 46.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 33.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 31.2%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{x}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 32.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.65 \cdot 10^{+70} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+194}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{x}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 52.1% accurate, 41.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 48.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 48.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

5. Simplified 48.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

6. Final simplification 48.4%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot z \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 16.6% accurate, 69.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x \cdot \cos y + z \cdot \sin y \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 48.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 48.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

5. Simplified 48.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z + x} \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 15.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

7. Final simplification 15.8%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot z \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024078 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Diagrams.ThreeD.Transform:aboutY from diagrams-lib-1.3.0.3"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (* x (cos y)) (* z (sin y))))