SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.2s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (- z x) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (z - x), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(z - x), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right) + x} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 87.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-89} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-23}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -5.2e-89) (not (<= z 2.3e-23))) (+ x (* y z)) (* x (- 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.2e-89) || !(z <= 2.3e-23)) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-5.2d-89)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.3d-23))) then
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -5.2e-89) || !(z <= 2.3e-23)) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -5.2e-89) or not (z <= 2.3e-23):
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -5.2e-89) || !(z <= 2.3e-23))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -5.2e-89) || ~((z <= 2.3e-23)))
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -5.2e-89], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.3e-23]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -5.1999999999999997e-89 or 2.3000000000000001e-23 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 88.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -5.1999999999999997e-89 < z < 2.3000000000000001e-23

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 92.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 92.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-89} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-23}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 61.5% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x (- 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * (1.0 - y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * (1.0d0 - y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * (1.0 - y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * (1.0 - y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 61.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 61.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 61.0%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \]

5. Simplified 61.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 61.0%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 - y\right) \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 36.5% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 33.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 33.2%

   \[\leadsto x \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024078 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (- z x))))