b parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 5.8s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 40.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-33}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} - 1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 5e-33) (- (/ m v) 1.0) (* (* (- 1.0 m) (/ m v)) (- 1.0 m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 5e-33) {
		tmp = (m / v) - 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) * (1.0 - m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 5d-33) then
        tmp = (m / v) - 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((1.0d0 - m) * (m / v)) * (1.0d0 - m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 5e-33) {
		tmp = (m / v) - 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) * (1.0 - m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 5e-33:
		tmp = (m / v) - 1.0
	else:
		tmp = ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) * (1.0 - m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 5e-33)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) - 1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(m / v)) * Float64(1.0 - m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 5e-33)
		tmp = (m / v) - 1.0;
	else
		tmp = ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) * (1.0 - m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 5e-33], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 5.00000000000000028e-33

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} - 1 \]

   if 5.00000000000000028e-33 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot m}}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

      2. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.25 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} - 1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.25e-17) (- (/ m v) 1.0) (/ (- 1.0 m) (/ v (* m (- 1.0 m))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.25e-17) {
		tmp = (m / v) - 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) / (v / (m * (1.0 - m)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.25d-17) then
        tmp = (m / v) - 1.0d0
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) / (v / (m * (1.0d0 - m)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.25e-17) {
		tmp = (m / v) - 1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) / (v / (m * (1.0 - m)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.25e-17:
		tmp = (m / v) - 1.0
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) / (v / (m * (1.0 - m)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.25e-17)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) - 1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / Float64(v / Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.25e-17)
		tmp = (m / v) - 1.0;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - m) / (v / (m * (1.0 - m)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.25e-17], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / N[(v / N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.24999999999999989e-17

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} - 1 \]

   if 2.24999999999999989e-17 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]

      2. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}}} \]

      3. un-div-inv 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{\frac{v}{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m * ((1.0 - m) / v)) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 62.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{-174}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 3.2e-174) -1.0 (/ m v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.2e-174) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 3.2d-174) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 3.2e-174) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 3.2e-174:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 3.2e-174)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 3.2e-174)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 3.2e-174], -1.0, N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 3.2e-174

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 3.2e-174 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in v around 0 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 76.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m}{v} + m\right) - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (- (+ (/ m v) m) 1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return ((m / v) + m) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = ((m / v) + m) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return ((m / v) + m) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return ((m / v) + m) - 1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(m / v) + m) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = ((m / v) + m) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + m), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 76.4%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 76.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v} + m \cdot 1\right)} - 1 \]

   3. un-div-inv 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + m \cdot 1\right) - 1 \]

   4. *-rgt-identity 76.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m}\right) - 1 \]

7. Applied egg-rr 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + m\right)} - 1 \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 76.7% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{m}{v} - 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (- (/ m v) 1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (m / v) - 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (m / v) - 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (m / v) - 1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (m / v) - 1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(m / v) - 1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (m / v) - 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 76.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 76.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} - 1 \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 25.6% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v} + -1\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 21.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024077 -o generate:simplify
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "b parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))