Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A

Percentage Accurate: 90.3% → 99.2%

Time: 21.4s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -1.9999999999999999e-154
  2. k = 0.0
  3. m = -2.00000000000000007e154

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 90.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = (a * (k ** m)) / ((1.0d0 + (10.0d0 * k)) + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return (a * Math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return (a * math.pow(k, m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(Float64(a * (k ^ m)) / Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(10.0 * k)) + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = (a * (k ^ m)) / ((1.0 + (10.0 * k)) + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(N[(a * N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(1.0 + N[(10.0 * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{1}{a} + k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\frac{1}{{k}^{m}}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m -8e-17)
   (/ (* (pow k m) a) (+ 1.0 (* k k)))
   (if (<= m 4.3e-6)
     (/ 1.0 (+ (/ 1.0 a) (* k (+ (* 10.0 (/ 1.0 a)) (/ k a)))))
     (/ a (/ 1.0 (pow k m))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -8e-17) {
		tmp = (pow(k, m) * a) / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else if (m <= 4.3e-6) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 / pow(k, m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= (-8d-17)) then
        tmp = ((k ** m) * a) / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
    else if (m <= 4.3d-6) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / ((1.0d0 / a) + (k * ((10.0d0 * (1.0d0 / a)) + (k / a))))
    else
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 / (k ** m))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -8e-17) {
		tmp = (Math.pow(k, m) * a) / (1.0 + (k * k));
	} else if (m <= 4.3e-6) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 / Math.pow(k, m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= -8e-17:
		tmp = (math.pow(k, m) * a) / (1.0 + (k * k))
	elif m <= 4.3e-6:
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))))
	else:
		tmp = a / (1.0 / math.pow(k, m))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -8e-17)
		tmp = Float64(Float64((k ^ m) * a) / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)));
	elseif (m <= 4.3e-6)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 / a) + Float64(k * Float64(Float64(10.0 * Float64(1.0 / a)) + Float64(k / a)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 / (k ^ m)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= -8e-17)
		tmp = ((k ^ m) * a) / (1.0 + (k * k));
	elseif (m <= 4.3e-6)
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	else
		tmp = a / (1.0 / (k ^ m));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, -8e-17], N[(N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[m, 4.3e-6], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * N[(N[(10.0 * N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / N[(1.0 / N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if m < -8.00000000000000057e-17

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]

   if -8.00000000000000057e-17 < m < 4.30000000000000033e-6

   1. Initial program 90.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 88.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 88.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a}\right)}^{-1}} \]

      3. +-commutative 88.8%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

      4. +-commutative 88.8%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k + 10\right)} + 1}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

      5. fma-undefine 88.8%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 88.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}}} \]

   9. Simplified 88.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in k around 0 97.4%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}}} \]

   if 4.30000000000000033e-6 < m

   1. Initial program 67.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

      2. un-div-inv 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

      3. +-commutative 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{{k}^{m}}} \]

      4. fma-define 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, 10 + k, 1\right)}}{{k}^{m}}} \]

      5. +-commutative 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, \color{blue}{k + 10}, 1\right)}{{k}^{m}}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{{k}^{m}}}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{1 + k \cdot k}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{1}{a} + k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\frac{1}{{k}^{m}}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\frac{1}{{k}^{m}}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.65e-5)
   (* (/ (pow k m) (hypot 1.0 k)) (/ a (hypot 1.0 k)))
   (/ a (/ 1.0 (pow k m)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.65e-5) {
		tmp = (pow(k, m) / hypot(1.0, k)) * (a / hypot(1.0, k));
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 / pow(k, m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.65e-5) {
		tmp = (Math.pow(k, m) / Math.hypot(1.0, k)) * (a / Math.hypot(1.0, k));
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 / Math.pow(k, m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.65e-5:
		tmp = (math.pow(k, m) / math.hypot(1.0, k)) * (a / math.hypot(1.0, k))
	else:
		tmp = a / (1.0 / math.pow(k, m))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.65e-5)
		tmp = Float64(Float64((k ^ m) / hypot(1.0, k)) * Float64(a / hypot(1.0, k)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 / (k ^ m)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.65e-5)
		tmp = ((k ^ m) / hypot(1.0, k)) * (a / hypot(1.0, k));
	else
		tmp = a / (1.0 / (k ^ m));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.65e-5], N[(N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(a / N[Sqrt[1.0 ^ 2 + k ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / N[(1.0 / N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.65e-5

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

      2. add-sqr-sqrt 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m} \cdot a}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k} \cdot \sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      3. times-frac 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \cdot \frac{a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}}} \]

      4. hypot-1-def 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \cdot \frac{a}{\sqrt{1 + k \cdot k}} \]

      5. hypot-1-def 98.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}} \]

   if 2.65e-5 < m

   1. Initial program 67.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

      2. un-div-inv 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

      3. +-commutative 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{{k}^{m}}} \]

      4. fma-define 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, 10 + k, 1\right)}}{{k}^{m}}} \]

      5. +-commutative 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, \color{blue}{k + 10}, 1\right)}{{k}^{m}}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{{k}^{m}}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{{k}^{m}}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)} \cdot \frac{a}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(1, k\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\frac{1}{{k}^{m}}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.021:\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{1}{a} + k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\frac{1}{{k}^{m}}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m -0.021)
   (* (pow k m) a)
   (if (<= m 1.85e-5)
     (/ 1.0 (+ (/ 1.0 a) (* k (+ (* 10.0 (/ 1.0 a)) (/ k a)))))
     (/ a (/ 1.0 (pow k m))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.021) {
		tmp = pow(k, m) * a;
	} else if (m <= 1.85e-5) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 / pow(k, m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= (-0.021d0)) then
        tmp = (k ** m) * a
    else if (m <= 1.85d-5) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / ((1.0d0 / a) + (k * ((10.0d0 * (1.0d0 / a)) + (k / a))))
    else
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 / (k ** m))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -0.021) {
		tmp = Math.pow(k, m) * a;
	} else if (m <= 1.85e-5) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	} else {
		tmp = a / (1.0 / Math.pow(k, m));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= -0.021:
		tmp = math.pow(k, m) * a
	elif m <= 1.85e-5:
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))))
	else:
		tmp = a / (1.0 / math.pow(k, m))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -0.021)
		tmp = Float64((k ^ m) * a);
	elseif (m <= 1.85e-5)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 / a) + Float64(k * Float64(Float64(10.0 * Float64(1.0 / a)) + Float64(k / a)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 / (k ^ m)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= -0.021)
		tmp = (k ^ m) * a;
	elseif (m <= 1.85e-5)
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	else
		tmp = a / (1.0 / (k ^ m));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, -0.021], N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[m, 1.85e-5], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * N[(N[(10.0 * N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a / N[(1.0 / N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if m < -0.0210000000000000013

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   if -0.0210000000000000013 < m < 1.84999999999999991e-5

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a}\right)}^{-1}} \]

      3. +-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

      4. +-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k + 10\right)} + 1}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

      5. fma-undefine 88.3%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}}} \]

   9. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in k around 0 96.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}}} \]

   if 1.84999999999999991e-5 < m

   1. Initial program 67.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

      2. un-div-inv 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

      3. +-commutative 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{{k}^{m}}} \]

      4. fma-define 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, 10 + k, 1\right)}}{{k}^{m}}} \]

      5. +-commutative 67.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, \color{blue}{k + 10}, 1\right)}{{k}^{m}}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 67.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{{k}^{m}}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{{k}^{m}}}} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -0.021:\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{1}{a} + k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{\frac{1}{{k}^{m}}}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{1}{a} + k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right)}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m -9.5e-5) (not (<= m 6e-7)))
   (* (pow k m) a)
   (/ 1.0 (+ (/ 1.0 a) (* k (+ (* 10.0 (/ 1.0 a)) (/ k a)))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -9.5e-5) || !(m <= 6e-7)) {
		tmp = pow(k, m) * a;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= (-9.5d-5)) .or. (.not. (m <= 6d-7))) then
        tmp = (k ** m) * a
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / ((1.0d0 / a) + (k * ((10.0d0 * (1.0d0 / a)) + (k / a))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= -9.5e-5) || !(m <= 6e-7)) {
		tmp = Math.pow(k, m) * a;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= -9.5e-5) or not (m <= 6e-7):
		tmp = math.pow(k, m) * a
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= -9.5e-5) || !(m <= 6e-7))
		tmp = Float64((k ^ m) * a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 / a) + Float64(k * Float64(Float64(10.0 * Float64(1.0 / a)) + Float64(k / a)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= -9.5e-5) || ~((m <= 6e-7)))
		tmp = (k ^ m) * a;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, -9.5e-5], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 6e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[Power[k, m], $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * N[(N[(10.0 * N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < -9.5000000000000005e-5 or 5.9999999999999997e-7 < m

   1. Initial program 85.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 85.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 85.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 85.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 85.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 85.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 85.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 85.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 85.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

   if -9.5000000000000005e-5 < m < 5.9999999999999997e-7

   1. Initial program 90.7%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 90.7%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 90.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 90.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 89.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a}\right)}^{-1}} \]

      3. +-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

      4. +-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k + 10\right)} + 1}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

      5. fma-undefine 88.3%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}}} \]

   9. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in k around 0 96.8%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;{k}^{m} \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{1}{a} + k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right)}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 56.3% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{1}{a} + k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m -1.8e+49)
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))
   (if (<= m 2.65e-5)
     (/ 1.0 (+ (/ 1.0 a) (* k (+ (* 10.0 (/ 1.0 a)) (/ k a)))))
     (+ a (* a (* k (- (* k 99.0) 10.0)))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -1.8e+49) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else if (m <= 2.65e-5) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= (-1.8d+49)) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else if (m <= 2.65d-5) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / ((1.0d0 / a) + (k * ((10.0d0 * (1.0d0 / a)) + (k / a))))
    else
        tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0d0) - 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= -1.8e+49) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else if (m <= 2.65e-5) {
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= -1.8e+49:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	elif m <= 2.65e-5:
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))))
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= -1.8e+49)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	elseif (m <= 2.65e-5)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(1.0 / a) + Float64(k * Float64(Float64(10.0 * Float64(1.0 / a)) + Float64(k / a)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 99.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= -1.8e+49)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	elseif (m <= 2.65e-5)
		tmp = 1.0 / ((1.0 / a) + (k * ((10.0 * (1.0 / a)) + (k / a))));
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, -1.8e+49], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[m, 2.65e-5], N[(1.0 / N[(N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k * N[(N[(10.0 * N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(k / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if m < -1.79999999999999998e49

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 100.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 46.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if -1.79999999999999998e49 < m < 2.65e-5

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 91.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 91.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 91.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 91.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 91.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 91.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 91.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 91.0%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 91.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}{a}\right)}^{-1}} \]

      3. +-commutative 87.1%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right) + 1}}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

      4. +-commutative 87.1%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(k + 10\right)} + 1}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

      5. fma-undefine 87.1%

         \[\leadsto {\left(\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}}{a}\right)}^{-1} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}}} \]

   9. Simplified 87.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(k, k + 10, 1\right)}{a}}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in k around 0 95.2%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right) + \frac{1}{a}}} \]

   if 2.65e-5 < m

   1. Initial program 67.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 27.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot k\right) \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)} + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k\right)} \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt1-in 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)} + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 27.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0 37.2%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;m \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{1}{a} + k \cdot \left(10 \cdot \frac{1}{a} + \frac{k}{a}\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 54.9% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.65e-5)
   (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0))))
   (+ a (* a (* k (- (* k 99.0) 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.65e-5) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.65d-5) then
        tmp = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0d0) - 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.65e-5) {
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.65e-5:
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.65e-5)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 99.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.65e-5)
		tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.65e-5], N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.65e-5

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 94.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 94.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 94.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 94.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 94.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 94.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 94.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 94.6%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   if 2.65e-5 < m

   1. Initial program 67.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 27.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot k\right) \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)} + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k\right)} \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt1-in 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)} + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 27.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0 37.2%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 54.8% accurate, 7.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.65e-5)
   (/ a (+ (* k k) (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))))
   (+ a (* a (* k (- (* k 99.0) 10.0))))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.65e-5) {
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.65d-5) then
        tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0)))
    else
        tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0d0) - 10.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.65e-5) {
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	} else {
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.65e-5:
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)))
	else:
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.65e-5)
		tmp = Float64(a / Float64(Float64(k * k) + Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(a + Float64(a * Float64(k * Float64(Float64(k * 99.0) - 10.0))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.65e-5)
		tmp = a / ((k * k) + (1.0 + (k * 10.0)));
	else
		tmp = a + (a * (k * ((k * 99.0) - 10.0)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.65e-5], N[(a / N[(N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(a + N[(a * N[(k * N[(N[(k * 99.0), $MachinePrecision] - 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.65e-5

   1. Initial program 94.6%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   3. Simplified 94.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k} \]

   if 2.65e-5 < m

   1. Initial program 67.1%

      \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 67.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      2. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

      3. distribute-frac-neg2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

      4. distribute-neg-frac2 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

      5. remove-double-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

      6. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

      7. associate-+l+ 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

      8. sqr-neg 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

      9. distribute-rgt-out 67.1%

         \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 3.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 27.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) - 10 \cdot a\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. cancel-sign-sub-inv 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot k\right) \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right)} + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      3. mul-1-neg 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-k\right)} \cdot \left(a + -100 \cdot a\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      4. distribute-rgt1-in 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-100 + 1\right) \cdot a\right)} + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      5. metadata-eval 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-99} \cdot a\right) + \left(-10\right) \cdot a\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{-10} \cdot a\right) \]

      7. *-commutative 27.4%

         \[\leadsto a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot -10}\right) \]

   8. Simplified 27.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a + k \cdot \left(\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-99 \cdot a\right) + a \cdot -10\right)} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in a around 0 37.2%

      \[\leadsto a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(99 \cdot k - 10\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.65 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{a}{k \cdot k + \left(1 + k \cdot 10\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a + a \cdot \left(k \cdot \left(k \cdot 99 - 10\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 45.5% accurate, 12.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k (+ k 10.0)))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a / (1.0d0 + (k * (k + 10.0d0)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * Float64(k + 10.0))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * (k + 10.0)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * N[(k + 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.4%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 87.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 53.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Final simplification 53.7%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(k + 10\right)} \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 28.8% accurate, 16.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k 10.0))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a / (1.0d0 + (k * 10.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * 10.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * 10.0));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * 10.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.4%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 87.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in m around 0 53.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in k around 0 32.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{10 \cdot k}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 32.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

8. Simplified 32.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}} \]

9. Final simplification 32.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot 10} \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 44.7% accurate, 16.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 (/ a (+ 1.0 (* k k))))

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * k));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a / (1.0d0 + (k * k))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a / (1.0 + (k * k));
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a / (1.0 + (k * k))

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return Float64(a / Float64(1.0 + Float64(k * k)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a / (1.0 + (k * k));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := N[(a / N[(1.0 + N[(k * k), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.4%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot 10}\right) + k \cdot k} \]

3. Simplified 87.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + k \cdot 10\right) + k \cdot k}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 86.3%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1} + k \cdot k} \]

6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 52.6%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{a}}{1 + k \cdot k} \]

7. Final simplification 52.6%

   \[\leadsto \frac{a}{1 + k \cdot k} \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 20.6% accurate, 114.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ a \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a k m) :precision binary64 a)

C

double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, k, m)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: k
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    code = a
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double k, double m) {
	return a;
}

Python

def code(a, k, m):
	return a

Julia

function code(a, k, m)
	return a
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, k, m)
	tmp = a;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, k_, m_] := a

Derivation

1. Initial program 87.4%

   \[\frac{a \cdot {k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   2. remove-double-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}\right)\right)} \]

   3. distribute-frac-neg2 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)}}\right) \]

   4. distribute-neg-frac2 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{k}^{m}}{-\left(-\left(\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k\right)\right)}} \]

   5. remove-double-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + k \cdot k}} \]

   6. sqr-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\left(1 + 10 \cdot k\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)}} \]

   7. associate-+l+ 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{\color{blue}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \left(-k\right) \cdot \left(-k\right)\right)}} \]

   8. sqr-neg 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \left(10 \cdot k + \color{blue}{k \cdot k}\right)} \]

   9. distribute-rgt-out 87.4%

      \[\leadsto a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + \color{blue}{k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 87.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{{k}^{m}}{1 + k \cdot \left(10 + k\right)}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in k around 0 77.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot {k}^{m}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

7. Simplified 77.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{k}^{m} \cdot a} \]

8. Taylor expanded in m around 0 21.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a} \]

9. Final simplification 21.9%

   \[\leadsto a \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024076 
(FPCore (a k m)
  :name "Falkner and Boettcher, Appendix A"
  :precision binary64
  (/ (* a (pow k m)) (+ (+ 1.0 (* 10.0 k)) (* k k))))