Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 84.8% → 98.9%

Time: 26.6s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 11.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 84.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+94} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-34}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2e+94) (not (<= y 5e-34)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (pow (exp y) (log (/ y (+ y z)))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2e+94) || !(y <= 5e-34)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (pow(exp(y), log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2d+94)) .or. (.not. (y <= 5d-34))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + ((exp(y) ** log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2e+94) || !(y <= 5e-34)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.pow(Math.exp(y), Math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2e+94) or not (y <= 5e-34):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.pow(math.exp(y), math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2e+94) || !(y <= 5e-34))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64((exp(y) ^ log(Float64(y / Float64(y + z)))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2e+94) || ~((y <= 5e-34)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + ((exp(y) ^ log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2e+94], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 5e-34]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Power[N[Exp[y], $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2e94 or 5.0000000000000003e-34 < y

   1. Initial program 86.2%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 86.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 86.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -2e94 < y < 5.0000000000000003e-34

   1. Initial program 86.9%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{+94} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-34}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 87.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.32 \cdot 10^{+175}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + y \cdot x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.32e+175)
   (+ x (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z 0.5) -1.0))) y))
   (if (<= z -3e+111)
     (/ (+ 1.0 (* y x)) y)
     (if (<= z -1000.0) (/ (exp (- z)) y) (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.32e+175) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else if (z <= -3e+111) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (y * x)) / y;
	} else if (z <= -1000.0) {
		tmp = exp(-z) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.32d+175)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 + (z * ((z * 0.5d0) + (-1.0d0)))) / y)
    else if (z <= (-3d+111)) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (y * x)) / y
    else if (z <= (-1000.0d0)) then
        tmp = exp(-z) / y
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.32e+175) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else if (z <= -3e+111) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (y * x)) / y;
	} else if (z <= -1000.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp(-z) / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.32e+175:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y)
	elif z <= -3e+111:
		tmp = (1.0 + (y * x)) / y
	elif z <= -1000.0:
		tmp = math.exp(-z) / y
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.32e+175)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y));
	elseif (z <= -3e+111)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(y * x)) / y);
	elseif (z <= -1000.0)
		tmp = Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.32e+175)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	elseif (z <= -3e+111)
		tmp = (1.0 + (y * x)) / y;
	elseif (z <= -1000.0)
		tmp = exp(-z) / y;
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.32e+175], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -3e+111], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, -1000.0], N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if z < -1.32e175

   1. Initial program 60.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 82.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 82.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 82.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 68.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 69.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot z} - 1\right)}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 69.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 0.5} - 1\right)}{y} \]

   8. Simplified 69.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 0.5} - 1\right)}{y} \]

   if -1.32e175 < z < -3e111

   1. Initial program 37.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 83.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 83.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 83.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 75.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 83.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 + x \cdot y}{y}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 83.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot x}}{y} \]

   10. Simplified 83.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 + y \cdot x}{y}} \]

   if -3e111 < z < -1e3

   1. Initial program 35.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 35.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 35.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 35.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 35.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 76.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 76.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 76.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in x around 0 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{-z}}{y}} \]

   if -1e3 < z

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.32 \cdot 10^{+175}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+111}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + y \cdot x}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1000:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.3% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.46 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-34}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.46) (not (<= y 2e-34)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.46) || !(y <= 2e-34)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.46d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 2d-34))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.46) || !(y <= 2e-34)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.46) or not (y <= 2e-34):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.46) || !(y <= 2e-34))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.46) || ~((y <= 2e-34)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.46], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2e-34]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.46 or 1.99999999999999986e-34 < y

   1. Initial program 87.4%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -1.46 < y < 1.99999999999999986e-34

   1. Initial program 84.2%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.46 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-34}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.8% accurate, 8.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{x}\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -200000.0)
   (+ x (/ (* x (+ (/ 1.0 x) (/ (* z (+ (* z 0.5) -1.0)) x))) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -200000.0) {
		tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0 / x) + ((z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0)) / x))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-200000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0d0 / x) + ((z * ((z * 0.5d0) + (-1.0d0))) / x))) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -200000.0) {
		tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0 / x) + ((z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0)) / x))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -200000.0:
		tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0 / x) + ((z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0)) / x))) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -200000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(1.0 / x) + Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.5) + -1.0)) / x))) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -200000.0)
		tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0 / x) + ((z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0)) / x))) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -200000.0], N[(x + N[(N[(x * N[(N[(1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2e5

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 86.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 86.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + \left(\frac{1}{x \cdot y} + \frac{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) - 1\right)}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)}{x}\right)}{y}} \]

   if -2e5 < y

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 93.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{x}\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 86.8% accurate, 9.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+236}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} - \frac{z}{x}\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.95e+236)
   (+ x (/ (* x (- (/ 1.0 x) (/ z x))) y))
   (if (<= y -200000.0)
     (+ x (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z 0.5) -1.0))) y))
     (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.95e+236) {
		tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0 / x) - (z / x))) / y);
	} else if (y <= -200000.0) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.95d+236)) then
        tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0d0 / x) - (z / x))) / y)
    else if (y <= (-200000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 + (z * ((z * 0.5d0) + (-1.0d0)))) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.95e+236) {
		tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0 / x) - (z / x))) / y);
	} else if (y <= -200000.0) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.95e+236:
		tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0 / x) - (z / x))) / y)
	elif y <= -200000.0:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.95e+236)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(x * Float64(Float64(1.0 / x) - Float64(z / x))) / y));
	elseif (y <= -200000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.95e+236)
		tmp = x + ((x * ((1.0 / x) - (z / x))) / y);
	elseif (y <= -200000.0)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.95e+236], N[(x + N[(N[(x * N[(N[(1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -200000.0], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.95e236

   1. Initial program 81.4%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 81.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 81.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 81.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 72.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around inf 67.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + \left(\frac{1}{x \cdot y} + \frac{z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) - 1\right)}{x \cdot y}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{z \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot z - 1\right)}{x}\right)}{y}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 95.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{z}{x}}\right)}{y} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 95.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} + \color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot z}{x}}\right)}{y} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 95.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{\color{blue}{-z}}{x}\right)}{y} \]

   10. Simplified 95.4%

       \[\leadsto x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} + \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{x}}\right)}{y} \]

   if -1.95e236 < y < -2e5

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 88.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 85.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 85.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot z} - 1\right)}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 85.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 0.5} - 1\right)}{y} \]

   8. Simplified 85.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 0.5} - 1\right)}{y} \]

   if -2e5 < y

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 93.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+236}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{x \cdot \left(\frac{1}{x} - \frac{z}{x}\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 86.7% accurate, 11.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -200000.0)
   (+ x (/ (+ 1.0 (* z (+ (* z 0.5) -1.0))) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -200000.0) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-200000.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + ((1.0d0 + (z * ((z * 0.5d0) + (-1.0d0)))) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -200000.0) {
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -200000.0:
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -200000.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -200000.0)
		tmp = x + ((1.0 + (z * ((z * 0.5) + -1.0))) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -200000.0], N[(x + N[(N[(1.0 + N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2e5

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 86.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 86.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 81.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) - 1\right)}}{y} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot z} - 1\right)}{y} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 81.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 0.5} - 1\right)}{y} \]

   8. Simplified 81.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot 0.5} - 1\right)}{y} \]

   if -2e5 < y

   1. Initial program 86.5%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 93.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   7. Simplified 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -200000:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1 + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5 + -1\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 64.6% accurate, 16.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-99}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3e+108) x (if (<= y 3.6e-99) (/ 1.0 y) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3e+108) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.6e-99) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3d+108)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 3.6d-99) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3e+108) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.6e-99) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3e+108:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 3.6e-99:
		tmp = 1.0 / y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3e+108)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.6e-99)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3e+108)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.6e-99)
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3e+108], x, If[LessEqual[y, 3.6e-99], N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.99999999999999984e108 or 3.6000000000000001e-99 < y

   1. Initial program 87.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 87.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 87.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2.99999999999999984e108 < y < 3.6000000000000001e-99

   1. Initial program 84.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+108}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{-99}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 84.4% accurate, 42.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 86.5%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 91.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 85.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 85.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

7. Simplified 85.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

8. Final simplification 85.2%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{1}{y} \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 49.3% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 86.5%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 91.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 49.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 49.6%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 91.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024076 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y)))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))