Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2

Percentage Accurate: 89.2% → 99.8%

Time: 55.1s

Alternatives: 21

Speedup: 1.9×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 89.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x - 1.0d0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0d0) * log((1.0d0 - y)))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x - 1.0) * Math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * Math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x - 1.0) * math.log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * math.log((1.0 - y)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 1.0) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z - 1.0) * log(Float64(1.0 - y)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x - 1.0) * log(y)) + ((z - 1.0) * log((1.0 - y)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(-1 + x, \log y, -t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma (+ z -1.0) (log1p (- y)) (fma (+ -1.0 x) (log y) (- t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((z + -1.0), log1p(-y), fma((-1.0 + x), log(y), -t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(Float64(z + -1.0), log1p(Float64(-y)), fma(Float64(-1.0 + x), log(y), Float64(-t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + (-t)), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) + \left(-t\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} + \left(-t\right) \]

   3. associate-+l+ 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right)} \]

   4. fma-define 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right)} \]

   5. sub-neg 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   8. log1p-define 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(-t\right)\right) \]

   9. fma-define 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x - 1, \log y, -t\right)}\right) \]

   10. sub-neg 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x + \left(-1\right)}, \log y, -t\right)\right) \]

   11. metadata-eval 99.8%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}, \log y, -t\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(x + -1, \log y, -t\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \mathsf{fma}\left(-1 + x, \log y, -t\right)\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (fma (+ z -1.0) (log1p (- y)) (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((z + -1.0), log1p(-y), ((-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(fma(Float64(z + -1.0), log1p(Float64(-y)), Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y))) - t)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-define 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-define 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 99.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot -0.3333333333333333 + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z + -1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))
   (*
    y
    (+
     (- 1.0 z)
     (*
      y
      (+
       (* (+ z -1.0) -0.5)
       (*
        y
        (+ (* (+ z -1.0) -0.3333333333333333) (* -0.25 (* y (+ z -1.0))))))))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.5) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.3333333333333333) + (-0.25 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + (y * (((z + (-1.0d0)) * (-0.5d0)) + (y * (((z + (-1.0d0)) * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) + ((-0.25d0) * (y * (z + (-1.0d0))))))))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.5) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.3333333333333333) + (-0.25 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.5) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.3333333333333333) + (-0.25 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * -0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * -0.3333333333333333) + Float64(-0.25 * Float64(y * Float64(z + -1.0)))))))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.5) + (y * (((z + -1.0) * -0.3333333333333333) + (-0.25 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * -0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-0.25 * N[(y * N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + y \cdot \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot -0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(z + -1\right) \cdot -0.3333333333333333 + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z + -1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 99.7% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))
   (*
    (+ z -1.0)
    (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5))))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + ((z + (-1.0d0)) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5)))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 88.2% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-1 + x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(-1 + x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (+ -1.0 x) -1.0) (not (<= (+ -1.0 x) 1.0)))
   (- (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) t)
   (- (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) (log y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) || !((-1.0 + x) <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((((-1.0d0) + x) <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (((-1.0d0) + x) <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = (((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = ((y * (1.0d0 - z)) - log(y)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) || !((-1.0 + x) <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - Math.log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) or not ((-1.0 + x) <= 1.0):
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - math.log(y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) || !(Float64(-1.0 + x) <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((-1.0 + x) <= -1.0) || ~(((-1.0 + x) <= 1.0)))
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = ((y * (1.0 - z)) - log(y)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision], -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision], 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 x #s(literal 1 binary64)) < -1 or 1 < (-.f64 x #s(literal 1 binary64))

   1. Initial program 90.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   if -1 < (-.f64 x #s(literal 1 binary64)) < 1

   1. Initial program 69.9%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} + y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Simplified 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      2. metadata-eval 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      3. +-commutative 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

      4. neg-mul-1 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-\left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      6. neg-sub0 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 - \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      7. associate--r+ 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0 - -1\right) - z\right)} - \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 73.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{1} - z\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

   9. Simplified 73.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;-1 + x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(-1 + x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 99.6% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+
   (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y))
   (* (+ z -1.0) (* y (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5))))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + ((z + (-1.0d0)) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5)))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 99.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z + -1\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (+ (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (* -0.5 (* y (+ z -1.0))))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (-0.5 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + ((-0.5d0) * (y * (z + (-1.0d0))))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (-0.5 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (-0.5 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + Float64(-0.5 * Float64(y * Float64(z + -1.0)))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + (-0.5 * (y * (z + -1.0)))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-0.5 * N[(y * N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z + -1\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 99.5% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) (* (+ z -1.0) (* y (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5))))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + ((z + (-1.0d0)) * (y * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0)))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(Float64(z + -1.0) * Float64(y * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + ((z + -1.0) * (y * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z + -1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot y - 1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z + -1\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 61.0% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.04 \cdot 10^{+142} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+49}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.04e+142) (not (<= z 1.25e+49)))
   (-
    (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5)))))
    t)
   (- (log (/ 1.0 y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.04e+142) || !(z <= 1.25e+49)) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = log((1.0 / y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.04d+142)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.25d+49))) then
        tmp = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) - t
    else
        tmp = log((1.0d0 / y)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.04e+142) || !(z <= 1.25e+49)) {
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((1.0 / y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.04e+142) or not (z <= 1.25e+49):
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t
	else:
		tmp = math.log((1.0 / y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.04e+142) || !(z <= 1.25e+49))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 / y)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.04e+142) || ~((z <= 1.25e+49)))
		tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
	else
		tmp = log((1.0 / y)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.04e+142], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.25e+49]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.04e142 or 1.2500000000000001e49 < z

   1. Initial program 69.6%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 62.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   if -1.04e142 < z < 1.2500000000000001e49

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-log-exp 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right)} - t \]

      2. exp-sum 48.2%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right)} - t \]

      3. *-commutative 48.2%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      4. exp-to-pow 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{{y}^{\left(x - 1\right)}} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)}} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. metadata-eval 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right)} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot e^{\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      9. *-commutative 48.3%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z + -1\right)}}\right) - t \]

      10. exp-to-pow 48.3%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(1 - y\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}}\right) - t \]

      11. sub-neg 48.3%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      12. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      13. sqrt-unprod 47.8%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      14. sqr-neg 47.8%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      15. sqrt-unprod 47.8%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      16. add-sqr-sqrt 47.8%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \color{blue}{y}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 47.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + y\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right)} - t \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 48.4%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{1}\right) - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.04 \cdot 10^{+142} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+49}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 87.5% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1.0)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (- (log (/ 1.0 y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = log((1.0 / y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = log((1.0d0 / y)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((1.0 / y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 1.0):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = math.log((1.0 / y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 / y)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 1.0)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = log((1.0 / y)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   6. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   if -1 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 84.2%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-log-exp 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right)} - t \]

      2. exp-sum 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right)} - t \]

      3. *-commutative 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)}} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      4. exp-to-pow 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left(\color{blue}{{y}^{\left(x - 1\right)}} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)}} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. metadata-eval 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right)} \cdot e^{\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot e^{\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)}\right) - t \]

      9. *-commutative 80.7%

         \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot \left(z + -1\right)}}\right) - t \]

      10. exp-to-pow 80.7%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(1 - y\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}}\right) - t \]

      11. sub-neg 80.7%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      12. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{-y} \cdot \sqrt{-y}}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      13. sqrt-unprod 79.8%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-y\right) \cdot \left(-y\right)}}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      14. sqr-neg 79.8%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \sqrt{\color{blue}{y \cdot y}}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      15. sqrt-unprod 79.8%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \color{blue}{\sqrt{y} \cdot \sqrt{y}}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

      16. add-sqr-sqrt 79.8%

          \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + \color{blue}{y}\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot {\left(1 + y\right)}^{\left(z + -1\right)}\right)} - t \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.4%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({y}^{\left(x + -1\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{1}\right) - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{1}{y}\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 87.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 1.0)))
   (- (* x (log y)) t)
   (- (- y (log y)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y - log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = (x * log(y)) - t
    else
        tmp = (y - log(y)) - t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = (x * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (y - Math.log(y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 1.0):
		tmp = (x * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (y - math.log(y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(y - log(y)) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 1.0)))
		tmp = (x * log(y)) - t;
	else
		tmp = (y - log(y)) - t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(y - N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 1 < x

   1. Initial program 95.2%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \log y} - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   6. Simplified 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot x} - t \]

   if -1 < x < 1

   1. Initial program 84.2%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \log y} + y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   6. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\log y\right)} + y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 80.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(1 + 0.5 \cdot y\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 80.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.5}\right) - \log y\right) - t \]

   9. Simplified 80.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(1 + y \cdot 0.5\right) - \log y\right)} - t \]

   10. Taylor expanded in y around 0 80.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y - \log y\right)} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(y - \log y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 99.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) (* y (- 1.0 z))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((((-1.0d0) + x) * log(y)) + (y * (1.0d0 - z))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) + (y * (1.0 - z))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. fma-define 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. fma-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. +-commutative 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   9. metadata-eval 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. +-commutative 98.7%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Simplified 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Final simplification 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y + y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\right) - t \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 89.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+224}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 4.2e+224) (- (* (+ -1.0 x) (log y)) t) (- (* z (log1p (- y))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 4.2e+224) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * log1p(-y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 4.2e+224) {
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * Math.log(y)) - t;
	} else {
		tmp = (z * Math.log1p(-y)) - t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 4.2e+224:
		tmp = ((-1.0 + x) * math.log(y)) - t
	else:
		tmp = (z * math.log1p(-y)) - t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 4.2e+224)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 + x) * log(y)) - t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(z * log1p(Float64(-y))) - t);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 4.2e+224], N[(N[(N[(-1.0 + x), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(z * N[Log[1 + (-y)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 4.2000000000000003e224

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 92.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) - t} \]

   if 4.2000000000000003e224 < z

   1. Initial program 53.8%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 35.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 35.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - y\right) \cdot z} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 35.5%

         \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} \cdot z - t \]

      3. log1p-define 77.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)} \cdot z - t \]

   5. Simplified 77.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) \cdot z} - t \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+224}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(-1 + x\right) \cdot \log y - t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right) - t\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 14: 46.9% accurate, 11.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y (- (* y -0.25) 0.3333333333333333)) 0.5)))))
  t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * ((y * (-0.25d0)) - 0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * ((y * -0.25) - 0.3333333333333333)) - 0.5))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.25), $MachinePrecision] - 0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

5. Final simplification 46.2%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.25 - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 15: 46.9% accurate, 14.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y (- (* y -0.3333333333333333) 0.5))))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * ((y * (-0.3333333333333333d0)) - 0.5d0))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * ((y * -0.3333333333333333) - 0.5))))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * N[(N[(y * -0.3333333333333333), $MachinePrecision] - 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 46.1%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.3333333333333333 \cdot y} - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right) - t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 46.1%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.3333333333333333} - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right) - t \]

7. Simplified 46.1%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.3333333333333333} - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right) - t \]

8. Final simplification 46.1%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.3333333333333333 - 0.5\right)\right)\right) - t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 16: 42.7% accurate, 15.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+45} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 13500000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -3.5e+45) (not (<= t 13500000.0))) (- t) (* z (- y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -3.5e+45) || !(t <= 13500000.0)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-3.5d+45)) .or. (.not. (t <= 13500000.0d0))) then
        tmp = -t
    else
        tmp = z * -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -3.5e+45) || !(t <= 13500000.0)) {
		tmp = -t;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -3.5e+45) or not (t <= 13500000.0):
		tmp = -t
	else:
		tmp = z * -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -3.5e+45) || !(t <= 13500000.0))
		tmp = Float64(-t);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -3.5e+45) || ~((t <= 13500000.0)))
		tmp = -t;
	else
		tmp = z * -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -3.5e+45], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 13500000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-t), N[(z * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -3.50000000000000023e45 or 1.35e7 < t

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      2. fma-define 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

      3. sub-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      4. metadata-eval 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      5. sub-neg 96.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      6. log1p-define 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      7. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

      8. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 73.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   7. Simplified 73.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

   if -3.50000000000000023e45 < t < 1.35e7

   1. Initial program 84.7%

      \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      2. sub-neg 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      3. metadata-eval 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

      4. fma-define 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

      5. mul-1-neg 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

      6. fma-neg 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

      7. +-commutative 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

      8. sub-neg 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

      9. metadata-eval 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

      10. +-commutative 98.1%

          \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

   5. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

   6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 18.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 18.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

      2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 18.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]

   8. Simplified 18.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]

   9. Taylor expanded in y around inf 17.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r* 17.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

       2. mul-1-neg 17.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   11. Simplified 17.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 43.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+45} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 13500000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 17: 46.8% accurate, 19.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (* z (+ -1.0 (* y -0.5)))) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (z * ((-1.0d0) + (y * (-0.5d0))))) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(y * -0.5)))) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (z * (-1.0 + (y * -0.5)))) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(z * N[(-1.0 + N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.9%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot y} - 1\right)\right) - t \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 45.9%

      \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right) - t \]

7. Simplified 45.9%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot -0.5} - 1\right)\right) - t \]

8. Final simplification 45.9%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(-1 + y \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 18: 46.8% accurate, 19.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) - z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (- (* -0.5 (* z y)) z)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * ((-0.5 * (z * y)) - z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (((-0.5d0) * (z * y)) - z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * ((-0.5 * (z * y)) - z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * ((-0.5 * (z * y)) - z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(-0.5 * Float64(z * y)) - z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * ((-0.5 * (z * y)) - z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(N[(-0.5 * N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + y \cdot \left(-0.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(z - 1\right) + -0.25 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 46.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot y - 0.3333333333333333\right) - 0.5\right) - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 45.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z + -0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Final simplification 45.9%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right) - z\right) - t \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 19: 46.8% accurate, 30.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (* y (- 1.0 z)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (y * (1.0d0 - z)) - t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (y * (1.0 - z)) - t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z)) - t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (y * (1.0 - z)) - t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - t), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. fma-define 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. fma-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. +-commutative 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   9. metadata-eval 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. +-commutative 98.7%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Simplified 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in y around inf 45.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} - t \]

7. Final simplification 45.7%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(1 - z\right) - t \]
8. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 20: 46.6% accurate, 35.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-t\right) - z \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (- t) (* z y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t - (z * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t - (z * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t - (z * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t - (z * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(-t) - Float64(z * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t - (z * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[((-t) - N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) + \log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right)\right)} - t \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x - 1\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   2. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   3. metadata-eval 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right) - t \]

   4. fma-define 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)\right)} - t \]

   5. mul-1-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\log y, x + -1, \color{blue}{-y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)}\right) - t \]

   6. fma-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(x + -1\right) - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right)} - t \]

   7. +-commutative 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + x\right)} - y \cdot \left(z - 1\right)\right) - t \]

   8. sub-neg 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - t \]

   9. metadata-eval 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(z + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - t \]

   10. +-commutative 98.7%

       \[\leadsto \left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 + z\right)}\right) - t \]

5. Simplified 98.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log y \cdot \left(-1 + x\right) - y \cdot \left(-1 + z\right)\right)} - t \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around inf 45.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} - t \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} - t \]

   2. distribute-rgt-neg-in 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]

8. Simplified 45.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z\right)} - t \]

9. Final simplification 45.4%

   \[\leadsto \left(-t\right) - z \cdot y \]
10. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 21: 36.3% accurate, 107.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-t)

Derivation

1. Initial program 89.8%

   \[\left(\left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y + \left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right)\right) - t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(z - 1\right) \cdot \log \left(1 - y\right) + \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   2. fma-define 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z - 1, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right)} - t \]

   3. sub-neg 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{z + \left(-1\right)}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   4. metadata-eval 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + \color{blue}{-1}, \log \left(1 - y\right), \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   5. sub-neg 89.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   6. log1p-define 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right)}, \left(x - 1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   7. sub-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \color{blue}{\left(x + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

   8. metadata-eval 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + -1, \mathsf{log1p}\left(-y\right), \left(x + -1\right) \cdot \log y\right) - t} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 35.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot t} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 35.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

7. Simplified 35.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-t} \]

8. Final simplification 35.4%

   \[\leadsto -t \]
9. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024076 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Statistics.Distribution.Beta:$cdensity from math-functions-0.1.5.2"
  :precision binary64
  (- (+ (* (- x 1.0) (log y)) (* (- z 1.0) (log (- 1.0 y)))) t))