Graphics.Rasterific.QuadraticFormula:discriminant from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 98.2% → 98.7%

Time: 3.4s

Alternatives: 4

Speedup: 1.0×

• 33.9% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.7% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, y \cdot \left(z \cdot -4\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma x x (* y (* z -4.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, x, (y * (z * -4.0)));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(x, x, Float64(y * Float64(z * -4.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * x + N[(y * N[(z * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.2%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. associate-*l* 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(4 \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, -y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-z \cdot 4\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(-4\right)\right)}\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, x, y \cdot \left(z \cdot -4\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 98.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * x) - Float64(Float64(y * 4.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * x) - ((y * 4.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.2%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing
3. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 53.1% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 + \left(-4 \cdot z\right) \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ 0.0 (* (* -4.0 z) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.0 + ((-4.0 * z) * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = 0.0d0 + (((-4.0d0) * z) * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return 0.0 + ((-4.0 * z) * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return 0.0 + ((-4.0 * z) * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(0.0 + Float64(Float64(-4.0 * z) * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0 + ((-4.0 * z) * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(0.0 + N[(N[(-4.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.2%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 22.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right)} \]

   2. *-un-lft-identity 22.2%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot e^{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right)} \]

   3. log-prod 22.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 1 + \log \left(e^{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 22.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} + \log \left(e^{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

   5. add-log-exp 50.7%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. *-commutative 50.7%

      \[\leadsto 0 + -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \]

   7. associate-*r* 50.7%

      \[\leadsto 0 + \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot z\right) \cdot y} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 50.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 + \left(-4 \cdot z\right) \cdot y} \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 53.1% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* -4.0 (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -4.0 * (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (-4.0d0) * (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return -4.0 * (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return -4.0 * (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(-4.0 * Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = -4.0 * (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(-4.0 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.2%

   \[x \cdot x - \left(y \cdot 4\right) \cdot z \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024076 -o generate:simplify
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.QuadraticFormula:discriminant from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* x x) (* (* y 4.0) z)))