Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1

Percentage Accurate: 92.3% → 96.4%

Time: 9.6s

Alternatives: 13

Speedup: 0.6×

• 32.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 92.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(Float64(a * z) * b))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + ((a * z) * b);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(a * z), $MachinePrecision] * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 96.4% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t\_1 \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* b (* z a)))))
   (if (<= t_1 INFINITY) t_1 (* a (+ t (* z b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + (b * (z * a));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + (b * (z * a));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + (b * (z * a))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= math.inf:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(t * a)) + Float64(b * Float64(z * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = ((x + (y * z)) + (t * a)) + (b * (z * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= Inf)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, Infinity], t$95$1, N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b)) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 98.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 x (*.f64 y z)) (*.f64 t a)) (*.f64 (*.f64 a z) b))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 0.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 19.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 19.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right) \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 38.8% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-262}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-251}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-91}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* a (* z b))))
   (if (<= x -5.2e+45)
     x
     (if (<= x -1.2e-13)
       t_1
       (if (<= x -1.8e-296)
         (* t a)
         (if (<= x 2.15e-262)
           (* y z)
           (if (<= x 1.4e-251)
             (* t a)
             (if (<= x 2.2e-156)
               t_1
               (if (<= x 5.5e-91) (* y z) (if (<= x 1.45e+56) t_1 x))))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (z * b);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.2e+45) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.2e-13) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= -1.8e-296) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 2.15e-262) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.4e-251) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 2.2e-156) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 5.5e-91) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.45e+56) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = a * (z * b)
    if (x <= (-5.2d+45)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= (-1.2d-13)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (x <= (-1.8d-296)) then
        tmp = t * a
    else if (x <= 2.15d-262) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (x <= 1.4d-251) then
        tmp = t * a
    else if (x <= 2.2d-156) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (x <= 5.5d-91) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (x <= 1.45d+56) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = a * (z * b);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.2e+45) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.2e-13) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= -1.8e-296) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 2.15e-262) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.4e-251) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 2.2e-156) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 5.5e-91) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 1.45e+56) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = a * (z * b)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -5.2e+45:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= -1.2e-13:
		tmp = t_1
	elif x <= -1.8e-296:
		tmp = t * a
	elif x <= 2.15e-262:
		tmp = y * z
	elif x <= 1.4e-251:
		tmp = t * a
	elif x <= 2.2e-156:
		tmp = t_1
	elif x <= 5.5e-91:
		tmp = y * z
	elif x <= 1.45e+56:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(a * Float64(z * b))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -5.2e+45)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.2e-13)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= -1.8e-296)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	elseif (x <= 2.15e-262)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (x <= 1.4e-251)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	elseif (x <= 2.2e-156)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 5.5e-91)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (x <= 1.45e+56)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = a * (z * b);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -5.2e+45)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.2e-13)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= -1.8e-296)
		tmp = t * a;
	elseif (x <= 2.15e-262)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (x <= 1.4e-251)
		tmp = t * a;
	elseif (x <= 2.2e-156)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 5.5e-91)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (x <= 1.45e+56)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -5.2e+45], x, If[LessEqual[x, -1.2e-13], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, -1.8e-296], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 2.15e-262], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.4e-251], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 2.2e-156], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, 5.5e-91], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 1.45e+56], t$95$1, x]]]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if x < -5.20000000000000014e45 or 1.45000000000000004e56 < x

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -5.20000000000000014e45 < x < -1.1999999999999999e-13 or 1.39999999999999994e-251 < x < 2.1999999999999999e-156 or 5.49999999999999965e-91 < x < 1.45000000000000004e56

   1. Initial program 88.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 89.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 89.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 89.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 89.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 89.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 89.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 89.7%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{b \cdot z}{t}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \frac{z}{t}}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 60.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -1.1999999999999999e-13 < x < -1.7999999999999999e-296 or 2.1500000000000001e-262 < x < 1.39999999999999994e-251

   1. Initial program 87.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 51.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -1.7999999999999999e-296 < x < 2.1500000000000001e-262 or 2.1999999999999999e-156 < x < 5.49999999999999965e-91

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 58.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   7. Simplified 58.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 54.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.2 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-262}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-251}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-91}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{+56}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 39.0% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-262}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-157}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-91}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.15 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* b (* z a))))
   (if (<= x -4.4e+45)
     x
     (if (<= x -1.55e-11)
       t_1
       (if (<= x -1.15e-262)
         (* t a)
         (if (<= x 6.8e-157)
           t_1
           (if (<= x 4.3e-91)
             (* y z)
             (if (<= x 3.15e+63) (* a (* z b)) x))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (z * a);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.4e+45) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.55e-11) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= -1.15e-262) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 6.8e-157) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 4.3e-91) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 3.15e+63) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = b * (z * a)
    if (x <= (-4.4d+45)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= (-1.55d-11)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (x <= (-1.15d-262)) then
        tmp = t * a
    else if (x <= 6.8d-157) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (x <= 4.3d-91) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (x <= 3.15d+63) then
        tmp = a * (z * b)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = b * (z * a);
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -4.4e+45) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.55e-11) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= -1.15e-262) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 6.8e-157) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (x <= 4.3e-91) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (x <= 3.15e+63) {
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = b * (z * a)
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -4.4e+45:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= -1.55e-11:
		tmp = t_1
	elif x <= -1.15e-262:
		tmp = t * a
	elif x <= 6.8e-157:
		tmp = t_1
	elif x <= 4.3e-91:
		tmp = y * z
	elif x <= 3.15e+63:
		tmp = a * (z * b)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(b * Float64(z * a))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -4.4e+45)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.55e-11)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= -1.15e-262)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	elseif (x <= 6.8e-157)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 4.3e-91)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (x <= 3.15e+63)
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(z * b));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = b * (z * a);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -4.4e+45)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.55e-11)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= -1.15e-262)
		tmp = t * a;
	elseif (x <= 6.8e-157)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (x <= 4.3e-91)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (x <= 3.15e+63)
		tmp = a * (z * b);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(b * N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[x, -4.4e+45], x, If[LessEqual[x, -1.55e-11], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, -1.15e-262], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 6.8e-157], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[x, 4.3e-91], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 3.15e+63], N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 5 regimes

2. if x < -4.4000000000000001e45 or 3.1499999999999999e63 < x

   1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 92.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 51.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -4.4000000000000001e45 < x < -1.55000000000000014e-11 or -1.15000000000000005e-262 < x < 6.79999999999999955e-157

   1. Initial program 92.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 92.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 86.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 86.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 86.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 86.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 86.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 86.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 86.6%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 77.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{b \cdot z}{t}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \frac{z}{t}}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 73.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 47.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 47.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. associate-*r* 54.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 54.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)} \]

   if -1.55000000000000014e-11 < x < -1.15000000000000005e-262

   1. Initial program 86.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 86.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 90.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if 6.79999999999999955e-157 < x < 4.3e-91

   1. Initial program 93.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 93.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 63.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   7. Simplified 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   if 4.3e-91 < x < 3.1499999999999999e63

   1. Initial program 87.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 87.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 87.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 90.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 90.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 90.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 90.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 90.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 90.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 90.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 90.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 90.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 90.5%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 81.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{b \cdot z}{t}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \frac{z}{t}}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 72.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 60.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 5 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.55 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-262}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-157}:\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 4.3 \cdot 10^{-91}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 3.15 \cdot 10^{+63}:\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 87.8% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-150}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(z + \frac{t}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* z (+ y (* a b))))))
   (if (<= z -2.35e+64)
     t_1
     (if (<= z -1.8e-150)
       (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* b (* a (+ z (/ t b)))))
       (if (<= z 1.8e-104) (+ x (+ (* t a) (* a (* z b)))) t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.35e+64) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= -1.8e-150) {
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + (b * (a * (z + (t / b))));
	} else if (z <= 1.8e-104) {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
    if (z <= (-2.35d+64)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z <= (-1.8d-150)) then
        tmp = (x + (y * z)) + (b * (a * (z + (t / b))))
    else if (z <= 1.8d-104) then
        tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)))
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -2.35e+64) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z <= -1.8e-150) {
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + (b * (a * (z + (t / b))));
	} else if (z <= 1.8e-104) {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -2.35e+64:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z <= -1.8e-150:
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + (b * (a * (z + (t / b))))
	elif z <= 1.8e-104:
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)))
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b))))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -2.35e+64)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= -1.8e-150)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(b * Float64(a * Float64(z + Float64(t / b)))));
	elseif (z <= 1.8e-104)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(a * Float64(z * b))));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -2.35e+64)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z <= -1.8e-150)
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + (b * (a * (z + (t / b))));
	elseif (z <= 1.8e-104)
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[z, -2.35e+64], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[z, -1.8e-150], N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(b * N[(a * N[(z + N[(t / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[z, 1.8e-104], N[(x + N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if z < -2.35000000000000015e64 or 1.7999999999999999e-104 < z

   1. Initial program 85.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 85.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 85.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 85.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 78.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 82.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 88.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 88.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   if -2.35000000000000015e64 < z < -1.8000000000000001e-150

   1. Initial program 95.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 95.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in b around inf 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(a \cdot z + \frac{a \cdot t}{b}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot z + \color{blue}{a \cdot \frac{t}{b}}\right) \]

      2. distribute-lft-out 92.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + b \cdot \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(z + \frac{t}{b}\right)\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(z + \frac{t}{b}\right)\right)} \]

   if -1.8000000000000001e-150 < z < 1.7999999999999999e-104

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.35 \cdot 10^{+64}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq -1.8 \cdot 10^{-150}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + b \cdot \left(a \cdot \left(z + \frac{t}{b}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 95.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{+169}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.5e+93) (not (<= z 2.35e+169)))
   (+ x (* z (+ y (* a b))))
   (+ (+ x (* y z)) (+ (* t a) (* a (* z b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.5e+93) || !(z <= 2.35e+169)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.5d+93)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.35d+169))) then
        tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
    else
        tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.5e+93) || !(z <= 2.35e+169)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.5e+93) or not (z <= 2.35e+169):
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
	else:
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.5e+93) || !(z <= 2.35e+169))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x + Float64(y * z)) + Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(a * Float64(z * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.5e+93) || ~((z <= 2.35e+169)))
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	else
		tmp = (x + (y * z)) + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.5e+93], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.35e+169]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.49999999999999998e93 or 2.3499999999999999e169 < z

   1. Initial program 76.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 76.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 74.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 74.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 82.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 92.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   if -3.49999999999999998e93 < z < 2.3499999999999999e169

   1. Initial program 96.8%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+93} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.35 \cdot 10^{+169}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 85.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-163} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-102}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4.5e-163) (not (<= z 2.4e-102)))
   (+ x (* z (+ y (* a b))))
   (+ x (+ (* t a) (* a (* z b))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.5e-163) || !(z <= 2.4e-102)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4.5d-163)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.4d-102))) then
        tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
    else
        tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4.5e-163) || !(z <= 2.4e-102)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4.5e-163) or not (z <= 2.4e-102):
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4.5e-163) || !(z <= 2.4e-102))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(t * a) + Float64(a * Float64(z * b))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4.5e-163) || ~((z <= 2.4e-102)))
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	else
		tmp = x + ((t * a) + (a * (z * b)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4.5e-163], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.4e-102]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(a * N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -4.4999999999999997e-163 or 2.4e-102 < z

   1. Initial program 87.9%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 87.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 78.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 82.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 86.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 86.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   if -4.4999999999999997e-163 < z < 2.4e-102

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 95.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot t + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4.5 \cdot 10^{-163} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-102}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 82.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-177} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-140}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.8e-177) (not (<= z 3.4e-140)))
   (+ x (* z (+ y (* a b))))
   (+ x (* t a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.8e-177) || !(z <= 3.4e-140)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.8d-177)) .or. (.not. (z <= 3.4d-140))) then
        tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
    else
        tmp = x + (t * a)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.8e-177) || !(z <= 3.4e-140)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.8e-177) or not (z <= 3.4e-140):
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)))
	else:
		tmp = x + (t * a)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.8e-177) || !(z <= 3.4e-140))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y + Float64(a * b))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * a));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.8e-177) || ~((z <= 3.4e-140)))
		tmp = x + (z * (y + (a * b)));
	else
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.8e-177], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 3.4e-140]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(z * N[(y + N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.79999999999999987e-177 or 3.40000000000000008e-140 < z

   1. Initial program 88.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around 0 78.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right) + y \cdot z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 78.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(a \cdot b\right) \cdot z}\right) + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-in 86.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)} + x \]

   7. Simplified 86.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right) + x} \]

   if -2.79999999999999987e-177 < z < 3.40000000000000008e-140

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 90.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

   7. Simplified 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-177} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-140}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y + a \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 39.4% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+69}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -5.2e+14)
   x
   (if (<= x -1.5e-296) (* t a) (if (<= x 2.4e+69) (* y z) x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.2e+14) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.5e-296) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 2.4e+69) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-5.2d+14)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= (-1.5d-296)) then
        tmp = t * a
    else if (x <= 2.4d+69) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -5.2e+14) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= -1.5e-296) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else if (x <= 2.4e+69) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -5.2e+14:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= -1.5e-296:
		tmp = t * a
	elif x <= 2.4e+69:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -5.2e+14)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.5e-296)
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	elseif (x <= 2.4e+69)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -5.2e+14)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= -1.5e-296)
		tmp = t * a;
	elseif (x <= 2.4e+69)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[x, -5.2e+14], x, If[LessEqual[x, -1.5e-296], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 2.4e+69], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -5.2e14 or 2.4000000000000002e69 < x

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -5.2e14 < x < -1.4999999999999999e-296

   1. Initial program 85.7%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 85.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 86.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 86.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 47.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -1.4999999999999999e-296 < x < 2.4000000000000002e69

   1. Initial program 91.3%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 91.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 90.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 90.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 41.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 41.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]

   7. Simplified 41.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 46.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -1.5 \cdot 10^{-296}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+69}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 9: 72.5% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+96} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+47}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -3.9e+96) (not (<= a 4.2e+47)))
   (* a (+ t (* z b)))
   (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.9e+96) || !(a <= 4.2e+47)) {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-3.9d+96)) .or. (.not. (a <= 4.2d+47))) then
        tmp = a * (t + (z * b))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.9e+96) || !(a <= 4.2e+47)) {
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -3.9e+96) or not (a <= 4.2e+47):
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -3.9e+96) || !(a <= 4.2e+47))
		tmp = Float64(a * Float64(t + Float64(z * b)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -3.9e+96) || ~((a <= 4.2e+47)))
		tmp = a * (t + (z * b));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -3.9e+96], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 4.2e+47]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(a * N[(t + N[(z * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -3.9e96 or 4.2e47 < a

   1. Initial program 80.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 85.4%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 85.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around inf 84.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -3.9e96 < a < 4.2e47

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 77.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+96} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+47}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 10: 59.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+47}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -3.9e+97) (not (<= a 8e+47))) (* b (* z a)) (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.9e+97) || !(a <= 8e+47)) {
		tmp = b * (z * a);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-3.9d+97)) .or. (.not. (a <= 8d+47))) then
        tmp = b * (z * a)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -3.9e+97) || !(a <= 8e+47)) {
		tmp = b * (z * a);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -3.9e+97) or not (a <= 8e+47):
		tmp = b * (z * a)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -3.9e+97) || !(a <= 8e+47))
		tmp = Float64(b * Float64(z * a));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -3.9e+97) || ~((a <= 8e+47)))
		tmp = b * (z * a);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -3.9e+97], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 8e+47]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(b * N[(z * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -3.8999999999999999e97 or 8.0000000000000004e47 < a

   1. Initial program 80.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      3. fma-define 80.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right)} + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right) \]

      4. associate-*l* 85.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

      5. *-commutative 85.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 85.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a}\right) \]

      7. distribute-rgt-out 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(t + b \cdot z\right)} \]

      8. remove-double-neg 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-b \cdot z\right)\right)}\right) \]

      9. *-commutative 92.2%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right)\right)\right) \]

      10. distribute-lft-neg-out 92.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot b}\right)\right) \]

      11. sub-neg 92.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t - \left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      12. sub-neg 92.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-\left(-z\right) \cdot b\right)\right)} \]

      13. distribute-lft-neg-out 92.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot b\right)}\right)\right) \]

      14. *-commutative 92.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \left(-\left(-\color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right)\right)\right) \]

      15. remove-double-neg 92.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{b \cdot z}\right) \]

      16. *-commutative 92.2%

          \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + \color{blue}{z \cdot b}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t + z \cdot b\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 90.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + \frac{b \cdot z}{t}\right)\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 88.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \left(t \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{b \cdot \frac{z}{t}}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 88.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z, x\right) + a \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \left(1 + b \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in b around inf 49.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(b \cdot z\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 49.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(b \cdot z\right) \cdot a} \]

      2. associate-*r* 54.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)} \]

   10. Simplified 54.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)} \]

   if -3.8999999999999999e97 < a < 8.0000000000000004e47

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 72.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.9 \cdot 10^{+97} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+47}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;b \cdot \left(z \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 11: 64.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.41 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 8.3 \cdot 10^{-50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -0.41) (not (<= y 8.3e-50))) (+ x (* y z)) (+ x (* t a))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.41) || !(y <= 8.3e-50)) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-0.41d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 8.3d-50))) then
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = x + (t * a)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -0.41) || !(y <= 8.3e-50)) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -0.41) or not (y <= 8.3e-50):
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (t * a)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -0.41) || !(y <= 8.3e-50))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * a));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -0.41) || ~((y <= 8.3e-50)))
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = x + (t * a);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -0.41], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 8.3e-50]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -0.409999999999999976 or 8.2999999999999995e-50 < y

   1. Initial program 88.0%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 88.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 88.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 88.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 67.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot z} \]

   if -0.409999999999999976 < y < 8.2999999999999995e-50

   1. Initial program 94.2%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 93.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 93.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + a \cdot t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 64.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]

   7. Simplified 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -0.41 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 8.3 \cdot 10^{-50}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot a\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 12: 37.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+154} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-79}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= a -1.95e+154) (not (<= a 6.8e-79))) (* t a) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.95e+154) || !(a <= 6.8e-79)) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((a <= (-1.95d+154)) .or. (.not. (a <= 6.8d-79))) then
        tmp = t * a
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if ((a <= -1.95e+154) || !(a <= 6.8e-79)) {
		tmp = t * a;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if (a <= -1.95e+154) or not (a <= 6.8e-79):
		tmp = t * a
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((a <= -1.95e+154) || !(a <= 6.8e-79))
		tmp = Float64(t * a);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((a <= -1.95e+154) || ~((a <= 6.8e-79)))
		tmp = t * a;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := If[Or[LessEqual[a, -1.95e+154], N[Not[LessEqual[a, 6.8e-79]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -1.9500000000000001e154 or 6.79999999999999951e-79 < a

   1. Initial program 82.4%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 82.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 42.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{a \cdot t} \]

   if -1.9500000000000001e154 < a < 6.79999999999999951e-79

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l+ 98.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

      2. associate-*l* 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 39.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 41.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -1.95 \cdot 10^{+154} \lor \neg \left(a \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{-79}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot a\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 13: 27.2% accurate, 15.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 90.8%

   \[\left(\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + t \cdot a\right) + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l+ 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \left(a \cdot z\right) \cdot b\right)} \]

   2. associate-*l* 90.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + \color{blue}{a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)}\right) \]

3. Simplified 90.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + \left(t \cdot a + a \cdot \left(z \cdot b\right)\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 26.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 26.4%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 97.4% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(b \cdot a + y\right) + \left(x + t \cdot a\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -11820553527347888000:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 4.7589743188364287 \cdot 10^{-122}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(b \cdot z + t\right) \cdot a + \left(z \cdot y + x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t a b)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))
   (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0)
     t_1
     (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122)
       (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x))
       t_1))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
    if (z < (-11820553527347888000.0d0)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (z < 4.7589743188364287d-122) then
        tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t, double a, double b) {
	double t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	double tmp;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122) {
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t, a, b):
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a))
	tmp = 0
	if z < -11820553527347888000.0:
		tmp = t_1
	elif z < 4.7589743188364287e-122:
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x)
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(b * a) + y)) + Float64(x + Float64(t * a)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(b * z) + t) * a) + Float64(Float64(z * y) + x));
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t, a, b)
	t_1 = (z * ((b * a) + y)) + (x + (t * a));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -11820553527347888000.0)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (z < 4.7589743188364287e-122)
		tmp = (((b * z) + t) * a) + ((z * y) + x);
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_, a_, b_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(z * N[(N[(b * a), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(t * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -11820553527347888000.0], t$95$1, If[Less[z, 4.7589743188364287e-122], N[(N[(N[(N[(b * z), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] * a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$1]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024076 
(FPCore (x y z t a b)
  :name "Graphics.Rasterific.CubicBezier:cachedBezierAt from Rasterific-0.6.1"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (if (< z -11820553527347888000.0) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a))) (if (< z 4.7589743188364287e-122) (+ (* (+ (* b z) t) a) (+ (* z y) x)) (+ (* z (+ (* b a) y)) (+ x (* t a)))))

  (+ (+ (+ x (* y z)) (* t a)) (* (* a z) b)))