Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 82.3% → 93.8%

Time: 10.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 82.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 93.8% accurate, 0.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{t\_1 - y \cdot t} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y \cdot t - t\_1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{\left(t \cdot \frac{\frac{y}{z}}{z}\right) \cdot 0.25 + 0.5}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* z (* 2.0 z))))
   (if (<= (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- t_1 (* y t))) INFINITY)
     (+ x (* (* y 2.0) (/ z (- (* y t) t_1))))
     (- x (* (* y 2.0) (/ (+ (* (* t (/ (/ y z) z)) 0.25) 0.5) z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= ((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) * ((((t * ((y / z) / z)) * 0.25) + 0.5) / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) * ((((t * ((y / z) / z)) * 0.25) + 0.5) / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = z * (2.0 * z)
	tmp = 0
	if (((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= math.inf:
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)))
	else:
		tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) * ((((t * ((y / z) / z)) * 0.25) + 0.5) / z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(2.0 * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(t_1 - Float64(y * t))) <= Inf)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * Float64(z / Float64(Float64(y * t) - t_1))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(t * Float64(Float64(y / z) / z)) * 0.25) + 0.5) / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= Inf)
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	else
		tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) * ((((t * ((y / z) / z)) * 0.25) + 0.5) / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], Infinity], N[(x + N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(N[(t * N[(N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 0.25), $MachinePrecision] + 0.5), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t))) < +inf.0

   1. Initial program 93.3%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 96.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if +inf.0 < (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t)))

   1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 63.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{{z}^{2}}}{z}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot \frac{y}{{z}^{2}}\right)}}{z} \]

   7. Simplified 84.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \left(t \cdot \frac{y}{{z}^{2}}\right)}{z}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-un-lft-identity 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \left(t \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot y}}{{z}^{2}}\right)}{z} \]

      2. unpow2 84.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \left(t \cdot \frac{1 \cdot y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot z}}\right)}{z} \]

      3. times-frac 94.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{z} \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)}\right)}{z} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 94.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{z} \cdot \frac{y}{z}\right)}\right)}{z} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*l/ 94.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}}{z}}\right)}{z} \]

       2. *-lft-identity 94.0%

          \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \left(t \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}}}{z}\right)}{z} \]

   11. Simplified 94.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot \left(t \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{y}{z}}{z}}\right)}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq \infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y \cdot t - z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{\left(t \cdot \frac{\frac{y}{z}}{z}\right) \cdot 0.25 + 0.5}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 94.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{t\_1 - y \cdot t} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y \cdot t - t\_1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* z (* 2.0 z))))
   (if (<= (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- t_1 (* y t))) 2e+225)
     (+ x (* (* y 2.0) (/ z (- (* y t) t_1))))
     (- x (/ y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 2e+225) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = z * (2.0d0 * z)
    if ((((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 2d+225) then
        tmp = x + ((y * 2.0d0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)))
    else
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	double tmp;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 2e+225) {
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = z * (2.0 * z)
	tmp = 0
	if (((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 2e+225:
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(z * Float64(2.0 * z))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(t_1 - Float64(y * t))) <= 2e+225)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * Float64(z / Float64(Float64(y * t) - t_1))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = z * (2.0 * z);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((((y * 2.0) * z) / (t_1 - (y * t))) <= 2e+225)
		tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (z / ((y * t) - t_1)));
	else
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(z * N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$1 - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+225], N[(x + N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z / N[(N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t))) < 1.99999999999999986e225

   1. Initial program 94.5%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   if 1.99999999999999986e225 < (/.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 y #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (-.f64 (*.f64 (*.f64 z #s(literal 2 binary64)) z) (*.f64 y t)))

   1. Initial program 0.2%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 54.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 91.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+225}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y \cdot t - z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 89.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-30} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-35}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.02e-30) (not (<= z 2.8e-35)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (+ x (* z (/ 2.0 t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.02e-30) || !(z <= 2.8e-35)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.02d-30)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.8d-35))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (2.0d0 / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.02e-30) || !(z <= 2.8e-35)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.02e-30) or not (z <= 2.8e-35):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.02e-30) || !(z <= 2.8e-35))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(2.0 / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.02e-30) || ~((z <= 2.8e-35)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.02e-30], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.8e-35]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.0199999999999999e-30 or 2.8e-35 < z

   1. Initial program 73.5%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -1.0199999999999999e-30 < z < 2.8e-35

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 91.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \frac{2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot -2, y \cdot t\right)}, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + 2 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{x \cdot \left(-2 \cdot {z}^{2} + t \cdot y\right)}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. times-frac 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{y}{x} \cdot \frac{z}{-2 \cdot {z}^{2} + t \cdot y}\right)}\right) \]

      2. fma-define 87.4%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{y}{x} \cdot \frac{z}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, {z}^{2}, t \cdot y\right)}}\right)\right) \]

   7. Simplified 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + 2 \cdot \left(\frac{y}{x} \cdot \frac{z}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-2, {z}^{2}, t \cdot y\right)}\right)\right)} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around 0 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + 2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. metadata-eval 91.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(--2\right)} \cdot \frac{z}{t} \]

      2. distribute-lft-neg-in 91.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(--2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\right)} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 91.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}}\right) \]

      4. associate-*l/ 91.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{-2}{t} \cdot z}\right) \]

      5. distribute-lft-neg-in 91.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{-2}{t}\right) \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-neg-frac 91.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{--2}{t}} \cdot z \]

      7. metadata-eval 91.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{t} \cdot z \]

   10. Simplified 91.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{2}{t} \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-30} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.8 \cdot 10^{-35}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 89.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-35}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot -2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -6.5e-41) (not (<= z 2.6e-35)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (/ (* z -2.0) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.5e-41) || !(z <= 2.6e-35)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-6.5d-41)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.6d-35))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - ((z * (-2.0d0)) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.5e-41) || !(z <= 2.6e-35)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -6.5e-41) or not (z <= 2.6e-35):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -6.5e-41) || !(z <= 2.6e-35))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(z * -2.0) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -6.5e-41) || ~((z <= 2.6e-35)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -6.5e-41], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.6e-35]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(z * -2.0), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.5000000000000004e-41 or 2.60000000000000005e-35 < z

   1. Initial program 73.5%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -6.5000000000000004e-41 < z < 2.60000000000000005e-35

   1. Initial program 93.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 94.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 91.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. *-commutative 91.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot -2}}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 91.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot -2}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-41} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-35}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot -2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 82.3% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.0021 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-35}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -0.0021) (not (<= z 2.6e-35))) (- x (/ y z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -0.0021) || !(z <= 2.6e-35)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-0.0021d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.6d-35))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -0.0021) || !(z <= 2.6e-35)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -0.0021) or not (z <= 2.6e-35):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -0.0021) || !(z <= 2.6e-35))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -0.0021) || ~((z <= 2.6e-35)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -0.0021], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.6e-35]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -0.00209999999999999987 or 2.60000000000000005e-35 < z

   1. Initial program 72.0%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -0.00209999999999999987 < z < 2.60000000000000005e-35

   1. Initial program 93.5%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 87.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.0021 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-35}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 75.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-236}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-238}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{-z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -2.8e-236) x (if (<= x 2.5e-238) (/ y (- z)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.8e-236) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 2.5e-238) {
		tmp = y / -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-2.8d-236)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 2.5d-238) then
        tmp = y / -z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -2.8e-236) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 2.5e-238) {
		tmp = y / -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -2.8e-236:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 2.5e-238:
		tmp = y / -z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -2.8e-236)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 2.5e-238)
		tmp = Float64(y / Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -2.8e-236)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 2.5e-238)
		tmp = y / -z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -2.8e-236], x, If[LessEqual[x, 2.5e-238], N[(y / (-z)), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.79999999999999986e-236 or 2.5e-238 < x

   1. Initial program 82.6%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 83.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -2.79999999999999986e-236 < x < 2.5e-238

   1. Initial program 72.2%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

   3. Simplified 78.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 57.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{y}{z}} \]

      2. distribute-frac-neg 57.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-y}{z}} \]

   8. Simplified 57.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-y}{z}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-236}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{-238}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{y}{-z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 75.1% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 81.3%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]

3. Simplified 90.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{z}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 75.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 75.7%

   \[\leadsto x \]
7. Add Preprocessing

Developer target: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024075 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :alt
  (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))