Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.4s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = -137936264773688100.0
  2. y = 2.736466021868132e+34
  3. z = -1.2928680923252655e+98

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (+ x z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (x + z), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(x + z), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

   2. fma-define 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
4. Add Preprocessing

5. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right) \]
6. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 2: 74.2% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{+80} \lor \neg \left(z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+34} \lor \neg \left(z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+18}\right) \land z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.1e+80)
         (not (or (<= z -3.1e+34) (and (not (<= z -1.9e+18)) (<= z 5.8e-39)))))
   (* y z)
   (* x (+ y 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.1e+80) || !((z <= -3.1e+34) || (!(z <= -1.9e+18) && (z <= 5.8e-39)))) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.1d+80)) .or. (.not. (z <= (-3.1d+34)) .or. (.not. (z <= (-1.9d+18))) .and. (z <= 5.8d-39))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x * (y + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.1e+80) || !((z <= -3.1e+34) || (!(z <= -1.9e+18) && (z <= 5.8e-39)))) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.1e+80) or not ((z <= -3.1e+34) or (not (z <= -1.9e+18) and (z <= 5.8e-39))):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.1e+80) || !((z <= -3.1e+34) || (!(z <= -1.9e+18) && (z <= 5.8e-39))))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.1e+80) || ~(((z <= -3.1e+34) || (~((z <= -1.9e+18)) && (z <= 5.8e-39)))))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.1e+80], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.1e+34], And[N[Not[LessEqual[z, -1.9e+18]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[z, 5.8e-39]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.10000000000000001e80 or -3.09999999999999977e34 < z < -1.9e18 or 5.79999999999999975e-39 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 95.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 95.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 95.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.10000000000000001e80 < z < -3.09999999999999977e34 or -1.9e18 < z < 5.79999999999999975e-39

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{+80} \lor \neg \left(z \leq -3.1 \cdot 10^{+34} \lor \neg \left(z \leq -1.9 \cdot 10^{+18}\right) \land z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{-39}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 3: 60.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-68}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.15e+99)
   (* y z)
   (if (<= y -1.0)
     (* y x)
     (if (<= y 6e-68) x (if (<= y 3.6e+101) (* y z) (* y x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+99) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if (y <= 6e-68) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.6e+101) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.15d+99)) then
        tmp = y * z
    else if (y <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = y * x
    else if (y <= 6d-68) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 3.6d+101) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = y * x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.15e+99) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else if (y <= 6e-68) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.6e+101) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = y * x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.15e+99:
		tmp = y * z
	elif y <= -1.0:
		tmp = y * x
	elif y <= 6e-68:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 3.6e+101:
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = y * x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.15e+99)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	elseif (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	elseif (y <= 6e-68)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.6e+101)
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.15e+99)
		tmp = y * z;
	elseif (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = y * x;
	elseif (y <= 6e-68)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.6e+101)
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = y * x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.15e+99], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 6e-68], x, If[LessEqual[y, 3.6e+101], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -1.1500000000000001e99 or 6e-68 < y < 3.60000000000000029e101

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 97.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 63.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.1500000000000001e99 < y < -1 or 3.60000000000000029e101 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 95.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 95.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around 0 65.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 65.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   12. Simplified 65.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < y < 6e-68

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 76.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{+99}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-68}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.6 \cdot 10^{+101}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 4: 83.6% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -15000000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -15000000000000.0) (not (<= y 3e-69)))
   (* y (+ x z))
   (* x (+ y 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -15000000000000.0) || !(y <= 3e-69)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-15000000000000.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3d-69))) then
        tmp = y * (x + z)
    else
        tmp = x * (y + 1.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -15000000000000.0) || !(y <= 3e-69)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -15000000000000.0) or not (y <= 3e-69):
		tmp = y * (x + z)
	else:
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -15000000000000.0) || !(y <= 3e-69))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(y + 1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -15000000000000.0) || ~((y <= 3e-69)))
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	else
		tmp = x * (y + 1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -15000000000000.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3e-69]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(y + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.5e13 or 2.99999999999999989e-69 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 96.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 96.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 96.2%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -1.5e13 < y < 2.99999999999999989e-69

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 78.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + y\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 78.2%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(y + 1\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 78.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -15000000000000 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-69}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(y + 1\right)\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 5: 98.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.0) (not (<= y 1.0))) (* y (+ x z)) (+ x (* y z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * (x + z)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.0) or not (y <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * (x + z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || ~((y <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -1 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 6: 60.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.0) (not (<= y 1.0))) (* y x) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.0) or not (y <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.0) || !(y <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.0) || ~((y <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1 or 1 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

      2. fma-define 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]
   4. Add Preprocessing
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. fma-undefine 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right) + x} \]

      2. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} + x \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

      4. distribute-lft-in 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z + y \cdot x\right)} \]

      5. associate-+r+ 96.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y \cdot z\right) + y \cdot x} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around 0 53.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 53.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   12. Simplified 53.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1 < y < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
   2. Add Preprocessing

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 72.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 7: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (x + z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (x + z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (x + z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \]
4. Add Preprocessing

Alternative 8: 36.2% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Add Preprocessing

3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 35.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 35.0%

   \[\leadsto x \]
5. Add Preprocessing

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2024073 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))